Abstract
Summary
Using the six-criteria remission definition (adapted from de Lautour 2016), 43% of included patients achieved gout remission after 52 weeks of pegloticase treatment. Using the three-criteria remission definition (adapted from G-CAN), 70% of included patients achieved gout remission after 52 weeks of pegloticase treatment.
What do the results mean?
All patients in the MIRROR RCT had uncontrolled gout, and patients had experienced gout for an average of approximately 14 years. These analyses showed that lowering serum urate levels with pegloticase for 12 months put gout into remission in a large proportion of these patients with hard-to-treat disease. Importantly, these findings indicate that the simplified criteria adapted from the G-CAN definition were practical to use in routine clinical care and could be used to see how well treatment is working in patients with uncontrolled gout.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
Plain language writing and editing assistance were provided by Tara Croston, PhD, of Red Nucleus and funded by Amgen Inc. Additional writing support was provided by Swati Ghatpande, PhD, an employee of and stockholder in Amgen Inc. All authors have authorized the third-party submission.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The MIRROR RCT (NCT03994731) was a phase 4, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The protocol was approved by the Western Institutional Review Board. The trial was conducted in adherence with the Declaration of Helsinki, and all patients provided written informed consent.
Author contributions
Yael Klionsky, Karina D. Torralba, Katie Obermeyer, Gordon Lam, and Brian LaMoreaux conceptualized the MIRROR RCT and poststudy analysis. Katie Obermeyer, Lissa Padnick-Silver, and Brian LaMoreaux contributed to the methodology. Yael Klionsky, Gordon Lam, and Brian LaMoreaux contributed to the investigation of the MIRROR RCT. Katie Obermeyer and Lissa Padnick-Silver formally analyzed the data of the MIRROR RCT post-study analysis. All authors reviewed and edited the plain language summary publication.
Funding
Horizon Therapeutics (now Amgen Inc.) sponsored this post-study analysis and the MIRROR RCT.
Conflict of interest statement
Yael Klionsky has received consultancy and speaker honoraria and/or served on advisory boards for Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Janssen, Lilly, and MedIQ and received speaker fees from AstraZeneca. Karina D. Torralba has received contract research support from Bioclinica; received research support as a clinical trial investigator from Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Human Genome Sciences, Novartis, and UCB; served on advisory boards for Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Cabaletta Bio, and Janssen; received speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi; and received consulting fees from AstraZeneca. Katie Obermeyer and Brian LaMoreaux are employees of and stockholders in Amgen Inc. Lissa Padnick-Silver is a former employee of and holds stock in Amgen Inc. Gordon Lam has received consulting and speaker honoraria and research support as a clinical trial investigator from AbbVie, Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Horizon Therapeutics, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and UCB. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial ties with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
