Hand grip strength is frequently assessed to evaluate interventions or guide treatment. When using calibrated equipment in a standardised method, hand-held dynamometry is a reliable measure for hand grip strength and can be compared to normative data. However, existing British grip strength normative data were published 20 years ago.
Methods
A non-experimental quantitative study was carried out to establish if existing UK hand grip norms and consolidated multinational norms were representative of today’s 20–49-year-old British adult population. The methodology used was modelled on a previous British study using the mean Jamar dynamometer maximal grip strengths and reported within age bands.
Results
A total of 135 healthy British citizens of various ethnicities between 20 and 49 years were recruited. Grip strength is decreased in comparison to the existing British normative data for both males and females in all age bands. A significant difference exists (p < 0.05) for male right hand aged 40–44 years and right and left hands for women 25–29 years and 45–49 years, respectively. Significant differences were also noted in 5 and 8 of the 12 multinational means for men and women respectively.
Conclusions
Due to small sample size, the ability of this study to demonstrate a significant difference in mean grip strength to the earlier British norms is low. However, a small increase in sample size may have resulted in further significant differences with both studies. A larger study, taking into consideration ethnicity, is recommended to ensure valid and reliable grip strength norms are used in practice.
AngstFDrerupSWerleS. Prediction of grip and key pinch strength in 978 healthy subjects. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2010; 11: 94–2474-11-94.
2.
CoxJSpauldingSKramerJ. Is there a relationship between hand strength and hand function?. ASHT 2006 scientific and clinical paper abstracts from Atlanta meeting. J Hand Ther2006; 19: 444–445.
3.
ErtemKHarmaACetinA. An investigation of hand dominance, average versus maximum grip strength, body mass index and ages as determinants for hand evaluation. Isokinetics Exerc Sci2005; 13: 223–227.
4.
BoadellaJMKuijerPPSluiterJK. Effect of self-selected handgrip position on maximal handgrip strength. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2005; 86: 328–331.
5.
FessEE. The need for reliability and validity in hand assessment instruments. J Hand Surg1986; 11: 621–623.
6.
WerleSGoldhahnJDrerupS. Age- and gender-specific normative data of grip and pinch strength in a healthy adult Swiss population. J Hand Surg Eur2009; 34: 76–84.
7.
InnesE. Handgrip strength testing: a review of the literature. Aust Occup Ther J1999; 46: 120–140.
8.
LinDCYChangJShiehS. Prediction of hand strength by hand injury severity scoring system in hand injured patients. Disabil Rehabil2012; 34: 423–428.
9.
SavvaCKaragiannisCRushtonA. Test-retest reliability of grip strength measurement in full elbow extension to evaluate maximum grip strength. J Hand Surg Eur2013; 38: 183–186.
10.
MathiowetzV. Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength. Occup Ther Int2002; 9: 201–209.
11.
BohannonRWPeolssonAMassy-WestroppN. Reference values for adult grip strength measured with a Jamar dynamometer: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy2006; 92: 11–15.
12.
BohannonRW. Hand-held compared with isokinetic dynamometry for measurement of static knee extension torque (parallel reliability of dynamometers). Clin Phys Physiol Meas1990; 11: 217–222.
13.
BohannonRW. Test-retest reliability of hand-held dynamometry during a single session of strength assessment. Phys Ther1986; 66: 206–209.
14.
SchaubertKLBohannonRW. Reliability and validity of three strength measures obtained from community-dwelling elderly persons. J Strength Condition Res2005; 19: 717–720.
15.
SvensBLeeH. Intra- and inter-instrument reliability of grip-strength measurements: GRIPTRACK and JAMAR hand dynamometers. Br J Hand Ther2005; 10: 47–55.
16.
CrosbyCAWehbéMAMawrB. Hand strength: normative values. J Hand Surg Am1994; 19: 665–670.
17.
MathiowetzVWeberKVollandG. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am1984; 9: 222–226.
18.
GeereJChesterRKaleS. Power grip, pinch grip, manual muscle testing or thenar atrophy - which should be assessed as a motor outcome after carpal tunnel decompression? A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2007; 8: 114–114.
19.
WardCAdamsJ. Comparative study of the test-re-test reliability of four instruments to measure grip strength in a healthy population. Br J Hand Ther2007; 12: 48–54.
20.
AshfordRFNagelburgSAdkinsR. Sensitivity of the Jamar Dynamometer in detecting submaximal grip effort. J Hand Surg Am1996; 21: 402–405.
21.
Fess EE. Grip strength. In: Clinical Assessment Recommendations, 2nd ed. Chicago: American Society of Hand Therapists, 1992, pp.41-45.
22.
EkblomAGDahlinLRosbergH. Hand function in children with radial longitudinal deficiency. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders2013; 14: 116–116.
23.
OsterasNHagenKGrotleM. Exercise programme with telephone follow-up for people with hand osteoarthritis – protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders2014; 15: 82–82.
24.
BeumerALindauT. Grip strength ratio: a grip strength measurement that correlates well with DASH score in different hand/wrist conditions. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders2014; 15: 336–336.
25.
Tägil M, Geijer M, Abramo A, et al. Ten years' experience with a pyrocarbon prosthesis replacing the proximal interphalangeal joint. A prospective clinical and radiographic follow-up. J Hand Surg Eur 2014; 39: 587–595.
26.
Khan A and Giddins G. The outcome of conservative treatment of spiral metacarpal fractures and the role of the deep transverse metacarpal ligaments in stabilizing these injuries. J Hand Surg Eur 2015; 40: 59–62.
27.
Behr B, Heffinger C, Hirche C, et al. Scaphoid nonunions in skeletally immature adolescents. J Hand Surg Eur 2014; 39: 602–665.
28.
CouzensGPetersSCutbushK. Stainless steel versus titanium volar multi-axial locking plates for fixation of distal radius fractures: a randomised clinical trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorder2014; 15: 74–74.
29.
HarthAVetterWR. Grip and pinch strength among selected adult occupational groups. Occup Ther Int1994; 1: 13–28.
30.
GodtschailkMAdamsJ. An analysis of the inner and outer grip strength of rock climbers and matched healthy non-climbers. Br J Hand Ther2006; 11: 15–21.
31.
BarnesJAdamsJ. Differences in dominant and non-dominant handgrip strength of male golf professionals measured using the Jamar dynomometer. Br J Hand Ther2007; 12: 112–116.
32.
WuSWuSLiangH. Measuring factors affecting grip strength in a Taiwan Chinese population and a comparison with consolidated norms. Appl Ergon2009; 40: 811–815.
33.
RichardsLPalmiter-ThomasP. Grip strength measurement: a critical review of tools, methods, and clinical utility. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med1996; 8: 87–109.
34.
AnjumSNeshat, ChoudaryP. Comparative evaluation of grip and pinch strength in an Asian and European population. Hand Ther2012; 17: 11–14.
35.
GilbertsonLBarber-LomaxS. Power and pinch grip strength recorded using the hand-held Jamar dynamometer and B L hydraulic pinch gauge: British normative data for adults. Br J Occup Ther1994; 57: 483–487.
36.
MathiowetzVKashmanNVollandG. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1985; 66: 69–74.
37.
Strauss E, Sherman EM and Spreen O. A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
38.
Massy-WestroppNGillTKTaylorAW. Hand Grip Strength: age and gender stratified normative data in a population-based study. BMC Res Notes2011; 4: 127–127.
39.
PetersMJHvan NesSIVanhoutteEK. Revised normative values for grip strength with the Jamar dynamometer. J Peripher Nerv Syst2011; 16: 47–50.
40.
PeolssonAHedlundRÖbergB. Intra- and inter-tester reliability and reference values for hand strength. J Rehabil Med2001; 33: 36–41.
Hamilton GF, McDonald C and Chenier TC. Measurement of grip strength: validity and reliability of the sphygmomanometer and Jamar grip dynamometer. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1992; 16: 215-219.
44.
MacDermidJCFehrLBLindsayKC. The effect of physical factors on grip strength and dexterity. Br J Hand Ther2002; 7: 112–118.
