This paper analyses efforts to promote innovation in the UK energy networks sector. Using a case study approach, we chart the co-evolution between technologies and institutions in electricity distribution networks since the introduction of privatization and market liberalization over twenty years ago. It is observed that as a result of macro level institutional dynamics, innovation has become an increasingly important policy and regulatory goal. However, efforts to promote radical and architectural innovation, such as the transition to a smart grid, face significant barriers at the firm and sector levels. It is argued that changes are required to the formal and informal institutions which govern the sector in order to promote a more coherent relationship between technological and institutional change, leading to a productive innovation system which allows firms to collaborate across the electricity value chain and develop inter-firm/cross sector innovation partnerships.
BeesleyM. E. and LittlechildS. C. (1989) “The Regulation of Privatized Monopolies in the United Kingdom”, The RAND Journal of Economics, 20(3): 454–472.
7.
ChristensenC. (1997) The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press.
8.
ChristensenC. M. and RosenbloomR. S. (1995) “Explaining the attacker's advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network”, Research Policy, 24(2): 233–257.
9.
de ReuverM. (2009) “Governing mobile service innovation in co-evolving value networks. PhD Thesis”. Technical University of Delft.
10.
DjapicP.RamsayC. (2007) “Taking an active approach”, Power and Energy Magazine, IEEE, 5(4): 68–77.
11.
DosiG.FailloM. (2008) “Organizational Capabilities, Patterns of Knowledge Accumulation and Governance structures in Business Firms: An Introduction”, Organization Studies, 29(8–9): 1165–1185.
12.
DTI (2003) Energy White Paper: Our energy future – creating a low-carbon economy.
13.
FingerM.GroenewegenJ. (2005) “The Quest for Coherence Between Institutions and Technologies in Infrastructures”, Journal of Network Industries, 6: 227–259.
14.
FoxonT. (2003) Inducing innovation for a low-carbon future: Drivers, barriers and policies. The Carbon Trust.
15.
FoxonT. (2006) “The Rationale for Policy Interventions from an Innovation Systems Perspective”, In MurphyJ. (ed.), Governing Technology for Sustainability. London: Earthscan.
16.
FoxonT. (2010) A Coevolutionary Framework for Analysing a Transition to a Sustainable Low Carbon Economy. University of Leeds: Sustainability Research Institute Working Paper no.22.
17.
FoxonT.J. and PearsonP.J.G. (2007) “Towards improved policy processes for promoting innovation in renewable electricity technologies in the UK”, Energy Policy, 35(3): 1539–1550.
18.
FreemanC. and PerezC. (1988) “structural Crises of Adjustment: Business cycles and investment behaviour”, In DosiG.FreemanC.NelsonR.SilverbergG. and SoeteL. (eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter. pp. 38–67.
19.
GarudR. and KarnøeP. (2003) “Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship”, Research Policy, 32(2): 277–300.
20.
GeelsF.W. (2002) “Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study”, Research Policy, 31(8–9): 1257–1274.
21.
GeelsF.W. (2004) “From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory”, Research Policy, 33(6–7): 897–920.
22.
HekkertM.P.SuursR.A.A. (2007) “Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4): 413–432.
23.
HelmD. (2004) Energy, the state, and the market: British energy policy since 1979. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
HendersonR.M. and ClarkK.B. (1990) “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 9–30.
25.
HughesT. (1983) Networks of power: Electrification in Western society, 1880–1930Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
26.
JacobssonS. and BergekA. (2004) “Transforming the energy sector: The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(5): 815–849.
27.
JamasbT. and PollittM. (2007) “Incentive regulation of electricity distribution networks: Lessons of experience from Britain”, Energy Policy, 35(12): 6163–6187.
28.
KernF. and SmithA. (2008) “Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands”, Energy Policy, 36(11): 4093–4103.
29.
KünnekeR.GroenewegenJ. (2010) “Aligning modes of organization with technology: Critical transactions in the reform of infrastructures”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 75(3): 494–505.
30.
KünnekeR. W. (2008) “Institutional reform and technological practice: The case of electricity”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(2): 233–265.
31.
LehtonenM. and NyeS. (2009) “History of electricity network control and distributed generation in the UK and Western Denmark”, Energy Policy, 37(6): 2338–2345.
32.
LiF. and WhalleyJ. (2002) “Deconstruction of the telecommunications industry: From value chains to value networks”, Telecommunications Policy, 26(9–10): 451–472.
33.
LittlechildS. (1983) Regulation of British Telecommunications Profitability: Report to the Secretary of State for Industry.
34.
LoorbachD.FrantzeskakiN. (2010) “Introduction to the special section: Infrastructures and transitions”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(8): 1195–1202.
35.
LundvallB.-A. (1992) National systems ofinnovation: Towards a theory ofinnovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
36.
MacKerronG. (2009) “Lessons from the UK on Urgency and Legitimacy in Energy Policy Making”, In MacMillanP. (ed.), Energy for the Future: A New Agenda.
37.
MalerbaF. (2002) “Sectoral systems of innovation and production”, Research Policy, 31(2): 247–264.
38.
McDonaldJ. (2008) “Adaptive intelligent power systems: Active distribution networks”, Energy Policy, 36(12): 4346–4351.
39.
MitchellC. (2007) The Political Economy of Sustainable Energy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
MoranM. (2003) The British Regulatory State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
MurmannJ. P. (2003) Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of firms, technology, and institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
NelsonR. (1993) National innovation systems: A comparative analysis New York; Oxford Oxford University Press.
43.
NelsonR. (1998) “The Co-Evolution of Technology, Industrial Structure ans Supporting Institutions”, In DosiG.TeeceD. J. and ChytryJ. (eds), Technology, Organisation and Competitivness. New York: Oxford.
44.
NelsonR. R. and WinterS. G. (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic changeCambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
45.
NooteboomB. (1999) “Innovation, learning and industrial organisation”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2): 127–150.
46.
Northcote-GreenJ. and WilsonR. (2006) Control and automation of electrical power distribution systems. London: CRC/Taylor & Francis.
47.
OchoaL. F.DentC. J. (2010) “Distribution Network Capacity Assessment: Variable DG and Active Networks”, Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 25(1): 87–95.
48.
OFGEM (2010) LCN Fund Governance Document v.3.
49.
OwenG. (2006) “Sustainable development duties: New roles for UK economic regulators”, Utilities Policy, 14(3): 208–217.
50.
PenroseE. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
51.
PerezC. (2002) Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
52.
PIU (2002) The Energy Review. Performance Innovation Unit London.
53.
PollittM. (2010) “Does electricity (and heat) network regulation have anything to learn from fixed line telecoms regulation?”, Energy Policy, 38(3): 1360–1371.
54.
RavenR. (2005) “Strategic Niche Management for Biomass: A comparative study on the experimental introduction of bioenergy technologies in the Netherlands and Denmark. PhD Thesis”. PhD, Technology Management, Eindhoven.
55.
ScottJ. and EvansG. (2007) “Electricity Networks: The Innovation Supply Chain”, In HelmD. (ed.), The New Energy Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
ScottW. R. (2001) Institutions and Organizations. London: Sage Publications.
57.
ShawR.AttreeM. (2010) “Developing electricity distribution networks and their regulation to support sustainable energy”, Energy Policy, 38(10): 5927–5937.
58.
SmithA.StirlingA. (2005) “The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions”, Research Policy, 34(10): 1491–1510.
59.
SmithA.VoßJ.-P. (2010) “Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges”, Research Policy, 39(4): 435–448.
60.
SouthertonD.ChappellsH. (2004) Sustainable Consumption: The Implications of Changing Infrastructures of Provision. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
61.
StankiewiczR. and CarlssonB. (1991) “On the nature, function and composition of technological systems”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1(2): 93.
62.
StenzelT. and FrenzelA. (2008) “Regulating technological change–The strategic reactions of utility companies towards subsidy policies in the German, Spanish and UK electricity markets”, Energy Policy, 36(7): 2645–2657.
63.
StrbacG.RamsayC. (2009) “This sustainable lsle”, Power and Energy Magazine, IEEE, 7(5): 44–52.
64.
SummertonJ. (2004) “The new energy divide: Notes on policies and equity in changing infrastructures”, In SouthertonD.ChappellsH. and VlietB. V. (eds), Sustainable Consumption: The Implications of Changing Infrastructures of Provision. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing;.
65.
UnruhG. C. (2000) “Understanding carbon lock-in”, Energy Policy, 28(12): 817–830.
66.
van der SteenM.GroenewegenJ. (2008) “Evolutionary Innovation Systems of Low Carbon Electricity: Insights about Institutional Change and Innovation in the Cases of CHP and Wind Energy”, In FoxonT. J.KöhlerJ. and OughtonC. (eds), Innovation For A Low Carbon Economy Economic, Institutional and Management Approaches. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
67.
VerbongG.GeelsF. W. (2008) “Multi-niche analysis of dynamics and policies in Dutch renewable energy innovation journeys (1970–2006): Hype-cycles, closed networks and technology-focused learning”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5): 555–573.
68.
VoßJ.-P. and BauknechtD. (2008) “Network Regulation”, In PraetoriusBarbara D. B.CamesMartinFischerCorinnaPehntMartinSchumacherKatjaVoßJan-Peter, (ed.), Innovation for Sustainable Electricity Systems. LondonSpringer.
69.
WilliamsonO. E. (2000) “The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead”, Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3): 595–613.
70.
WinskelM. (2002) “When Systems Are Overthrown: The ‘Dash for Gas’ in the British Electricity Supply Industry”, Social Studies of Science, 32(4): 563–598.
71.
WoodmanB. and BakerP. (2008) “Regulatory frameworks for decentralised energy”, Energy Policy, 36(12): 4527–4531.
