Controversy remains regarding the results of all arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs compared with the mini-open approach. The purpose of this study was to perform a comprehensive literature search and meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing the results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs and mini-open rotator cuff repairs.
Hypothesis:
There is no difference between the clinical results obtained from all arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs compared with mini-open repairs.
Study Design:
Meta-analysis.
Methods:
A computerized search of articles published between 1966 and July 2006 was performed using MEDLINE and PubMed. Additionally, a search of abstracts from 4 major annual meetings each held between 2000 and 2005 was performed to identify Level I to III studies comparing the results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and mini-open repair. Studies that included follow-up of an average of over 2 years and a minimum of 1 year and included the use of 1 of 4 validated functional outcome scores used to study shoulder injuries were included in the present meta-analysis. All outcome scores were converted to a 100-point scale to allow for outcome comparison.
Results:
Five studies that met the inclusion criteria were identified. There was no difference in functional outcome scores or complications between the arthroscopic and mini-open repair groups.
Conclusion:
Based on current literature, there was no difference in outcomes between the arthroscopic and mini-open rotator cuff repair techniques.
AprelevaMOzbaydarMFitzgibbonsPGWarnerJJ. Rotator cuff tears: The effect of the reconstruction method on three-dimensional repair site area. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:519–526.
2.
BarberFACawleyPPrudichJF. Suture anchor failure strength: An in vivo study. Arthroscopy. 1993;9:647–652.
3.
BhandariMMorrowFKulkarniAVTornettaP3rd. Meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review of their methodologies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:15–24.
4.
BlevinsFTWarrenRFCavoC. Arthroscopic assisted rotator cuff repair: Results using a mini-open deltoid splitting approach. Arthroscopy. 1996;12:50–59.
5.
BurkhartS. Arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears: Concept of margin convergence. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000;1:232–239.
6.
BurkhartSSPaganJL DiazWirthMAAthanasiouKA. Cyclic loading of anchor-based rotator cuff repairs: Confirmation of the tension overload phenomenon and comparison of suture anchor fixation with transosseous fixation. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:720–724.
7.
CarpenterJEFishDNHustonLJGoldsteinSA. Pull-out strength of five suture anchors. Arthroscopy. 1993;9:109–113.
8.
CodmanE. Rupture of the supraspinatus tendon. BostonMed Surg J. 1911;164:708–710.
9.
GartsmanGMKhanMHammermanSM. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:832–840.
10.
GerberCSchneebergerAGBeckMSchlegelU. Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:371–380.
11.
GerberCSchneebergerAGPerronSMNyffelerRW. Experimental rotator cuff repair: A preliminary study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1281–1290.
12.
HeckerATSheaMHayhurstJOMyersERMeeksLWHayesWC. Pull-out strength of suture anchors for rotator cuff and Bankart lesion repairs. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:874–879.
KimSHHaKIParkJHKangJSOhSKOhI. Arthroscopic versus mini-open salvage repair of the rotator cuff tear: Outcome analysis at 2 to 6 years' follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:746–754.
LiemDLichtenbergSMagoschPHabermeyerP. Magnetic resonance imaging of arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1770–1776.
18.
LiuSH. Arthroscopically-assisted rotator-cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:592–595.
19.
MacGillivrayJDMaCB. An arthroscopic stitch for massive rotator cuff tears: The Mac stitch. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(6):669–671.
20.
MazzoccaADMillettPJGuancheCASantangeloSAArcieroRA. Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1861–1868.
21.
ParkJYLevineWNMarraGPollockRGFlatowELBiglianiLU. Portal-extension approach for the repair of small and medium rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:312–316.
22.
ParkMCCadetERLevineWNBiglianiLUAhmadCS. Tendon-to-bone pressure distributions at a repaired rotator cuff footprint using transosseous suture and suture anchor fixation techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1154–1159.
23.
PaulosLEKodyMH. Arthroscopically enhanced “miniapproach” to rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22:19–25.
24.
PosadaAUribeJWHechtmanKSTjinATEWZvijacJE. Mini-deltoid splitting rotator cuff repair: Do results deteriorate with time?Arthroscopy. 2000;16:137–141.
25.
ReedSCGlossopNOgilvie-HarrisDJ. Full-thickness rotator cuff tears: A biomechanical comparison of suture versus bone anchor techniques. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:46–48.
26.
RomeoAAMazzoccaAHangDWShottSBachBRJr. Shoulder scoring scales for the evaluation of rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;427:107–114.
27.
RudnerLGlassGEvarttDEmeryP. A User's Guide to the Metaanalysis of Research Studies. College Park, MD: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation; 2002.
28.
SauerbreyAMGetzCLPiancastelliMIannottiJPRamseyMLWilliamsGRJr. Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: A comparison of clinical outcome. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1415–1420.
29.
ScheibelMTHabermeyerP. A modified Mason-Allen technique for rotator cuff repair using suture anchors. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:330–333.
StollsteimerGTSavoieFH3rd. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Current indications, limitations, techniques, and results. Instr Course Lect. 1998;47:59–65.
34.
TauroJC. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Analysis of technique and results at 2- and 3-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 1998;14:45–51.
35.
VermaNNDunnWAdlerRS. All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: A retrospective review with minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:587–594.
36.
WarnerJJTetreaultPLehtinenJZurakowskiD. Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: A cohort comparison study. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:328–332.
37.
WeberSC. Arthroscopic debridement and acromioplasty versus mini-open repair in the treatment of significant partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 1999;15:126–131.
38.
WilliamsGIannottiJLuchettiWFerronA. Mini vs. open repair of isolated supraspinatus tendon tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7:310.
39.
YamaguchiKBallCMGalatzLM. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Transition from mini-open to all-arthroscopic. Clin Orthop Relet Res. 2001;390:83–94.
40.
YoumTMurrayDHKubiakENRokitoASZuckermanJD. Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: A comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14:455–459.
