Abstract
The human requirement for vitamin D is achieved primarily through the synthesis of this prehormone in the skin during exposure to ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation, with only a minor contribution from the diet, year round. Achieving optimal vitamin D status is therefore largely dependent upon adequate exposure of the skin to sunlight, however, the length of exposure required varies with latitude and season, and is also dependent upon skin pigmentation, with darker skin requiring greater exposure than fair skin due to the protective effects of melanin against UVB radiation. In northern European latitudes, where UVB radiation between the months of October and March is of insufficient intensity for the synthesis of vitamin D via this route, vitamin D deficiency is a public health concern, particularly for south Asian diaspora and other dark-skinned ethnic minority communities. The consequences of vitamin D deficiency include poor bone health, including rickets and osteomalacia. In addition, there is increasing awareness of an important role for vitamin D in the development and progression of chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes, which is prevalent in south Asian populations. The aim of this review is to examine some of the most recent reports of vitamin D status in south Asian diaspora communities, and to explore its impact on bone health. In addition, we will examine the putative association between type 2 diabetes and vitamin D deficiency in south Asian populations and the current guidelines for treatment of vitamin D deficiency of south Asians in primary care settings.
Introduction
Vitamin D can be obtained from diet (oily fish and liver oils), however, the human requirement for vitamin D is achieved primarily through the synthesis of this prehormone in the skin during exposure to ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation, with only a minor contribution from the diet, year round.1,2 Vitamin D status is assessed by measuring 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D] levels circulating in the blood plasma or serum. Although there has been much debate over the definition of adequate and optimal vitamin D status based on blood 25(OH)D levels, there is general consensus that values < 25 nmol/l (10 ng/ml) indicate deficiency and ≥50 nmol/l (20 ng/ml) indicate sufficiency. The variations to this, proposed by different international expert panels are effectively summarised by Spiro and Buttriss. 3
The potential consequences of vitamin D deficiency are wide ranging. Vitamin D receptors are present in many cell types and almost every human tissue, and vitamin D is an important regulator of the expression of genes regulating key metabolic processes. It is not surprising, therefore, that deficiency has been linked to increased prevalence of a broad range of medical conditions, including muscular skeletal disorders, cardiovascular disease, cancer, autoimmune disorders and type 2 diabetes. 4
Achieving optimal vitamin D status is largely dependent upon adequate exposure of the skin to sunlight, however, the length of exposure required varies with latitude and season. It is also dependent upon skin pigmentation, with darker skin requiring greater exposure than fair skin because melanin absorbs UVB radiation in the 290–320 nm range and functions as a light filter determining the amount of incident UV radiation available for the cutaneous production of previtamin D3. 5 In northern European latitudes, UVB radiation between the months of October and March is of insufficient intensity for the synthesis of vitamin D via this route, thus deficiency is of public health concern, particularly for south Asian (SA) diaspora (defined as people originating from India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh) and other darker-skinned ethnic minority communities in the UK.6,7
Risk factors for south Asian communities in the UK
Vitamin D deficiency is estimated to affect the majority of the UK SA population, with one report suggesting that this may be as high as 94% of the SA population in the winter, and 82% in the summer. 8 This high prevalence can be accounted for by several risk factors that are particular to the SA population, including poor dietary intake of vitamin D, as many SAs in the UK follow religions with an emphasis on a vegetarian diet, which is low in vitamin D content. 9 However, some Banglasheshi populations may have a lower prevalence of deficiency due to a diet that includes the regular consumption of oily fish. The protective effect of melanin in SA skin that limits cutaneous vitamin D synthesis is compounded by the cultural needs to cover the body amongst many SA women. Studies conducted around the world report lower vitamin D status in veiled women compared with males or females adopting Western dress, 10 however, sun avoidance when outside is common to both male and female SA adults. Kift et al. 11 conducted a prospective cohort study comparing the seasonal variation in vitamin D status in SA and white adults living in Manchester, UK over a 12-month period. The study revealed a marked seasonal variation in both groups. In summer, the median 25(OH)D level in the SA group was 9.0 ng/ml, falling to 5.8 ng/ml in winter. 11 This compared with values in the white population of 26.2 ng/ml in summer and 18.9 ng/ml in winter. The majority of SAs never reached sufficiency in vitamin D status. Ultraviolet (UV) dosimeters used to record personal UV exposure revealed lower UV exposure among SAs, despite spending similar amounts of time outdoors. Sun exposure diaries completed by the participants also reported lower amounts of skin surface exposure in the SA group suggesting sun avoidance when outside. 11 Other studies using simulated courses of summer sunlight in SA adults in controlled dosimetric conditions have confirmed the efficacy of sunlight exposure doses equivalent to 45 minutes of unshaded noontime summer sunlight at 53.5°N (Manchester, United Kingdom) in raising vitamin D status.12,13 While it has been reported that a higher dose of UV radiation is required to increase plasma 25(OH)D concentration in SAs than Whites, the capacity to produce vitamin D is no different between the two ethnic groups. 14
Bone health
Despite the well established mechanistic link between vitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcium homeostasis described in other papers within this special edition of Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Diseases, evidence for an impact of poor vitamin D status on bone health in UK SA populations is conflicting.
Observational studies exploring the relationship between vitamin D status, bone quality and biochemical markers of bone turnover have been undertaken. Lowe et al. 15 studied the vitamin D status and markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal White and SA women living in the UK. Bone quality was assessed using broadband ultrasound attenuation. Although the SA women had significantly higher serum PTH and lower 25(OH)D concentrations than White women, this was not associated with significantly higher markers of bone resorption, or reduced bone quality in the SA women. Similar results were reported by Patel et al., 7 who undertook a large cross-sectional study examining vitamin D status and numerous health outcomes, including osteoporosis in UK minority ethnic groups. The study included over 1000 SA adults, aged > 45 years, recruited from 20 primary care practices in Birmingham, UK. Severe vitamin D deficiency (25(OH)D < 6 ug/l) was reported in 42% of the SA participants, however, poor vitamin D status was not found to be associated with elevated incidence of osteoporosis, measured using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), in this ethnic group. 7 In contrast, in a study of young SA women living in the UK (mean age 29 years), 16 DXA revealed that a decrease in serum 25(OH)D of ≤15 ng/ml was associated with a reduction in bone mass at the hip and wrist.
Intervention studies have also been undertaken to examine the effect of vitamin D supplementation of deficient women on bone health. In a randomized control trial (RCT) conducted in postmenopausal SA women, Von Hurst 17 reported that vitamin D supplementation [4000 IU (100 µg) vitamin D3 daily] significantly increased serum 25(OH)D from median (25th, 75th percentiles) 21 (11, 40) to 75 (55, 84) nmol/l, and this was associated with significantly lower markers of bone resorption compared with the placebo control group. They concluded that correcting vitamin D deficiency in older women suppresses the age-induced increase in bone turnover and reduces bone resorption that would normally be exacerbated in conditions of low serum 25(OH)D. 17 A recent study examining tibial tenderness as a diagnostic measure of vitamin D status also reported a positive improvement in tenderness score following high-dose vitamin D supplementation [1.8 million IU (45 mg) of vitamin D3 in split doses], in Pakistani women at high risk for deficiency. 18
As mentioned previously, 25(OH)D status exhibits marked seasonal variation, however, this variation is muted in SA women due to reduced sunlight exposure during the summer months. Darling et al. 19 hypothesized that a high degree of seasonal cycling of 25(OH)D increased bone resorption, and conducted a longitudinal study of SA and White women in which 25(OH)D was measured once per season, along with PTH and C-terminal telopetide of type-1 collagen (CTX) which is released during the resorption of mature bone. The study confirmed this hypothesis, revealing that the amplitude of the seasonal change in 25(OH)D was positively associated with elevated PTH and CTX. 19 This finding also concurs with the hypothesis put forward by Vieth that large seasonal fluctuations in 25(OH)D are associated with adverse health outcomes. 20
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent in diabetic patients, and could be as high as in 91% patients with diabetes. 21 While this observation is not evidence for a causal link, vitamin-D-specific receptors have been identified in β-pancreatic cells 22 and there is some evidence suggesting a crucial role for vitamin D status in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), via direct and indirect mechanisms that impact on β-cell function. 23 However, the evidence from human studies remains conflicting.
A systematic review undertaken by Mitri et al. 24 examined both longitudinal observation studies of vitamin D status and RCTs of vitamin D supplementation on glycaemic outcomes. Meta-analysis of the longitudinal data from three observational cohort studies revealed that there was a statistically significant overall reduction in relative risk of the development of newly diagnosed T2DM in those who consumed >12.6 µg/day compared with those who consumed <5 µg/day. Combining data from five cohort studies that measured baseline blood 25(OH)D concentration revealed that there was a significant inverse relationship between blood 25(OH)D and risk of developing T2DM, with individuals with a 25(OH)D > 25 ng/ml having a 43% lower risk than those with 25(OH)D < 14 ng/ml. 24 This observation was confirmed in a recent prospective observational study of prediabetic patients in the USA, after adjusting for other lifestyle factors. 25 Mitri 24 undertook an analysis of the data from three RCTs identified by the systematic search that examined the impact of infrequent, high-dose vitamin D supplementation (100,000 IU given once; 40,000 IU/week for 26 weeks; 100,000 or 200,000 IU given once) in patients with established T2DM. The analysis revealed no improvement in the glycaemic indicators in these patients. In addition, summarising data from four RCTs that examined the impact of vitamin D supplementation (doses ranging from 5714 to 8571 IU/day) on insulin resistance in participants with normal glucose tolerance revealed no significant effect, with the exception of one trial 26 that reported an improvement in insulin resistance following vitamin D supplementation (4000 IU/day) in nondiabetic SA women with insulin resistance at baseline. Taken together, this indicates that there is an inverse relationship between vitamin D status and risk of developing T2DM, however ‘normalising’ vitamin D status through supplementation in patients with established T2DM does not improve glycaemic outcomes; however, there may be some genetically determined differences in this glycaemic response to supplementation that also involves parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcium metabolism. 27
Studies in south Asian populations with type 2 diabetes mellitus
SA communities have a four-to-six-fold greater rate of people with T2DM than White British communities, 28 and there have been a number of recent studies investigating the relationship with vitamin D status and T2DM in this ethnic group. A small cross-sectional study conducted in SAs in the UK revealed a significantly higher prevalence of hypovitaminosis [defined as a 25(OH)D < 50 nmol/l] in with T2DM (83%) compared with the nondiabetic control group (70%), although there was no difference in the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency [defined as 25(OH)D < 12.5 nmol/l] between the two groups (13% versus 19%, respectively). 29 In addition, there were no overall significant differences in the mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels between patients with and without vitamin D deficiency, however, vitamin D deficient women did have higher HbA1c levels than the rest of the diabetic cohort. Linear regression analysis revealed that vitamin D deficiency was independently related to HbA1c in women with T2DM, but not in men. 29
Metabolic syndrome (a condition that includes insulin resistance, visceral adiposity, atherogenic dyslipidemia and endothelial dysfunction 30 ) is also prevalent in SA populations. George et al. 31 examined the association between 25(OH)D and PTH with metabolic syndrome in SA (Indian) adults living in South Africa to determine whether ethnic differences in 25(OH)D levels or PTH levels contribute to difference in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome. The study revealed that SAs had significantly higher fasting glucose, lower 25(OH)D levels and were more insulin resistant than non SAs. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency (<30 nmol/l) was 3% in South Africans and 15% in SAs. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was higher in the SAs (46%), compared with South Africans (19%), however, no statistically significant association between vitamin D status, and metabolic syndrome or its components was identified. 31 Similarly, a study in Oslo, Norway was undertaken to examine the reason for the greater prevalence of insulin resistance and T2DM in people of SA ethnicity. 32 Vitamin D deficient patients [25(OH)D ≤ 50 nmol/l] with T2DM were recruited, 43 of northern European origin and 19 SA. There was evidence of ethnic differences in fasting endogenous glucose production, with higher levels found in SAs, however, there was no significant correlation between 25(OH)D and insulin sensitivity or insulin secretion in either ethnic group or in the cohort as a whole. 32
Gestational diabetes is also more prevalent in SA women than in White women. 33 Whitelaw et al. 34 undertook a cross-sectional study in UK pregnant women undergoing glucose tolerance testing at 26 weeks’ gestation to explore potential links between lower vitamin D status, ethnicity and glucose metabolism during pregnancy. Of the 1467 women included in the study, 53.4% of the women were of SA origin, with 40.6% describing themselves as European (including British). The selection criteria excluded women with pregestational diabetes. Vitamin D status, PTH levels, plasma glucose, serum insulin and calcium were included in the biochemical analyses. Vitamin D status was significantly higher in the European compared with the SA women, with 93% of SA and 66% of European women deficient [25(OH)D < 20 ng/ml]. 34 Fasting and postchallenge glucose, and fasting insulin concentrations were lower among European women than SA women, however, there were no statistically significant associations between vitamin D status and glucose tolerance in pregnancy, and it was concluded that lower 25(OH)D does not explain ethnic differences in the risk of gestational diabetes. However, some interesting associations between serum calcium and fasting insulin and the risk of developing gestational diabetes were noted, irrespective of ethnicity in this cohort. 34
Combinations of calcium and vitamin D have also been studied. One of the largest observational studies, the Women’s Health Initiative study of 33,951 participants receiving calcium plus vitamin D supplements (1000 mg Ca and 400 IU Vitamin D3 daily), revealed there was no reduction in the risk of developing diabetes over 7 years. 35 Interestingly, a study conducted in the UK 36 investigated the effect of vitamin D (dose) and calcium (dose) supplementation on glycaemic control in SA patients with established T2DM and vitamin D inadequacy. A total of 52 patients diagnosed with T2DM for >3 years were included in this study. At baseline, 29 were vitamin D deficient (<25 nmol/l) and 23 insufficient (≤50 nmol/l). Supplementation with 10 µg/day vitamin D and 1200 mg calcium/day resulted in an increase in serum 25(OH)D to normal levels, and a decrease in HbA1c. There was a significant negative correlation between change in Hb1Ac and change in vitamin D levels post-treatment (r –0.305) suggesting that vitamin D replacement therapy combined with calcium may be beneficial for glycaemic control in SA patients. 36
Management of vitamin D deficiency in South Asians within the primary care setting
In 2012, the Chief Medical Officers for the United Kingdom sent out a letter to General Practitioners, Practice Nurses Health Visitors and Community Pharmacists to raise the awareness of vitamin D deficiency, particularly amongst the high risk groups in UK population which include people who have darker skin of SA origin. 37 They recommended that these groups of patients should take a daily supplement containing 10 μg (400 IU) of vitamin D. This has recently been confirmed by the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) in the most recent (2016) report on vitamin D and health, 38 in which a reference nutrient intake (RNI) of 10 μg/day is now recommended for all individuals over the age of 4 years, including ‘population groups at increased risk of vitamin D deficiency’. Recognizing that this is difficult to achieve from natural dietary sources unless oily fish is consumed daily, Public Health England also suggests that people from at-risk groups, including darker-skinned ethnic minorities, should consider taking a daily supplement of 10 μg throughout the year.
In 2014, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) released guidelines entitled ‘Vitamin D: increasing supplement use in at-risk groups’. 39 The ‘at risk’ group included those who have low or no exposure to the sun, including those who cover their skin for cultural reasons and people with darker skin, including SAs. The emphasis in this guideline is around a multi-agency approach in raising the awareness of vitamin D deficiency, the increased availability of vitamin D products, and recommending that suitable supplements should be available to people with particular dietary needs (for example, people who avoid nuts, are vegan, or have a halal or kosher diet). Testing of vitamin D status if someone has symptoms of deficiency, or is at very high risk, was also recommended.
There is broad acceptance amongst healthcare professionals and Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) of the need to raise awareness of Vitamin D deficiency, not only amongst the healthcare professionals, but also in the UK population, and a general consensus that there is no need to test the vitamin D status routinely in asymptomatic patients. In symptomatic patients, there is a need to measure the vitamin D status if one or more other risk factors are present. The loading dose and maintenance dose of vitamin D can then be prescribed, based on the status of the individual. An example of a typical flowchart produced by CCGs to guide nonspecialist clinicians through the diagnosis and treatment of vitamin D deficiency is shown in Figure 1. This example is taken from the Lancashire Medicines Manage-ment Group (LMMG). 40 It must be noted that since this article was accepted for publication, we have been informed by the LMMG that this flowchart has been updated (February 2017) and that the question of conducting the vitamin D assay at the same time as the other blood tests (U&Es, LFTs, etc.) is currently being considered.

Adult patient pathway for vitamin D deficiency in Primary Care, version 2, 2014. 40
As most guidelines do not recommend the testing of vitamin D status in asymptomatic adults, SAs remain at high risk of deficiency and potential longer-term sequelae due to the very high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in this population, with most individuals remaining asymptomatic. However, the most recent SACN report raises the RNI from 0 (1991) to 10 µg/d for all individuals aged 4 years and above. 38 Current guidelines recommend prevention through advice on regular sunlight exposure, dietary sources of vitamin D and use of ‘over the counter’ vitamin D supplements, giving patient control of vitamin D supplementation. The choice of product should be led by patient preference, taking into consideration their cultural or religious beliefs. One specific example is gelatin, which is usually derived from pigs and commonly used to encapsulate medications and supplements. In Islam, any products derived from pigs are considered to be unlawful, or ‘not Halal’. Where there is no choice regarding products containing gelatine, there is a statement from WHO that permits Muslims to take medicines encapsulated by gelatine, however this still remains a contentious issue amongst Islamic leaders and scholars.
Summary
While there is compelling evidence for an association between vitamin D deficiency and chronic conditions, including poor bone health and T2DM, all of which are prevalent in SA ethnic minority groups in the UK, unequivocal evidence of a causal mechanism remains elusive. The most recent reports from SACN and Public Health England recommend that in order to protect musculoskeletal health, serum 25(OH)D should not fall below 25 nmol/l, and that intakes of 10 µg/day are recommended for the UK population over 4 years of age. For SA ethnic minority groups in the UK, meeting these recommendations is likely to require the use of vitamin D supplements year round. New patient care guidelines for nonspecialists are required to emphasize this in the primary care setting.
Footnotes
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
