Shoulder pain syndrome is a common musculoskeletal disorder that impairs daily function and quality of life. While exercise therapy is widely used, the additional value of biofeedback remains unclear. This meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of exercise therapy, with and without biofeedback, on pain, function, and strength in individuals with shoulder pain.
Methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Databases were searched until November 2024, with an updated search in February 2025, yielding no additional studies.
Results
Thirteen trials met the inclusion criteria. Exercise therapy significantly reduced shoulder pain (SMD: −0.47; 95% CI, −0.83 to −0.11; p = 0.01) and improved shoulder function (SMD: 0.70; 95% CI, 0.13 to 1.28; p = 0.02) compared to controls. However, exercise combined with biofeedback did not produce statistically significant improvements in pain (p = 0.42), function (p = 0.25), or strength (p = 0.52). Considerable heterogeneity was observed, especially among biofeedback trials. Sensitivity analyses revealed inconsistent effects of biofeedback across studies.
Conclusion
Exercise therapy is effective in reducing pain and enhancing function in individuals with shoulder pain. The addition of biofeedback shows no consistent benefit and requires further high-quality research. Heterogeneity among studies warrants cautious interpretation.
KhodaverdizadehMMohammad RahimiNEsfahaniM. A systematic review and meta-analysis: the effect of scapular-focused exercise therapy on shoulder pain and function and scapular positioning in people with scapular dyskinesia. Iran Rehabil J2023; 21: 577–590.
2.
KamonsekiDHCalixtreLBBarretoRPG,et al.Effects of electromyographic biofeedback interventions for shoulder pain and function: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil2021; 35: 952–963.
3.
PageMJO’ConnorDAMalekM, et al.Patients’ experience of shoulder disorders: a systematic review of qualitative studies for the OMERACT shoulder core domain set. Rheumatology2019; 58: 1410–1421.
4.
MichenerLASharmaSCoolsAM,et al.Relative scapular muscle activity ratios are altered in subacromial pain syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2016; 25: 1861–1867.
5.
HuangTSOuHLHuangCY,et al.Specific kinematics and associated muscle activation in individuals with scapular dyskinesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2015; 24: 1227–1234.
6.
LudewigPMCookTM. Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement. Phys Ther2000; 80: 276–291.
7.
LopesADTimmonsMKGroverM, et al.Visual scapular dyskinesis: kinematics and muscle activity alterations in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2015; 96: 298–306.
8.
KiblerWBLudewigPMMcClurePW, et al.Clinical implications of scapular dyskinesis in shoulder injury: the 2013 consensus statement from the ‘Scapular Summit.’. Br J Sports Med2013; 47: 877–885.
9.
ZhongZZangWTangZ, et al.Effect of scapular stabilization exercises on subacromial pain (impingement) syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Neurol2024; 15: 1357763.
10.
SilveiraALimaCBeaupreL, et al.Shoulder specific exercise therapy is effective in reducing chronic shoulder pain: a network meta-analysis. PLoS One2024; 19: e0294014.
11.
MeloASCMoreiraJSAfreixoV, et al.Effectiveness of specific scapular therapeutic exercises in patients with shoulder pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. JSES Rev Rep Tech2024; 4: 161–174.
12.
ParaskevopoulosEPlakoutsisGChronopoulosE,et al.Effectiveness of combined program of manual therapy and exercise vs exercise only in patients with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Health2023; 15: 727–735.
13.
SharmaSHussainMESharmaS. Effects of exercise therapy plus manual therapy on muscle activity, latency timing and SPADI score in shoulder impingement syndrome. Complement Ther Clin Pract2021; 44: 101390.
14.
TostiBCorradoSManconeS, et al.Integrated use of biofeedback and neurofeedback techniques in treating pathological conditions and improving performance: a narrative review. Front Neurosci2024; 18: 1358481.
15.
TiryakiPÇelikDBilselK,et al.Effectiveness of exercises with electromyographic biofeedback in conservative treatment of massive rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2023; 102: 419–426.
16.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. J Clin Epidemiol2021; 134: 103–112.
17.
HigginsJPTThompsonSGDeeksJJ,et al.Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J2003; 327: 557–560.
18.
EggerMSmithGDSchneiderM,et al.Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br Med J1997; 315: 629–634.
19.
SterneJACSavovićJPageMJ, et al.Rob 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J2019; 366: l4898.
20.
SandsjöLLarsmanPHuis in’t VeldRMHA,et al.Clinical evaluation of a myofeedback-based teletreatment service applied in the workplace: a randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare2010; 16: 329–335.
21.
MaCSzetoGPYanT, et al.Comparing biofeedback with active exercise and passive treatment for the management of work-related neck and shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2011; 92: 849–858.
22.
LuoSLShihYFLinJJ,et al.Scapula-focused exercises with or without biofeedback and corticospinal excitability in recreational overhead athletes with shoulder impingement. J Athl Train2024; 59: 617–626.
23.
KosterinkSMHuis in’t VeldRMHACagnieB, et al.The clinical effectiveness of a myofeedback-based teletreatment service in patients with non-specific neck and shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare2010; 16: 316–321.
24.
StakerJLEvansAJJacobsLE, et al.The effect of tactile and verbal guidance during scapulothoracic exercises: an EMG and kinematic investigation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2022; 62: 102334.
25.
McKennaLJBonnettLPanzichK, et al.The addition of real-time ultrasound visual feedback to manual facilitation increases serratus anterior activation in adults with painful shoulders: a randomized crossover trial. Phys Ther2021; 101: pzaa208.
26.
HottaGHQueirozPOPde LemosTW, et al.Immediate effect of scapula-focused exercises performed with kinematic biofeedback on scapular kinematics in individuals with subacromial pain syndrome. Clin Biomech2018; 58: 7–13.
27.
SaitoHHarroldMECavalheriV,et al.Scapular focused interventions to improve shoulder pain and function in adults with subacromial pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiother Theory Pract2018; 34: 653–670.
28.
FerlitoRTestaGMcCrackenKL, et al.Effectiveness of therapeutical interventions on the scapulothoracic complex in the management of patients with subacromial impingement and frozen shoulder: a systematic review. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol2023; 8: 38.
29.
RoyJSMoffetHMcFadyenBJ. The effects of unsupervised movement training with visual feedback on upper limb kinematic in persons with shoulder impingement syndrome. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2010; 20: 939–946.
30.
BaşkurtZBaşkurtFGelecekN,et al.The effectiveness of scapular stabilization exercise in the patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil2011; 24: 173–179.
31.
AytarABaltaciGUhlT, et al.The effects of scapular mobilization in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Sport Rehabil2015; 24: 116–129.
EngebretsenKGrotleMBautz-HolterE, et al.Supervised exercises compared with radial extracorporeal shock-wave therapy for subacromial shoulder pain: 1-year results of a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther2011; 91: 37–47.
34.
de OliveiraAKAda CostaKSAde LucenaGL, et al.Comparing exercises with and without electromyographic biofeedback in subacromial pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Biomech2022; 93: 105596.
35.
MoezyASepehrifarSDodaranMS. The effects of scapular stabilization based exercise therapy on pain, posture, flexibility and shoulder mobility in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome: a controlled randomized clinical trial. Med J Islam Repub Iran2014; 28: 87.
36.
KimJShinDSongC. Visual feedback to improve the effects of scapular stabilization exercises on pain intensity, range of motion, strength, and disability in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. Med Sci Technol2017; 58: 42–48.
37.
Juul-KristensenBLarsenCMEshojH, et al.Positive effects of neuromuscular shoulder exercises with or without EMG-biofeedback, on pain and function in participants with subacromial pain syndrome–A randomised controlled trial. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2019; 48: 161–168.
38.
StruyfFNijsJMollekensS, et al.Scapular-focused treatment in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Rheumatol2013; 32: 73–85.
39.
ShahMSutariaJKhantA. Effectiveness of scapular stability exercises in the patient with the shoulder impingement syndrome. Indian J Phys Ther2014; 2: 79–84.
40.
PekyavasNOErgunN. Comparison of virtual reality exergaming and home exercise programs in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome and scapular dyskinesis: short term effect. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc2017; 51: 238–242.
41.
NowotnyJKastenPKopkowC, et al.Evaluation of a new exercise program in the treatment of scapular dyskinesis. Int J Sports Med2018; 39: 782–790.
42.
MoslehiMLetafatkarAMiriH. Feedback improves the scapular-focused treatment effects in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc2021; 29: 2281–2288.
43.
BiglianiLULevineWN. Current concepts review-subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79: 1854–1868.
44.
RavichandranHJanakiramanBGelawAY, et al.Effect of scapular stabilization exercise program in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a systematic review. J Exerc Rehabil2020; 16: 216–226.
45.
YukselEYesilyaprakSS. The effectiveness of scapular stabilization exercises in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome and scapular dyskinesis. Ann Rheum Dis2015; 74: 1311–1316.
46.
LeeES. The effect of SNAGs and biofeedback training on the integrative propriocepcion and function of the patients with cervical disorder. J Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Soc2020; 21: 284–290.
47.
FlorjanskiWMalysaAOrzeszekS, et al.Evaluation of biofeedback usefulness in masticatory muscle activity management—A systematic review. J Clin Med2019; 8: 766.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
