San Francisco Bay Area Filipinas with breast cancer underutilize support services. Our partnership engaged in community-based participatory research (CBPR) that involved formation of a community advisory board (CAB) representing low-income, low-English-proficient Filipinas with breast cancer. While CABs are a standard component of CBPR projects, the process of establishing and fostering CAB involvement has been under studied. This commentary explores the process our team used—building upon the Filipino cultural method of pakikisama which stresses making the other feel welcome, safe, and nurtured—to overcome barriers to active engagement. Challenges included minimizing power imbalances between the research team and CAB, and the establishment of an environment of familiarity, trust and caring among CAB members. We recorded all CAB meetings, transcribed them verbatim, and Tagalog portions were transcribed into English for analysis. Mobilizing pakikisama supported partnership building and allowed CAB members to engage in inclusive dialogue and formulate a culturally relevant support model.
MinklerM. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes. John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
2.
GomezSLQuachTHorn-RossPLPhamJTCockburnMChangET. Hidden breast cancer disparities in Asian women: disaggregating incidence rates by ethnicity and migrant status. Am J Public Health. 2010; 100(suppl1): S125–S131.
3.
ChockburnMDeapenD. Cancer Incidence and Mortality in California: Trends by Race/Ethnicity 1988–2001. University of Southern California; 2004.
4.
McCrackenMOlsenMChenMSJemalAThunMCokkinidesV. Cancer incidence, mortality, and associated risk factors among Asian Americans of Chinese, Filipino, Vietnamese, Korean, and Japanese ethnicities. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007; 57(4): 190–205.
5.
OoiSLMartinezMELiCI. Disparities in breast cancer characteristics and outcomes by race/ethnicity. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011; 127(3): 729–738.
6.
LiCIMaloneKEDalingJR. Differences in breast cancer stage, treatment, and survival by race and ethnicity. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163(1): 49–56.
7.
ChuKCLamarCAFreemanHP. Racial disparities in breast carcinoma survival rates: separating factors that affect diagnosis from factors that affect treatment. Cancer. 2003; 97(11): 2853–2860.
8.
GomezSLPressDJLichtensztajnDKeeganTHMShemaSJLeGM. Patient, hospital, and neighborhood factors associated with treatment of early-stage breast cancer among Asian American women in California. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012; 21(5): 821–834.
9.
VergaraB. Pinoy Capital: The Filipino Nation in Daly City. Temple University Press; 2008.
10.
EspirituYL. Home Bound: Filipino American Lives across Cultures, Communities, and Countries. University of California Press; 2003.
11.
EspirituYL. The Intersection of Race, Ethnicity, and Class: The multiple identities of second-generation Filipinos. In: MinPG editor. The Second Generation: Ethnic Identity among Asian Americans. AltaMira Press; 2002.
12.
EspirituYL. We don’t sleep around like white girls do. Signs. 2001; 26(2): 415–440.
13.
RafaelVL. “Your Grief Is Our Gossip”: Overseas Filipinos and Other Spectral Presences. Public Culture. 1997; 9(2): 267–291.
14.
KoCSadlerGRyujinLDongA. Filipina American women’s breast cancer knowledge, attitudes, and screening behaviors. BMC Public Health. 2003; 3(1): 27.
15.
GreenLWGeorgeMADanielMFrankisCJHerbertCPBowieWR. Guidelines for participatory research in health promotion. In: Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. MinklerWallerstein (eds). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2003, pp. 419–428.
16.
IsraelBASchulzAJParkerEABeckerAB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Ann. Rev Public Health. 1998; 19(1): 173–202.
17.
IsraelBASchulzAJParkerEABeckerABAllenAJGuzmanJR. Critical issues in developing and following community based participatory research principals. In: Community-Based Participatory Research for Health. MinklerWallerstein (eds). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2003, pp. 48–62.
18.
JamesSArniellaGBickellNAWalkerWRobinsonVTaylorB. Community ACTION boards: an innovative model for effective community-academic research partnerships. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011; 5(4): 399–404.
19.
CheungFMvandeVijverFJRLeongFTL. Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. Am Psychol. 2011; 66(7): 593–603.
20.
MaggayMP. [Hints: habitual Filipino modes of communication] Pahiwatig: kagawiang pangkomunikasyon ng Pilipino. Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila University Press; 2002.
21.
LynchFde GuzmanA. Four Readings on Philippine Values. Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila University Press; 1974.
22.
PasickRJBarkerJCOtero-SabogalRBurkeNJJosephGGuerraC. Intention, subjective norms, and cancer screening in the context of relational culture. Health Educ Behav. 2009; 36(5 Suppl): 91S–110S.
23.
AlejoAE. Tao po! Tuloy po! [It’s a person! Please come in!] Quezon City, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila University Press; 1990.
24.
BurkeNJVilleroOGuerraC. Passing through: meanings of survivorship and support among filipinas with breast cancer. Qual Health Res. 2012; 22: 189–198.
25.
AguilarDEAbesamis-MendozaNUrsuaRDivinoLAMCadagKGavinNP. Lessons learned and challenges in building a Filipino health coalition. Health Promot Pract. 2010; 11(3): 428–436.
26.
JanesCRCorbettKK. Anthropology and global health. Ann Rev Anthropol. 2009; 38(1): 167–183.
27.
CraneJT. Unequal ‘partners’. AIDS, academia, and the rise of global health. Behemoth. 2010; 3(3): 78–97.
