Use of patient reported experience measure and patient reported outcome measures to evaluate differences in surgical or non-surgical management of humeral shaft fractures

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of patient reported experience measures (PREMs) in humeral shaft fractures managed with or without surgery against patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Methods

Adult patients treated for a humeral shaft fracture between June 2015 and August 2017 were included in non-surgery and surgery (early and late surgery) groups. The PREM questionnaire was based on patient and clinician feedback obtained during focus groups and was posted to patients. PROMs included the short form-12 (SF-12) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, stiffness, function and satisfaction.

Results

Eighty-one patients responded, 54 patients were treated in a brace and 27 with surgery (13 early, 14 late). There was moderate positive correlation between PREM and VAS satisfaction and function and moderate negative correlation with VAS pain and stiffness. There was also moderate positive correlation between PREM and SF-12 mental and weak positive correlation with SF-12 physical. The late surgery group had poorer PREMs (expectations, p = 0.002 and friends & family test, p = 0.0001) and PROMs (VAS satisfaction, p = 0.005) compared to the early surgery group.

Conclusions

PREMs can be used in conjunction with PROMs to improve the patient's quality of care and as a means of identifying, at an early stage, those patients not doing well and to offer surgery.

Keywords

patient reported experience measure PREM PROM non-surgical surgical humeral shaft fractures

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bobrovitz

Santana

Kline

, et al. Multicenter validation of the quality of trauma care patient-reported experience measure (QTAC-PREM). J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2016; 80: 111–118.

Jones

Wainwright

Foster

, et al. A systematic review of patient reported outcomes and patient experience in enhanced recovery after orthopaedic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2014; 96: 89–94.

Bailey

. A guide to patient reported measures– theory, landscape and uses. Monmouth Partners. 2016; 1–6. https://silo.tips/download/a-guide-to-patient-reported-measures-theory-landscape-and-uses (accessed 16 October 2021).

Kingsley

Patel

. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Educ 2017; 17: 137–144.

Coulter

. Measuring what matters to patients. Br Med J 2017; 356: 1–2.

Gagnier

Morgenstern

Kellam

. A retrospective cohort study of adverse events in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Patient Saf Surg 2017; 11: 1–14.

Bakody

. Orthopaedic plaster casting: nurse and patient education. Nurs Stand 2009; 23: 49–56.

Ter

Sen

Hung

, et al. Chronic kidney disease predicts a lower probability of improvement in patient-reported experience measures among patients with fractures: a prospective multicenter cohort study. Arch Osteoporos 2018; 13: 1–10.

Griffin

Parsons

Achten

, et al. Recovery of health-related quality of life in a United Kingdom hip fracture population: the warwick hip trauma evaluation - A prospective cohort study. Bone Jt J 2015; 97–B: 372–382.

10.

Peeters

CMM

Visser

Van De Ree

CLP

, et al. Quality of life after hip fracture in the elderly: a systematic literature review. Injury 2016; 47: 1369–1382.

11.

Haywood

Brett

Tutton

, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in older people with hip fracture: a systematic review of quality and acceptability. Qual Life Res 2017; 26: 799–812.

12.

Orwig

Hochberg

Yu-Yahiro

, et al. Delivery and outcomes of a yearlong home exercise program after hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 323–331.

13.

Lagergren

Möller

Rogmark

. Displaced femoral neck fractures in patients 60–69 years old – treatment and patient reported outcomes in a register cohort. Injury 2020; 51: 2652–2657.

14.

Jayakumar

Teunis

Vranceanu

, et al. The impact of a patient's Engagement in their health on the magnitude of limitations and experience following upper limb fractures. Bone Jt J 2020; 102 B: 42–47.

15.

Jayakumar

Teunis

Vranceanu

A-M

, et al. Relationship between magnitude of limitations and patient experience during recovery from upper-extremity fracture. JBJS Open Access 2019; 4: e0002.

16.

Matsunaga

Tamaoki

MJS

Matsumoto

, et al. Minimally invasive osteosynthesis with a bridge plate versus a functional brace for humeral shaft fractures: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg Am 2017; 99: 583–592.

17.

Ware

Kosinski

Keller

, et al. A 12-item short-form health survey of scales and preliminary construction tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34: 220–233.

18.

Boonstra

Schiphorst Preuper

Reneman

, et al. Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Int J Rehabil Res 2008; 31: 165–169.

19.

Dawson

Rogers

Fitzpatrick

, et al. The Oxford shoulder score revisited. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129: 119–123.

20.

Jenkinson

Coulter

Bruster

. The picker patient experience questionnaire: development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries. Int J Qual Heal Care 2002; 14: 353–358.

21.

Gandek

Ware

Aaronson

, et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 health survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA project. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 1171–1178.

22.

Free online Short Form-12 (SF-12) score calculator. OrthoToolKit. http://orthotoolkit.com/sf-12/ (accessed 16 October 2018).

23.

National Clinical Guideline Centre. Patient experience in adult NHS services : improving the experience of care for people using adult NHS services.

24.

Tsehaie

van der Oest

MJW

Poelstra

, et al. Positive experience with treatment is associated with better surgical outcome in trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Eur 2019; 44: 714–721.

25.

Rämö

Sumrein

Lepola

, et al. Effect of surgery vs functional bracing on functional outcome among patients with closed displaced humeral shaft fractures: the FISH randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Assoc 2020; 323: 1792–1801.

26.

Harkin

Large

. Humeral shaft fractures: union outcomes in a large cohort. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017; 26: 1881–1888.

27.

Broadbent

Will

McQueen

. Prediction of outcome after humeral diaphyseal fracture. Injury 2010; 41: 572–577.

28.

Cadet

Yin

Schulz

, et al. Proximal humerus and humeral shaft nonunions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013; 21: 538–547.

29.

Toivanen

JAK

Nieminen

Laine

, et al. Functional treatment of closed humeral shaft fractures. Int Orthop 2005; 29: 10–13.

30.

Rutgers

Ring

. Treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus using a functional brace. J Orthop Trauma 2006; 20: 597–601.

31.

Driesman

Fisher

Karia

, et al. Fracture site mobility at 6 weeks after humeral shaft fracture predicts nonunion without surgery. J Orthop Trauma 2017; 31: 657–662.

32.

Ali

Griffiths

Obi

, et al. Nonoperative treatment of humeral shaft fractures revisited. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2015; 24: 210–214.

33.

Papasoulis

Drosos

Ververidis

, et al. Functional bracing of humeral shaft fractures. A review of clinical studies. Injury 2010; 41: e21–e27.

34.

Schoch

Padegimas

Maltenfort

, et al. Humeral shaft fractures: national trends in management. J Orthop Traumatol 2017; 18: 259–263.

35.

Bot

AGJ

Becker

SJE

Mol

, et al. Validation of phone administration of short-form disability and psychology questionnaires. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38: 1383–1387.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB