A proximal interphalangeal joint custom-made orthosis in trigger finger: Functional outcome

Abstract

Introduction

Trigger finger is a common and functionally limiting disorder. Finger immobilization using an orthotic device is one of the conservative treatment options for treating this condition. The most common orthosis previously described for trigger finger is metacarpophalangeal joint immobilization. There are limited studies describing the effectiveness of proximal interphalangeal joint orthosis for treatment of trigger finger.

Methods

This study was a single group pretest-posttest design. Adult patients with single digit idiopathic trigger finger were recruited and asked to wear a full-time orthoses for 6 weeks. The pre- and post-outcome measures included Quick-DASH score, the Stages of Stenosing Tenosynovitis (SST), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, the number of triggering events in ten active fists, and participant satisfaction with symptom improvement. Orthotic devices were made with thermoplastic material fabricated with adjustable Velcro tape at the dorsal side. All participants were given written handouts on this disease, orthotic care and gliding exercises. Paired t-tests were used to determine changes in outcome measures before and after wearing the orthosis.

Results

There were 30 participants included in this study. Evaluation after the use of PIP joint orthosis at 6 weeks revealed that there were statistically significant improvements in Quick-DASH score from enrolment (mean difference −29.0 (95%CI −34.5 to −23.4); p < 0.001), SST (mean difference −1.4 (95%CI −1.8 to −1.0); p < 0.001) and VAS (mean difference −3.4 (95%CI −4.3 to −2.5); p < 0.001). There were no serious adverse events and patient satisfaction with the treatment was high.

Conclusions

Despite our small study size, the use of proximal interphalangeal joint orthosis for 6 weeks resulted in statistically significant improvements in function, pain and triggering, and also high rates of acceptance in patients with isolated idiopathic trigger finger.

Keywords

Trigger finger orthosis proximal interphalangeal joint custom-made

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Moore

JS.

Flexor tendon entrapment of the digits (trigger finger and trigger thumb). J Occup Environ Med 2000; 42: 526–545.

Ryzewicz

Wolf

Trigger digits: principles, management, and complications. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31: 135–146.

Huisstede

BMA

Hoogvliet

Henk Coert

, et al. Multidisciplinary consensus guideline for managing trigger finger: results from the European HANDGUIDE study. Phys Ther 2014; 94: 1421–1433.

Rhoades

Gelberman

Manjarris

JF.

Stenosing tenosynovitis of the fingers and thumb: results of a prospective trial of steroid injection and splinting. Clin Orthop 1984; 190: 236–238.

Patel

Bassini

Trigger fingers and thumb. When to splint, inject, or operate. J Hand Surg Am 1992; 17: 110–113.

Lunsford

Valdes

Hengy

Conservative management of trigger finger: a systematic review. J Hand Ther 2019; 32: 212–221.

Evan

Hunter

Burkhalter

WE.

Conservative management of the trigger finger: a new approach. J Hand Ther 1988; 1: 59–68.

Rodgers

McCarthy

Tiedeman

JJ.

Functional distal interphalangeal joint splinting for trigger finger in laborers: a review and cadaver investigation. Orthopedics 1998; 21: 305–310.

Sheon

RP.

Repetitive strain injury. Diagnostic and treatment tips on six common problems. The Goff group. Postgrad Med 1997; 102: 72–85.

10.

Teo

DCI

Wong

YKY.

Effectiveness of proximal interphalangeal joint-blocking orthosis vs metacarpophalangeal joint-blocking orthosis in trigger digit management: a randomized clinical trial. J Hand Ther 2019; 32: 444–451.

11.

Beaton

Wright

Katz

Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of the three-item reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg 2005; 87: 1038–1046.

12.

Drijkoningen

van Berckel

Becker

SJE

, et al. Night splinting for idiopathic trigger digits. Hand 2018; 13: 558–562.

13.

Mintken

Glynn

Cleland

JA.

Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) and numeric pain rating scale in patients with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009 ; 18: 920–926.

14.

Copay

Chung

Eyberg

, et al. Minimum clinically important difference: current trends in the orthopaedic literature, part I: upper extremity: a systematic review. JBJS Rev 2018; 6: e1.

15.

Colbourn

Heath

Manary

, et al. Effectiveness of splinting for the treatment of trigger finger. J Hand Ther 2008; 21: 336– 343.

16.

Tarbhai

Hannah

Schroeder

HP.

Trigger finger treatment: a comparison of 2 splint designs. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37: 243–249.

17.

Lindner-Tons

Ingell

An alternative splint design for trigger finger. J Hand Ther 1998; 11: 206–208.

18.

Swezy

RL.

Trigger finger splinting. Orthopedics 1999; 22: 180.