Egg recognition and rejection is a common and effective anti-parasitism adaptation in bird hosts. Hosts reject alien eggs using recognition signals such as egg ground color and maculation. Green-backed tits (Parus monticolus) have a highly developed capability for recognizing parasite eggs, but the cues used for egg recognition are unclear. We combined avian visual perceptual modeling and field experiments to explore the effects of egg ground color and maculation on the recognition of parasite eggs. P. monticolus uses a multi-cue with possible hierarchical mechanism for egg recognition. The mechanism of egg recognition in P. monticolus appears to be a specific adaptation to the phenotypes of eggs laid by local brood parasites.
DaviesNB. Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. London: T & A Poyser, 2000.
2.
SolerM. Long-term coevolution between avian brood parasites and their hosts. Biol Rev2014; 89: 688–704.
3.
BánMMoskátCBartaZ, et al. Simultaneous viewing of own and parasitic eggs is not required for egg rejection by a cuckoo host. Behav Ecol2013; 24: 1014–1021.
4.
ŠulcMProcházkaPCapekM, et al. Birds use eggshell UV reflectance when recognizing non-mimetic parasitic eggs. Behav Ecol2016; 27: 677–684.
5.
MoskátCSzékelyTCuthillIC, et al. Hosts’ responses to parasitic eggs: which cues elicit hosts’ egg discrimination?Ethology2008; 114: 186–194.
6.
Ruiz-RayaFSolerM. Signal detection and optimal acceptance thresholds in avian brood parasite-host systems: implications for egg rejection. Phil Trans R Soc B2020; 375: 20190477.
7.
LyonBE. Egg recognition and counting reduce costs of avian conspecific brood parasitism. Nature2003; 422: 495–499.
8.
UnderwoodTJSealySG. Grasp-ejection in two small ejecters of cowbird eggs: a test of bill-size constraints and the evolutionary equilibrium hypothesis. Anim Behav2006; 71: 409–416.
9.
SolerJJPérez-ContrerasTDe NeveL, et al. Recognizing odd smells and ejection of brood parasitic eggs. An experimental test in magpies of a novel defensive trait against brood parasitism. J Evol Biol2014; 27: 1265–1270.
10.
LeclaireSBourretVBonadonnaF. Blue petrels recognize the odor of their egg. J Exp Biol2017; 220: 3022–3025.
11.
RothsteinSI. Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: which egg parameters elicit responses by rejecter species?Behav Ecol Sociobiol1982; 11: 229–239.
12.
HanleyDGrimTIgicB, et al.Egg discrimination along a gradient of natural variation in eggshell coloration. Proc R Soc B2017; 284: 20162592.
13.
Abolins-AbolsMHanleyDMoskátC, et al. Anti-parasitic egg rejection by great reed warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) tracks differences along an eggshell color gradient. Behav Process2019; 166: 103902.
14.
PolačikováLStokkeBGProcházkaP, et al.The role of blunt egg pole characteristics for recognition of eggs in the song thrush (Turdus philomelos). Behaviour2010; 147: 465–478.
15.
DainsonMHauberMELópezAV, et al.Does contrast between eggshell ground and spot coloration affect egg rejection?Sci Nat2017; 104: 54.
16.
WangLHsuY-CLiangW. Rejection of parasitic eggs by Yellow-bellied Prinias: importance of egg spot location. J Ornithol2020; 161: 987–994.
17.
LiuJYangCYuJ, et al.Egg recognition in Cinereous Tits (Parus cinereus): eggshell spots matter. Avian Res2019; 10: 37.
18.
UnderwoodTJSealySG. Influence of shape on egg discrimination in American Robins and Gray Catbirds. Ethology2006; 112: 164–173
19.
PikeTW. Egg recognition in Japanese quail. Avian Biol Res2011; 4: 231–236.
20.
ZöleiAHauberMEGeltschN, et al. Asymmetrical signal content of egg shape as predictor of egg rejection by great reed warblers, hosts of the common cuckoo. Behaviour2012; 149: 391–406.
21.
StokkeBGPolačikováLDyrczA, et al. Responses of Reed Warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus to non-mimetic eggs of different sizes in a nest parasitism experiment. Acta Ornithol2010; 45: 98–104.
22.
GuiguenoMFSealySGWestphalAM. Rejection of parasitic eggs in passerine hosts: Size matters more for a non-ejecter. Auk2014; 131: 583–594.
23.
MarchettiK. Egg rejection in a passerine bird: size does matter. Anim Behav2000; 59: 877–883.
24.
AvilésJMSolerJJPérez-ContrerasT, et al. Ultraviolet reflectance of great spotted cuckoo eggs and egg discrimination by magpies. Behav Ecol2006; 17: 310–314.
25.
HonzaMPolačikováL. Experimental reduction of ultraviolet wavelengths reflected from parasitic eggs affects rejection behaviour in the blackcap Sylvia atricapilla. J Exp Biol2008; 211: 2519–2523.
26.
YangCWangLHsuYC, et al.UV reflectance as a cue in egg discrimination in two Prinia species exploited differently by brood parasites in Taiwan. Ibis2013; 155: 571–575.
27.
AntonovAStokkeBGMoksnesA, et al.Egg rejection in Marsh Warblers (Acrocephalus palustris) heavily parasitized by Common Cuckoos (Cuculus canorus). Auk2006; 123: 419–430.
28.
LiDLiXZhangY, et al.Contrasting effects of egg size and appearance on egg recognition and rejection response by Oriental reed warblers. Ecol Evol2020; 10: 10508–10519.
29.
LuroABIgicBCrostonR, et al.Which egg features predict egg rejection responses in American robins? Replicating Rothstein’s (1982) study. Ecol Evol2018; 8: 1673–1679.
30.
SamašPHauberMEHonzaM. A meta-analysis of avian egg traits cueing egg-rejection defenses against brood parasitism. Front Ecol Evol2021; 9: 703208.
31.
ButlerMWStineMEKiKC. Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis) use color patterning, but not the colors themselves, as a cue to eject interspecific parasitic eggs. Auk2020; 137: 1–9.
LiuJPZhangLZhangL, et al.Egg recognition abilities of tit species in the Paridae family: do Indomalayan tits exhibit higher recognition than Palearctic tits?Zool Res2020; 41: 726–733.
34.
YangCLiangWMøllerAP. Egg retrieval versus egg rejection in cuckoo hosts. Phil Trans R Soc B2019; 374: 20180200.
35.
YePYangCLiangW. Nest site availability and niche differentiation between two cavity-nesting birds in time and space. Ecol Evol2019; 9: 11904–11910.
36.
del HoyoJElliottASargatalJ, et al.Handbook of the birds of the world. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions, 2013.
37.
YePYaoXBiJ, et al.Breeding biology of the Green-backed Tit (Parus monticolus) in southwest China. Avian Resin press.
38.
StoddardMCPrumRO. Evolution of avian plumage color in a tetrahedral color space: a phylogenetic analysis of new world buntings. Am Nat2008; 171: 755–776.
39.
YangCHuangQWangL, et al.Plaintive cuckoos do not select tailorbird hosts that match the phenotypes of their own eggs. Behav Ecol2016; 27: 835–841.
40.
VorobyevMOsorioD. Receptor noise as a determinant of colour thresholds. Proc R Soc B1998; 265: 351–358.
41.
StoddardMCStevensM. Pattern mimicry of host eggs by the common cuckoo, as seen through a bird’s eye. Proc R Soc B2010; 277: 1387–1393.
42.
AntonovAAvilésJMStokkeBG, et al.Egg discrimination in an open nesting passerine under dim light conditions. Ethology2011; 117: 1128–1137.
43.
HanleyDLópezAVFioriniVD, et al. Variation in multicomponent recognition cues alters egg rejection decisions: a test of the optimal acceptance threshold hypothesis. Phil Trans R Soc B2019; 374: 20180195.
LiDRuanYWangY, et al.Egg-spot matching in common cuckoo parasitism of the oriental reed warbler: effects of host nest availability and egg rejection. Avian Res2016; 7: 21.
46.
YangCLiangWAntonovA, et al.Diversity of parasitic cuckoos and their hosts in China. Chin Birds2012; 3: 9–32.
