Hand Size Reduces the Reliability of K-Force® Grip Dynamometer

Abstract

Background

Objective evaluation of grip strength is crucial for determining functional status of patients and demonstrating treatment effectiveness. A novel dynamometer, K-Force® Grip, has been developed that can work in conjunction with smart devices. However, the device has a smaller circumference compared to the Jamar®Plus+ and lacks an adjustable grip width, unlike the Jamar®Plus+. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the K-Force® Grip across different hand sizes in healthy subjects.

Methods

We recruited 1 23 healthy subjects (n=246 hands) and categorized them based on hand length and span. Grip strength was measured using both the Jamar®Plus + hydraulic hand dynamometer and the K-Force® Grip dynamometer.

Results

Inter-device consistency was excellent for the overall population (ICC=0.937) and for individuals with large hand spans and long hand lengths. It was good for other anthropometric groups. However, ICC estimates for absolute inter-device agreement indicated high variability and were unstable (as indicated by the confidence intervals including zero). BlandAltman plots suggest K-Force® values are systematically lower than those from the Jamar®Plus+.

Conclusion

The devices should not be used interchangeably in research settings. For clinical follow-up, the Jamar®Plus + dynamometer is recommended, especially in adolescent populations where hand growth continues over time.

Keywords

Grip strength reliability muscle strength dynamometer hand grip measurement hand size

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fess

. Grip strength. In: Casanova

(ed). Clinical Assessment Recommendations. 2 ed. Chicago: American Society of Hand Therapists, 1992, pp. 41–45.

Kinvent . K-Grip. Kinvent. https://physio.kinvent.com/product-page/k-grip/ (n.d.), Accessed: December 15, 2024.

Jaber

Hewson

Duchêne

. Design and validation of the Grip-ball for measurement of hand grip strength. Med Eng Phys 2012; 34(9): 1356–1361.

Gripable . Gripable: hand therapy made smart. Gripable (n.d.). https://gripable.co/us/. (Accessed: December 15, 2024).

Nikodelis

TSS

Athanasakis

Chalitsios

, et al. Comparative study of validity and reliability of two handgrip dynamometers: K-force grip and jamar. Biomechanics 2021; 1(1): 73–82. DOI: 10.3390/biomechanics1010006.

Magni

NOM

McLaine

. Reliability and validity of the K-force grip dynamometer in healthy subjects: do we need to assess it three times? Hand Ther 2023; 28(1): 33–39. DOI: 10.1177/17589983231152958.

Cildan

Tonak

Kitis

. Validity, reliability and test-retest study of Grip strength measurement in two positions with two dynamometers: Jamar(R) Plus and K-Force(R) Grip. Hand Surg Rehabil 2022; 41(3): 305–310. DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2022.02.007.5.

Garrett

. The adult human hand: some anthropometric and biomechanical considerations. Hum Factors 1971; 13(2): 117–131.

Ruiz

Espana-Romero

Ortega

, et al. Hand span influences optimal grip span in male and female teenagers. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31(8): 1367–1372. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.06.014.

10.

Roberts

Denison

Martin

, et al. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing 2011; 40(4): 423–429.

11.

Mathiowetz

VWK

Volland

Kashman

. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9(2): 222–226. DOI: 10.1016/s0363-5023(84)80146-x.

12.

Guerra

Amaral

Sousa

, et al. Comparison of jamar and bodygrip dynamometers for handgrip strength measurement. J Strength Cond Res 2017; 31(7): 1931–1940. DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001666.

13.

Kong

Lee

Lowe

, et al. Evaluation of various handle grip spans for optimizing finger-specific force based on the users' hand sizes. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 2007; 51(15): 884–888.

14.

Mokkink

Terwee

Patrick

, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63(7): 737–745.

15.

Koo

. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 2016; 15(2): 155–163. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.

16.

Scholtes

Terwee

Poolman

. What makes a measurement instrument valid and reliable? Injury 2011; 42(3): 236–240.

17.

Bohannon

. Minimal clinically important difference for grip strength: a systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci 2019; 31(1): 75–78. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.31.75.

18.

Svens

Lee

. Intra- and inter-instrument reliability of grip-strength measurements: Br. J Hand Ther 2005; 10(2): 47–55. DOI: 10.1177/175899830501000202.

19.

Mathiowetz

. Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength. Occup Ther Int 2002; 9(3): 201–209.

20.

Stamate

Bertolaccini

Deriaz

, et al. Interinstrument reliability between the Squegg® smart dynamometer and hand grip trainer and the Jamar® hydraulic hand dynamometer: a pilot study. Am J Occup Ther 2023; 77(5): 7705205150.