Arthroscopic labral repair of the hip is successfully performed with increasing frequency using either knotless or knotted suture anchors, each with its own risks and benefits.
Purpose:
To examine biomechanical and clinical outcomes for labral repair of the hip based on the use of knotted or knotless suture anchors.
Study Design:
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
Methods:
A search was performed to retrieve clinical and biomechanical studies examining the use of knotless or knotted suture anchors for arthroscopic labral repair of the hip. The studied outcomes included functional outcome scores such as modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living, biomechanical outcomes, failure mechanisms, and complications such as revision/reoperation and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Results:
A total of 47 articles met inclusion criteria for analysis (5 articles examining biomechanical outcomes and 42 reporting clinical outcomes). Included patients (N = 6185) who underwent hip labral repair had a mean age of 33.0 ± 8.5 years and follow-up time of 43.8 ± 18.4 months. The knotless group (n = 2719) had a mean preoperative mHHS of 63.3 ± 4.1 and postoperative mHHS of 86.3 ± 2.8 at a mean follow-up time of 47.2 ± 16.1 months. The knotted group (n = 2600) had a mean preoperative mHHS of 69.5 ± 8.3 and postoperative mHHS of 88.8 ± 5.5 with a mean follow-up time of 44.8 ± 18.1 months. The most common reason for failure of knotless anchors in biomechanical studies was suture breakage or pullout, and for knotted anchors it was anchor pullout. Of the articles reporting on revisions and/or conversion to THA after labral repair, the knotless group had 225 reoperations (8.1%) and 123 cases of conversion to THA (4.4%). The knotted group had 101 reoperations (6.2%) and 31 cases of conversion to THA (1.9%).
Conclusion:
Arthroscopic management of labral repairs of the hip using either knotless or knotted suture anchors appears to be both safe and effective in reducing pain and improving function. Biomechanical evaluation suggests differing failure mechanisms in knotted versus knotless anchors. The rates of revision and conversion to THA are low overall, irrespective of knotted or knotless anchors.
AndersonSTrenhaileS.All knot-less arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech. 2018;7(8):e811-e816.
2.
AvnieliIBVidraMFactorS, et al. Postoperative weightbearing protocols after arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement does not affect patient outcome: a comparative study with minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2020;36(1):159-164.
3.
BeckMKalhorMLeunigMGanzR.Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(7):1012-1018.
4.
Ben TovTAmarEShapiraASteinbergEAtounERathE. Clinical and functional outcome after acetabular labral repair in patients aged older than 50 years. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(3):305-310.
5.
BencaEDlaskaCEDiFrancoMD, et al. Biomechanical comparison of knotless vs. knotted suture anchors in the acetabular rim with respect to bone density. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2020;74:21-26.
6.
BentsEJBradyPCAdamsCRTokishJMHigginsLDDenardPJ.Patient-reported outcomes of knotted and knotless glenohumeral labral repairs are equivalent. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017;46(6):279-283.
7.
BoliaIKFagottiLBriggsKKPhilipponMJ.Midterm outcomes following repair of capsulotomy versus nonrepair in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement with labral repair. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(6):1828-1834.
8.
ByrdJWTJonesKS.Arthroscopic acetabular labral repair in patients over the age of 60 years: a matched case-control study. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(5):1406-1410.
9.
ByrdJWTJonesKS.Primary repair of the acetabular labrum: outcomes with 2 years’ follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(5):588-592.
CetinkayaSTokerBOzdenVEDikmenGTaserO.Arthroscopic labral repair versus labral debridement in patients with femoroacetabular impingement: a minimum 2.5 year follow-up study. Hip Int. 2016;26(1):20-24.
12.
ChristoforettiJJBucciGNickelBSingletonSBMcGovernRP.“Mini-Max” knotless acetabular labrum repair: repair construct rationale and allocation in a consecutive case series with minimum 1-year clinical outcomes. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2021;8(3):261-269.
13.
ConawayWKMartinSD.Puncture capsulotomy during hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: preserving anatomy and biomechanics. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;6(6):e2265-e2269.
14.
CortenKGanzRChosaELeunigM.Bone apposition of the acetabular rim in deep hips: a distinct finding of global pincer impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(suppl 2):10-16.
15.
Di BenedettoPGorassoGCastriottaLMancusoFGiardiniPCauseroA. All-suture anchors in arthroscopic acetabular labral repair: our experience. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(4), supplement:85.
16.
DombBGKyinCRosinskyPJ, et al. Circumferential labral reconstruction for irreparable labral tears in the primary setting: minimum 2-year outcomes with a nested matched-pair labral repair control group. Arthroscopy. 2020;36(10):2583-2597.
17.
DombBGPhilipponMJGiordanoBD.Arthroscopic capsulotomy, capsular repair, and capsular plication of the hip: relation to atraumatic instability. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(1):162-173.
18.
DombBGStakeCEFinleyZJBaiseRABotserI.Two-year outcome of arthroscopic capsular repair of the hip: a prospective matched-pair controlled study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2013;1(4):2325967113S00009.
19.
DombBGYuenLCOrtiz-DecletVLitrentaJPeretsIChenAW.Arthroscopic labral base repair in the hip: 5-year minimum clinical outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(12):2882-2890.
20.
EconomopoulosKJChhabraAKweonC.Prospective randomized comparison of capsular management techniques during hip arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(2):395-402.
21.
ErnatJJComfortSMJildehTRRuzbarskyJJPhilipponMJ.Effect of anchor density on functional outcomes after arthroscopic hip labral repair. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(12):3210-3217.
22.
Forster-HorváthCUnterreithmeierUFriesS, et al. Midterm follow-up and assessment of cartilage thickness by arthro-magnetic resonance imaging after arthroscopic cam resection, labral repair, and rim trimming without labral detachment. Arthroscopy. 2021;37(2):541-551.
23.
FukuiKBriggsKKTrindadeCACPhilipponMJ.Outcomes after labral repair in patients with femoroacetabular impingement and borderline dysplasia. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(12):2371-2379.
24.
GreavesLLGilbartMKYungACKozlowskiPWilsonDR.Effect of acetabular labral tears, repair and resection on hip cartilage strain: a 7 T MR study. J Biomech. 2010;43(5):858-863.
25.
HaYCKimKCShinYE.Patient satisfaction after arthroscopic repair of acetabular labral tears. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014;6(2):159-164.
26.
HanypsiakBTDelongJMSimmonsLLoweWBurkhartS.Knot strength varies widely among expert arthroscopists. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(8):1978-1984.
HigginsJPTAltmanDGGøtzschePC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:D5928.
29.
HylandSSMaesoADRogersMGoforthMBrolinsonPG.Comparative analysis between operative and non-operative acetabular labral tear injuries in Division 1 collegiate athletes. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1):9461.
30.
JacksonTJHammarstedtJEVemulaSPDombBG.Acetabular labral base repair versus circumferential suture repair: a matched-paired comparison of clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(9):1716-1721.
31.
JacksonTJHanypsiakBStakeCELindnerDEl BitarYFDombBG.Arthroscopic labral base repair in the hip: clinical results of a described technique. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(2):208-213.
32.
KaplanDJSamimMBurkeCJBaronSLMeislinRJYoumT.Decreased hip labral width measured via preoperative magnetic resonance imaging is associated with inferior outcomes for arthroscopic labral repair for femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2021;37(1):98-107.
33.
KnapikDMKolaczkoJGGillespieRJSalataMJVoosJE.Complications and return to activity after arthroscopic repair of isolated type II SLAP lesions: a systematic review comparing knotted versus knotless suture anchors. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(4):2325967120911361.
34.
KohJLGuptaK.Evaluation of repair of the hip labrum under simulated full weight-bearing. Hip Int. 2017;27(1):104-109.
35.
KollmorgenRMatherR.Current concepts in labral repair and refixation: anatomical approach to labral management. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017;46(1):42-48.
36.
LaFranceRKenneyRGiordanoBMohrKCabreraJSnibbeJ.The effect of platelet enriched plasma on clinical outcomes in patients with femoroacetabular impingement following arthroscopic labral repair and femoral neck osteoplasty. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015;2(2):158.
37.
LaPorteCRahlMDAyeniORMengeTJ.Postoperative pain management strategies in hip arthroscopy. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019;12(4):479.
38.
LarsonCMGiveansMRStoneRM.Arthroscopic debridement versus refixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement: mean 3.5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(5):1015-1021.
39.
LeeJWHwangDSKangCHwangJMChungHJ.Arthroscopic repair of acetabular labral tears associated with femoroacetabular impingement: 7-10 years of long-term follow-up results. Clin Orthop Surg. 2019;11(1):28-35.
40.
LeeYKHaYCHwangDSKooKH.Learning curve of basic hip arthroscopy technique: CUSUM analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(8):1940-1944.
41.
LertwanichPEjnismanLPhilipponMJ. Comments on “Labral base refixation in the hip: rationale and technique for an anatomic approach to labral repair.”Arthroscopy. 2011;27(3):303-304.
42.
LimJYJangYHYooJILeeYKKooKHHaYC.Outcomes after arthroscopic repair in patients with tears of hypertrophic versus morphologically normal acetabular labra. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(5):1168-1174.
43.
LitrentaJMuBHOrtiz-DecletV, et al. Hip arthroscopy successfully treats femoroacetabular impingement in adolescent athletes. J Pediatr Orthop. 2020;40(3):e156-e160.
44.
LitrentaJMMuBHChenAWPeretsIOrtiz-DecletVDombBG.Arthroscopic labral treatment in adolescents: clinical outcomes with minimum 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(4):870-875.
45.
MaldonadoDRChenSLChenJW, et al. Prospective analysis of arthroscopic hip anatomic labral repair utilizing knotless suture anchor technology: the controlled-tension anatomic technique at minimum 2-year follow-up. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(7):2325967120935079.
46.
MaldonadoDROuyangVWOwensJS, et al. Labral tear management in patients aged 40 years and older undergoing primary hip arthroscopy: a propensity-matched case-control study with minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(14):3925-3936.
47.
MaldonadoDROwensJSGoCC, et al. Females and males achieved comparable outcomes and clinical benefits following primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair, but age affected outcomes and conversion to total hip arthroplasty. A short and mid-term follow-up analysis with dual stratification. Arthroscopy. 2022;38(8):2427-2440.
48.
MartinSDKucharikMPAbrahamPFNazalMRMeekWMVaradyNH.Functional outcomes of arthroscopic acetabular labral repair with and without bone marrow aspirate concentrate. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022;104(1):4-14.
49.
MatacheBAHurleyETKanakamedalaAC, et al. Knotted versus knotless anchors for labral repair in the shoulder: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2021;37(4):1314-1321.
50.
MengeTJBriggsKKDornanGJMcNamaraSCPhilipponMJ.Survivorship and outcomes 10 years following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: labral debridement compared with labral repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(12):997-1004.
51.
MohanRJohnsonNRHevesiMGibbsCMLevyBAKrychAJ.Return to sport and clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopic labral repair in young amateur athletes: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(9):1679-1684.
52.
MoreiraBPascual-GarridoCChadayamurriVMei-DanO.Eversion-inversion labral repair and reconstruction technique for optimal suction seal. Arthrosc Tech. 2015;4(6):e697-e700.
53.
MullinsKFilanDCartonP.Arthroscopic correction of sports-related femoroacetabular impingement in competitive athletes: 2-year clinical outcome and predictors for achieving minimal clinically important difference. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(3):2325967121989675.
54.
NaessigSKucharikMMeekWEberlinCMartinS.Prehabilitation and rehabilitation program for patients undergoing arthroscopic acetabular labral repair: a comprehensive 5-phase patient-guided program. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022;10(2):23259671211071073.
55.
NakashimaHUtsunomiyaHKanezakiS, et al. Is arthroscopic hip labral repair/reconstruction surgery effective for treating femoroacetabular impingement in the presence of osteoarthritis?Clin J Sport Med. 2021;31(4):367-373.
56.
OkanoueYDanJAsoKSugimuraNTeranishiYIkeuchiM.Arthroscopic labral repair combined with less invasive open-shelf acetabuloplasty for patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023;33(5):2143-2149.
57.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:N71.
58.
PhilipponMJSchenkerML.A new method for acetabular rim trimming and labral repair. Clin Sports Med. 2006;25(2):293-297.
59.
PhilipponMJWeissDRKuppersmithDABriggsKKHayCJ.Arthroscopic labral repair and treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in professional hockey players. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(1):99-104.
60.
RanawatASGolishSRMillerMD, et al. Modes of failure of knotted and knotless suture anchors in an arthroscopic Bankart repair model with the capsulolabral tissues intact. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2011;40(3):134-138.
61.
RedmondJMEl BitarYFGuptaAStakeCEVemulaSPDombBG.Arthroscopic acetabuloplasty and labral refixation without labral detachment. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(1):105-112.
62.
RheeSMKangSYJangECKimJYHaYC.Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic acetabular labral repair using knot-tying or knotless suture technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(10):1411-1416.
63.
RiffAJKunzeKNMovassaghiK, et al. Systematic review of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: the importance of labral repair and capsular closure. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(2):646-656.e3.
64.
RobinsonPGLuHWilliamsonT, et al. Do the outcomes of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement change over time?Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022;108(4):103157.
65.
SafranMRBehnAWBotserIBMardonesR.Knotless anchors in acetabular labral repair: a biomechanical comparison. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(1):70-76.e1.
66.
SawyerGABriggsKKDornanGJOmmenNDPhilipponMJ.Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic hip labral repair using looped versus pierced suture techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1683-1688.
67.
ShahAKayJMemonM, et al. What makes suture anchor use safe in hip arthroscopy? A systematic review of techniques and safety profile. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(4):1280-1293.e1.
68.
ShimJWJungTWKimISYooJC.Knot-tying versus knotless suture anchors for arthroscopic Bankart repair: a comparative study. Yonsei Med J. 2021;62(8):743-749.
69.
ShinJJde SaDLBurnhamJMMauroCS.Refractory pain following hip arthroscopy: evaluation and management. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2018;5(1):3-14.
70.
SlimKNiniEForestierDKwiatkowskiFPanisYChipponiJ.Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(9):712-716.
71.
SorianoKKJFloresSEAungMSNguyenTQZhangAL. Treatment of labral calcification in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome with arthroscopic calcification excision, labral repair, and osteoplasty improves outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2021;37(2):554-563.
UchidaSMurataYTsukamotoM, et al. Endoscopic shelf acetabuloplasty concomitant with labral repair, cam osteoplasty, and capsular plication to treat acetabular dysplasia in artistic athletes: a case series. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(11):23259671211049222.
74.
UggenCWeiAGlousmanRE, et al. Biomechanical comparison of knotless anchor repair versus simple suture repair for type II SLAP lesions. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(10):1085-1092.
75.
UtsunomiyaHStoraciHWRosenbergSI, et al. The hip suction seal, part II: the effect of rim trimming, chondrolabral junction separation, and labral repair/refixation on hip distractive stability. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(11):2733-2739.
76.
VassaloCCBarrosAAGCostaLPGuedesEDCDe AndradeMAP. Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic repair of acetabular labral tears. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2018;4(1):328.
77.
WestermannRWDayMADuchmanKRGlassNALynchTSRosneckJT.Trends in hip arthroscopic labral repair: an American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database study. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(5):1413-1419.
78.
WhiteBJPattersonJHerzogMM.Bilateral hip arthroscopy: direct comparison of primary acetabular labral repair and primary acetabular labral reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(2):433-440.
79.
WhiteBJPattersonJScolesAMLiloATHerzogMM.Hip arthroscopy in patients aged 40 years and older: greater success with labral reconstruction compared with labral repair. Arthroscopy. 2020;36(8):2137-2144.
80.
WiningerAEDabashSEllisTJNhoSJHarrisJD.The key parts of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: implications for the learning curve. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(6):23259671211018703.
81.
YooJIHaYCLeeYKLeeGYYooMJKooKH.Morphologic changes and outcomes after arthroscopic acetabular labral repair evaluated using postoperative computed tomography arthrography. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(2):337-345.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
