Abstract
Background
The purpose of this systematic review is to compare the outcomes and complications of allograft-prosthetic composite (APC) versus megaprosthesis for shoulder arthroplasty with non-oncologic indications.
Methods
A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane to search for studies through April 2025 that reported outcomes on APC, megaprosthesis, or both with non-oncologic indications. Data was extracted on study details, patient demographics, follow-up durations, surgical indications, outcome measures, range of motion (ROM), surgical complications, and revision rates.
Results
Five studies with 157 patients (27 megaprosthesis, 130 APC) met inclusion criteria. Over 25% of the patients were male, and the mean age was 66 years. A majority of patients (n = 155) had undergone prior surgery. Of the four studies that reported ROM, all found improvements post-operatively, which were significant (p < 0.05) for forward flexion (APC and megaprosthesis), abduction (APC), internal rotation (megaprosthesis), and external rotation (megaprosthesis and one of three APC studies). Forty-eight complications and 33 revisions were reported, which both occurred at higher rates following megaprosthesis.
Conclusion
Compared to APC, megaprosthesis may offer slightly better postoperative ROM but confers a higher risk profile. These findings should be considered when choosing a shoulder arthroplasty technique with non-oncologic indications.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
