Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody that targets vascular endothelial growth factor-A, and is indicated in the treatment of various tumors (colon, lung, renal, and glioblastoma). It has been recently approved for the treatment of ovarian cancer in various countries. This review summarizes the activity and toxicity of bevacizumab in the treatment of ovarian cancer, both as single-agent drug and in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. As a single-agent drug, it has shown response rates of 16–21% in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. Two phase III randomized trials have been published evaluating the addition of bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy as front-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. In addition, trials evaluating the combination with chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer (platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant disease) have also been reported. All these trials showed a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival although no improvement in overall survival has been reported. The main adverse event is hypertension. Other serious, but uncommon adverse events include gastrointestinal perforation as well as renal and central nervous system toxicity.

Keywords

bevacizumab combination therapy single-agent therapy ovarian cancer progression-free survival

Introduction

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic cancer and fifth leading cause of cancer death in the United States. In the year 2012, there will be an estimated 22,280 new cases and 15,500 deaths in the US alone [Siegel et al. 2012]. Primary peritoneal cancer and fallopian tube cancer are managed similarly to epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). EOC is highly curable when it is confined to the ovaries, with up to 90% expected 5-year survival. However, EOC is rarely diagnosed at an early stage because the disease causes few specific symptoms when it is localized to the ovary. More than 70% of women with EOC present with advanced stage III or IV disease, which is associated with high morbidity and mortality [Heintz et al. 2006].

Current management of advanced stage disease includes surgical tumor debulking, followed by adjuvant platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy [McGuire et al. 1996; Piccart et al. 2000]. An approach to improve the outcome of treatment in EOC has focused on modifying the dose, schedule, or route of administration of chemotherapy. The use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been reported to improve outcomes although with increase toxicity [Alberts et al. 1996; Armstrong et al. 2006; Markman et al. 2001]. For various reasons the use of intraperitoneal chemotherapy has not been uniformly adopted despite the positive results of these three randomized trials [Rowan, 2009]. More recently, it was reported that the administration of intravenous (IV) paclitaxel on a weekly schedule improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) [Katsumata et al. 2009]. Another approach consisted of incorporating different cytotoxic agents in sequential doublet and triplet combinations (unfortunately, no combination demonstrated an improvement in OS) [Bookman, 2009]. Another recently described approach is the administration of chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting, before surgical resection in contrast to conventional postoperative chemotherapy [Vergote et al. 2010]. Although this approach is associated with a higher frequency of optimal cytoreduction and lower postoperative adverse events, it did not translate into improvements in OS. Nonetheless, this is now a valid approach that is being used more frequently. Therefore, despite more than 10 years of research the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel remains the standard chemotherapy regimen in advanced ovarian cancer. However, OS for patients with advanced ovarian cancer is poor and the 5-year survival remains at only 27% [Siegel et al. 2012].

Despite the introduction of platinum and paclitaxel the majority of women with advanced stage recur within 5 years and drug resistance emerges [Heintz et al. 2006]. Recurrent ovarian cancer is classified as been platinum resistant, defined as relapsing within 6 months, or platinum sensitive, defined as relapsing more than 6 months after completing initial platinum-based chemotherapy [Markman et al. 1991]. Patients with platinum-resistant disease are typically treated with other agents, such as pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), topotecan, gemcitabine, weekly paclitaxel or participation in a clinical trial. However, the overall response rate with these alternate agents is only 10–25% with relatively short durations of response [Agarwal and Kaye, 2003]. Thus, exploration of alternative therapeutics has become an area of extensive and important research.

Based on increasing knowledge of key biologic pathways driving tumor progression, several targeted therapies have been recently investigated in recurrent ovarian cancer. Unfortunately, most of these therapies have shown limited activity [Bookman et al. 2003; Garcia et al. 2012; Gordon et al. 2005, 2006; Posadas et al. 2007; Schilder et al. 2005, 2008, 2009]. One of the targeted approaches most widely studied and most promising in the treatment of EOC is the inhibition of angiogenesis. Bevacizumab is the inhibitor of angiogenesis that has been most extensively studied in EOC. This review will focus on the potential role of bevacizumab in the management of ovarian cancer, including both upfront therapy and treatment of recurrent disease.

Tumor angiogenesis in epithelial ovarian cancer

Angiogenesis seems to play a major role in the natural history of ovarian cancer, promoting tumor growth and progression in the form of ascites formation and metastatic spread [Byrne et al. 2003; Hollingsworth et al. 1995; Shen et al. 2000]. Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody that targets vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, and is indicated in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and glioblastoma multiforme [Escudier et al. 2007; Friedman et al. 2009; Hurwitz et al. 2004; Sandler et al. 2006]. This antibody binds to and neutralizes all biologically active forms of VEGF-A, and then suppresses tumor growth and inhibits metastatic disease progression [Lin et al. 1999]. The utility of VEGF antibodies in the treatment of ovarian carcinoma was initially explored in animal models, where VEGF blockade was shown to inhibit ascites formation and slow tumor growth [Byrne et al. 2003]. In addition, VEGF-targeting agents are thought to enhance the effects of chemotherapy by normalization of primitive tumor vasculature, leading to decreased interstitial fluid pressure, increased tumor oxygenation, and enhanced delivery of cytotoxic drugs [Jain, 2005].

Single-agent bevacizumab in recurrent ovarian cancer

Two single-agent phase II trials have explored the utility of bevacizumab in the treatment of persistent or recurrent disease: The first and largest single-agent study was conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) and termed GOG-0170D. In this trial 62 women with persistent or recurrent EOC or primary peritoneal cancer received bevacizumab monotherapy (15 mg/kg IV) repeated every three weeks. The study allowed up to two prior lines of chemotherapy and 58% of patients had platinum-resistant disease. Encouraging activity was reported as evidenced by an overall response rate of 21% and median PFS and OS of 4.7 and 17 months, respectively. In addition, 40% of patients remained progression-free at 6 months. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events thought to be related to bevacizumab included hypertension (9.7%, n = 6), thromboembolism (1.6%, n = 2, one pulmonary embolism, no arterial emboli), gastrointestinal (GI) events (6.4%, n = 4, no perforations or fistulas), proteinuria (n = 1), and hypersensitivity reactions (3.2%, n = 2) [Burger et al. 2007].

The second study (gENENTECH avf 2949g) evaluated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in 44 patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian carcinoma or peritoneal serous carcinoma who had experienced disease progression during or within 3 months of discontinuing topotecan or PLD. Almost 90% of patients had platinum-resistant disease. Results included an objective response rate of 15.9%, median PFS of 4.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1–5.5 months], and median OS of 10.7 months. An estimated 28% of patients remained progression-free at 6 months. Bevacizumab-associated grade 3 to 4 events included hypertension (9.1%), proteinuria (15.9%), bleeding (2.3%), and wound healing complications (2.3%). Arterial thromboembolic events occurred in three patients (6.8%). Three deaths were related to bevacizumab treatment [Cannistra et al. 2007]. The incidence of GI perforation (GIP; 11.4%) was higher than reported in bevacizumab trials of other tumor types. GIP occurred in 23.8% of patients who had received three prior chemotherapy regimens, compared with 0% of patients receiving two prior chemotherapy regimens (p < 0.01). A trend toward higher risk of GIP was observed for patients with bowel wall thickening or bowel obstruction on CT scan [Cannistra et al. 2007].

Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

Several authors have evaluated the safety and activity of bevacizumab in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy agents typically used in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: topotecan, PLD, and weekly paclitaxel [Kudoh et al. 2011; McGonigle et al. 2011; O’Malley et al. 2011]. As summarized in Table 1, these studies show that the combination is safe and active and suggest bevacizumab may enhance the efficacy of the cytotoxic agent.

Table 1.

Phase II bevacizumab trials in recurrent ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer.

Trial	Setting	Platinum-resistant disease (%)	Treatment	RR (%)	Grade 3 to 4 AEs
GOG-0170D [Burger et al. 2007] n = 62	Recurrent EOC/PPC;≤2 prior regimens	42	Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 21 days	21	HTN n = 6 (10%)
Genentech AVF 2949g [Cannistra et al. 2007] n = 44	Recurrent EOC/PPC; ≤3 prior regimens	84	Bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 21 days	16	HTN n = 6 (14%) GIP n = 5
NCI-5789 [Garcia et al. 2008] n = 70	Recurrent EOC/PPC; ≤3 prior regimens	40	Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 14 days + cyclophosphamide 50 mg daily	24	HTN n = 11 (16%) GIP n = 4 (6%) CI n = 2 (3%)
[McGonigle et al. 2011] n = 40	Platinum-resistant OC/PPC/FTC; ≤2 prior regimens	70 (primary) 30 (secondary)	Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 14 days + topotecan 4 mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15	25	HTN (20%) Neutropenia (18%) GI toxicity (18%)
[Kudoh et al. 2011] n = 30	Recurrent OC; ≥1 prior regimen	97	Bevacizumab 2 mg/kg + PLD 10 mg/m² weekly (3 weeks on, 1 week off)	33	Hand-foot syndrome (3%) GIP (3%)
[O’Malley et al. 2011] n = 41	Recurrent EOC; ≥1 prior regimen	29 (primary) 28 (secondary)	Bevacizumab 10–15 mg/kg every 14 days + paclitaxel 60–70 mg/m² weekly	63	GIP (5%)
[Tillmanns et al. 2012] n = 48	Recurrent EOC/PPC; ≥1 prior regimen	93%	Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 14 days + (nab)-paclitaxel 100 mg/m² weekly	50	GI perforation (4%)

AE, adverse event; CI, cerebral ischemia; EOC, epithelial ovarian cancer; FTC, fallopian tube cancer; GI, gastrointestinal; GIP, gastrointestinal perforation; GOG, Gynecologic Oncology Group; HTN, hypertension; (nab)-, nanoparticle albumin-bound; OC, ovarian cancer; PLD, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; PPC, primary peritoneal cancer; RR, response rate.

Recently, preliminary results of a phase III randomized trial evaluating the role of bevacizumab in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer were presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [a randomized phase III trial evaluating bevacizumab (BEV) plus chemotherapy (CT) for platinum (PT)-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (OC); AURELIA] [Pujade-Lauraine et al. 2012]. In this trial 361 patients were randomized to chemotherapy alone (PLD, weekly paclitaxel, or topotecan) or with bevacizumab. Patients with platinum-refractory EOC, history of bowel obstruction, or more than two prior anticancer regimens were ineligible. The primary endpoint of the study was PFS while secondary endpoints included objective response rate, OS, and safety. The addition of bevacizumab significantly improved PFS (6.7 months versus 3.4 months for chemotherapy alone). Objective response rate increased from 12.6% with chemotherapy alone to 30.9% with chemotherapy and bevacizumab. GIPs, fistula, or abscesses occurred in four patients (2.2%) while thrombosis was reported in five (2.8%).

A somewhat different approach was to combine bevacizumab with low-dose metronomic oral cyclophosphamide. Metronomic chemotherapy (MC) was first shown to suppress tumor growth in experimental models, possibly by inhibiting angiogenesis through the release of thrombospondin [Hanahan et al. 2000]. This schedule of administration of chemotherapy is devoid of the typical toxicities associated with cytotoxic chemotherapy (alopecia, myelosuppression, nausea, vomiting, etc.). The combined use of MC of antiangiogenic therapies demonstrates marked inhibition of tumor growth in experimental models [Bello et al. 2001; Hashimoto et al. 2010; Klement et al. 2000; Merritt et al. 2010]. In this study (NCI-5789) 70 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer were treated with bevacizumab and oral cyclophosphamide administered at a dose of 50 mg/day [Garcia et al. 2008]. Up to three prior lines of therapy were allowed and 40% of patients had platinum-resistant disease. An overall response rate of 24% was reported with an additional 62% of patients achieving stable disease. At 6 months there was a PFS of 56% with a median time to progression of 7.2 months. This regimen was associated with a toxicity profile similar to that seen with single-agent bevacizumab in this patient population including two cases (3%) of grade 4 cerebral ischemia and four episodes (6%) of GIP or fistula. However, grade 3 or 4 cytotoxic chemotherapy-associated toxicities were not observed. Other authors have confirmed the activity and favorable toxicity profile of this regimen [Sanchez-Muñoz et al. 2010].

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as front-line treatment

The activity of single-agent bevacizumab and the ability to combine it with chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer led to studies exploring its use as front-line therapy. Two single-arm phase II trials demonstrated the feasibility of combining carboplatin and paclitaxel with bevacizumab in this setting [Micha et al. 2007; Penson et al. 2010]. In the first study 20 patients were treated with six cycles of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab. This study reported a response rate of 80% and, more importantly, no evidence of bowel perforations or wound complications. The second study enrolled 62 patients who were treated with six to eight cycles of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab for 1 year. Treatment was associated with two pulmonary embolisms and two GIPs, with no grade 4 toxicities seen during maintenance bevacizumab treatment [Penson et al. 2010]. These two studies showed that the addition of bevacizumab to front-line chemotherapy is feasible and well tolerated with encouraging activity and, along with the collective data previously discussed, supported exploring the use of bevacizumab in randomized trials in front-line therapy.

The first trial, GOG-0218, was a double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III study enrolling 1873 women with previously untreated stage III or IV EOC. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups after maximal surgical cytoreduction: chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy plus concurrent bevacizumab, or chemotherapy plus concurrent bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab. All patients received six 21-day cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel, plus a study treatment for cycles 2–22. Median PFS, which was the primary endpoint of the trial, was 10.3 months in the control group, 11.2 months in the bevacizumab-initiation group, and 14.1 months in the bevacizumab-throughout group. The hazard of progression or death was significantly lower in the bevacizumab-throughout group compared with the control group (p < 0.001).

Extended treatment with bevacizumab was relatively well tolerated. Compared with chemotherapy alone, the only significant difference was the rate of hypertension requiring medical therapy (23% versus 7%). Rates of GIP, fistula formation, necrosis, or leak > grade 2 were twice as high with extended bevacizumab treatment (16 cases versus 7 cases; 2.6% versus 1.2%). There were no apparent differences in other adverse events including grade 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, venous or arterial thrombosis, or clinically significant bleeding [Burger et al. 2011].

The Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) International Collaboration on Ovarian Neoplasms (ICON7) trial was an open-label phase III randomized trial. In this study 1528 women with high risk, early stage disease or advanced EOC were randomized to chemotherapy alone (carboplatin and paclitaxel) or chemotherapy with concurrent bevacizumab, followed by 12 cycles of maintenance bevacizumab or disease progression, whichever occurred earlier. The dose of bevacizumab was lower than in the GOG-0218 trial, with 7.5 mg/kg every 21 days. PFS at 36 months was 20.3 months for standard chemotherapy compared with 21.8 months for those who also received bevacizumab (p = 0.04). In updated analyses, PFS at 42 months was still higher with bevacizumab compared with standard chemotherapy (24.1 months versus 22.4 months; p = 0.04). This difference was greater in patients at a high risk of progression, defined as patients with stage IV disease or stage III disease and > 1.0 cm residual disease after debulking surgery (18.1 months versus 14.5 months; p = 0.002); this translated to an increased median OS (36.6 months versus 28.8 months; p = 0.002). Adverse events were reported as consistent with previous bevacizumab trials [Perren et al. 2011].

The results of these two studies (Table 2) led to the approval by the European Commission of bevacizumab in combination with standard chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel) as a front-line treatment for women with advanced ovarian cancer. However, it is important to note that no improvement in OS has been reported in these two studies. In addition, two independent cost-effective analyses report that with no improvement in OS the use of bevacizumab as part of front-line therapy in ovarian cancer is not cost effective [Cohn et al. 2011; Lesnock et al. 2011].

Table 2.

Front-line phase III trials of bevacizumab in patients with epithelial ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer.

Trial	Treatment arms	PFS (months)	OS (months)	GI events grade ≥2	HTN grade ≥2	CNS events grade ≥2
				No of patients (%)	No of patients (%)	No of patients (%)
GOG-0218 [Burger et al. 2011] n = 1873	CT	10.3	39.3	7 (1.2)	43 (7.2)	0
	CT+Bev	11.2	38.7	17 (2.8)	100 (16.5)	0
	CT+Bev → Bev	14.1	39.7	16 (2.6)	139 (22.9)	2 (0.3)
ICON7 [Perren et al. 2011] n = 1528	CT	22.4	28.8	3 (<1)	2 (<1)	0
ICON7 [Perren et al. 2011] n = 1528	CT+Bev → Bev	24.1	36.6	10 (1)	46 (6)	2 (<1)

Bev, bevacizumab; CNS, central nervous system; CT, carboplatin and paclitaxel; GI, gastrointestinal; GOG, Gynecologic Oncology Group; HTN, hypertension; ICON7, International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm 7; OS, overall survival; PFS progression-free survival.

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer

In addition to GOG-0218 and ICON7 a third phase III randomized trial explored the use of bevacizumab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (Ovarian Cancer Study Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy and Anti-Angiogenic Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Disease; OCEANS) [Aghajanian et al. 2011]. This study evaluated 484 women with platinum-sensitive ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer, who were randomly assigned to six cycles of carboplatin plus gemcitabine, with or without bevacizumab. Preliminary results showed that PFS was significantly longer for women given bevacizumab [12.4 months compared with 8.4 months in the placebo-treated group, hazard ratio (HR) 0.484, 95% CI 0.388–0.605, p < 0.0001]. Objective response rate increased by 21.1% (p < 0.0001), from 57.4% in the placebo group to 78.5% in the bevacizumab-treated group; duration of response increased from a median duration of response of 7.4 months to 10.4 months, respectively [HR 0.534, 95% CI 0.408–0.698, p < 0.0001]. OS data are still premature, with median overall survival of 29.9 months in the placebo group and 35.5 months in the treatment group. Discontinuation of treatment for adverse events was more common in the bevacizumab group (23% versus 5%). The bevacizumab arm had higher rates of hypertension grade 3 or higher (17% versus < 1%), proteinuria > grade 3 (9% versus 1%), and non central nervous system bleeding (6% versus 1%). There were no cases of GIP in either arm during therapy [Aghajanian et al. 2011]. The result of this study led to the approval by the European Commission of bevacizumab in combination with standard chemotherapy (gemcitabine and carboplatin) to treat women with first recurrence of platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. The results of GOG-0213, an ongoing randomized trial comparing carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab in patients with platinum-sensitive disease, are eagerly expected [National Cancer Institute, 2012].

Conclusion

The VEGF-targeted recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody, bevacizumab, has demonstrated efficacy in advanced EOC. Amongst new biologic drugs, bevacizumab is the first agent to show clear therapeutic activity in recurrent disease and potential as part of first-line therapy along with an acceptable toxicity profile. However, it is unclear whether the improvement in PFS is clinically meaningful and will translate into better quality of life or prolonged survival. Questions also remain regarding the optimal dose and treatment duration. Three (GOG-0218, OCEANS, and AURELIA) of the phase III randomized trials evaluating the role of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer used a dose of 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. ICON7 used a dose of 7.5 mg/kg. Together, these independent phase III trials show a benefit in the dose range of 7.5 mg/kg to 15 mg/kg. In the two upfront trials (GOG-018 and ICON7), bevacizumab was administered during a fixed period of time while in the two studies in the recurrent setting (OCEANS and AURELIA) it was administered until progression. The latter two studies showed a larger hazard ratio for PFS favoring the use of bevacizumab suggesting that administration until progression may represent the optimal schedule. The existing data suggest that at this time the main role of bevacizumab in the treatment of ovarian cancer may be in the setting of recurrent disease in combination with chemotherapy. However, efforts to identify biomarkers with potential prognostic and predictive value in EOC patients treated with bevacizumab are critical in selecting patients for therapy and are the subject of ongoing research.

Footnotes

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Garcia has participated in clinical trials evaluating bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. Dr Singh declares no conflicts of interest in preparing this article.

References

Agarwal

Kaye

(2003) Ovarian cancer: strategies for overcoming resistance to chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 3: 502–516.

Aghajanian

Finkler

Rutherford

Smith

Parmar

. (2011) OCEANS: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (BEV) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian (EOC), primary peritoneal (PPC), or fallopian tube cancer (FTC) (LBA5007). J Clin Oncol 29(Suppl. Abstracts): LBA5007.

Alberts

Liu

Hannigan

O’Toole

Williams

Young

. (1996) Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 335: 1950–1955.

Armstrong

Bundy

Wenzel

Huang

Baergen

Lele

. (2006) Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 354: 34–43.

Bello

Carrabba

Giussani

Lucini

Cerutti

Scaglione

. (2001) Low-dose chemotherapy combined with an antiangiogenic drug reduces human glioma growth in vivo. Cancer Res 61: 7501–7506.

Bookman

(2009) Trials with impact on clinical management: first line. Int J Gynecol Cancer 19(Suppl. 2): S55–S62.

Bookman

Darcy

Clarke-Pearson

Boothby

Horowitz

(2003) Evaluation of monoclonal humanized anti-HER2 antibody, trastuzumab, in patients with recurrent or refractory ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma with overexpression of HER2: a phase II trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 21: 283–290.

Burger

Brady

Bookman

Fleming

Monk

Huang

. (2011) Incorporation of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 365: 2473–2483.

Burger

Sill

Monk

Greer

Sorosky

(2007) Phase II trial of bevacizumab in persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 25: 5165–5171.

10.

Byrne

Ross

Holash

Nakanishi

Hofmann

. (2003) Vascular endothelial growth factor-trap decreases tumor burden, inhibits ascites, and causes dramatic vascular remodeling in an ovarian cancer model. Clin Cancer Res 9: 5721–5728.

11.

Cannistra

Matulonis

Penson

Hambleton

Dupont

Mackey

. (2007) Phase II study of bevacizumab in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer or peritoneal serous cancer. J Clin Oncol 25: 5180–5186.

12.

Cohn

Kim

Resnick

O’Malley

Straughn

Jr. (2011) At what cost does a potential survival advantage of bevacizumab make sense for the primary treatment of ovarian cancer? A cost-effectiveness analysis. J Clin Oncol 29: 1247–1251.

13.

Escudier

Pluzanska

Koralewski

Ravaud

Bracarda

Szczylik

. (2007) Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, double-blind phase III trial. Lancet 370: 2103–2111.

14.

Friedman

Prados

Wen

Mikkelsen

Schiff

Abrey

. (2009) Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27: 4733–4740.

15.

Garcia

Hirte

Fleming

Yang

Tsao-Wei

Roman

. (2008) Phase II clinical trial of bevacizumab and low-dose metronomic oral cyclophosphamide in recurrent ovarian cancer: a trial of the California, Chicago, and Princess Margaret Hospital phase II consortia. J Clin Oncol 26: 76–82.

16.

Garcia

Sill

Lankes

Godwin

Mannel

Armstrong

. (2012) A phase II evaluation of lapatinib in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol 124: 569–574.

17.

Gordon

Finkler

Edwards

Garcia

Crozier

Irwin

. (2005) Efficacy and safety of erlotinib HCl, an epidermal growth factor receptor (HER1/EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: results from a phase II multicenter study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15: 785–792.

18.

Gordon

Matei

Aghajanian

Matulonis

Brewer

Fleming

. (2006) Clinical activity of pertuzumab (rhuMAb 2C4), a HER dimerization inhibitor, in advanced ovarian cancer: potential predictive relationship with tumor HER2 activation status. J Clin Oncol 24: 4324–4332.

19.

Hanahan

Bergers

Bergsland

(2000) Less is more, regularly: metronomic dosing of cytotoxic drugs can target tumor angiogenesis in mice. J Clin Invest 105: 1045–1047.

20.

Hashimoto

Man

Cruz-Munoz

Tang

Kumar

. (2010) Potent preclinical impact of metronomic low-dose oral topotecan combined with the antiangiogenic drug pazopanib for the treatment of ovarian cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 9: 996–1006.

21.

Heintz

Odicino

Maisonneuve

Quinn

Benedet

Creasman

. (2006) Carcinoma of the ovary. FIGO 26th annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95(Suppl. 1): S161–S192.

22.

Hollingsworth

Kohn

Steinberg

Rothenberg

Merino

(1995) Tumor angiogenesis in advanced stage ovarian carcinoma. Am J Pathol 147: 33–41.

23.

Hurwitz

Fehrenbacher

Novotny

Cartwright

Hainsworth

Heim

. (2004) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 350: 2335–2342.

24.

Jain

(2005) Antiangiogenic therapy for cancer: current and emerging concepts. Oncology (Williston Park) 19(Suppl. 3): S7–S16.

25.

Katsumata

Yasuda

Takahashi

Isonishi

Jobo

Aoki

. (2009) Dose-dense paclitaxel once a week in combination with carboplatin every 3 weeks for advanced ovarian cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374: 1331–1338.

26.

Klement

Baruchel

Rak

Man

Clark

Hicklin

. (2000) Continuous low-dose therapy with vinblastine and VEGF receptor-2 antibody induces sustained tumor regression without overt toxicity. J Clin Invest 105: R15–R24.

27.

Kudoh

Takano

Kouta

Kikuchi

Kita

Miyamoto

. (2011) Effects of bevacizumab and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for the patients with recurrent or refractory ovarian cancers. Gynecol Oncol 122: 233–237.

28.

Lesnock

Farris

Krivak

Smith

Markman

(2011) Consolidation paclitaxel is more cost-effective than bevacizumab following upfront treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 122: 473–478.

29.

Lin

Y.S.

Nguyen

Mendoza

J.L.

Escandon

Fei

Meng

Y.G.

. (1999) Preclinical pharmacokinetics, interspecies scaling, and tissue distribution of a humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 288: 371–378.

30.

McGonigle

Muntz

Vuky

Paley

Veljovich

Greer

. (2011) Combined weekly topotecan and biweekly bevacizumab in women with platinum-resistant ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer: results of a phase 2 study. Cancer 117: 3731–3740.

31.

McGuire

Hoskins

Brady

Kucera

Partridge

Look

. (1996) Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 334: 1–6.

32.

Markman

Bundy

Alberts

Fowler

Clark-Pearson

Carson

. (2001) Phase III trial of standard-dose intravenous cisplatin plus paclitaxel versus moderately high-dose carboplatin followed by intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in small-volume stage III ovarian carcinoma: an intergroup study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Southwestern Oncology Group, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 19: 1001–1007.

33.

Markman

Rothman

Hakes

Reichman

Hoskins

Rubin

. (1991) Second-line platinum therapy in patients with ovarian cancer previously treated with cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 9: 389–393.

34.

Merritt

Nick

Carroll

Matsuo

Dumble

. (2010) Bridging the gap between cytotoxic and biologic therapy with metronomic topotecan and pazopanib in ovarian cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 9: 985–995.

35.

Micha

Goldstein

Rettenmaier

Genesen

Graham

Bader

. (2007) A phase II study of outpatient first-line paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian, peritoneal, and fallopian tube cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17: 771–776.

36.

National Cancer Institute (2012) Carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab after surgery in treating patients with recurrent ovarian epithelial cancer, primary peritoneal cavity cancer, or fallopian tube cancer. linicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00565851. Available at: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00565851?term=NCT00565851&rank=1

37.

O’Malley

Richardson

Rheaume

Salani

Eisenhauer

Mccann

. (2011) Addition of bevacizumab to weekly paclitaxel significantly improves progression-free survival in heavily pretreated recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 121: 269–272.

38.

Penson

Dizon

Cannistra

Roche

Krasner

Berlin

. (2010) Phase II study of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab with maintenance bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy for advanced mullerian tumors. J Clin Oncol 28: 154–159.

39.

Perren

Swart

Pfisterer

Ledermann

Pujade-Lauraine

Kristensen

. for the ICON7 Investigators (2011) A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 365: 2484–2496.

40.

Piccart

Bertelsen

James

Cassidy

Mangioni

Simonsen

. (2000) Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: three-year results. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 699–708.

41.

Posadas

Liel

Kwitkowski

Minasian

Godwin

Hussain

. (2007) A phase II and pharmacodynamic study of gefitinib in patients with refractory or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer 109: 1323–1330.

42.

Pujade-Lauraine

Hilpert

Weber

Reuss

Poveda

Kristensen

. (2012) AURELIA: A randomized phase III trial evaluating bevacizumab (BEV) plus chemotherapy (CT) for platinum (PT)-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) (LBA5002). J Clin Oncol 30(Suppl. Abstracts): LBA5002.

43.

Rowan

(2009) Intraperitoneal therapy for ovarian cancer: why has it not become standard? J Natl Cancer Institute 101: 775–777.

44.

Sánchez-Muñoz

Mendiola

Pérez-Ruiz

Rodríguez-Sánchez

Jurado

Alonso-Carrión

. (2010) Bevacizumab plus low-dose metronomic oral cyclophosphamide in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Oncology 79: 98–104.

45.

Sandler

Gray

Perry

Brahmer

Schiller

Dowlati

. (2006) Paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small-cell cancer. N Engl J Med 355: 2542–2550.

46.

Schilder

Pathak

Lokshin

Holloway

Alvarez

Aghajanian

. (2009) Phase II trial of single-agent cetuximab in atients with persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma with the potential for dose escalation to rash. Gynecol Oncol 113: 21–27.

47.

Schilder

Sill

Chen

Darcy

Decesare

Lewandowski

. (2005) Phase II study of gefitinib in patients with relapsed or persistent ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma and evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and immunohistochemical expression: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Clin Cancer Res 11: 5539–5548.

48.

Schilder

Sill

Lee

Shaw

Senterman

Klein-Szanto

. (2008) Phase II evaluation of imatinib mesylate in the treatment of recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 26: 3418–3425.

49.

Shen

Ghazizadeh

Kawanami

Shimizu

Jin

Araki

. (2000) Prognostic significance of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in human ovarian carcinoma. Br J Cancer 83: 196–203.

50.

Siegel

Naishadham

Jemal

(2012) Cancer statistics for Hispanics/Latinos, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62: 21153. Epub ahead of print 17 Sept 2012. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21153.

51.

Tillmanns

T.D.

Lowe

M.P.

Walker

M.S.

Stepanski

E.J.

Schwartzberg

L.S.

(2012) Phase II clinical trial of bevacizumab with albumin-bound paclitaxel in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant primary epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. Epub ahead of print in September.

52.

Vergote

Tropé

Amant

Kristensen

Ehlen

Johnson

. (2010) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 363: 943–953.

Bevacizumab and ovarian cancer

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Tumor angiogenesis in epithelial ovarian cancer

Single-agent bevacizumab in recurrent ovarian cancer

Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as front-line treatment

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer

Conclusion

Footnotes

Funding

Conflict of interest statement

References