Diffuse background illumination (DBI) diagnostics is applied to study spray instabilities in lean direct injection combustion systems for gas turbines. Experiments were performed in a reacting kerosene spray at atmospheric pressure using DBI, Mie Scattering, and OH* chemiluminescence (OH*-CL) imaging to delineate instability dynamics. Comparison of DBI and Mie scattering results shows that the Mie scattering is effective in illustrating the planar structure of the dispersed spray, but the line-of-sight DBI provided an improved visualization of the off-axis features of the spray to aid in understanding the spray dynamics. Measurements were postprocessed into phase-reconstructed data to illustrate the dynamic relationship between spray and OH*-CL oscillations and to demonstrate the effectiveness of DBI imaging for illustrating the influence of spray structure on the flame topology. Results show that DBI provides a clear illustration of how spray oscillations govern the switching between premixed (lean or rich) and diffusion modes of combustion over the course of the oscillation cycle.
BoggavarapuPRavikrishnaRV. A review on atomization and sprays of biofuels for IC engine applications. Int J Spray Combust2013; 5: 85–121.
2.
GongCJangiMLucciniT. Large eddy simulation of air entrainment and mixing in reacting and non-reacting diesel sprays. Flow Turbul Combust2014; 93: 385–404.
3.
LiuLPengY, et al.A review of phenomenological spray penetration modelling for diesel engines with advanced injection strategy. Int J Spray Combust2020; 12: 1–22.
4.
TianJLiuY, et al.Experimental study on spray characteristics of octanol biodiesel and modification of spray tip penetration model. Phys Fluids2021; 33: 091902.
5.
PucilowskiMJangiM, et al.LES study of diesel flame/wall interaction and mixing mechanisms at different wall distances. Proc Combust Inst2021; 38: 5597–5604.
6.
GhijiMGoldsworthyLBranderPA, et al.Numerical and experimental investigation of early stage diesel sprays. Fuel2016; 175: 274–286.
7.
AsgariBAmaniE. A multi-objective CFD optimization of liquid fuel spray injection in dry low-emission gas turbine combustors. Appl Energ2017; 203: 696–710.
8.
AlajmiAAdamN, et al.Fuel atomization in gas turbines: a review of novel technology. Int J Energ Res2019; 43: 3166–3181.
9.
PassarelliMKazbekovA, et al.Experimental study of forced synchronization and cross-coupling in a liquid-fuelled gas turbine combustor at elevated pressure. Proc Combust Inst2023; 39: 4751–4759.
10.
JingDZhangFLiY, et al.Experimental investigation on the macroscopic and microscopic spray characteristics of diesel like fuel. Fuel2017; 199: 478–487.
AradheyYLiCMeadowsJ. Coupled droplet dynamics: investigation of acoustic-spray interactions in a reacting flow field. Combust Flame2023; 250: 112645.
13.
AnandCTNDeshmukhDRavikrishnaRV. Laser-based spatio-temporal characterization of port fuel injection (PFI) sprays. Int J Spray Combust2010; 2: 125–150.
14.
RenaudADucruixSZimmerL. Experimental study of the precessing vortex core impact on the liquid fuel spray in a gas turbine model combustor. J Eng Gas Turb Power2019; 141: 111022.
15.
ManinJBardiMPickettLM.Evaluation of the liquid length via diffused back-illumination imaging in vaporizing diesel sprays. In: Proceedings of international symposium on diagnostics and modeling of combustion in internal combustion engines, Fukuoka, Japan, 23-26 July 2012, SP2-4, pp. 665–673. The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers.
16.
GhandhiJBHeimM. An optimized optical system for backlit imaging. Rev Sci Instrum2009; 80: 056105.
WeissLWensingM, et al.Development of limited-view tomography for measurement of spray G plume direction and liquid volume fraction. Exp Fluids2020; 61: 1–17.
19.
WestlyeFRPenneyK, et al.Diffuse back-illumination setup for high temporally resolved extinction imaging. Appl Opt2017; 56: 5028–5038.
20.
LazzaroM. Ray-tracing analysis of shadowgraph and diffuse back-illumination extinction imaging of a synthetic GDI spray. Exp Fluids2021; 62: 30.
21.
WangZLiX, et al.Potential of kerosene-diesel blends as alternative fuels for diesel engines: perspectives from spray combustion characteristics. Fuel2023; 335: 127112.
22.
GodboldCPoursadeghF, et al.Measurement of air-fuel mixing in a diesel spray at engine relevant conditions using UV-VIS DBI diagnostic. Proceedings of the ASME 2021 internal combustion engine division fall technical conference. Online, 13-15 October, 2021, V001T03A006. ASME.
23.
CardonaSPayriR, et al.Effects of varying the liquid fuel type and air co-flow conditions on the microscopic spray characteristics in an atmospheric co-flow spray burner. Fuel2023; 335: 127018.
24.
ManinJPickettLMCruaC.Microscopic observation of miscible mixing in sprays at elevated temperatures and pressures. In: ILASS Americas 27th annual conference of liquidatomization and spray systems, Raleigh, North Carolina, 15–17 May, 2015, paper no. 93. ILASS.
25.
LiTSchiemannM, et al.Experimental investigations of single particle and particle group combustion in a laminar flow reactor using simultaneous volumetric OH-LIF imaging and diffuse backlight-illumination. Renew Sust Energ Rev2021; 136: 110337.
MuruseganMSingaraveluB, et al.Onset of flame-intrinsic thermoacoustic instabilities in partially premixed turbulent combustors. Int J Spray Combust2018; 10: 171–184.
28.
HuangYYangV. Dynamics and stability of lean-premixed swirl-stabilized combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci2009; 35: 293–364.
29.
GejjiRMHuangCAndersonW. Parametric investigation of combustion instabilities in a single-element lean direct injection combustor. Int J Spray Combust2018; 11: 1–16.
30.
RaghunathanMGeorgeNB, et al.Inhibiting the onset of thermoacoustic instability through targeted control of critical regions. Int J Spray Combust2023; 15: 3–15.
31.
KrausCHarthSBockhornH. Experimental investigation of combustion instabilities in swirl-stabilized partially premixed flames in single- and multiple-burner setup. Int J Spray Combust2016; 8: 4–26.
32.
ImJHKimD, et al.Self-pulsation characteristics of a gas-liquid swirl coaxial injector. Atomiz Sprays2009; 19: 57–74.
33.
HassaCHeinzeJDreizlerA. Self-excited oscillation in a combustion chamber driven by phase change in the liquid fuel feed system. Int J Spray Combust2011; 3: 273–284.
34.
JohnsonMJamesAAgrawalAK. Effect of insert porosity on combustion instability in a lean premixed combustor analyzed by a proper orthogonal decomposition-based phase reconstruction technique. J Eng Gas Turb Power2024; 146: 081006.
35.
TedderSATacinaKM, et al.Fundamental study of a single point lean direct injector. Part I: effect of air swirler angle and injector tip location on spray characteristics. In: 50th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference, Cleveland, Ohio, 28–30 July, 2014, AIAA 2014-3435. AIAA.
36.
JohnsonMJamesAAgrawalAK. Analysis of spray atomization effects on the performance of porous media as disruptors of thermoacoustic instability. In: Proceedings of the 13th U.S. national combustion meeting, College Station, Texas, 19–22 March, 2023, 180NCT-0376.
37.
BerkoozGHolmesPLumleyJL. The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech1993; 25: 539–575.
38.
WeissJ.A tutorial on the proper orthogonal decomposition. In AIAA Aviation 2019 forum, Dallas, Texas, 17–21 June, 2019, AIAA 2019-3333. AIAA.
39.
DaschJC. One-dimensional tomography: a comparison of Abel, onion-peeling, and filtered backprojection methods. Appl Opt1992; 31: 1146–1152.
40.
KolhePSAgrawalAK. Abel inversion of deflectometric data: comparison of accuracy and noise propagation of existing techniques. Appl Opt2009; 48: 3894–3902.
GajanPStrzeleckiA, et al.Investigation of spray behavior downstream of an aeroengine injector with acoustic excitation. J Propuls Power2007; 23: 390–397.
