Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease mainly affecting areas rich in apocrine glands. Clinically, is characterized by painful subcutaneous nodules and if left untreated to pus secretion, abscess and fistula formation. Its frequency is estimated to be 0.5–4% of the general population, affecting women more often. Pathogenesis of HS is still not clearly defined. It seems to be a combination of genetic factors with alterations in the skin microbiome. Furthermore, at tissue (i.e. skin) as well as at serum level, several inflammatory cytokines are upregulated. The most important of the latter are tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin (IL)-1, IL-17, and IL-23. Adding another level of complexity, it has been suggested that keratinocytes might be intrinsically activated, contributing also to the observed inflammation. Interestingly, it has been noted that frequency of HS is increased in some autoimmune rheumatic diseases, such as spondyloarthropathies (SpA). Of note, both HS and SpA have relatively strong association with metabolic diseases and obesity implying that there are indeed some common underlying pathophysiological pathways. Although no specific microbe has been identified, alterations in the microbiome of the skin of these patients have been reported. Of note, microbes with a capability for biofilm formation are abundant. Treatment of HS among others, include antibiotics as well as biologic drugs targeting TNF and other cytokines and used for autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Herein, we review the current evidence on links between HS and autoimmune diseases and infectious diseases with a focus on epidemiology and pathophysiology.

Keywords

autoimmunity Hidradenitis suppurativa microbiome

Introduction

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by subcutaneous painful nodules¹ affecting areas rich in apocrine glands such as axillary, inguinal, genital, and infra-mammary regions.² The inflamed glands result into pus secretion and eventually to scar, fistula, sinuses, or abscess formation.^3,4 Its frequency has a wide range among different ethnic subgroups,^2,5 but on average is estimated to be around 0.5–4%.^2,3,6,7

Epidemiology

HS remains generally under-recognized,⁸ especially if not presented to dermatologists, affecting the overall reported prevalence and incidence figures. This is despite its very distinct clinical presentation and the possibility to achieve a reliable diagnosis even based on simple questioning.⁹ Prevalence figures are also affected by the nature of the studies undertaken, population studied, and geographical location.¹⁰ With a prevalence of up to 4%, HS is therefore frequent, especially in post-pubescent women.^8,11 However, the onset of HS has been described also in prepubertal children as well as postmenopausal women.^7,12 The female:male ratio is approximately 3:1, with women showing a greater likelihood of having genitofemoral lesions.¹³ The prevalence of HS appears to decline after the age of 50 years.⁷ Around a third of patients report a positive family history for HS, with an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance.^14,15 Family history has been associated with early onset HS.¹⁶ Many genes have been implicated in the pathogenesis of the disease with these encoding for expression of the subunits of γ-secretase complex being the most well described.² Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the promoter region of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) gene have also been linked with HS.¹⁷

Associations with metabolic disease, autoimmune rheumatic diseases, and other conditions

Associations have been reported with various factors and habits that belong in the cardio-metabolic spectrum, such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and smoking.^7,18,19 Smoking has been linked with worse disease in HS.²⁰ Similarly, a strong association has been found between body mass index (BMI) and disease severity of HS, with more severe HS seen in obese compared with overweight patients.²⁰ A possible metabolic loop has in fact been described linking insulin resistance and HS, with altered mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), the latter reported in metabolic and autoimmune disorders. More specifically, mTOR has been found to be increased in lesional as well as nonlesional skin of HS patients and mTOR gene expression correlated with the severity of HS. Evidence also implicates mTOR in insulin resistance seen in patients with HS,²¹ further supporting the concept of a metabolic loop linking HS, BMI, and insulin resistance. This disease ‘behavior’ and association with BMI and obesity has also been reported in other inflammatory skin and joint conditions such as psoriasis and rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).^22–26 Common proinflammatory pathways seem to be the culprit in these observed associations.²⁷ For example, upregulation of conventional cytokines [e.g. TNFα and interleukin (IL)-17] and adipokines (e.g. chemerin, visfatin, leptin, and adiponectin) have been reported in psoriasis and adiposity.²⁸ Studies have shown a relationship between adiponectin and psoriasis, but a relationship that depends on the presence of obesity.²⁹ Adiponectin, a cytokine produced by adipose tissue at levels inversely proportional to BMI and waist:hip ratio, induces the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1 and IL-10 and inhibits the cytokines IL-6 and TNFα, the latter two well-recognized for their role in inflammation for example, in the setting of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In the case of leptin, another pro-inflammatory cytokine derived from adipocytes, its circulating levels have been correlated directly with body fat mass.³⁰ Therapeutic strategies targeting all aspects of disease, including skin and joint involvement in the case of psoriasis and PsA as well as obesity, are recommended. Of note, a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome has also been noted in patients with HS compared with controls, suggesting that metabolic abnormalities may be a contributing factor in the development of HS, particularly in younger patients.³¹ Similar associations have been identified in psoriasis possibly due to commonalities in the mechanistic pathways underlying both skin conditions.^32,33 Interestingly, obesity also seems to negatively affect the response to biologic therapy in these conditions.³⁴ In line with these observations, weight loss has been associated with improved inflammatory states in autoimmune rheumatic diseases such as PsA, supporting the hypothesis of obesity as a promotor of disease activity in PsA.²³ In the case of HS, reports on nonpharmacologic approaches to therapy that include weight loss are limited by the small study size and the general lack of randomized controlled trials.³⁵ However, a recent multicenter, observational, crossover, pilot study has shown no association of the improvement in disease severity with weight loss.³⁶

Inflammatory bowel disease is also a frequent comorbidity in HS.³⁷ A study has shown that 17% of patients with Crohn’s disease are affected by HS.³⁸ Clinical, histologic and epidemiologic similarities (e.g. sinus tracts, granulomatous inflammation, scarring and post-pubertal onset) support this association.³⁸ In addition, it has been also suggested that mood disorders such as depression and anxiety are also more frequent in these patients.^1,39,40

With regard to autoimmune inflammatory joint disease, rheumatoid factor negative, and HLA-B27 negative joint disease appears to be more frequent among patients with HS compared with the general population, often with asymmetrical peripheral joint involvement.⁴¹ Interestingly, however, recent evidence from a cross-sectional study in patients from the Groningen Leeuwarden Axial Spondylarthritis (GLAS) cohort, fulfilling the Assessment of Spondylarthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria for axial spondyloarthropathy (SpA) (79% HLA-B27 positive), shows HS to be more prevalent than in the general population (9.1% versus 0.053–4.1%).⁴² Reports also exist of the coexistence of HS with other autoimmune rheumatic diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)⁴³ and SAPHO (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis) syndrome,⁴⁴ further supporting the notion of a possible common denominator in disease pathogenesis.

Pathogenesis

General aspects

The pathogenesis of HS is not entirely clear and possibly represents a dysregulated immune response to skin microbiota, in a susceptible genetic background.¹ There is some evidence that keratinocytes may be also intrinsically dysfunctional,⁴⁵ while it is unknown whether bacterial infections are per se the primary cause or a contributing factor to this clinical condition.¹ It is currently debated which is the initiating event in the pathogenesis of HS. Current hypothesis suggests that infundibular hyperkeratosis, follicular epithelium hyperplasia, and perifolliculitis come first.⁴⁶ These lead to possible bacterial biofilm formation,¹ distention and rupture of the terminal hair follicles (HFs), and subsequently to spillage of material (such as keratin or hair-shafts) from pilosebaceous unit to the dermis.^2,4 These act as danger signals initiating the immune response and recruiting various cells including macrophages, B and T lymphocytes, and neutrophils.²

As mentioned above, genetic factors play significant role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Familiar cases are associated with loss of function mutations for genes encoding proteins in the γ-secretase complex.⁴⁷ γ-secretase plays a significant role in the Notch signal transduction, as it mediates the intramembrane cleavage of the latter and subsequent release of the intracellular domain of Notch (NICD).⁴⁸ Notch plays a significant role in the HF and hair cycle homeostasis^48,49 regulating also keratinocyte (KC) differentiation and proliferation.^49–51 It also seems to be important for the development and function of natural killer (NK) and T-regulatory (Treg) cells.^47,52 It is not known what the exact role of Notch is in pathogenesis for HS. Some investigators have suggested that Notch dysregulation might be an epiphenomenon related to the observed aberrancies in keratinocytes proliferation.⁵³

Tregs have been found to promote the proliferation and differentiation of HF stem cells, which is critical for HF maintenance and regeneration.^47,54 A high T-helper-17 (Th17)/Tregs ratio has been observed in the skin of patients with HS. This, was normalized after treatment with anti-TNF reagents.⁵⁵ Interestingly, an imbalance in the Th17/Tregs ratio has been found in obesity and other conditions associated with HS, as mentioned previously, such as smoking, depression, and inflammatory bowel diseases.⁴⁷

What happens at the lesion?

Histopathology

Lesions of HS are characterized by infiltrates of white blood cells. It has been suggested that in early lesions, neutrophilic abscesses along with macrophages, monocytes, and dendritic cells predominate, whereas in chronic lesions one can note more B lymphocytes and plasma cells.⁵⁶

Cytokines-role of TNF, IL-17, and IL-1

Pro-inflammatory (IL-1β, TNF, IL-17) as well as anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10) are found to be increased in HS lesional and per-lesional skin compared with healthy donors or patients with psoriasis^56,57 (Figure 1). Interferon (IFN)-γ is also increasingly expressed in the skin of HS patients compared with healthy individuals.^1,50 However, this finding has not been confirmed by all investigators.⁵⁵

Figure–1.

Molecules involved in the lesions of hidradenitis suppurativa, at a glance. At the upper right corner are summarized the main alterations observed.

TNF is produced by dendritic cells and macrophages and its levels are associated with HS severity.¹ IL-17 is produced by neutrophils,⁵⁸ Th17 cells,⁵⁹ or other cells capable for its production.⁴⁷ In agreement, high levels of IL-23 (which drives IL-17 production) have been also found to be increased in HS lesions⁵⁹ produced by macrophages and dendritic cells.¹

It has been suggested that IL-17 might drive production of IL1-β by KCs via activation of the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain, leucine-rich repeat and pyrin domain containing (NLRP3) protein of inflammasome and caspase-1.^58,60 Both are increased in the epidermis of HS patients. IL-18 regulated by caspase-1 and NLRP3 was also found increased in HS skin.⁵⁷ It has been hypothesized that keratin fibers and other debris as well as damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPS) or pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecules (PAMPS) can also activate the inflammasome.^1,56 It has also been suggested that IL-17 induces the production of S100A8 and S100A9 by KCs, which are increased in lesional but not perilesional skin in HS⁵⁸ and are also expressed by macrophages and neutrophils.⁵⁰ Of note, they are also increased in the serum of HS patients.⁵⁸ These proteins, in turn, can augment KC proliferation and expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines.⁵⁸ In addition, there are data supporting that KCs intrinsically produce increased levels of IL-1.⁵⁰ It is possible that there is a positive feedback loop between IL-1 and IL-17.¹ To add another level of complexity, IL-36 family members which belong to the IL-1 family are also increased systemically and locally expressed by KCs and macrophages.⁶¹ These are able to mediate Th1 and Th17 responses as well as KC proliferation.^61,62 Finally, a recent study demonstrated that IL-26 is increased in plasma and skin of HS patients.⁶³ IL-26 is a cytokine expressed mainly by Th17 cells but also from other cell types such as innate lymphoid cells 3 (ILC3), and belongs in the IL-20 subfamily.^63,64 It leads to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines through ligation to its receptors (IL-10R2 and IL-20R1) but it can also bind to cell-free DNA and subsequently activate Toll-like receptors pathways. In addition, it exerts direct antimicrobial properties having the ability to open pores in bacterial membranes.^63,64 Scala et al. showed that inhibition of IL-26, decreased IL-1β, IL-6 as well as human β-defensin-2 (HBD-2) and human β-defensin-3 (HBD-3) genes expression, in skin, leaving unaffected those encoding for IL-17 and IL-23.⁶³ Interestingly, antimicrobial, cytotoxic, and phagocytic ability from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from HS patients was impaired, implying that IL-26 might be dysfunctional in these patients.⁶³

In contrast, IL-22 is relatively decreased in HS.^50,65 KCs from HS patients produced less IL-22 compared with those of healthy donors.⁴⁵ IL-22 deficiency has also been linked to increased IL-10 production,⁶⁵ which might be induced, among others by IL-1β.⁶⁵ It is also worth mentioning that IL-22 production is enhanced by Notch signaling, which is defective in some HS patients.⁵⁰ In human intestinal epithelial cells, it has been shown that IL-22, through the forced expression of the Notch target gene Hes1 and subsequent phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)-3, induced the genes encoding for antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) such as REG1A, REG3A, and REG3G.⁶⁶

Matrix metalloproteinases and AMPs

Overexpression of matrix-metalloproteinases (MMP; especially MMP-2 and MMP-8) has been observed in lesional skin of patients with HS^3,67,68 partly explaining the derangement of extracellular matrix and the respective morphological changes.³ In a recent study, it was found that MMP-8 was secreted in HS skin by accumulating granulocytes, driven by TNF.⁶⁹ The latter was found to also increase the expression of MMP-8 by dermal fibroblasts. Providing another hint for the link between HS and metabolic diseases, Tsaousi et al. found a negative correlation between MM8 blood levels (which were also increased) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) blood levels.⁶⁹ For the former, a positive correlation with resistin is also reported.⁶⁹ To be mentioned, resistin is one of the key adipokines increased in obese patients. It is considered as an inflammatory mediator and has been reported to be increased in patients with inflammatory arthritis similarly to PsA and ankylosing spondylitis.²⁵ In addition, IL-17 could be related with augmented MMPs production, as it has been shown previously for fibroblast-like synoviocytes from patients with enthesitis-related arthritis.⁷⁰

AMPs seem to also have a role in HS. There is relative deficiency of AMPs in HS lesions, compared with skin from psoriasis or atopic dermatitis patients.⁶⁵ This could be related to the lower IL-22 and IL-20 levels in HS lesions, both regulating along with other factors (e.g. IL-17) AMP production.⁶⁵ It has been shown that there are alterations in the pattern of the AMP produced by isolated KC from HS patients compared with healthy donors, further supporting the notion for an intrinsic defect of these cells.⁵⁰ Transcriptome analyses have shown that expression of the AMPs dermcidin and ribonuclease-7 were downregulated in HS lesional skin compared to skin form healthy donors.^71,72 The role of dermcidin was further highlighted in another transcriptome analyses, in which the gene encoding for this AMP was one of the top downregulated genes in HS lesions compared with nonlesional skin from the same patients.⁷³ On the other hand, in HS lesions compared with healthy skin from the same patients, mRNA levels of several AMPs such as HBD-2, S100A7 (psoriasin), S100A7A (koebnerisin) and LL-37 were found to be increased.^73–75 LL-37 (cathelicidin) can be produced by many different cell types including resident cells such as keratinocytes and immune cells. Its levels were correlated with presence of immune cells such as neutrophils, macrophages, and T cells.⁴ It acts as chemo-attractant, augmenting also pro-inflammatory responses, upregulating costimulatory molecules expression by DCs and increasing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines ⁴ Expression of AMPs might also vary, with regard to the severity of HS. Hofmann et al.⁷² found that HBD-3 was upregulated in HS but not in patients with Hurley grade III.

Serum

At a peripheral blood level, inflammation markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and several cytokines, most of them are pro-inflammatory, are found to be elevated in HS patients. In fact, it is generally observed that IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12p70, IL-17, soluble TNF receptor II (sTNF-RII), TNF-a, and IL-10 are found to be elevated in the peripheral blood of these patients.^18,76–79 Recently, it was suggested that IL-26 is also increased.⁶³ Various studies have shown that levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines and CRP go in parallel with disease^18,76,77,79 and mirror response to treatment.¹⁸ In addition, a small study has suggested that baseline IL-6 and CRP levels can serve as negative predictors for response to infliximab;⁸⁰ and the frequency of T cells secreting IL-17 and IL-22 is increased in the peripheral blood of patients with HS compared with that of healthy donors.⁵⁰ IL-17 leads to chemokine production, which, in turn, recruit leukocytes (e.g. macrophages, neutrophils) at the site of inflammation.⁸¹ In addition, they augment the production of IL-1β and IL-6 providing a positive feedback loop for Th17 cells development and subsequent IL-17 production⁸¹ and regulate AMP production. On the other hand, it has to be mentioned that there are some possibly contradictory data.^82,83 Kanni et al. have shown that isolated PBMCs produced lower levels of the above-mentioned cytokines compared to healthy controls, which is also in line with the fact that no differences were observed in the whole blood mRNA expression between patients and controls.^83,84 These discrepancies require further investigation but might represent differences in the environment (in vivo versus ex vivo) in that the cytokines were measured, in epigenetics modifications, or both.⁸⁴

A recent study demonstrated that complement might have some role in HS.³ Kanni et al. showed that C5a and membrane attack complex C5b-9 were increased in plasma of HS patients compared with healthy individuals.³ In addition, in ex vivo experiments they showed that blocking c5a was able to inhibit TNF production by patients’ PBMCs. These findings imply a central role of the complement in HS and possibly explain, at the same time, recruitment and activation of neutrophils at skin lesions.³

Microbiome and biofilms

Despite the clinical presentation of HS that resembles bacterial infection and the efficacy of antimicrobials as a treatment modality, the role of bacteria remains controversial. To understand their role in the pathogenesis of HS and possibly identify new therapeutic targets, researchers tried to isolate bacteria from skin lesions in HS patients. No specific bacterial agent has been found so far, contrariwise a variety of microorganisms mostly part of the skin normal flora were identified. Gram-positive cocci and rods,⁸⁵ including Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), and Corynebacterium spp have been isolated from deep tissue samples. CoNS were the most common species found in cultures from deep lesions obtained by carbon dioxide laser treatment.^86,87 Staphylococcus lugdunensis, a CoNS species, was associated with early stages of HS lesions (Hurley I).⁸⁸ Anaerobic bacteria, predominantly Gram-negative rods Prevotella and Porphyromonas, were also identified in various early and chronic HS lesions.^88,89 Using next-generation sequencing, it was demonstrated that there is a significantly different microbiome in patients with HS, either lesional or nonlesional, compared with that in healthy controls: Corynebacterium species (type I) or Porphyromonas and Peptoniphilus species (type IV) were the predominant species identified from HS lesions, whereas type IV was not detected in healthy controls. This significant difference between both lesional and nonlesional HS skin microbiota and that in healthy controls, drives the hypothesis of a link between a dysbiotic cutaneous microbiome and HS.⁹⁰

The formation of biofilm in chronic and acute HS lesions is not a surprising finding knowing that CoNS and the other commonly found in HS bacteria are known for their capability of biofilm formation.^91,92 The presence of the latter has implications both in the pathogenesis of HS, as well as in the choice of treatment. The chronic course with acute exacerbations in between, the need of prolonged treatment with the slow healing process of the lesions, the need for surgical debridement in severe stages, and the relative resistance towards classic antimicrobials are compatible with a biofilm-driven disease.⁹³

Severity and scores of HS

In the last three decades, multiple scoring systems have been introduced in order to evaluate the severity of HS. The Harley staging system was proposed first in 1989 and it is still widely used in research and clinical practice. It uses clinical features such as the presence of abscesses, scarring, and sinus track formation to categorize HS patients into three distinct stages: stage I is characterized by abscess formation, single or multiple, without scarring or sinus tracts; stage II by recurrent abscesses single or multiple, widely separated lesions with scarring and tract formation; and stage III by diffuse or near-diffuse involvement, or multiple interconnected tracts and abscesses across the entire area.⁹⁴ Hurley severity staging is helpful in therapeutic decisions, but it is not suitable for treatment evaluation during follow up. Thus, more dynamic HS scoring systems such as Sartorius score (later modified) and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) were proposed in order to assess treatment response better; an overwhelming need especially after the introduction of biologics into the treatment options.^20,95 A more recent scoring system, Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR), is defined as at least a 50% reduction in total abscess and inflammatory nodule count with no increase in abscess and draining fistula count when compared with baseline⁹⁶ and has been used to assess the effectiveness of treatment with biologics. Furthermore, scale scores that consider the degree of pain, the number of flares, and the impact on quality of daily life in HS patients, such as the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Pain Visual Analog Scale, have been used to assess treatment effectiveness in both research and clinical settings.⁹⁷ It is worth noting that not all the staging scores use biomarkers in the assessment of either the severity or the treatment response. However, a study proposed that soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) serum level could be used as a valuable marker for disease staging in patients with HS.⁹⁸ Finally, is worth mentioning that efforts have been made to establish a core outcome set in HS clinical trials.⁹⁹

Treatment

Antibiotics

Systemic antibiotics used to be the cornerstone of HS treatment for decades. Both European¹⁰⁰ and North American⁹⁷ guidelines continue to recommend as a considerable option the use of antimicrobial agents alone or in combinations at different stages of HS. Tetracyclines, clindamycin, rifampicin, moxifloxacin, metronidazole, and ertapenem are the agents that have proved their efficacy in HS treatment. Not surprisingly, the regimens that have been proposed seem to share more or less the same attributes: they are active against aerobic and anaerobic bacterial agents most commonly found in HS lesions, they penetrate and show antimicrobial activity in biofilms, and importantly possess significant anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties.

Tetracyclines

Tetracycline and its second-generation semisynthetic analogs doxycycline and minocycline are recommended as monotherapy for mild stages of HS.^97,100 They have a broad-spectrum bacteriostatic activity against a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria by binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit, thereby halting bacterial protein synthesis. Doxycycline, the most commonly used tetracycline in HS, has been shown to have also the ability to penetrate S. aureus biofilm in high-enough concentrations to maintain its antibacterial activity.¹⁰¹ In addition, doxycycline, as with other tetracyclines, has a variety of anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties.¹⁰² It can reduce the production of IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-8, downregulate chemotaxis, promote lipo-oxygenase, MMP and nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) signaling inhibition.

Clindamycin, rifampicin

Clindamycin is the only antibiotic that has been studied for topical treatment and can be used in mild localized stages of HS.¹⁰³ It has also shown the same efficacy compared with oral tetracycline.¹⁰⁴ The systemic combination of clindamycin and rifampicin is the most studied and its efficacy is well established.^105,106 It is widely offered in cases of tetracycline failure in mild to moderate stages of HS.^97,100 Clindamycin has a bacteriostatic activity against both aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria by binding irreversibly to 50S ribosomal subunit, thereby inhibiting bacterial protein synthesis. It has no potent antibiofilm effect¹⁰¹ and its anti-inflammatory properties are suggested in topical treatment against Acne vulgaris.¹⁰⁷ However, the lack of both properties is balanced by the excellent antibiofilm activity of rifampicin as it has been proven in periprosthetic joint infections.^101,108 Rifampicin binds to the 50s ribosomal subunit where it disrupts transpeptidation and thereby halts protein synthesis in a similar manner to macrolides. It has a broad-spectrum activity mostly against Gram-positive and some Gram-negative bacteria as well. In addition, it is suggested that rifampicin possesses anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. There is evidence that it can reduce inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) transcription and NF-κB activity, inhibit excessive Th17 responses, and thereby reduce their differentiation and secretion.^109,110

Moxifloxacin, rifampicin, and metronidazole

This triple combination is appeared to be effective in reducing HS activity in moderate to severe cases that were refractory to other treatment.¹¹¹ Moxifloxacin is a synthetic fluoroquinolone with a broad spectrum of activity against aerobic Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and has a potent activity against most of the anaerobic enteric pathogens. It is suggested that possesses anti-inflammatory properties as well, by reducing IL-1ß, IL-8, TNF-α, stabilizing IXb protein, suppressing NF-κB signaling, and reducing IL-17A.^112,113 Metronidazole was added to increase the activity spectra; to cover some Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria that are naturally resistant or have intermediate susceptibility to moxifloxacin. In addition, combination of moxifloxacin with rifampicin alters the pharmacokinetics and the efficacy of moxifloxacin.

Ertapenem

Ertapenem is an intravenous broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotic that can be used to treat complicated skin and soft tissue infections¹¹⁴ and is highly efficient in improving the clinical aspects of severe HS.¹¹⁵ However, it is recommended to be used for a single 6-week course as rescue therapy or during surgical planning.⁹⁷

Biologics

Given the role of TNF, IL-23, and IL-17 in the pathogenesis of HS, as outlined above, treatment with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has been successfully tried and are included as therapeutic options in moderate to severe HS, in the relevant European and North American guidelines.^97,100 In fact, after several trials, adalimumab has been approved for moderate to severe (Hurley stage II and III) HS. Of note, the dosing differs from schemes approved for other diseases such as RA, being 40 mg every week, after a loading dose of 160 mg and 80 mg at weeks 0 and 2, respectively.¹¹⁶

In the two largest phase-III trials (Pioneer I and II) for adalimumab in HS, involving 307 and 326 patients, HiSCR was achieved at week 12 in 41.8% and 58.9% of patients treated with adalimumab compared with 26.0% and 27.6% for placebo.¹¹⁷ Infliximab has also proven to be effective in the treatment of HS,¹¹⁸ although more studies are needed. Interestingly, in a small retrospective study, infliximab in a dosing scheme of 5 mg/kg at weeks 0 and 2 performed better than adalimumab given at 40 mg every other week.¹¹⁹ That said, It has been suggested that a dosing scheme of infliximab every 4 instead of every 8 weeks might be beneficial for HS patients.¹²⁰ Results for other TNF inhibitors, such as certolizumab¹²¹ or etanercept, are either negative or inconclusive.¹¹⁶

Anakinra, an IL-1 receptor antagonist, is also a promising drug for this disease. The largest, thus far, trial for this regime has shown superiority versus placebo at week 12. HiSCR was achieved in 78% and 30% of the patients (p = 0.04), respectively. This difference wore off after 12 weeks without treatment.¹²²

IL-23 is also a significant player in HS. That given, ustekinumab, which is a monoclonal antibody against the p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23, has been tried as a treatment modality. In the largest, thus far, open-label trial, 47% of HS patients treated with ustekinumab achieved HiSCR at week 40 and moderate to marked improvement was seen in 82% according to the modified Sartorius score.⁸² Furthermore, in a small retrospective study, guselkumab, which is a monoclonal antibody against p19 subunit of IL-23, at a dose of 100 mg at weeks 0 and 4 and every 8 weeks thereafter, proved to be effective in more than half (63%) of the HS patients treated.¹²³ Importantly, 7 out of 8 patients in the study had previously been treated with other antibiotics. The authors of this study suggested that higher doses might be even more effective. A phase-II multicenter trial is currently underway to test this drug in moderate to severe HS.¹²¹

Monoclonal antibodies against IL-17 have been also tried. A recently published open-label trial for patients receiving 300 mg of secukinumab weekly for 5 weeks, then every 4 weeks reported that 78% of the patients achieved HiSCR at week 24.¹²⁴ In addition, clinical trials are underway to test the safety and efficacy of this secukinumab and bimekizumab (monoclonal antibody against IL-17a and IL-17F) in moderate to severe HS.¹²¹

Finally, apremilast, which is an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) approved for psoriasis and PsA, has shown some efficacy in HS. In a placebo-controlled trial, 53% of HS patients at 30 mg of apremilast, twice a day, achieved HiSCR at week 16 compared with none of placebo (p = 0.055).¹²⁵

In general, treatment for HS is not clearly defined and is based on anecdotal evidence and expert opinion.¹²⁶ As a general approach, systemic or topical antibiotics are used. However, in moderate to severe disease or when antibiotics discontinuation leads to disease flares, treatment with biologic drugs or other immunosuppressives is suggested.¹²⁶ Short-term glucocorticoids can also be used as a bridging or adjuvant therapy.⁹⁷ Surgical treatment is used alone or usually in combination with medical treatment, as outlined previously.

Conclusion

HS is not as rare as previously thought, affecting 0.5–4% of the general population. Its pathogenesis is still largely unclear. However, it seems that a combination of genetic factors and skin microbiome alterations play a role. TNF, IL-23/IL-17 axis, and IL-1 seem to also play a significant role, which is mirrored in the efficacy of TNF inhibitors and other biologics in the treatment of HS. Links between HS and autoimmune conditions have been demonstrated, with an increased prevalence of HS in some antirheumatic drugs and common associations with comorbidities of the metabolic spectrum. Future epidemiologic studies in large HS or antirheumatic drug cohorts will clarify this issue and might elucidate more the pathogenesis of the former.

Footnotes

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declare that there is no conflict of interest.

ORCID iDs

George E Fragoulis

Elena Nikiphorou

References

Shah

Alhusayen

Amini-Nik

The critical role of macrophages in the pathogenesis of hidradenitis suppurativa. Inflamm Res 2017; 66: 931–945.

Tricarico

Boniotto

Genovese

, et al. An integrated approach to unravel hidradenitis suppurativa etiopathogenesis. Front Immunol 2019; 10: 892.

Kanni

Zenker

Habel

, et al. Complement activation in hidradenitis suppurativa: a new pathway of pathogenesis? Br J Dermatol 2018; 179: 413–419.

Thomi

Schlapbach

Yawalkar

, et al. Elevated levels of the antimicrobial peptide LL-37 in hidradenitis suppurativa are associated with a Th1/Th17 immune response. Exp Dermatol 2018; 27: 172–177.

Vazquez

Alikhan

Weaver

, et al. Incidence of hidradenitis suppurativa and associated factors: a population-based study of Olmsted County, Minnesota. J Invest Dermatol 2013; 133: 97–103.

Jemec

Heidenheim

Nielsen

NH.

The prevalence of hidradenitis suppurativa and its potential precursor lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996; 35: 191–194.

Revuz

Canoui-Poitrine

Wolkenstein

, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with hidradenitis suppurativa: results from two case-control studies. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 59: 596–601.

Dufour

Emtestam

Jemec

GB.

Hidradenitis suppurativa: a common and burdensome, yet under-recognised, inflammatory skin disease. Postgrad Med J 2014; 90: 216–221; quiz 220.

Esmann

Dufour

Jemec

GB.

Questionnaire-based diagnosis of hidradenitis suppurativa: specificity, sensitivity and positive predictive value of specific diagnostic questions. Br J Dermatol 2010; 163: 102–106.

10.

Miller

McAndrew

Hamzavi

Prevalence, risk factors, and comorbidities of hidradenitis suppurativa. Dermatol Clin 2016; 34: 7–16.

11.

Canoui-Poitrine

Revuz

Wolkenstein

, et al. Clinical characteristics of a series of 302 French patients with hidradenitis suppurativa, with an analysis of factors associated with disease severity. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 61: 51–57.

12.

Palmer

Keefe

Early-onset hidradenitis suppurativa. Clin Exp Dermatol 2001; 26: 501–503.

13.

Jemec

GB.

Clinical practice. Hidradenitis suppurativa. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 158–164.

14.

Al-Ali

Ratnamala

Mehta

, et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa (or Acne inversa) with autosomal dominant inheritance is not linked to chromosome 1p21.1-1q25.3 region. Exp Dermatol 2010; 19: 851–853.

15.

Von Der Werth

Williams

Raeburn

JA.

The clinical genetics of hidradenitis suppurativa revisited. Br J Dermatol 2000; 142: 947–953.

16.

Deckers

van der Zee

Boer

, et al. Correlation of early-onset hidradenitis suppurativa with stronger genetic susceptibility and more widespread involvement. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 72: 485–488.

17.

Savva

Plantinga

Kotanidou

, et al. Association of autophagy-related 16-like 1 (ATG16L1) gene polymorphism with sepsis severity in patients with sepsis and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2014; 33: 1609–1614.

18.

Jimenez-Gallo

de la Varga-Martinez

Ossorio-Garcia

, et al. Effects of adalimumab on T-helper-17 lymphocyte- and neutrophil-related inflammatory serum markers in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa. Cytokine 2018; 103: 20–24.

19.

Konig

Lehmann

Rompel

, et al. Cigarette smoking as a triggering factor of hidradenitis suppurativa. Dermatology 1999; 198: 261–264.

20.

Sartorius

Emtestam

Jemec

, et al. Objective scoring of hidradenitis suppurativa reflecting the role of tobacco smoking and obesity. Br J Dermatol 2009; 161: 831–839.

21.

Monfrecola

Balato

Caiazzo

, et al. Mammalian target of rapamycin, insulin resistance and hidradenitis suppurativa: a possible metabolic loop. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2016; 30: 1631–1633.

22.

Jensen

Skov

Psoriasis and obesity. Dermatology 2016; 232: 633–639.

23.

Klingberg

Bilberg

Bjorkman

, et al. Weight loss improves disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis and obesity: an interventional study. Arthritis Res Ther 2019; 21: 17.

24.

McInnes

Ferraccioli

D’Agostino

, et al. Body mass index and treatment response to subcutaneous abatacept in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a post hoc analysis of a phase III trial. RMD Open 2019; 5: e000934.

25.

Nikiphorou

Fragoulis

GE.

Inflammation, obesity and rheumatic disease: common mechanistic links. A narrative review. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2018; 10: 157–167.

26.

Nikiphorou

Norton

Young

, et al. The association of obesity with disease activity, functional ability and quality of life in early rheumatoid arthritis: data from the early rheumatoid arthritis study/early rheumatoid arthritis network UK prospective cohorts. Rheumatology (Oxford). Epub ahead of print 26 March 2018. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/key066.

27.

Rodriguez-Cerdeira

Cordeiro-Rodriguez

Carnero-Gregorio

, et al. Biomarkers of inflammation in obesity-psoriatic patients. Mediators Inflamm 2019; 2019: 1–14.

28.

Chiricozzi

Raimondo

Lembo

, et al. Crosstalk between skin inflammation and adipose tissue-derived products: pathogenic evidence linking psoriasis to increased adiposity. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2016; 12: 1299–1308.

29.

Bavoso

Pinto

Soares

MMS

, et al. Psoriasis in obesity: comparison of serum levels of leptin and adiponectin in obese subjects - cases and controls. An Bras Dermatol 2019; 94: 192–197.

30.

Farooqi

O’Rahilly

20 years of leptin: human disorders of leptin action. J Endocrinol 2014; 223: T63–T70.

31.

Sabat

Chanwangpong

Schneider-Burrus

, et al. Increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome in patients with acne inversa. PLoS One 2012; 7: e31810.

32.

Gisondi

Fostini

Fossa

, et al. Psoriasis and the metabolic syndrome. Clin Dermatol 2018; 36: 21–28.

33.

Phan

Sigal

Lhafa

, et al. Metabolic comorbidities and hypertension in psoriasis patients in France. Comparisons with French national databases. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2016; 143: 264–274.

34.

Iannone

Lopalco

Rigante

, et al. Impact of obesity on the clinical outcome of rheumatologic patients in biotherapy. Autoimmun Rev 2016; 15: 447–450.

35.

Hendricks

Hirt

Sekhon

, et al. Non-pharmacologic approaches for hidradenitis suppurativa - a systematic review. J Dermatolog Treat 2019: 1–8.

36.

Damiani

Mahroum

Pigatto

PDM

, et al. The safety and impact of a model of intermittent, time-restricted circadian fasting (“ramadan fasting”) on hidradenitis suppurativa: insights from a multicenter, observational, cross-over, pilot, exploratory study. Nutrients 2019; 11. pii: E1781.

37.

Fimmel

Zouboulis

CC.

Comorbidities of hidradenitis suppurativa (acne inversa). Dermatoendocrinol 2010; 2: 9–16.

38.

van der Zee

van der Woude

Florencia

, et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa and inflammatory bowel disease: are they associated? Results of a pilot study. Br J Dermatol 2010; 162: 195–197.

39.

Machado

Stergiopoulos

Maes

, et al. Depression and anxiety in adults with hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. Epub ahead of print 5 June 2019. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.0759.

40.

Onderdijk

van der Zee

Esmann

, et al. Depression in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013; 27: 473–478.

41.

Jemec

Revuz

Leyden

(eds). Hidradenitis Suppurativa. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006.

42.

Rondags

Arends

Wink

, et al. High prevalence of hidradenitis suppurativa symptoms in axial spondyloarthritis patients: a possible new extra-articular manifestation. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019; 48: 611–617.

43.

Ben David

Bragazzi

Watad

, et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa associated with systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e0186.

44.

Ozyemisci-Taskiran

Bolukbasi

Gogus

A hidradenitis suppurativa related SAPHO case associated with features resembling spondylarthropathy and proteinuria. Clin Rheumatol 2007; 26: 789–791.

45.

Jones

Banerjee

Berger

, et al. Inherent differences in keratinocyte function in hidradenitis suppurativa: evidence for the role of IL-22 in disease pathogenesis. Immunol Invest 2018; 47: 57–70.

46.

von Laffert

Stadie

Wohlrab

, et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa: bilocated epithelial hyperplasia with very different sequelae. Br J Dermatol 2011; 164: 367–371.

47.

Melnik

John

Chen

, et al. T helper 17 cell/regulatory T-cell imbalance in hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa: the link to hair follicle dissection, obesity, smoking and autoimmune comorbidities. Br J Dermatol 2018; 179: 260–272.

48.

Melnik

Plewig

Impaired Notch signalling: the unifying mechanism explaining the pathogenesis of hidradenitis suppurativa (acne inversa). Br J Dermatol 2013; 168: 876–878.

49.

Rangarajan

Talora

Okuyama

, et al. Notch signaling is a direct determinant of keratinocyte growth arrest and entry into differentiation. EMBO J 2001; 20: 3427–3436.

50.

Hotz

Boniotto

Guguin

, et al. Intrinsic defect in keratinocyte function leads to inflammation in hidradenitis suppurativa. J Invest Dermatol 2016; 136: 1768–1780.

51.

Shang

Smith

Role of Notch signaling in regulating innate immunity and inflammation in health and disease. Protein Cell 2016; 7: 159–174.

52.

Haraguchi

Suzuki

Koyama

, et al. Notch activation induces the generation of functional NK cells from human cord blood CD34-positive cells devoid of IL-15. J Immunol 2009; 182: 6168–6178.

53.

Frew

JW.

Complement, hidradenitis suppurativa and pathogen-driven positive selection. Br J Dermatol 2019; 180: 685–686.

54.

Ali

Zirak

Rodriguez

, et al. Regulatory T cells in skin facilitate epithelial stem cell differentiation. Cell 2017; 169: 1119–1129.e11.

55.

Moran

Sweeney

Hughes

, et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa is characterized by dysregulation of the Th17: Treg cell axis, which is corrected by anti-TNF therapy. J Invest Dermatol 2017; 137: 2389–2395.

56.

van der Zee

de Ruiter

van den Broecke

, et al. Elevated levels of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-10 in hidradenitis suppurativa skin: a rationale for targeting TNF-α and IL-1β. Br J Dermatol 2011; 164: 1292–1298.

57.

Kelly

Hughes

McGarry

, et al. Dysregulated cytokine expression in lesional and nonlesional skin in hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol 2015; 173: 1431–1439.

58.

Lima

Karl

Giner

, et al. Keratinocytes and neutrophils are important sources of proinflammatory molecules in hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol 2016; 174: 514–521.

59.

Schlapbach

Hanni

Yawalkar

, et al. Expression of the IL-23/Th17 pathway in lesions of hidradenitis suppurativa. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011; 65: 790–798.

60.

Cho

Suh

Lee

, et al. IL-17 and IL-22 enhance skin inflammation by stimulating the secretion of IL-1beta by keratinocytes via the ROS–NLRP3-caspase-1 pathway. Int Immunol 2012; 24: 147–158.

61.

Di Caprio

Balato

Caiazzo

, et al. IL-36 cytokines are increased in acne and hidradenitis suppurativa. Arch Dermatol Res 2017; 309: 673–678.

62.

Vigne

Palmer

Martin

, et al. IL-36 signaling amplifies Th1 responses by enhancing proliferation and Th1 polarization of naive CD4+ T cells. Blood 2012; 120: 3478–3487.

63.

Scala

Di Caprio

Cacciapuoti

, et al. A new T helper 17 cytokine in hidradenitis suppurativa: antimicrobial and proinflammatory role of interleukin-26. Br J Dermatol. Epub ahead of print 23 June 2019. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.17854.

64.

Larochette

Miot

Poli

, et al. IL-26, a cytokine with roles in extracellular DNA-induced inflammation and microbial defense. Front Immunol 2019; 10: 204.

65.

Wolk

Warszawska

Hoeflich

, et al. Deficiency of IL-22 contributes to a chronic inflammatory disease: pathogenetic mechanisms in acne inversa. J Immunol 2011; 186: 1228–1239.

66.

Murano

Okamoto

Ito

, et al. Hes1 promotes the IL-22-mediated antimicrobial response by enhancing STAT3-dependent transcription in human intestinal epithelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2014; 443: 840–846.

67.

Marzano

Ceccherini

Gattorno

, et al. Association of pyoderma gangrenosum, acne, and suppurative hidradenitis (PASH) shares genetic and cytokine profiles with other autoinflammatory diseases. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014; 93: e187.

68.

Mozeika

Pilmane

Nurnberg

, et al. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha and matrix metalloproteinase-2 are expressed strongly in hidradenitis suppurativa. Acta Derm Venereol 2013; 93: 301–304.

69.

Tsaousi

Witte

, et al. MMP8 is increased in lesions and blood of acne inversa patients: a potential link to skin destruction and metabolic alterations. Mediators Inflamm 2016; 2016: 1–8.

70.

Agarwal

Misra

Aggarwal

Interleukin 17 levels are increased in juvenile idiopathic arthritis synovial fluid and induce synovial fibroblasts to produce proinflammatory cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases. J Rheumatol 2008; 35: 515–519.

71.

Shanmugam

Jones

McNish

, et al. Transcriptome patterns in hidradenitis suppurativa: support for the role of antimicrobial peptides and interferon pathways in disease pathogenesis. Clin Exp Dermatol. Epub ahead of print 24 April 2019. DOI: 10.1111/ced.13959.

72.

Hofmann

Saborowski

Lange

, et al. Expression of innate defense antimicrobial peptides in hidradenitis suppurativa. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 66: 966–974.

73.

Coates

Mariottoni

Corcoran

, et al. The skin transcriptome in hidradenitis suppurativa uncovers an antimicrobial and sweat gland gene signature which has distinct overlap with wounded skin. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0216249.

74.

Bechara

Sand

Skrygan

, et al. Acne inversa: evaluating antimicrobial peptides and proteins. Ann Dermatol 2012; 24: 393–397.

75.

Schlapbach

Yawalkar

Hunger

RE.

Human β-defensin-2 and psoriasin are overexpressed in lesions of acne inversa. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 61: 58–65.

76.

Hessam

Sand

Gambichler

, et al. Correlation of inflammatory serum markers with disease severity in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 73: 998–1005.

77.

Jimenez-Gallo

de la Varga-Martinez

Ossorio-Garcia

, et al. The clinical significance of increased serum proinflammatory cytokines, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. Mediators Inflamm 2017; 2017: 1–8.

78.

Matusiak

Bieniek

Szepietowski

JC.

Increased serum tumour necrosis factor-alpha in hidradenitis suppurativa patients: is there a basis for treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha agents?

Acta Derm Venereol 2009; 89: 601–603.

79.

Matusiak

Szczech

Bieniek

, et al. Increased interleukin (IL)-17 serum levels in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: implications for treatment with anti-IL-17 agents. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017; 76: 670–675.

80.

Montaudie

Seitz-Polski

Cornille

, et al. Interleukin 6 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein are potential predictive markers of response to infliximab in hidradenitis suppurativa. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017; 76: 156–158.

81.

Yao

Thomsen

SF.

The role of interleukin-17 in the pathogenesis of hidradenitis suppurativa. Dermatol Online J 2017; 23. pii: 13030/qt8rw2j9zv.

82.

Blok

Brodmerkel

, et al. Ustekinumab in hidradenitis suppurativa: clinical results and a search for potential biomarkers in serum. Br J Dermatol 2016; 174: 839–846.

83.

Kanni

Tzanetakou

Savva

, et al. Compartmentalized cytokine responses in hidradenitis suppurativa. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0130522.

84.

Blok

Brodmerkel

, et al. Gene expression profiling of skin and blood in hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol 2016; 174: 1392–1394.

85.

Ring

Riis Mikkelsen

Miller

, et al. The bacteriology of hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review. Exp Dermatol 2015; 24: 727–731.

86.

Lapins

Jarstrand

Emtestam

Coagulase-negative staphylococci are the most common bacteria found in cultures from the deep portions of hidradenitis suppurativa lesions, as obtained by carbon dioxide laser surgery. Br J Dermatol 1999; 140: 90–95.

87.

Sartorius

Killasli

Oprica

, et al. Bacteriology of hidradenitis suppurativa exacerbations and deep tissue cultures obtained during carbon dioxide laser treatment. Br J Dermatol 2012; 166: 879–883.

88.

Guet-Revillet

Jais

Ungeheuer

, et al. The microbiological landscape of anaerobic infections in hidradenitis suppurativa: a prospective metagenomic study. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 65: 282–291.

89.

Ring

Sigsgaard

Thorsen

, et al. The microbiome of tunnels in hidradenitis suppurativa patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019; 33: 1775–1780.

90.

Ring

Thorsen

Saunte

, et al. The follicular skin microbiome in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa and healthy controls. JAMA Dermatol 2017; 153: 897–905.

91.

Okoye

Vlassova

Olowoyeye

, et al. Bacterial biofilm in acute lesions of hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol 2017; 176: 241–243.

92.

Ring

Bay

Nilsson

, et al. Bacterial biofilm in chronic lesions of hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol 2017; 176: 993–1000.

93.

Kathju

Lasko

Stoodley

Considering hidradenitis suppurativa as a bacterial biofilm disease. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2012; 65: 385–389.

94.

Hurley

Axillary hyperhidrosis, apocrine bromhidrosis, hidradenitis suppurativa, and familial benign pemphigus: surgical approach. In: Roenigk

Roenigk

(eds) Dermatologic surgery. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1989, pp.729–739.

95.

Kimball

Kerdel

Adams

, et al. Adalimumab for the treatment of moderate to severe Hidradenitis suppurativa: a parallel randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157: 846–855.

96.

Kimball

Jemec

Yang

, et al. Assessing the validity, responsiveness and meaningfulness of the hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR) as the clinical endpoint for hidradenitis suppurativa treatment. Br J Dermatol 2014; 171: 1434–1442.

97.

Alikhan

Sayed

Alavi

, et al. North American clinical management guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa: a publication from the United States and Canadian hidradenitis suppurativa foundations: part II: topical, intralesional, and systemic medical management. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 81: 91–101.

98.

Matusiak

Bieniek

Szepietowski

JC.

Soluble interleukin-2 receptor serum level is a useful marker of hidradenitis suppurativa clinical staging. Biomarkers 2009; 14: 432–437.

99.

Thorlacius

Ingram

Villumsen

, et al. A core domain set for hidradenitis suppurativa trial outcomes: an international Delphi process. Br J Dermatol 2018; 179: 642–650.

100.

Zouboulis

Desai

Emtestam

, et al. European S1 guideline for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2015; 29: 619–644.

101.

Mandell

Orr

Koch

, et al. Large variations in clinical antibiotic activity against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms of periprosthetic joint infection isolates. J Orthop Res 2019; 37: 1604–1609.

102.

Sun

Shigemi

Tanaka

, et al. Tetracyclines downregulate the production of LPS-induced cytokines and chemokines in THP-1 cells via ERK, p38, and nuclear factor- κB signaling pathways. Biochem Biophys Rep 2015; 4: 397–404.

103.

Clemmensen

OJ.

Topical treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa with clindamycin. Int J Dermatol 1983; 22: 325–328.

104.

Jemec

Wendelboe

Topical clindamycin versus systemic tetracycline in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 39: 971–974.

105.

Gener

Canoui-Poitrine

Revuz

, et al. Combination therapy with clindamycin and rifampicin for hidradenitis suppurativa: a series of 116 consecutive patients. Dermatology 2009; 219: 148–154.

106.

Mendonca

Griffiths

CE.

Clindamycin and rifampicin combination therapy for hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol 2006; 154: 977–978.

107.

Del Rosso

Schmidt

. A review of the anti-inflammatory properties of clindamycin in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Cutis 2010; 85: 15–24.

108.

Zimmerli

Sendi

Role of rifampin against staphylococcal biofilm infections in vitro, in animal models, and in orthopedic-device-related infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019; 63. pii: e01746-18.

109.

Chen

, et al. Rifampicin attenuates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by inhibiting pathogenic Th17 cells responses. J Neurochem 2016; 139: 1151–1162.

110.

Yuhas

Berent

Ovadiah

, et al. Rifampin augments cytokine-induced nitric oxide production in human alveolar epithelial cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50: 396–398.

111.

Join-Lambert

Coignard

Jais

, et al. Efficacy of rifampin-moxifloxacin-metronidazole combination therapy in hidradenitis suppurativa. Dermatology 2011; 222: 49–58.

112.

Choi

Song

Kim

, et al. Effect of moxifloxacin on production of proinflammatory cytokines from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47: 3704–3707.

113.

Weiss

Shalit

Blau

, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of moxifloxacin on activated human monocytic cells: inhibition of NF-kappaB and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and of synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48: 1974–1982.

114.

Graham

Lucasti

Malafaia

, et al. Ertapenem once daily versus piperacillin-tazobactam 4 times per day for treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections in adults: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34: 1460–1468.

115.

Join-Lambert

Coignard-Biehler

Jais

, et al. Efficacy of ertapenem in severe hidradenitis suppurativa: a pilot study in a cohort of 30 consecutive patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016; 71: 513–520.

116.

Savage

Flood

Porter

, et al. TNF-alpha inhibitors in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2019; 10: 2040622319851640.

117.

Kimball

Okun

Williams

, et al. Two phase 3 trials of adalimumab for hidradenitis suppurativa. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 422–434.

118.

Grant

Gonzalez

Montgomery

, et al. Infliximab therapy for patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 62: 205–217.

119.

van Rappard

Leenarts

Meijerink-van

‘t

Oost

, et al. Comparing treatment outcome of infliximab and adalimumab in patients with severe hidradenitis suppurativa. J Dermatolog Treat 2012; 23: 284–289.

120.

Moriarty

Jiyad

Creamer

Four-weekly infliximab in the treatment of severe hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol 2014; 170: 986–987.

121.

Lim

SYD

Oon

. Systematic review of immunomodulatory therapies for hidradenitis suppurativa. Biologics 2019; 13: 53–78.

122.

Tzanetakou

Kanni

Giatrakou

, et al. Safety and efficacy of anakinra in severe hidradenitis suppurativa: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol 2016; 152: 52–59.

123.

Casseres

Kahn

Her

, et al. Guselkumab in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa: a retrospective chart review. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 81: 265–267.

124.

Prussick

Rothstein

Joshipura

, et al. Open-label, investigator-initiated, single-site exploratory trial evaluating secukinumab, an anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, for patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol 2019; 181: 609–611.

125.

Vossen

van Doorn

MBA

van der Zee

, et al. Apremilast for moderate hidradenitis suppurativa: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 80: 80–88.

126.

Saunte

DML

Jemec

GBE

. Hidradenitis suppurativa: advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA 2017; 318: 2019–2032.

Hidradenitis suppurativa: infection,autoimmunity,or both?

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Epidemiology

Associations with metabolic disease, autoimmune rheumatic diseases, and other conditions

Pathogenesis

General aspects

What happens at the lesion?

Histopathology

Cytokines-role of TNF, IL-17, and IL-1

Matrix metalloproteinases and AMPs

Serum

Microbiome and biofilms

Severity and scores of HS

Treatment

Antibiotics

Tetracyclines

Clindamycin, rifampicin

Moxifloxacin, rifampicin, and metronidazole

Ertapenem

Biologics

Conclusion

Footnotes

Funding

Conflict of interest statement

ORCID iDs

References