Translation and validation of the Swedish version of the problematic experience of therapy scale (PETS-Swe) for patients with peripheral nerve injuries in the hand

Abstract

Introduction

The Problematic Experience of Therapy Scale (PETS) identifies barriers to home-based exercise programs but has not been validated in hand therapy populations. This study aimed to translate the extended PETS into Swedish and evaluate its content and construct validity in patients undergoing early sensory relearning following peripheral nerve injury.

Methods

The PETS was translated into Swedish (PETS-Swe) following established cross-cultural adaptation guidelines. Fifty-three patients with peripheral nerve injuries completed the PETS-Swe four weeks into a home-based sensory relearning program. Exercise adherence was monitored using a daily exercise diary. Content validity was assessed through expert review (face validity) and patient ratings of item relevance, clarity, and ambiguity. Item-level (I-CVI) and scale-level (SCVI) content validity indices were calculated, alongside modified kappa statistics for interrater agreement. Construct validity was examined using Spearman’s correlation between PETS-Swe scores and reported exercise frequency.

Results

Translation revealed no major discrepancies. Most items demonstrated high content validity (I-CVI and S-CVI >0.8), though lower relevance scores were observed in the technical subscale (I-CVI: 0.65–0.69). Interrater agreement was good to excellent across all items (K >0.74 for items 1–17; K = 0.6–0.74 for items 18–20). Expert reviewers confirmed strong face validity. Moderate negative correlations were found between PETS-Swe scores and exercise adherence (rho = –0.40 to exercise log; –0.57 to diary), supporting construct validity.

Discussion

The Swedish version of the extended PETS is a valid tool for identifying barriers to home-based sensory relearning in patients with peripheral nerve injuries undergoing hand therapy.

Keywords

adherence hand sensory relearning psychometric properties

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lundborg

Rosen

. Hand function after nerve repair. Acta Physiol 2007; 189: 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.2006.01653.x

Witzel

Rohde

Brushart

. Pathway sampling by regenerating peripheral axons. J Comp Neurol 2005; 485: 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.20436

Kandel

Koester

Mack

, et al. Principles of neural scinece. 6th ed. McGrow Hill, 2021.

Jerosch-Herold

. Sensory relearning in peripheral nerve disorders of the hand: a web-based survey and Delphi consensus method. J Hand Ther 2011; 24: 292–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2011.05.002

Rosén

Björkman

Lundborg

. Sensory relearning and the plastic brain. In: Skirven

Osterman

Fedorcczy

(eds). Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity. 7th ed.

Elsevier, Inc.

2021, pp. 597–608.

Cheng

Hung

Wong

, et al. A prospective study of early tactile stimulation after digital nerve repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001: 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200103000-00020

Miller

Chester

Jerosch-Herold

. Effects of sensory reeducation programs on functional hand sensibility after median and ulnar repair: a systematic review. J Hand Ther 2012; 25: 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2012.04.001

Rosen

Lundborg

. Enhanced sensory recovery after median nerve repair using cortical audio-tactile interaction. A randomised multicentre study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2007; 32: 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsb.2006.08.019

Rosén

Vikström

Turner

, et al. Enhanced early sensory outcome after nerve repair as a result of immediate post-operative re-learning: a randomized controlled trial. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2015; 40: 598–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193414553163

10.

Vikström

Carlsson

Rosén

, et al. Patients’ views on early sensory relearning following nerve repair-a Q-methodology study. J Hand Ther 2018; 31: 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2017.07.003

11.

Haynes

. Introduction. In: Haynes

Taylor

Sacket

(eds). Compliance in health care. The John Hopkins University Press 1979, pp. 1–10.

12.

O'Brien

. The evidence on ways to improve patient’s adherence in hand therapy. J Hand Ther 2012; 25: 247–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2012.03.006

13.

Groth

Wilder

Young

. The impact of compliance on the rehabilitation of patients with mallet finger injuries. J Hand Ther 1994; 7: 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80037-8

14.

Lyngcoln

Taylor

Pizzari

, et al. The relationship between adherence to hand therapy and short-term outcome after distal radius fracture. J Hand Ther 2005; 18: 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2004.10.008

15.

Leijon

Faskunger

Bendtsen

, et al.

Who is not adhering to physical activity referrals, and why?

Scand J Prim Health Care 2011; 29: 234–240. https://doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2011.628238

16.

Yardley

Kirby

. Evaluation of booklet-based self-management of symptoms in ménière disease: a randomized controlled trial. Psychosom Med 2006; 68: 762–769. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000232269.17906.92

17.

Mokkink

Terwee

Knol

, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010; 10: 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-22

18.

Mokkink

Terwee

Patrick

, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010; 19: 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8

19.

Xia

Bai

Dai

, et al. The effects of sensory re-education on hand function recovery after peripheral nerve repair: a systematic review. Neuro Rehab 2021; 48: 293–304. https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-201612

20.

Association

. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human participants. Jama 2025; 333: 71–74. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.21972

21.

Kirby

Donovan-Hall

Yardley

. Measuring barriers to adherence: validation of the problematic experiences of therapy scale. Disabil Rehabil 2014; 36: 1924–1929. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2013.876106

22.

Wild

Grove

Martin

, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health 2005; 8: 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x

23.

Mokkink

Terwee

Patrick

, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006

24.

Polit

Beck

Owen

. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 2007; 30: 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199

25.

Mukaka

. Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J 2012; 24: 69–71.

26.

Cicchetti

Sparrow

. Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. Am J Ment Defic 1981; 86: 127–137.

27.

Schober

Boer

Schwarte

. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg 2018; 126: 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002864

28.

Essery

Geraghty

Kirby

, et al. Predictors of adherence to home-based physical therapies: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2017; 39: 519–534. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2016.1153160

29.

Ahmad

Haber

Bokor

. The influence of intraoperative factors and postoperative rehabilitation compliance on the integrity of the rotator cuff after arthroscopic repair. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2015; 24: 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.050

30.

Stisen

Mechlenburg

Bearne

, et al. Exploring needs, barriers to, and facilitators of rehabilitation exercise following revision hip replacement - a grounded theory study. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46: 5012–5020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2295008

31.

Svingen

Arner

Turesson

. Patients' experiences of flexor tendon rehabilitation in relation to adherence: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45: 1115–1123. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2051081

32.

Cheng

Chau

JPC

Hon

KLE

, et al. Assessment of adherence to eczema treatment in Hong Kong children. J Dermatol Treat 2019; 30: 790–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2019.1573304

33.

Bollen

Dean

Siegert

, et al. A systematic review of measures of self-reported adherence to unsupervised home-based rehabilitation exercise programmes, and their psychometric properties. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e005044. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005044

34.

Frost

Levati

McClurg

, et al. What adherence measures should be used in trials of home-based rehabilitation interventions? A systematic review of the validity, reliability, and acceptability of measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 98: 1241–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.08.482

35.

Weir

Enobun

Livesey

, et al. Increased actual sling wear is associated with better early patient-reported and image-based outcomes after shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2023; 32: 1392–1400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.127

36.

O'Brien

. Adherence to therapeutic splint wear in adults with acute upper limb injuries: a systematic review. Hand Ther 2010; 15: 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1258/ht.2009.009025

37.

Terwee

Prinsen

CAC

Chiarotto

, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2018; 27: 1159–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0

38.

Prinsen

Mokkink

Bouter

, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments. Qual Life Res 2016; 25: 21.

39.

Boel

Kristensen

Vinther

, et al. Empowering patients: qualitative insights into decisional needs in shared decision-making for post-operative rehabilitation after distal radius fracture. Disabil Rehabil 2025: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2598382

40.

Terwee

Bot

de Boer

, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012

41.

Altman

. Practical statistics for medical research. Champman & Hall 1991.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.28 MB

0.44 MB