Abstract
Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is a molecular chaperone protein essential for cellular survival. Functionally, HSPs promote proper protein folding, prevent misfolding, and restore three-dimensional protein structure which is critical following toxic cellular stresses. Recently, targeting HSP90 pharmacologically has gained traction in cancer therapy. Oncogenic cells depend on their ability to withstand endogenous (anoxia, nutrient deprivation, pH changes, and deranged signaling pathways) and exogenous (chemotherapy and radiation therapy) stressors for survival. Pharmacological inhibition of HSP90 destabilizes proteins and leads to degradation through the proteasome. This article will review the utility of HSP90 inhibition, as well as the current adoption in clinical trials and practice.
Introduction
Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is a molecular chaperone protein essential for cellular survival. While ubiquitously expressed in unstressed normal cells, the HSP90 complex assists in the folding and function of a variety of client proteins [Whitesell and Lindquist, 2005]. Discovered in 1962, transcription of heat shock proteins (HSPs) were noted to be induced by thermal and anoxic stress in contrast to most other cellular proteins [Ritossa, 1996]. Functionally, HSPs promote proper protein folding, prevent misfolding, and restore three-dimensional protein structure which is critical following toxic cellular stresses [Morimoto et al. 1997]. In addition, HSP functions in promoting intracellular protein transport and cellular regulation.
There are over 175 client proteins involved in a multitude of cellular processes (e.g. cell cycle control, proliferative/antiapoptotic signaling) and many are activated in malignancy [Richardson et al. 2011]. Client proteins include tyrosine kinases (e.g. Akt and MEK), transcription factors [i.e. androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor (ER), and p53], and structural proteins (tubulin, actin) [Goetz et al. 2003]. Multiple proteins involved in cell-specific oncogenic processes – BCR-ABL in chronic myelogenous leukemia [Peng and Li, 2007], NPM-ALK in lymphomas [Bonvini et al. 2002], mutated fms-like tyrosine kinase receptor-3 in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [Knapper, 2007], and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) kinase mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [Shimamura et al. 2005] – are closely regulated by the binding of the HSP90 complex.
Recently, targeting HSP90 pharmacologically has gained traction in cancer therapy. Oncogenic cells depend on their ability to withstand endogenous (anoxia, nutrient deprivation, pH changes, and deranged signaling pathways) and exogenous (chemotherapy and radiation therapy) stressors for survival [Isaacs et al. 2003]. Pharmacological inhibition of HSP90 destabilizes proteins and leads to degradation through the proteasome [Sepp-Lorenzino et al. 1995]. Since HSP90 is involved in multiple redundant pathways critical for cell viability, its inhibition in multiple cancer animal models results in significant antitumor effects [Workman et al. 2007]. Further, this explains the potential benefit of HSP90 inhibition as sensitizers for traditional cytotoxics, which would otherwise have limited benefits [Neckers, 2007].
This article reviews the utility of HSP90 inhibition, as well as the current adoption in clinical trials and practice.
Heat shock protein 90 structure
HSP90 exists as a homodimer with an N-terminal domain that is critical for hydrolysis of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and is involved in interactions with chaperones [Richardson et al. 2011]. The HSP90 complex cycles from the ADP-bound state to the ATP-bound state and the conformational change that occurs with replacement of ADP by ATP stabilizes and activates client proteins. When ADP is rebound to HSP90, the client protein is released and may be marked for destruction by the proteasome through ubiquitination [Isaacs et al. 2003]. Thus HSP90 is able to protect client proteins in the presence of cellular stress (Figure 1).

Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90)
Heat shock protein 90 function in malignant cells
High-level expression of HSP90 and other chaperone proteins has been identified in multiple solid [Ciocca et al. 1993; Kaur and Ralhan, 1995] and hematologic tumors [Chant et al. 1995; Yufu et al. 1992] and are correlated with poor prognosis in breast cancer [Jameel et al. 1992]. Further, HSP90 expression facilitates tumor cell survival through inhibition of apoptosis and interactions of the chaperone complex with aberrant client proteins [Isaacs et al. 2003]. HSP90 stabilizes human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) in breast cancer and Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase in chronic myeloid leukemia [Blagosklonny, 2001; Xu et al. 2001], key drivers in oncogenesis.
Heat shock protein 90 inhibition
Initial inhibitors of HSP90 included the naturally occurring products geldanamycin and radiciol [Whitesell et al. 1994]. While these molecules are structurally unrelated, both target the N-terminal domain nucleotide-binding site with higher affinity than either ATP or ADP. In addition, these inhibitors increase the recruitment of ubiquitin ligases to the HSP90 chaperone complex, leading to enhanced client protein degradation via the proteasome [Roe et al. 1999]. While the initial experiments demonstrated degradation of client proteins involved in oncogenic pathways [Mahalingam et al. 2009], their clinical use was not pursued due to poor
Two geldanamycin analogues, 17 allylamino-17 demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG; tanespimycin) and 17 dimethylaminoethylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-DMAG; alvespimycin) improved upon the toxicity associated with geldanamycin and resulted in significantly improved chemical synthesis processes [Uehara, 2003]. In addition, it was demonstrated that 17-AAG bound cancer cells with more than 100-fold higher affinity than HSP90 in normal cells, implying that inhibitors had a tumor-specific affinity [Kamal et al. 2003]. However, this is debated within the literature and remains an area of active investigation.
17-AAG has been tested in more than 30 clinical trials since 1999 either as a single agent or in combination with other approved agents such as bortzemib, imatinib, docetaxel, rituximab, and trastuzumab [Kim et al. 2009]. Exciting data with trastuzumab demonstrated that the combination of 17-AAG and trastuzumab had activity in patients with HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer who had previously progressed on trastuzumab monotherapy [Modi et al. 2007]. Pharmacological factors that hampered 17-AAG clinical use were difficulties with formulation and poor aqueous solubility of the compound. 17-DMAG was developed as a potent HSP90 inhibitor with improved pharmacokinetic properties. While 17-DMAG also demonstrated clinical activity as a single agent [Lancet et al. 2010] or when combined with chemotherapy, toxicity precluded further clinical testing [Glaze et al. 2005].
A reduced form of 17-AAG, retaspimycin (IPI-504) [Sydor et al. 2006], was shown to be a more potent HSP90 inhibitor compared with 17-AAG in biochemical binding assays. The increased solubility allows for simple aqueous-based intravenous formulations for clinical administration [Ge et al. 2006]. There are currently two open studies of IPI-504 for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (phase II in combination with docetaxel and a phase Ib/II in combination with everolimus; see http://www.cancertrials.gov).
A metabolite of 17-AAG [Egorin et al. 1998], the de-allylated analogue 17-amino-17 demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AG) has been formulated as an oral agent. It has been shown to act as a potent HSP90 inhibitor with
There are several limitations to these natural compounds. First, toxicity, specifically hepatotoxicity, may be mediated through cellular depletion of glutathione[Cysyk et al. 2006]. Second, the relative importance of the cellular oxiodreductase NQO1 [NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1] is currently under active observation. It is unclear whether NQO1 levels correlate with either cell sensitivity or growth inhibition to 17-AAG [Douglas et al. 2009; Guo et al. 2005]. One of the largest challenges for this drug class has been to identify a tolerable dose and schedule that provides therapeutic benefit. These limitations are currently being overcome with new synthetic HSP90 inhibitors.
Synthetic heat shock protein 90 inhibitors
Novel synthetic HSP90 inhibitors based on diverse chemical scaffolds have been developed with some in the preclinical space and others being used in clinical trials.
Based upon the 17-AAG backbone, a nonquinone phenol derivative has been shown to have antitumor activity in mouse xenograft models and a signature HSP90 inhibitor pharmacodynamic response [Menzella et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2008]. These compounds are currently in preclinical development.
Synthetic analogues of radicicol have overcome the lack of
Another synthetic approach has been to design HSP90 inhibitors that mimic the shape adopted by ATP when bound to HSP90. These purine scaffold inhibitors exhibit phenotypic effects similar to geldanamycin. The most advanced compound is BIIB021 being developed by Biogen Idec (Weston, MA, USA) and is currently in several phase I and II clinical trials in patients with GIST and metastatic breast cancer.
There are currently two related molecules (CUDC-305 and NVP-BEP800) currently in preclinical testing. Both compounds have high oral bioavailability and CUDC-305 has shown high intracranial dose distribution [Bao et al. 2009; Brough et al. 2009]. A third orally available compound, SNX-5422, was recently acquired by Pfizer (New York, NY) with plans for phase I trials. SNX-5422 was found to be superior to 17-AAG in treatment of mutant EGFR NSCLC and has resulted in partial tumor regressions in
Finally there are several inhibitors whose structural classes are not disclosed. Early clinical trials are using MPC-3100, XL888, and Hsp990.
Heat shock protein 90 inhibition monitoring
Clinical assays to measure HSP90 inhibition generally focus on either measuring the levels of a number of HSP90 client proteins or induction of HSP70 from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) both pre- and postinhibitor administration of the HSP90 inhibitor. These pharmacodynamic studies have a reproducible index of
Tumor biopsies to measure pharmacodynamic response have also been studied [Banerji et al. 2005], but this is challenging due to logistical and ethical issues with repeated invasive procedures. A noninvasive approach measuring levels of tumor HER-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor are being studied. Using novel positron emission tomography markers, gallium-68 or zirconium-89 labeled antibodies, tumor receptor expression is able to be monitored in real time. This strategy is currently being incorporated in clinical trials [Holland et al. 2010; Nagengast et al. 2010; Smith-Jones et al. 2006].
Conclusions/future
Currently, there are over 20 interventional trials listed on ClinicalTrials.gov utilizing HSP90 inhibitors (Table 1). This strong interest in HSP90 inhibition in the cancer armamentarium is encouraging, however several fundamental questions remain. First, which tumor type is best suited for study? While, HER-2 is the most sensitive client protein to HSP90 inhibition, multiple tumor types have shown
Interventional trials listed on www.ClinicalTrials.gov utilizing heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitors.
17-AAG, 17 allylamino-17demethoxygeldanamycin; 17-DMAG, 17 dimethylaminoethylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia; GIST, gastrointestinal stromal tumor; IPI-504, retaspimycin; NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; SCLC, small cell lung cancer.
An alternative is to target HSP90 co-chaperones including HSP40, HSP70 or CDC37 [Trepel et al. 2010]. Zhang and colleagues demonstrated that celastrol inhibits the HSP90-CDC37 complex formation [Zhang et al. 2009]. This HSP90 co-chaperone complex is critical for regulating various kinases, including ERBB2, EGFR, and BRAF that are critical drivers in tumor formation and proliferation. Further, by specifically targeting these complexes, there might be less severe toxicities observed clinically.
Another approach is to use HSP90 inhibition as an adjuvant to other chemotherapeutics and shut down the heat shock response to increase cellular stress and protein degradation. However, one challenge is that the current drug development paradigm of identifying a maximum tolerated dose may not be applicable in this situation as target modulation is critical to the antitumor effects elicited with HSP90 inhibition. One major strength of HSP90 inhibitors is the therapeutic window created as HSP90 inhibitors selectively accumulate in tumor tissue over normal tissue. This rapid clearance from normal tissues and the blood compartment may inhibit traditional pharmacokinetic monitoring, dosing, and scheduling. Thus, direct tumor monitoring either by biopsy or noninvasive methods is critical to optimal clinical efficacy. Given, the recent developments of novel synthetic analogues with improved chemical properties, the future is quite promising for this class of agents.
Footnotes
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no conflicts of interest in preparing this article.
