Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

There are few studies reporting long-term rotator cuff integrity following repair. The present study reports a case series of surgically repaired supraspinatus tendons followed up with clinical outcomes and ultrasound imaging after an average of 16 years.

Methods

The prospectively studied clinical outcomes at short-, medium- and long-term follow-up in 27 shoulders in 25 patients treated with arthroscopic subacromial decompression and mini-open rotator cuff repair have been reported previously. The functional outcomes scores recorded were the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) measures. These patients then underwent an ultrasound scan with respect to the long-term assessment of the shoulder and the integrity of the repair.

Results

A recurrent tear was noted in 37% of patients at 16.25 years after surgery, of which 50% were small. Two patients required repeat surgery. Patients had a mean UCLA score of 30, an ASES score of 91.3 and a SST score of 9.5 with a 85% level of satisfaction with surgery. Patients with a recurrent tear had outcome scores equivalent to those with an intact cuff with no significant pain. No independent risk factors were identified as predictors for recurrent tear.

Conclusions

Patients showed sustained benefit and satisfaction at long-term follow-up despite a 37% recurrence of full-thickness supraspinatus tear.

Keywords

cuff integrity long-term follow-up mini-open cuff repair patient-reported outcome measures rotator cuff repair

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hsu

Keener

. Natural history of rotator cuff disease and implications on management. Oper Tech Orthop 2015; 25: 2–9.

Yamaguchi

Ditsios

Middleton

et al.

The demographic and morphological features of rotator cuff disease. A comparison of asymptomatic and symptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg 2006; 88: 1699–1704.

Gumina

Arceri

Fagnani

et al.

subacromial space width: does overuse or genetics play a greater role in determining it?: an MRI study on elderly twins. J Bone Joint Surg 2015; 97: 1647–1652.

Motta Gda

Amaral

Rezende

et al.

Evidence of genetic variations associated with rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014; 23: 227–235.

Tashjian

Granger

Farnham

et al.

Genome-wide association study for rotator cuff tears identifies two significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25: 174–179.

Tashjian

Granger

Zhang

et al.

Identification of a genetic variant associated with rotator cuff repair healing. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25: 865–872.

Zandi

Coghlan

Bell

. Mini-incision rotator cuff repair: a longitudinal assessment with no deterioration of result up to nine years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15: 135–139.

Bell

Lim

Coghlan

. Long-term longitudinal follow-up of mini-open rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg 2013; 95: 151–157.

Cofield

. Subscapular muscle transposition for repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982; 154: 667–672.

10.

Ellman

Kay

. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression for chronic impingement. Two- to five-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73: 395–398.

11.

Coghlan

Bell

Forbes

et al.

Comparison of self-administered University of California, Los Angeles, shoulder score with traditional University of California, Los Angeles, shoulder score completed by clinicians in assessing the outcome of rotator cuff surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008; 17: 564–569.

12.

Godfrey

Hamman

Lowenstein

et al.

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the simple shoulder test: psychometric properties by age and injury type. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16: 260–267.

13.

Michener

McClure

Sennett

. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002; 11: 587–594.

14.

Vastamäki

Lohman

Borgmästars

. Rotator cuff integrity correlates with clinical and functional results at a minimum 16 years after open repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 471: 554–561.

15.

Kluger

Bock

Mittlbock

et al.

Long-term survivorship of rotator cuff repairs using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39: 2071–2081.

16.

Castagna

Conti

Markopoulos

et al.

Arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tear with a modified Mason–Allen stitch: mid-term clinical and ultrasound outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008; 16: 497–503.

17.

Kim

Kang

et al.

Effect of Age on Functional and Structural Outcome After Rotator Cuff Repair. The American Journal of Sports Medicine 2010; 38: 672–678.

18.

DeFranco

Bershadsky

Ciccone

et al.

Functional outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: a correlation of anatomic and clinical results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16: 759–765.

19.

McElvany

McGoldrick

Gee

et al.

Rotator cuff repair: published evidence on factors associated with repair integrity and clinical outcome. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43: 491–500.

20.

Boileau

Brassart

Watkinson

et al.

Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal?

J Bone Joint Surg 2005; 87: 1229–1240.

21.

Saccomanno

Sircana

Cazzato

et al.

Prognostic factors in uencing the outcome of rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 18: 1–11.

22.

Lorbach

Tompkins

. Rotator cuff: biology and current arthroscopic techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20: 1003–1011.

23.

Iannotti

Deutsch

Green

et al.

Time to failure after rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg 2013; 95: 965–965.

24.

Zumstein

. The Clinical and Structural Long-Term Results of Open Repair of Massive Tears of the Rotator Cuff. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2008; 90: 2423–2423.

25.

Yamamoto

Takagishi

Osawa

et al.

Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013; 19: 116–120.

26.

Jost

Pfirrmann

Gerber

et al.

Clinical outcome after structural failure of rotator cuff repairs. J Bone Joint Surg 2006; 82: 304–314.

27.

Jost

Zumstein

Pfirrmann

et al.

Long-term outcome after structural failure of rotator cuff repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 472–479.

28.

Galatz

Ball

Teefey

et al.

The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg 2004; 86: 219–224.

29.

Kim

Shin

Lee

. Repair integrity and functional outcomes after arthroscopic suture-bridge rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg 2012; 40: 294–288.

30.

Russell

Knight

Mulligan

et al.

Structural integrity after rotator cuff repair does not correlate with patient function and pain: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 2014; 96: 265–271.

31.

Teefey

Rubin

Middleton

et al.

Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears. Comparison of ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopic findings in seventy-one consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg 2004; 86A: 708–716.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.08 MB

Structural integrity of rotator cuff at 16 years following repair: good long-term outcomes despite recurrent tears

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material