It has been considered that the coexistence of similar species is facilitated by the differentiation in their foraging habits. We sought to test this hypothesis by evaluating the foraging behavior and factors influencing the foraging success of three coexisting ibis species – Black-headed ibis (Threskiornis melanocephalus), Red-naped ibis (Pseudibis papillosa), and Glossy ibis (Plegadis falcinellus) – in the semi-arid landscape of western India from January 2020 to April 2022. Overall, foraging parameters were similar among the species, except for inter-individual parameters (P < 0.05) and for the number of locomotion turns each species performed. Probing and the number of nearby wading birds significantly and positively influenced the foraging success of all the Ibis species studied. Seasonal variations affected the foraging success only for the Red-naped Ibis and within a season, the foraging success was significantly different between species. All species showed different water depth utilization for foraging. Red-naped Ibis used habitats other than wetlands without impacting its foraging success. Also, the foraging success differed between adults and juveniles of the Red-naped ibis but remained consistent for the Black-headed ibis. These findings can aid the future development of hypotheses related to how similar species coexist and help in management and conservation efforts for these species.
PapakostasGKazantzidisSGoutnerV, et al.Factors affecting the foraging behavior of the Squacco Heron. Waterbirds2005; 28, 28–34.
2.
BeerensJMNoonburgEGGawlikDE. Linking dynamic habitat selection with wading bird foraging distributions across resource gradients. PloS ONE2015; 10: e0128182.
3.
StolenEDCollazoJAPercivalHF. Group-foraging effects on capture rate in wading birds. The Condor2012; 114: 744–754.
4.
YeYJiangYHuC, et al.What makes a tactile forager join mixed-species flocks? A case study with the endangered Crested Ibis (Nipponia nippon). The Auk2017; 134: 421–431.
5.
MaheswaranGRahmaniAR. Effects of water level changes and wading bird abundance on the foraging behaviour of Black-necked storks Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus in Dudwa National Park, India. J Biosci2001; 26: 373–382.
6.
FlemingTHMuchhalaN. Nectar-feeding bird and bat niches in two worlds: Pantropical comparisons of vertebrate pollination systems. J Biogeogr2008; 35: 764–780.
7.
GawlikDECrozierGE. A test of cues affecting habitat selection by wading birds. The Auk2007; 124: 1075–1082.
8.
HafnerH. Ecology of wading birds. Col Waterbirds1997; 20: 115–120.
9.
RussellGJBassOLPimmSL. The effect of hydrological patterns and breeding-season flooding on the numbers and distribution of wading birds in Everglades National Park. Anim Cons Forum2002; 5: 185–199.
10.
BeerensJMNoonburgEGGawlikDE. Linking dynamic habitat selection with wading bird foraging distributions across resource gradients. PloS One2015; 10: e0128182.
11.
KushlanJA. Resource use strategies of wading birds. Wilson Bull1981; 93: 145–163.
12.
LantzSMGawlikDECookMI. The effect of water depth and submerged aquatic vegetation on the selection of foraging habitat and foraging success of wading birds. The Condor2010; 112: 460–469.
13.
IshtiaqFJavedSCoulterMC, et al.Resource partitioning in three sympatric species of storks in Keoladeo National Park, India. Waterbirds2010; 33: 41–49.
14.
CusterTWOsbornRG. Feeding habitat use by colonially-breeding herons, egrets, and ibises in North Carolina. The Auk1978; 95: 733–743.
15.
PierceRLGawlikDE. Wading bird foraging habitat selection in the Florida Everglades. Waterbirds2010; 33: 494–503.
16.
WrightHLCollarNJLakeIR, et al.Foraging ecology of sympatric White-shouldered Ibis Pseudibis davisoni and Giant Ibis Thaumatibis gigantea in northern Cambodia. Forktail2012; 28: 93–100.
17.
PetalasCLazarusTLavoieRA, et al.Foraging niche partitioning in sympatric seabird populations. Sci Rep2021; 11: 2493.
18.
YooSYNamHKHwangJK, et al.Foraging strategy of Black-faced spoonbill during breeding period in rice fields of Korea. Zool Stud2022; 61: 35.
19.
MarcotBGGawlikDEYanoskyA, et al.The value and necessity of natural history studies of waterbirds. Waterbirds2022; 45: 4–9.
20.
HancockJAKushlanJAKahlMP. Storks, Ibises and Spoonbills of the World. United Kingdom: A & C Black Publishers Ltd, London, 2011.
21.
ChaudhurySKoliVK. Population status, habitat preference, and nesting characteristics of Black-headed Ibis Threskiornis melanocephalus Latham, 1790 in southern Rajasthan, India. J Asia-Pac Biodivers2018; 11: 223–228.
22.
AmetaHKoliVKKitturS, et al.Is the Red-naped Ibis Pseudibis papillosa a “waterbird”? Distribution, abundance and habitat use in landscapes with two different dominant land uses in Udaipur district, Rajasthan, India. SIS Cons2022; 4: 30-39.
23.
AsawraKMitraAMehtaK, et al.Effect of wetland extent on seasonal abundance and behaviour of Red-naped Ibis Pseudibis papillosa in the semi-arid Dungarpur district, Rajasthan, India. SIS Cons2022; 4: 60–68.
24.
BirdLife International. Species factsheet: Threskiornis melanocephalus. https://www.birdlife.org. (2023, Accessed 18 March 2023).
25.
Census of India. District Census Handbook Udaipur (2014): Village and Town Wise Primary Census Abstract. Directorate of Census Operations, Rajasthan, India, 2011.
26.
JatMLSinghRVBaliyanJK, et al.Water balance studies for agricultural planning in Udaipur region. Annals Arid Zone2004; 43: 280–283.
27.
RaoPSSinghHPurohitRC. Changing economic scenario of the peri-urban area of Udaipur city, India. In: MaheshwariBThoradeniyaBSinghVP (ed), Balanced urban development: Options and strategies for liveable cities. Springer, Cham, 2016, p. 123–134.
28.
MondalHSMaheswaranG. Foraging Ecology of White-Bellied Heron (Ardea insignis) in the Fast-Flowing Rivers of Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Waterbirds2021; 44(4): 389–396.
29.
AliSRipleySD. Handbook of Birds of India and Pakistan. Second edition. Oxford University Press, New Dehli, India, 2007.
30.
RasmussenPCAndertonJC. Birds of South Asia: the Ripley guide. 2nd ed. Vol. I, Washington, D.C. and Barcelona: Smithsonian Institution and Lynx Edicions, 2012.
31.
AltmannJ. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour1974; 49: 227–266.
32.
KalamAUrfiAJ. Foraging behaviour and prey size of the painted stork. J Zool2008; 274(2): 198–204.
33.
MurrayNJShawPP. Foraging behaviour and success of Australian white ibis (Threskiornis molucca) in an urban environment. Notornis2009; 56: 201–205.
34.
LourençoPMCatryTPiersmaT, et al.Comparative feeding ecology of shorebirds wintering at Banc d’Arguin, Mauritania. Estuaries Coast2016; 39: 855–865.
35.
TouhamiFIdrissiHRBenhoussaA. Foraging behaviour of wintering shorebirds at Merja Zerga lagoon (Atlantic coast, Morocco). Ostrich2020; 91: 244–251.
36.
GarridoJRSarasaCGFernández-CruzM. Intraspecific kleptoparasitism in the cattle egret. J Field Ornithol2002; 73: 185–190.
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Australia, 2022. URL. https://www.R-project.org/
39.
PinheiroJBatesDDebRoyS, et al.Package ‘nlme’. Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models, version, 2017; 3(1): 274.
40.
GwiazdaRFlisASkórkaP, et al.Effect of age on the foraging behaviour of Grey Heron Ardea cinerea L., 1758 at a submontane dam reservoir in the post-breeding season. Avian Biol Res2017; 10(2):76–83.
41.
BurnhamKPAndersonDR. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd ed.Springer, New York, 2002.
42.
WickhamH. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-VerlagNew York, 2016. Available from: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
43.
IBM Corp Released. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp, 2011.
44.
SharmaAKBhawnaniRTripathiAK. Glossy Ibis Plegadis falcinellus breeding in Rajasthan, India. Indian BIRDS2020; 16:198.
45.
SundarKSKitturS. Glossy ibis distribution and abundance in an agricultural landscape: seasonal and annual variation. SIS Cons2019; 1:135–138.
46.
ValoneTJGiraldeauLA. Patch estimation by group foragers: what information is used?Anim Behav1993; 45: 721–728.
47.
BeauchampGBelisleMGiraldeauLA. Influence of conspecific attraction on the spatial distribution of learning foragers in a patchy habitat. J Anim Ecol1997; 66: 671–682.
48.
MasterTLFrankelMRussellM. Benefits of foraging in mixed-species wader aggregations in a southern New Jersey saltmarsh. Col Waterbirds1993; 16:149–157.
49.
ScottD.The feeding success of cattle egrets in flocks. Anim Behav1984; 32: 1089–1100.
50.
CollazoJAGilliamJFMiranda-CastroL. Functional response models to estimate feeding rates of wading birds. Waterbirds2010; 33: 33–40.
51.
SundarKSG. Flock size, density and habitat selection of four large waterbirds species in an agricultural landscape in Uttar Pradesh, India: Implications for management. Waterbirds2006; 29: 365–374.
52.
KoliVKYaseenMBhatnagarC. Population status of Painted Stork Mycteria leucocephala and Black-headed Ibis Threskiornis melanocephalus in southern Rajasthan, India. Indian BIRDS2013; 8: 39–41.
53.
AmetaHKoliVKSundarKG. Is Three A Crowd? Three Indian Ibis Species vary strategies to achieve sympatry depending different seasons, landscapes and habitats. Waterbirds. 2024; 47: 1–10.
54.
KoliVKChaudharySSundarKG. Roosting ecology of Black-headed Ibis (Threskiornis melanocephalus) in urban and rural areas of southern Rajasthan, India. Waterbirds2019; 42: 51–60.
55.
du ToitCJChinsamyACunninghamSJ. Comparative morphology and soft tissue histology of the remote-touch bill-tip organ in three ibis species of differing foraging ecology. J Anat2022; 241: 966–980.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
