Re-tear following rotator cuff repair (RCR) is a concerning complication that can lead to poor patient outcomes and necessitate the need for revision surgery. The purpose of our study was to look at the combined construct of knotted vs. knotless medial row and suture vs. suture tape, focusing primarily on re-tear rates following surgery.
Methods
A retrospective observational study of 343 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic double row, 4-anchor rotator cuff repair from February 2014 to March 2020 was conducted. Univariate and multivariate statistics were used to assess differences in demographics, comorbidities and tear characteristics between patients who experienced a symptomatic re-tear and those who did not.
Results
The overall symptomatic re-tear rate was 7.6%. Patients who had a knotted medial row repair had a significantly lower rate of re-tear (4.7 vs. 11.3%, p = 0.022). Patients that had a knotted medial row and suture tape repair were significantly less likely to experience a re-tear (OR: 0.180, p = 0.001).
Discussion
The use of suture tape and a knotted medial row repair decreases the incidence of symptomatic re-tear following rotator cuff repair. The combined construct of suture tape and a knotted medial row in rotator cuff repair decreases the risk for symptomatic re-tear following surgery.
MatherRCKoenigLAcevedoD, et al.The societal and economic value of rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am2013; 95: 1993–2000.
2.
ChakravartyKWebleyM. Shoulder joint movement and its relationship to disability in the elderly. J Rheumatol1993; 20: 1359–1361.
3.
KarasuyamaMGotohMTaharaK, et al.Clinical results of conservative management in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tear: a meta-analysis. Clin Shoulder Elb2020; 23: 86–93.
4.
GomollAHKatzJNWarnerJJ, et al.Rotator cuff disorders: recognition and management among patients with shoulder pain. Arthritis Rheum2004; 50: 3751–3761.
5.
MallNALeeASChahalJ, et al.Transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair: a systematic review on the biomechanical importance of tying the medial row. Arthroscopy2013; 29: 377–386.
6.
SugayaHMaedaKMatsukiK, et al.Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. A prospective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am2007; 89: 953–960.
7.
RobinsonSKrigbaumHKramerJ, et al.Double row equivalent for rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical analysis of a new technique. J Orthop2018; 15: 426–431.
8.
GrimbergJDiopAKalraK, et al.In vitro biomechanical comparison of three different types of single- and double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: analysis of continuous bone-tendon contact pressure and surface during different simulated joint positions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2010; 19: 236–243.
9.
DinesJSBediAElAttracheNS, et al.Single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: techniques and outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2010; 18: 83–93.
10.
QuigleyRJGuptaAOhJH, et al.Biomechanical comparison of single-row, double-row, and transosseous-equivalent repair techniques after healing in an animal rotator cuff tear model. J Orthop Res2013; 31: 1254–1260.
11.
LeekBTRobertsonCMaharA, et al.Comparison of mechanical stability in double-row rotator cuff repairs between a knotless transtendon construct versus the addition of medial knots. Arthroscopy2010; 26: S127–S133.
12.
HuntingtonLColes-BlackJRichardsonM, et al.The use of suture-tape and suture-wire in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a comparative biomechanics study. Injury2018; 49: 2047–2052.
13.
LiuRWLamPHShepherdHM, et al.Tape versus suture in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: biomechanical analysis and assessment of failure rates at 6 months. Orthop J Sports Med2017; 5: 2325967117701212.
14.
DuquinTRBuyeaCBissonLJ. Which method of rotator cuff repair leads to the highest rate of structural healing? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med2010; 38: 835–841.
15.
BedeirYHJimenezAEGraweBM. Recurrent tears of the rotator cuff: effect of repair technique and management options. Orthop Rev (Pavia)2018; 10: 7593.
16.
ShamsudinALamPHPetersK, et al.Revision versus primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a 2-year analysis of outcomes in 360 patients. Am J Sports Med2015; 43: 557–564.
17.
MazzoccaADMillettPJGuancheCA, et al.Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med2005; 33: 1861–1868.
18.
GerberCSchneebergerAGPerrenSM, et al.Experimental rotator cuff repair. A preliminary study. J Bone Joint Surg Am1999; 81: 1281–1290.
19.
HuijsmansPEPritchardMPBerghsBM, et al.Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with double-row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am2007; 89: 1248–1257.
20.
BusfieldBTGlousmanREMcGarryMH, et al.A biomechanical comparison of 2 technical variations of double-row rotator cuff fixation: the importance of medial row knots. Am J Sports Med2008; 36: 901–906.
21.
KaplanKElAttracheNSVazquezO, et al.Knotless rotator cuff repair in an external rotation model: the importance of medial-row horizontal mattress sutures. Arthroscopy2011; 27: 471–478.
22.
ChristoforettiJJKruppRJSingletonSB, et al.Arthroscopic suture bridge transosseus equivalent fixation of rotator cuff tendon preserves intratendinous blood flow at the time of initial fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2012; 21: 523–530.
23.
BurkhartSSAdamsCRBurkhartSS, et al.A biomechanical comparison of 2 techniques of footprint reconstruction for rotator cuff repair: the SwiveLock-FiberChain construct versus standard double-row repair. Arthroscopy2009; 25: 274–281.
24.
RheeYGChoNSParkeCS. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using modified mason-allen medial row stitch: knotless versus knot-tying suture bridge technique. Am J Sports Med2012; 40: 2440–2447.
25.
ElbulukAMCoxeFRFabricantPD, et al.Does medial-row fixation technique affect the retear rate and functional outcomes after double-row transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair?Orthop J Sports Med2019; 7: 2325967119842881.
26.
PaulySFiebigDKieserB, et al.Biomechanical comparison of four double-row speed-bridging rotator cuff repair techniques with or without medial or lateral row enhancement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc2011; 19: 2090–2097.
27.
PogorzelskiJFritzEMHoranMP, et al.Minimum five-year outcomes and clinical survivorship for arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent double-row rotator cuff repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2019; 27: e1093–e1101.
28.
MillettPJEspinozaCHoranMP, et al.Predictors of outcomes after arthroscopic transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair in 155 cases: a propensity score weighted analysis of knotted and knotless self-reinforcing repair techniques at a minimum of 2 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg2017; 137: 1399–1408.
29.
SmithGCSBouwmeesterTMLamPH. Knotless double-row SutureBridge rotator cuff repairs have improved self-reinforcement compared with double-row SutureBridge repairs with tied medial knots: a biomechanical study using an ovine model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2017; 26: 2206–2212.
30.
ParkMCPetersonABMcGarryMH, et al.Knotless transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair improves biomechanical self-reinforcement without diminishing footprint contact compared with medial knotted repair. Arthroscopy2017; 33: 1473–1481.
31.
MijaresMRHillerAAlhandiA, et al.Is it necessary to tie the medial row in rotator cuff repair double-row constructs when using suture tape?J Clin Orthop Trauma2020; 11: S378–S382.
