Intraoperative complications during revision shoulder arthroplasty: a study using the National Joint Registry dataset

Abstract

Background

The surgical options for revision shoulder arthroplasty and the number of procedures performed are increasing. However, little is known about the risk factors for intraoperative complications associated with this complex surgery.

Methods

The National Joint Registry (NJR) is a surgeon reported database recording information on major joint replacements including revision shoulder arthroplasty. Using multivariable binary logistic regression modelling, we analyzed 1445 revision shoulder arthroplasties reported to the NJR between April 2012 and 2015.

Results

The risk of developing a complication during revision surgery was greater than primary arthroplasty (5% versus 2.5%). An intraoperative fracture was the most common complication occurring in 50 (3.5%) cases. Nerve injuries were recorded for two (0.1%) patients and vascular injuries for one (0.1%) patient. The incidence of intraoperative fractures was higher in females than males (relative risk = 3.25; p = 0.005). Periprosthetic fracture as an indication for revision carried the highest risk for any complication (relative risk = 3.00, p = 0.06).

Conclusions

This is the largest registry study to date investigating the incidence and risk factors for intraoperative complications during revision shoulder arthroplasty. Females have over three times the risk of intraoperative fractures compared to males. This study will help inform surgeons to accurately counsel patients.

Keywords

complication fracture National Joint Registry neurovascular injury revision shoulder arthroplasty

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cowling PD, Holland P, Kottam L, Baker P, Rangan A. Risk factors associated with intraoperative complications during primary shoulder arthroplasty surgery, 2016. Unpublished work.

The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and Centre of Excellence of Joint Replacements. Norwegian Arthroplasty Register Report in English. Norwegian Arthroplasty Registry: Helse Bergen HF, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, 2015.

Graves

Davidson

Ingerson

. The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Med J Australia 2004; 180: S31–S34.

NJR Editorial Board. National Joint Registry 13th Annual Report. Hemel Hempstead: National Joint Registry, 2015, pp.147–170.

Aldinger

Raiss

Rickert

Loew

. Complications in shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 485 cases. Int Orthop 2010; 34: 517–524.

Singh

JASJ

Schleck

Harmsen

Cofield

. Periprosthetic fractures associated with primary total shoulder arthroplasty and primary humeral head replacement: a thirty-three-year study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94: 1777–1785.

Antoni

Barthoulot

Kempf

Clavert

. Revisions of total shoulder arthroplasty: clinical results and complications of various modalities. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2016; 568: 51–57.

Wieser

Borbas

Meyer

Gerber

. Conversion of stemmed hemi- or total to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: advantages of a modular stem design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 651–660.

Wagner

Houdek

Elhassan

Sanchez-Sotelo

Cofield

Sperling

. What are risk factors for intraoperative humerus fractures during revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty and do they influence outcomes? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 3228–3234.

10.

Lovy

Keswani

Dowdell

Koehler

Kim

Hausman

. Outcomes, complications, utilization trends, and risk factors for primary and revision total elbow replacement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 2746: 745–754.

11.

Rasmussen

Olsen

Fevang

. A review of national shoulder and elbow joint replacement registries. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21: 1328–1335.

12.

Fevang

Lie

Havelin

Skredderstuen

Furnes

. Risk factors for revision after shoulder arthroplasty: 1,825 shoulder arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2009; 80: 83–91.

13.

Espehaug

Furnes

Havelin

Engesaeter

Vollset

Kindseth

. Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2006; 77: 49–56.

14.

American Society of Anesthesiologists. 2016 Relative Value Guide Book: A Guide for Anesthesia Values, Schaumburg, IL: American Society of Anesthesiologists, 2015.

15.

Cisneros

Atoun

Abraham

Tsvieli

Bruguera

Levy

. Revision shoulder arthroplasty: does the stem really matter? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25: 747–755.

16.

Flury

Frey

Goldhahn

Schwyzer

H-K

Simmen

. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a salvage procedure for failed conventional shoulder replacement due to cuff failure – midterm results. Int Orthop 2011; 35: 53–60.

17.

Dilisio

Miller

Siegel

Higgins

. Conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty: humeral stem retention versus revision. Orthopedics 2015; 38: e773–e779.

18.

Athwal

Sperling

Rispoli

Cofield

. Periprosthetic humeral fractures during shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 594–603.

19.

Weber-Spickschen

Alfke

Agneskirchner

. The use of a modular system to convert an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty to a reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results. Bone & Joint 2015; 97b: 1662–1667.

20.

Ball CM. Nerve injury following shoulder joint replacement. The 13th International Congress of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Jeju, Korea, 2016, Conference presentation, https://www.eiseverywhere.com/file_uploads/94874e946a6a1753c1bf2356069646a7_NerveInjuryBall.pdf (accessed: 10 July 2016).

21.

Malik

Aresti

Plumb

. Intraoperative nerve monitoring during total shoulder arthroplasty surgery. Shoulder Elbow 2014; 6: 90–94.

22.

Nagda

Rogers

Sestokas

. Peripheral nerve function during shoulder arthroplasty using intraoperative nerve monitoring. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16: 2–8.

23.

Ladermann

Lubbeke

Melis

. Prevalence of neurologic lesions after total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: 1288–1293.