The doctor in my pocket: examining mobile approaches to personal wellbeing

Abstract

Aims:

Today’s democratized media access, online engagement, and digital clout offer global opportunities for individual influence and customized messaging strategies. As such, public health initiatives are dramatically changing as target audiences decide where to place their time and attention regarding health information. This article reports on ways in which health professionals and mobile techies are teaming up to create pocket platforms for personal wellbeing. The following work also considers how healthcare digitization and mobilization operate in relation to public wellbeing.

Methods:

Using a double round Delphi survey, nine industry experts were asked about the impact of new media tools on health initiatives and subsequent healthcare behaviors. The panel also addressed the impact and efficacy of the mobile health movement.

Results:

Expert testimony identified ways in which millennial media can encourage (and sometimes prevent) improved patient, community, and population health outcomes. Industry leaders further addressed strategic moves healthcare professionals are making to ensure personal healthcare communication remains relevant, accessible, and attainable for the general public. Clear themes emerged throughout the iterative Delphi process, resulting in the overarching categories of information access, information literacy, patient privacy, patient accountability, physician engagement, and healthcare quality.

Conclusions:

This work connects theory with practice by examining developing health communication strategies through compliance-gaining choice models and modern marketing research. Findings delineate best practices for health communication and administration in the digital age, providing both a critical account of and practical approach to healthcare messaging within the millennial context. Results call attention to the impact of media platforms on information distribution, adaptive communication strategies, and overall health communication processes. The study invites further discussion regarding digital shifts in healthcare messaging and subsequent influences on patient/consumer compliance.

Keywords

Delphi survey mobile health public health new media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hsu

Yang

. Who is watching TV? Who is listening to radio? Consumer perceptions of TV and radio advertising information. Soc Behav Personal 2007;35:157–68.

Boulos

MNK

Wheeler

Tavares

, et al How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX. Biomed Eng Online 2011;10:24.

Hesse

Nelson

Kreps

, et al Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med 2005;165(22): 2618–24.

The Social Life of Health Information. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Available online at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2009/06/11/the-social-life-of-health-information/ (last accessed 20 March 2019).

Tan

SS-L

Goonawardene

. Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res; 19(1):e9.

Groening

. From ‘a box in the theater of the world’ to ‘the world as your living room’: cellular phones, television and mobile privatization. New Media Soc 2010;12:1331–47.

Gartner says worldwide mobile phone sales grew 35 percent in third quarter 2010; smartphone sales increased 96 percent: Gartner. Available online at: https://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/1466313 (last accessed 11 July 2018).

Anderson

Wolff

. “The Web Is Dead. Long Live the Internet.” Wired. November 20, 2018. Accessed March 20, 2019. https://www.wired.com/2010/08/ff-webrip/.

Kelman

. Interests, relationships, identities: three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment. Annu Rev Psychol 2006;57:1–26.

10.

Wheeless

Barraclough

Stewart

. Compliance-gaining and power in persuasion. Ann Int Commun Assoc 1983;7:105–45.

11.

Grant

King

Behnke

. Compliance-gaining strategies, communication satisfaction, and willingness to comply. Commun Rep 1994;7:99–108.

12.

Garko

. Perspective on and conceptualizations of compliance and compliance-gaining. Commun Quart 1990;38(2):138–157.

13.

Hasson

Keeney

McKenna

. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000;32(4): 1008–15.

14.

Dick

. Delphi face to face. Resource papers in action research, 2000. Available online at: http://www.aral.com.au/resources/delphi.html (last accessed 11 July 2018)

15.

Dalkey

. Studies in the Quality of Life: Delphi and Decision-making. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 1972.

16.

Dalkey

Helmer

. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manag Sci 1963;9:458–67.

17.

McKenna

. The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing. J Adv Nurs 1994;19(6): 1221–25.

18.

Strauss

Zeigler

. The Delphi technique and its uses in social science research. J Creative Behav 1975;9:253–9.

19.

Friedman

. Differential Games. Chelmsford, MA: Courier Corporation, 2006.

20.

Linstone

Turoff

(eds). Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. 1st ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc, 1975.

21.

Sumsion

. The Delphi technique: an adaptive research tool. Brit J Occup Therapy 1998;61:153–6.

22.

Young

Hogben

. An experimental study of the Delphi technique. Educ Res Perspect 1978;5:57–62.

23.

Beech

. Studying the future: a Delphi survey of how multi-disciplinary clinical staff view the likely development of two community mental health centres over the course of the next two years. J Adv Nurs 1997;25(2): 331–8.

24.

Green

Jones

Hughes

, et al Applying the Delphi technique in a study of GPs’ information requirements. Health Soc Care Commun 1999;7(3): 198–205.

25.

Procter

Hunt

. Using the Delphi survey technique to develop a professional definition of nursing for analysing nursing workload. J Adv Nurs 1994;19(5): 1003–14.

26.

Loughlin

Moore

. Using Delphi to achieve congruent objectives and activities in a pediatrics department. J Med Educ 1979;54(2): 101–6.

27.

Crisp

Pelletier

Duffield

, et al

The Delphi method?

Nurs Res 1997;46:116.

28.

Free

Phillips

Felix

, et al The effectiveness of M-health technologies for improving health and health services: a systematic review protocol. BMC Res Notes 2010;3:250.

29.

Kailas

Chong

Watanabe

. A simple iterative algorithm for wellness applications. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE wireless communication and networking conference, Sydney, Australia, 18–21 April 2010, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE.

30.

Schwab

. Sociocultural roots of mental illness: an epidemiologic survey. Springer, 1978. Available online at: http://www.springer.com/us/book/9781468424355 (last accessed 11 July 2018)

31.

Bawden

Robinson

. The dark side of information: overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. J Inform Sci 2009;35:180–191.

32.

Eppler

Mengis

. The concept of information overload: a review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. Inform Soc 2004;20:325–44.

33.

Bawden

Holtham

Courtney

. Perspectives on information overload. Aslib Proc 1999;51:249–55.

34.

Andretta

. Information literacy: a practitioner’s guide. Oxford: Chandos Publishing, 2005.

35.

Bawden

. Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. J Document 2001;57:218–59.

36.

Secker

Boden

Price

, et al The information literacy cookbook: ingredients, recipes and tips for success. Oxford: Chandos Publishing, 2007.

37.

McChesney

. The political economy of communication and the future of the field. Media Cult Soc 2000;22:109–16.

38.

Malhotra

Jain

Lagakos

. The information overload controversy: an alternative viewpoint. J Market 1982;46:27–37.

39.

Boynton

. What we value: a Delphi study to identify key values that guide ethical decision-making in public relations. Public Relat Rev 2006;32:325–30.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.49 MB

0.00 MB