The purpose of this review was to update the complication profile of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) post-2010, given greater procedural familiarity, improved learning curves, enhanced implant designs, and increased attention to the nuances of patient selection. Three electronic databases were searched and screened in duplicate from 1 January 2010 to 16 December 2018 based on predetermined criteria. Twenty-two studies examining 1455 patients (26% male; mean age: 73.4 ± 3.6; mean follow-up: 23.4 ± 14.3 months) were reviewed. Post-operative motion ranged a mean 122.4° ± 11.5° flexion, 109° ± 19.4° abduction, and 33° ± 11.2°/41° ± 5° external/internal rotation. Post-operative mean Constant score was 58.9 ± 10.1, American Shoulder Elbow Surgeon score was 73.4 ± 6.1, Simple Shoulder Test score was 63.5 ± 6.5, and a Visual Analog Scale pain score was 1.6 ± 0.9. The overall complication rate was 18.2% and major complication rate was 15.4%. Compared to pre-2010, the overall complication rate of 18.2% is lower than previous rates of 19%–68%, with the rate of “major” complications dropping three-fold from 15.4% to 4.6%. The data suggest that rTSA is a safe and efficacious alternative to aTSA and HA, and the “stale” nature of previous complication profiles are points fundamental to perioperative discussions surrounding rTSA.
GrammontPTrouilloudPLaffayJP, et al.Concept study and realization of a new total shoulder prosthesis. Rhumatologie1997; 39: 407–418.
8.
SchairerWWNwachukwuBULymanS, et al.National utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2015; 24: 91–97.
9.
FrankleMSiegalSPupelloD, et al.The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am2005; 87: 1697–1705.
10.
WernerCMLSteinmannPAGilbartM, et al.Treatment of painful pseudoparesis due to irreparable rotator cuff dysfunction with the Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am2005; 87: 1476–1486.
11.
CuffDJPupelloDR. Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am2013; 95: 2050–2055.
12.
DrakeGNO’ConnorDPEdwardsTB. Indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in rotator cuff disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res2010; 468: 1526–1533.
13.
MizunoNDenardPJRaissP, et al.Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis in patients with a biconcave glenoid. J Bone Joint Surg Am2013; Jul; 95: 1297–1304.
14.
GrohGIGrohGM. Complications rates, reoperation rates, and the learning curve in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2014; 23: 388–394.
15.
KemptonLBAnkersonEWiaterJM. A complication-based learning curve from 200 reverse shoulder arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res2011; 469: 2496–2504.
16.
RittmeisterMKerschbaumerF. Grammont reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and nonreconstructible rotator cuff lesions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2001; 10: 17–22.
17.
WallBNové-JosserandLO’ConnorDP, et al.Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology. J Bone Joint Surg Am2007; 89: 1476–1485.
18.
Eden J, Levit L, Berg A, et al.; Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist – finding what works in health care – NCBI Bookshelf, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24983062 (2011).
19.
SlimKNiniEForestierD, et al.Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg2003; 73: 712–716.
20.
SinkELLeunigMZaltzI, et al. Academic Network for Conservational Hip Outcomes Research Group. Reliability of a complication classification system for orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res2012; 470: 2220–2226.
21.
McHughML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb)2012; 22: 276–282.
22.
PadegimasEMZmistowskiBMRestrepoC, et al.Instability after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: which patients dislocate?Am J Orthop2016; 45: E444–E450.
23.
ThomassonBGMatzonJLPepeM, et al.Distal peripheral neuropathy after open and arthroscopic shoulder surgery: an under-recognized complication. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2015; 24: 60–66.
24.
SchnetzkeMPreisACodaS, et al.Anatomical and reverse shoulder replacement with a convertible, uncemented short-stem shoulder prosthesis: first clinical and radiological results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg2017; 137: 679–684.
25.
RoyJ-SMacdermidJCGoelD, et al.What is a successful outcome following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?Open Orthop J2010; 4: 157–163.
26.
DoorenboschCAMHarlaarJVeegerDHEJ. The globe system: an unambiguous description of shoulder positions in daily life movements. J Rehabil Res Dev2003; 40: 147–155.
27.
ZumsteinMAPinedoMOldJ, et al.Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2011; 20: 146–157.
28.
FarshadMGerberC. Comment on Table 1 of Farshad and Gerber: reverse total shoulder arthroplasty – from the most to the least common complication. Int Orthop2011; 35: 455–455.
29.
ChalmersPNRahmanZRomeoAA, et al.Early dislocation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2014; 23: 737–744.
30.
AffonsoJNicholsonGPFrankleMA, et al.Complications of the reverse prosthesis: prevention and treatment. Instr Course Lect2012; 61: 157–168.
31.
GalloRAGamradtSCMatternCJ, et al.Instability after reverse total shoulder replacement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2011; 20: 584–590.
32.
GutiérrezSKellerTSLevyJC, et al.Hierarchy of stability factors in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res2008; 466: 670–676.
33.
StephensonDROhJHMcGarryMH, et al.Effect of humeral component version on impingement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2011; 20: 652–658.
34.
CazeneuveJFCristofariDJ. The reverse shoulder prosthesis in the treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Br2010; 92: 535–539.
35.
EdwardsTBWilliamsMDLabriolaJE, et al.Subscapularis insufficiency and the risk of shoulder dislocation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2009; 18: 892–896.
36.
deWildeLFVan OvostEUyttendaeleD, et al.Results of an inverted shoulder prosthesis after resection for tumor of the proximal humerus. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot2002; 88: 373–378.
37.
GerberCPenningtonSDNyffelerRW. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2009; 17: 284–295.
SeebauerL. Total reverse shoulder arthroplasty: European lessons and future trends. Am J Orthop2007; 36(12 Suppl 1): 22–28.
40.
SirveauxFFavardLOudetD, et al.Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br2004; 86: 388–395.
41.
FarshadMGerberC. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-from the most to the least common complication. Int Orthop2010; 34: 1075–1082.
42.
RicciardiBFBostromMPLidgrenL, et al.Prevention of surgical site infection in total joint arthroplasty: an international tertiary care center survey. HSS J2014; 10: 45–51.
43.
SolarinoGAbateAVicentiG, et al.Reducing periprosthetic joint infection: what really counts?Joints2015; 3: 208–214.
44.
JohnsonRJamesonSSSandersRD, et al.Reducing surgical site infection in arthroplasty of the lower limb: a multi-disciplinary approach. Bone Joint Res2013; 2: 58–65.
45.
NagdaSHRogersKJSestokasAK, et al.Neer Award 2005: Peripheral nerve function during shoulder arthroplasty using intraoperative nerve monitoring. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2007; 16(3 Suppl): S2–S8.
46.
LoweJTLawlerSMTestaEJ, et al.Lateralization of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty decreases arm lengthening and demonstrates comparable risk of nerve injury compared with anatomic arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2018; 27: 1845–1851.
47.
UzerGYildizFBatarS, et al.Does grafting of the tuberosities improve the functional outcomes of proximal humeral fractures treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty?J Shoulder Elbow Surg2017; 26: 36–41.
48.
FormainiNTEverdingNGLevyJC, et al.Tuberosity healing after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures: the “black and tan” technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2015; 24: e299–e306.
49.
Jorge-MoraAAmhaz-EscanlarSFernández-PoseS, et al.Early outcomes of locked noncemented stems for the management of proximal humeral fractures: a comparative study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2019; 28: 48–55.
50.
Sanchez-Sotelo J, Nguyen NTV and Morrey ME. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a bone-preserving glenoid component: clinical and radiographic outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Arthroplast 2018; 2:247154921876168.
51.
WalchGMottierFWallB, et al.Acromial insufficiency in reverse shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2009; 18: 495–502.
52.
BoileauPChuinardCRoussanneY, et al.Reverse shoulder arthroplasty combined with a modified latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon transfer for shoulder pseudoparalysis associated with dropping arm. Clin Orthop Relat Res2008; 466: 584–593.
53.
BoulahiaAEdwardsTBWalchG, et al.Early results of a reverse design prosthesis in the treatment of arthritis of the shoulder in elderly patients with a large rotator cuff tear. Orthopedics2002; 25: 129–133.
54.
deWildeLMombertMVan PetegemP, et al.Revision of shoulder replacement with a reversed shoulder prosthesis (Delta III): report of five cases. Acta Orthop Belg2001; 67: 348–353.
55.
Valenti P, Boutens D, Nerot C. Delta 3 reversed prosthesis for arthritis with massive rotator cuff tear: long term results (>5 years). In: Walch G, Boileau P and Mole P (eds) 2000 Shoulder Prosthesis: two to ten years follow up. Montpellier: Sauramps Medical, 2001, pp. 253–259.
56.
LévigneCBoileauPFavardL, et al.Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2008; 17: 925–935.
57.
ParisienRLYiPHHouL, et al.The risk of nerve injury during anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an intraoperative neuromonitoring study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2016; 25: 1122–1127.
58.
CheungEWillisMWalkerM, et al.Complications in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2011; 19: 439–449.
59.
WierksCSkolaskyRLJiJH, et al.Reverse total shoulder replacement: intraoperative and early postoperative complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res2009; 467: 225–234.
60.
BufquinTHersanAHubertL, et al.Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: a prospective review of 43 cases with a short-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br2007; 89: 516–520.
61.
KleinMJuschkaMHinkenjannB, et al.Treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients with the Delta III reverse shoulder prosthesis. J Orthop Trauma2008; 22: 698–704.
62.
LenarzCShishaniYMcCrumC, et al.Is reverse shoulder arthroplasty appropriate for the treatment of fractures in the older patient? Early observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res2011; 469: 3324–3331.
63.
Sebastiá-ForcadaECebrián-GómezRLizaur-UtrillaA, et al.Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. A blinded, randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2014; 23: 1419–1426.
64.
ChalmersPNSlikkerWMallNA, et al.Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fracture: comparison to open reduction-internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2014; 23: 197–204.
65.
FrankRMLeeSSumnerS, et al.Shoulder arthroplasty outcomes after prior non-arthroplasty shoulder surgery. JB JS Open Access2018; 3: e0055–e0055.
66.
Izquierdo-FernándezAMinarroJCCarpintero-LluchR, et al.Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in obese patients: analysis of functionality in the medium-term. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg2018; 138: 1–5.
67.
JonušasJBanytėRRyliškisS. Clinical and radiological outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with less medialized endoprosthesis after mean follow-up time of 45 months. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg2017; 137: 1201–1205.
68.
KirznerNPaulEMoaveniA. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty vs BIO-RSA: clinical and radiographic outcomes at short term follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res2018; 13: 256–256.
69.
PadegimasEMNicholsonTASilvaS, et al.Outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty performed for postinfectious arthritis. Clin Orthop Surg2018; 10: 344–351.
70.
RaissPAlamiGBrucknerTMagoschP, et al.Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for type 1 sequelae of a fracture of the proximal humerus. Bone Joint J2018; 100–B: 318–323.
71.
TorrensCGuirroPMiquelJ, et al.Influence of glenosphere size on the development of scapular notching: a prospective randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg2016; 25: 1735–1741.
72.
UpdegroveGFNicholsonTANamdariS, et al.Short-term results of the DePuy Global Unite Platform Shoulder System: a two-year outcome study. Arch Bone Jt Surg2018; 6: 353–358.
73.
VerdanoMAAlianiDGalavottiC, et al.Grammont versus lateralizing reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture: functional and radiographic outcomes. Musculoskelet Surg2018; 102(Suppl 1): 57–65.
74.
YoonJPSeoAKimJJ, et al.Deltoid muscle volume affects clinical outcome of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with cuff tear arthropathy or irreparable cuff tears. PLoS One2017; 12: e0174361–e0174361.
75.
ZilberSCamanaELapnerP, et al.Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using helical blade to optimize glenoid fixation and bone preservation: preliminary results in thirty five patients with minimum two year follow-up. Int Orthop2018; 42: 2159–2164.
76.
Merolla G, Walch G, Ascione F, et al. Grammont humeral design versus onlay curved-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2018; 27: 701–710.
