A systematic review of the complications of contemporary total elbow arthroplasty

Abstract

Background

Total elbow arthroplasty is a low volume procedure. We aimed to evaluate complication rates and cumulative percentages associated with the most frequently used contemporary implants and for the commonest indications.

Methods

A systematic literature search of all studies reporting complications following total elbow arthroplasty with 12-month minimum follow-up was undertaken. Quality of studies was assessed with the Methodological-Index-for-Non-Randomised-studies criteria. British NJR data identified the most common UK prostheses and indications. The complication rates for all undesirable events contributing to patient outcome were extracted and cumulative percentages were calculated.

Results

One hundred seventeen studies were screened, 12 studies included, totalling 815 procedures. Mean follow-up was 3.8 years. The overall complication cumulative percentage was 60.7%, significantly higher than that seen in other joint arthroplasty, including a 6.5% deep infection rate. Nerve injury was comparable between implants at around 4.1%. Radiographic loosening had a cumulative rate of 17.2%. Revision for symptomatic aseptic loosening was 6.3%.

Conclusions

This is the largest systematic review of the complications of total elbow arthroplasty. Surgeons should be aware of differing complications related to their implant of choice, each having its own specific complication. Trauma as an indication appears to have an increased complication rates compared to inflammatory arthropathy. There is a lack of literature regarding the independent results of osteoarthritis as a specific indication for total elbow arthroplasty.

Keywords

elbow arthroplasty complications replacement osteoarthritis fractures arthritis rheumatoid

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

United Kingdom National Joint Registry. 15th Annual Report for England, Wales, Northern Island and the Isle of Man, 2018, http://www.njrreports.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR2015th20Annual20Report202018.pdf (accessed July 2018).

Gill

Morrey

. The Coonrad–Morrey total elbow arthroplasty in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. A ten to fifteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 1327–1335.

Sanchez-Sotelo

. Total elbow arthroplasty. Open Orthop J 2011; 5: 115–123.

Gambirasio

Riand

Stern

, et al. Total elbow replacement for complex fractures of the distal humerus. An option for the elderly patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83: 974–978.

Kamineni

Morrey

. Distal humeral fractures treated with non-custom total elbow replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 940–947.

Briggs TA. National review of adult elective orthopaedic services in England. Getting it right first time, 2015, http://gettingitrightfirsttime.co.uk/wp- (accessed July 2019).

New Zealand Orthopaedic Association. The New Zealand Joint Registry. 18 year report. January to December 2016, https://nzoa.org.nz/system/files/DH7827_NZJR_2017_Report_v4_26Oct17.pdf (accessed July 2018).

Swedish Shoulder Registry. 2018, http://www.ssas.se/axel/ (accessed July 2018).

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 1006–1012.

10.

Sokol

Wilson

. What is a surgical complication? World J Surg 2008; 32: 942–944.

11.

Ouzzani

Hammady

Fedorowicz

, et al. Rayyan – a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016; 5: 210–210.

12.

Slim

Nini

Forestier

, et al. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 2003; 73: 712–716.

13.

Ducrot

Ehlinger

Adam

, et al. Complex fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly: is primary total elbow arthroplasty a valid treatment alternative? A series of 20 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2013; 99: 10–20.

14.

Pham

Delclaux

Huguet

, et al. Coonrad–Morrey total elbow arthroplasty for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 54 prostheses reviewed at 7 years’ average follow-up (maximum, 16 years). J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27: 398–403.

15.

Mehta

Watts

Talwalkar

, et al. Early results of latitude primary total elbow replacement with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017; 26: 1867–1872.

16.

Mansat

Bonnevialle

Rongieres

, et al. Experience with the Coonrad–Morrey total elbow arthroplasty: 78 consecutive total elbow arthroplasties reviewed with an average 5 years of follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013; 22: 1461–1468.

17.

Hildebrand

Patterson

Regan

, et al. Functional outcome of semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82: 1379–1386.

18.

Ogino

Ito

Furu

, et al. Outcome of shortened extra-small ulnar component in linked total elbow arthroplasty for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol 2015; 25: 849–853.

19.

Sanchez-Sotelo

Baghdadi

YMK

Morrey

. Primary linked semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis: a single-institution experience with 461 elbows over three decades. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98: 1741–1748.

20.

Frostick

Elsheikh

Mohammed

, et al. Results of cementless total elbow arthroplasty using the discovery elbow system at a mean follow-up of 61.8 months. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017; 26: 1348–1354.

21.

Lee

Singh

Lai

. Semi-constrained total elbow arthroplasty for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow. Singapore Med J 2005; 46: 718–722.

22.

Mukka

Berg

Haj , et al. Semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis patients: clinical and radiological results of 1–8 years follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015; 135: 595–600.

23.

Ray

Kakarlapudi

Rajsekhar

, et al. Total elbow arthroplasty as primary treatment for distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. Injury 2000; 31: 687–692.

24.

Prasad

Ali

Stanley

. Total elbow arthroplasty for non-rheumatoid patients with a fracture of the distal humerus: a minimum ten-year follow-up. Bone Joint J 2016; 98: 381–386.

25.

Urquhart

Hanna

Brennan

, et al. Incidence and risk factors for deep surgical site infection after primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 1213–1216.

26.

Rispoli

Athwal

Morrey

. Neurolysis of the ulnar nerve for neuropathy following total elbow replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90: 1348–1351.

27.

Della Rocca

Leung

Pape

H-C

. Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and future projections. J Orthop Trauma 2011; 25: S66–70.

28.

Evans

Smith

Fine

, et al. Clinical rating systems in elbow research – a systematic review exploring trends and distributions of use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27: e98–e106.