Globally, the poor activity level of adolescent girls is a public health concern. Little research has involved adolescents in the design of interventions. This study assessed the feasibility of involving girls in the co-creation of an activity programme.
Methods:
Thirty-one students (15–17 years old) were recruited from a post-primary school. The Behaviour Change Wheel guided intervention design, providing insights into participants’ capability, opportunity and motivation for change. Step counts and self-reported physical activity levels were recorded pre- and post-intervention. Feasibility benchmarks assessed recruitment, data collection, acceptability and adherence.
Results:
Activity and educational sessions were delivered for six weeks during physical education class. Average attendance was 87% (benchmark = 80%). Eligibility was 61% (benchmark = 60%). There was a 100% retention rate (benchmark = 90%). All participants (n = 31) completed baseline measures and 71% (n = 22) completed post-measures. 54% (n = 17) of students completed pedometer measurements, with 32% (n = 10) having complete data. Average daily steps were 13,121 pre-intervention and 14,128 post-intervention (p > 0.05). Data collection was feasible, receiving a mean score > 4/5 (benchmark > 3.5/5).
Conclusions:
The Behaviour Change Wheel can be used to co-create an activity programme with adolescent girls. Predetermined benchmarks, except for pedometer recordings, were reached or exceeded, providing evidence for the need of a randomised controlled trial to test effectiveness.
HallalPAndersenLBullFGutholdRHaskellWEkelundU. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012; 380: 247–257.
2.
Barr-AndersonDNeumark-SztainerDSchmitzKWardDConwayTPrattC, et al. But I like PE: factors associated with enjoyment of physical education class in middle school girls. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2008; 79: 18–27.
3.
WoodsCBTannehillDQuinlanAMoynaNWalshJ. The Children’s Sport Participation and Physical Activity study (CSPPA). Dublin, Ireland: School of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University and the Irish Sports Council; 2010.
4.
ReesRKavanaghJHardenAShepherdJBruntonGOliverS, et al. Young people and physical activity: a systematic review matching their views to effective interventions. Health Educ Res. 2006; 21: 806–825.
5.
PearsonNBraithwaiteRBiddleSJH. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity among adolescent girls: a meta-analysis. Acad Pediatr. 2015; 15: 9–18.
6.
CorderKAtkinAEkelundUvan SluijsE. What do adolescents want in order to become more active?BMC Public Health. 2013; 13: 718.
7.
Murillo PardoBCamacho-MinanoMJGenerelo LanaspaEJulian ClementeJANovaisCMaia SantosMP. Data for action: the use of formative research to design a school-based intervention programme to increase physical activity in adolescents. Glob Health Promot. 2015; 22: 45–54.
8.
DudleyDAOkelyADPearsonPPeatJ. Engaging adolescent girls from linguistically diverse and low income backgrounds in school sport: a pilot randomised controlled trial. J Sci Med Sport. 2010; 13: 217–224.
9.
OkelyADCottonWGLubansDRMorganPJPuglisiLMillerJ, et al. A school-based intervention to promote physical activity among adolescent girls: rationale, design, and baseline data from the Girls in Sport group randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11: 658.
10.
GittelsohnJStecklerAJohnsonCCPrattCGrieserMPickrelJ, et al. Formative research in school and community-based health programs and studies: ‘state of the art’ and the TAAG approach. Health Educ Behav. 2006; 33: 25–39.
11.
EnrightEO’SullivanM. ‘Can I do it in my pyjamas?’ Negotiating a physical education curriculum with teenage girls. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 2010; 16: 203–222.
12.
JacquezFVaughnLWagnerE. Youth as partners, participants or passive recipients: a review of children and adolescents in community-based participatory research (CBPR). Am J Community Psychol. 2012; 51: 176–189.
13.
OwenMBCurryWBKernerCNewsonLFaircloughSJ. The effectiveness of school-based physical activity interventions for adolescent girls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2017; 105: 237–249.
14.
MichieSVan StralenMWestR. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011; 6: 42.
15.
CraigPDieppePMacintyreSMichieSNazarethIPetticrewM, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008; 337: a1655.
16.
HubbardGO’CarrollRMunroJMutrieNHawSMasonH, et al. The feasibility and acceptability of trial procedures for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial of a structured physical activity intervention for people diagnosed with colorectal cancer: findings from a pilot trial of cardiac rehabilitation versus usual care (no rehabilitation) with an embedded qualitative study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016; 2: 51.
17.
EldridgeSMChanCLCampbellMJBondCMHopewellSThabaneL, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016; 2: 64.
18.
TongASainsburyPCraigJ. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19: 349–357.
19.
KowalskiKCCrockerPRDonenRM. The Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) and Adolescents (PAQ-A) Manual. Saskatoon: University of Saskatchewan; 2004.
20.
VossCOgunleyeAASandercockGR. Physical Activity Questionnaire for children and adolescents: English norms and cut-off points. Pediatr Int. 2013; 55: 498–507.
21.
KaneM.JLaVoiNWiese-BjornstalDDuncanMNicholsJPetteeKAinsworthBThe 2007 Tucker Center research report, developing physically active girls: an evidence-based multidisciplinary approach.Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota; 2007.
22.
BenderALitfinJS. The effects of gender grouping on female students’ participation in physical education. Master of Arts in Education Action Research Papers. Paper 96. St. Catherine University; 2015.
23.
MichieSAtkinsLWestR. The behaviour change wheel: a guide to designing interventions. London: Silverback Publishing;2014.
24.
HsiehH-FShannonSE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15: 1277–1288.
25.
MichieSRichardsonMJohnstonMAbrahamCFrancisJHardemanW, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013; 46: 81–95.
26.
CaseyMMHarveyJTTelfordAEimeRMMooneyAPayneWR. Effectiveness of a school-community linked program on physical activity levels and health-related quality of life for adolescent girls. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14: 649.
27.
BarnesATPlotnikoffRCCollinsCEMorganPJ. Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the MADE4Life program: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Phys Act Health. 2015; 12: 1378–1393.
28.
KeltyTLMorganPJLubansDR. Efficacy and feasibility of the ‘Girls’ Recreational Activity Support Program Using Information Technology’: a pilot randomised controlled trial. 2012; Adv Physiol Educ, 2: 10-6.
29.
OkelyADLubansDRMorganPJCottonWPeraltaLMillerJ, et al. Promoting physical activity among adolescent girls: the Girls in Sport group randomized trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017; 14: 81.
30.
MotlRDishmanRSaundersRDowdaMFeltonGPateR. Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in adolescent girls. Am J Prev Med. 2001; 21: 110–117.
31.
ClemesSABiddleSJ. The use of pedometers for monitoring physical activity in children and adolescents: measurement considerations. J Phys Act Health. 2013; 10: 249–262.
32.
BraunVClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3: 77–101.
33.
QIP Ltd. NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis. Version 10. Software; 2012.
34.
Attride-StirlingJ. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual Res. 2001; 1: 385–405.
35.
Tudor-LockeC. Taking steps toward increased physical activity: using pedometers to measure and motivate. President’s Council Phys Fitness Sports Res Digest. 2002; 3: 1–8.
36.
BrooksFMagnussonJ. Taking part counts: adolescents’ experiences of the transition from inactivity to active participation in school-based physical education. Health Educ Res. 2006; 21: 872–883.
37.
MitchellFGraySInchleyJ. ‘This choice thing really works …’ Changes in experiences and engagement of adolescent girls in physical education classes, during a school-based physical activity programme. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy. 2015; 20: 593–611.
38.
BiddleSJWhiteheadSHO’DonovanTMNevillME. Correlates of participation in physical activity for adolescent girls: a systematic review of recent literature. J Phys Act Health. 2005; 2: 423–434.
39.
BrooksFMagnussonJ. Physical activity as leisure: the meaning of physical activity for the health and well-being of adolescent women. Health Care Women Int. 2007; 28: 69–87.
40.
FlintoffAScratonS. Stepping into active leisure? Young women’s perceptions of active lifestyles and their experiences of school physical education. Sport Educ Soc. 2001; 6: 5–21.
41.
EvensonKRGotoMMFurbergRD. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015; 12: 159.
42.
OwenMBCurryWBKernerCNewsonLFaircloughSJ. The effectiveness of school-based physical activity interventions for adolescent girls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2017; 105: 237–249.
