To our knowledge, no previous studies have directly compared the effects of orthosis wear in males and females with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze whether there are differences between males and females in pain, hand function, and grip strength following hand-based orthosis wear.
Methods
The study included 14 male and 14 female participants with first- and second-degree CMC joint osteoarthritis. A hand-based orthosis was custom-molded for each participant. Pain, function, grip strength, and pinch strength were evaluated at baseline and after a 6-week period of orthosis wear.
Results
Twenty-eight participants (mean age: males 64.6 ± 5.1 years; females 63.5 ± 3.2 years) completed the study. After 6 weeks of orthosis use, both males and females showed significant improvements in grip strength, pinch strength, hand function, daily activity performance, and pain reduction (all p < .05). Although both sexes benefited similarly in grip strength, pain, and function, females reported significantly greater improvement in satisfaction with hand function (p = .020). Mean adherence was 84.75%, with higher compliance observed in females.
Conclusion
Although both groups experienced significant improvements in pain, function, grip strength, pinch strength, and overall satisfaction with orthosis wear, greater improvement in satisfaction with hand function was observed among females.
HeYLiZAlexanderPG, et al.Pathogenesis of osteoarthritis: risk factors, regulatory pathways in chondrocytes. Experimental Models2020; 9: 194.
2.
KloppenburgMvan BeestSKroonFPB. Thumb base osteoarthritis: a hand osteoarthritis subset requiring a distinct approach. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol2017; 31: 649–660.
3.
Gebauer GJJoA and Phenomenology. The creativity of the. Hand2019; 6: 185–193.
4.
NicholsDSOberhoferHMChimHJHC. Anatomy and biomechanics of the thumb carpometacarpal joint. Hand Clin2022; 38: 129–139.
5.
AdamsJBarrattPArdenNK, et al.The osteoarthritis thumb therapy (OTTER) II trial: a study protocol for a three-arm multi-centre randomised placebo controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and efficacy and cost-effectiveness of splints for symptomatic thumb base osteoarthritis. BMJ Open2019; 9: e028342.
6.
AllenKDThomaLMGolightlyYM. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil2022; 30: 184–195.
7.
van der OestMJWDurakuLSAndrinopoulouER, et al.The prevalence of radiographic thumb base osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. Osteoarthr Cartil2021; 29: 785–792.
8.
BlackALClarkAL. Sexual dimorphism in knee osteoarthritis: biomechanical variances and biological influences. J Orthop2022; 32: 104–108.
9.
RaiVDietzNEDilisioMF, et al.Vitamin D attenuates inflammation, fatty infiltration, and cartilage loss in the knee of hyperlipidemic microswine. Arthritis Res Ther2016; 18: 203.
10.
PeshkovaMLychaginALipinaM, et al.Gender-related aspects in osteoarthritis development and progression: a review. Int J Mol Sci2022; 23: 2767.
11.
GarfinkelRJDilisioMFAgrawalDK. Vitamin D and its effects on articular cartilage and osteoarthritis. Orthop J Sports Med2017; 5: 2325967117711376.
12.
HuangKCaiH. The interplay between osteoarthritis and osteoporosis: mechanisms, implications, and treatment considerations – a narrative review. Exp Gerontol2024; 197: 112614.
13.
SchneiderMTZhangJCriscoJJ, et al.Men and women have similarly shaped carpometacarpal joint bones. J Biomech2015; 48: 3420–3426.
14.
HalilajEMooreDCLaidlawDH, et al.The morphology of the thumb carpometacarpal joint does not differ between men and women, but changes with aging and early osteoarthritis. J Biomech2014; 47: 2709–2714.
15.
PollardBDixonDJohnstonM. Does the impact of osteoarthritis vary by age, gender and social deprivation? A community study using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Disabil Rehabil2014; 36: 1445–1451.
16.
LaitnerMHEricksonLCOrtmanE. Understanding the impact of sex and gender in osteoarthritis: assessing research gaps and unmet needs. J Womens Health2021; 30: 634–641.
17.
SegalNANilgesJMOoWMSex differences in osteoarthritis prevalence, pain perception, physical function and therapeutics. Osteoarthr Cartil2024; 32: 1045–1053.
18.
SrikanthVKFryerJLZhaiG, et al.A meta-analysis of sex differences prevalence, incidence and severity of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil2005; 13: 769–781.
19.
TschonMContarteseDPaganiS, et al.Gender and sex are key determinants in osteoarthritis not only confounding variables. A systematic review of clinical data. J Clin Med2021; 10: 3178.
20.
McQuillanTJKenneyDCriscoJJ, et al.Weaker functional pinch strength is associated with early thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res2016; 474: 557–561.
21.
MazzaDFBoonsriPSAroraA, et al.Relationships between diagnostic imaging of first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis and pain, functional status, and disease progression: a systematic review. Osteoarthr Cartil2024; 32: 476–492.
22.
AskewRLCookKFRevickiDA, et al.Evidence from diverse clinical populations supported clinical validity of PROMIS pain interference and pain behavior. J Clin Epidemiol2016; 73: 103–111.
23.
MaetzelALiLCPencharzJ, et al.The economic burden associated with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and hypertension: a comparative study. Ann Rheum Dis2004; 63: 395–401.
24.
UsiskinI. Surgical treatments for osteoarthritis. Eur J Rheumatol2023; 11: S41–S47.
25.
GangopadhyaySJansenVSim KhorW, et al.Guideline on managing thumb base osteoarthritis: the British society for surgery of the hand evidence for surgical treatment (BEST) findings and recommendations. J Hand Surg Eur Vol2025; 50: 576–586.
26.
VeroneseNSmithLBolzettaF, et al.Efficacy of conservative treatments for hand osteoarthritis : an umbrella review of interventional studies. Wien Klin Wochenschr2021; 133: 234–240.
27.
TentiSFerrettiFGusinuR, et al.Impact of thumb osteoarthritis on pain, function, and quality of life: a comparative study between erosive and non-erosive hand osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol2020; 39: 2195–2206.
28.
MarksETobyEB. Commentary to “conservative treatment of thumb base osteoarthritis: a systematic review”. J Hand Surg Am2015; 40: 22.
29.
BaniMAArazpourMKashaniRV, et al.Comparison of custom-made and prefabricated neoprene splinting in patients with the first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2013; 8: 232–237.
30.
Cantero-TéllezRValdesKSchwartzDA, et al.Necessity of immobilizing the metacarpophalangeal joint in carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: short-Term effect. Hand2018; 13: 412–417.
31.
MarottaNDemecoAMarinaroC, et al.Comparative effectiveness of orthoses for thumb osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2021; 102: 502–509.
32.
LaddALWeissAPCriscoJJ, et al.The thumb carpometacarpal joint: anatomy, hormones, and biomechanics. Instr Course Lect2013; 62: 165–179.
33.
KennedyCDManskeMCHuangJI. Classifications in brief: the eaton-littler classification of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res2016; 474: 2729–2733.
34.
BaradaranABaradaranAEbrahimzadehMH, et al.Comparison of custom-made versus prefabricated thumb splinting for carpometacarpal arthrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Bone Jt Surg2018; 6: 478–485.
35.
WajonAAdaL. No difference between two splint and exercise regimens for people with osteoarthritis of the thumb: a randomised controlled trial. Aust J Physiother2005; 51: 245–249.
36.
ArazpourMSoflaeiMAhmadi BaniM, et al.The effect of thumb splinting on thenar muscles atrophy, pain, and function in subjects with thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. Prosthet Orthot Int2017; 41: 379–386.
37.
ShridharVWilliamsS. Basal thumb arthritis: treatment strategies for managing pain. Aust J Gen Pract2020; 49: 702–706.
38.
MathiowetzVWeberKVollandG, et al.Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am1984; 9: 222–226.
39.
PeolssonAHedlundRObergB. Intra- and inter-tester reliability and reference values for hand strength. J Rehabil Med2001; 33: 36–41.
40.
MacDermidJSolomonGValdesK. Clinical assessment recommendations. American Society of Hand Therapists, 2015.
41.
KillipSCMacDermidJCWoutersRM, et al.Rasch analysis of the brief Michigan hand questionnaire in patients with thumb osteoarthritis. BMC Muscoskelet Disord2022; 23: 551.
42.
KroonFPBvan BeestSErmuratS, et al.In thumb base osteoarthritis structural damage is more strongly associated with pain than synovitis. Osteoarthr Cartil2018; 26: 1196–1202.
43.
AthlaniLDe AlmeidaYKMartinsA, et al.Thumb basal joint arthritis in 2023. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res2024; 110: 103772.
44.
CarreiraACGJonesANatourJ. Assessment of the effectiveness of a functional splint for osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint of the dominant hand: a randomized controlled study. J Rehabil Med. 2010; 42(5): 469–474.
45.
ArnoldNChrzanAChanK, et al.Comparing isolated thumb force generation, wrist rotation, and clinical measurements in healthy and osteoarthritic individuals before and after surgery. Bioengineering2024; 11: 948.
46.
AlmashaqbehSFAl-MomaniSKhaderA, et al.The effect of gender and arm anatomical position on the hand grip strength and fatigue resistance during sustained maximal handgrip effort. J Biomed Phys Eng2022; 12: 171–180.
47.
SillemHBackmanCLMillerWC, et al.Comparison of two carpometacarpal stabilizing splints for individuals with thumb osteoarthritis. J Hand Ther2011; 24: 216–225.
48.
WeissSLaStayoPMillsA, et al.Splinting the degenerative basal joint: custom-made or prefabricated neoprene?J Hand Ther2004; 17: 401–406.
49.
McKeePRivardA. Orthoses as enablers of occupation: client-centred splinting for better outcomes. Can J Occup Ther2004; 71: 306–314.
50.
MarriottKABirminghamTB. Fundamentals of osteoarthritis. Rehabilitation: exercise, diet, biomechanics, and physical therapist-delivered interventions. Osteoarthr Cartil2023; 31: 1312–1326.
51.
HamannNHeidemannJHeinrichK, et al.Stabilization effectiveness and functionality of different thumb orthoses in female patients with first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech2014; 29: 1170–1176.
52.
CotugnoGAlthoeferKNanayakkaraTJITS. The role of the thumb: study of finger motion in grasping and reachability space in human and robotic hands. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst2016; 47: 1061–1070.
53.
KaustoJMirandaHPehkonenI, et al.The distribution and co-occurrence of physical and psychosocial risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders in a general working population. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2011; 84: 773–788.
54.
DiasRChandrasenanJRajaratnamV, et al.Basal thumb arthritis. Postgrad Med J2007; 83: 40–43.
55.
AppellHJ. Muscular atrophy following immobilisation. A review. Sports Med1990; 10: 42–58.
56.
MinerJ. Are women more sensitive? Sex and gender differences in pain perception, clinical evaluation and treatment, Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 122–135.
