The aim of this study was to explore the attitudes and behaviours of registered nurses and their colleagues around the adoption of standard precautions in order to determine strategies to promote adherence.
Design:
A qualitative exploratory descriptive design used interviews and focus group to collect data.
Setting:
Registered nurses and registered midwifes from a tertiary metropolitan hospital took part in the study.
Participants:
A voluntary sample of 29 adults was recruited from the Australian nursing (n = 25) and midwifery (n = 4) workforce. There were six men (mean age = 36.83 years; SD = 8.93) and 23 women (mean age = 41.36 years; SD = 10.25). Participants were recruited through advertisement on notice boards and emails from unit managers.
Results:
Thematic analysis revealed five themes but the focus here is on staff judgements which are against the guidelines. Participants indicated that where in their judgement the patient posed no risk and they judged themselves skilled in the procedure, they were justified in deviating from the guidelines. Some staff judgements appeared to be self-protecting, while others were irrational and inconsistent.
Conclusions:
Despite use of standard precautions being mandated, staff often deviated from them based on their own assessment of the situation or the patient. Any deviance from the guidelines is of concern but especially so when staff take it upon themselves to apply their own criteria or judgements. These results also suggest there may be some organisational inadequacies with regards to training and supervision of staff.
AtifMLBrenetAHageauxSFaveMHCochetCBaticleEPourrierCWolnyDAstagneauPKadiZand Standard Precautions Work Group. (2013) Awareness of standard precautions for 4439 healthcare professionals in 34 institutions in France. Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses43: 10–16.
2.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2012) Nursing and Midwifery Workforce 2011. National Health Workforce Series No. 2. Canberra: AIHW.
3.
BeekmannSEVlahovDKoziolDEMcShalleyEDSchmittJMHendersonDK. (1994) Temporal association between implementation of universal precautions and a sustained, progressive decrease in percutaneous exposures to blood. Clinical Infectious Diseases18: 562–569.
4.
Ben-DavidBGaitiniL. (1996) The routine wearing of gloves: impact on the frequency of needlestick and percutaneous injury and on surface contamination in the operating room. Anesthesia & Analgesia83: 623–628.
5.
BraunVClarkeV. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3.
6.
Centers for Disease Control. (1975) Isolation Techniques for Use in Hospitals. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
7.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1982) Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS): precautions for clinical and laboratory staffs. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report31: 577–580.
8.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1987) Recommendations for prevention of HIV transmission in healthcare settings. Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report36: 3–18.
9.
CummingsKMJetteAMRosenstockIM. (1987) Construct validation of the health belief model. Health Education & Behavior6: 394–405.
10.
CutterJJordanS. (2012) Inter-professional differences in compliance with standard precautions in operating theatres: A multi-site, mixed methods study. International Journal of Nursing Studies49: 953–968.
11.
de ZwartOVeldhuijzenIKElamGAroARAbrahamTBishopGDVoetenHARichardsusJHBrugJ. (2009) Perceived threat, risk perception, and efficacy beliefs related to SARS and other (emerging) infectious diseases: results of an international survey. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine16: 30–40.
12.
DeJoyDMGershonRMurphyLRWilsonMG. (1996) A work-systems analysis of compliance with universal precautions among health care workers. Health Education Quarterly23: 159–174.
13.
FrancisR. (2013) Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London: The Stationery Office.
14.
GammonJGouldD. (2005) Universal precautions: A review of knowledge, compliance and strategies to improve practice. Journal of Research in Nursing10: 529–547.
15.
GarnerJS. (1996) Guidelines for isolation precautions in hospitals. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology17: 13–21.
16.
GarnerJSSimmonsBP. (1983) CDC Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. Infection Control4: 247–325.
17.
HillsSWilkesL. (2003) Occupational exposure of nurses working in high risk areas: an Australian Study. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing21: 28–34.
18.
JacksonCLowtonKGriffithsP. (2014) Infection prevention as “a show”: a qualitative study of nurses’ infection prevention behaviours. International Journal of Nursing Studies51: 400–408.
19.
KnightVMBodsworthNJ. (1998) Perceptions and practice of universal blood and body fluid precautions by registered nurses at a major Sydney teaching hospital. Journal of Advanced Nursing27: 746–751.
20.
KretzerEKLarsonEL. (1998) Behavioral interventions to improve infection control practices. American Journal of Infection Control26: 245–253.
21.
LamSC. (2011) Universal to standard precautions in disease prevention: Preliminary development of compliance scale for clinical nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies48: 1533–1539.
22.
LamSC. (2014) Validation and cross-cultural pilot testing of compliance with standard precautions scale: self-administered instrument for clinical nurses. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology35: 547–555.
23.
LazarusRFolkmanS. (1984) Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer.
24.
LovedayHPWilsonJAPrattRJGolsorkhiMTingleABakABrowneJPrietoJWilcoxMand UK Department of Health. (2014) epic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in england. Journal of Hospital Infection86: S1-S70.
25.
LynchPJacksonMMCummingsMJStammWE. (1987) Rethinking the role of isolation practices in the prevention of nosocomial infections. Annals of Internal Medicine107: 243–246.
26.
National Health and Medical Research Council. (2010) Australian Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Infection in Healthcare. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
27.
NevesHCCSouzaACSeMedeirosMMunariDBRibeiroLCTippleAF. (2011) Safety of nursing staff and determinants of adherence to personal protective equipment. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem19: 354–361.
28.
NewsonSWB. (2001) The history of infection control: Semmelweis and handwashing. British Journal of Infection Control2: 24–25.
29.
Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. (2013) Code of professional conduct for nurses in Australia. Melbourne: Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia,.
30.
Nursing and Midwifery Council. (2015) The Code -Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives. London: The Nursing and Midwifery Regulator for England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland,.
31.
OsborneS. (2003) Influences on compliance with standard precautions among operating room nurses. American Journal of Infection Control31: 415–423.
32.
PereiraFMVLamSCChanJHMMalaguti-ToffanoSEGirE. (2015) Difference in compliance with Standard Precautions by nursing staff in Brazil versus Hong Kong. American Journal of Infection Control43: 769–772.
33.
PriceMWilliamsT. (2016) When doing wrong feels so right: normalization of deviance. Journal of Patient Safety. DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000157.
34.
RobertsSTKennedyBL. (2006) Why are young college women not using condoms? Their perceived risk, drug use, and development vulnerability may provide importnat clues to sexual risk. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing20: 32–40.
35.
SaghafiLRaselliPFrancillonCFrancioliP. (1992) Exposure to blood during various procedures: Results of two surveys before and after the implementation of universal precautions. American Journal of Infection Control20: 53–57.
36.
SiegelJDRhinehartEJacksonMChiarelloLand the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. (2007) Guidelines for isolation precaution: preventing transmission of infectious agents in healthcare settings. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
37.
SteinADMakarawoTPAhmadMFR. (2003) A survey of doctors’ and nurses’ knowledge, attitudes and compliance with infection control guidelines in Birmingham teaching hospitals. Journal of Hospital Infection54: 68–73.
38.
SundaramROParkinsonRW. (2007) Universal precaution compliance by orthopaedic trauma team members in a major trauma resuscitation scenario. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England89: 262–267.
39.
TaitARVoepel-LewisTTuttleDBMalviyaS. (2000) Compliance with standard precaution guidelines for the prevention of occupational transmission of bloodborne and airborne pathogens: a survey of postanesthesia nursing practice. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing31: 38–44.
40.
VaughanD. (1996) The challenger launch decision: risky technology, culture and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
WeinsteinN. (1984) Why it won’t happen to me: perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility. Health Psychology3: 431–457.
42.
WickmanMEKoniak-GriffinD. (2013) Invincibility fable: tool development to measure invincibility. Journal of Pediatric Nursing28: 575–584.
43.
YoungTArensFJKennedyGELaurieJWRutherfordGW. (2007) Antiretroviral post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for occupational HIV exposure. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews1: CD002835.
