Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The increased risk of CVD concerns an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and heart failure (HF), at corresponding relative risks of 2.5, 1.2 and 2.0, respectively, as compared with the general population. Especially young patients under the age of 40 years run a relatively high risk of these complications when compared with the general population. Chronic systemic inflammation causes a hypercoagulable state leading to the prothrombotic tendency characteristic of VTE, and accelerates all stages involved during atherogenesis in ASCVD. Increased awareness of VTE risk is warranted in patients with extensive colonic disease in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, as well as during hospitalization, especially when patients are scheduled for surgery. Similarly, critical periods for ASCVD events are the 3 months prior to and 3 months after an IBD-related hospital admission. The increased ASCVD risk is not fully explained by an increased prevalence of traditional risk factors and includes pro-atherogenc lipid profiles with high levels of small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol particles and dysfunctional high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Risk factors associated with HF are location and extent of inflammation, female sex, and age exceeding 40 years. A dose-dependent increase of overall CVD risk has been reported for corticosteroids. Immunomodulating maintenance therapy might reduce CVD risk in IBD, not only by a direct reduction of chronic systemic inflammation but possibly also by a direct effect of IBD medication on platelet aggregation, endothelial function and lipid and glucose metabolism. More data are needed to define these effects accurately. Despite accumulating evidence on the increased CVD risk in IBD, congruent recommendations to develop preventive strategies are lacking. This literature review provides an overview of current knowledge and identifies gaps in evidence regarding CVD risk in IBD, by discussing epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical management.

Keywords

cardiovascular disease drugs genetics inflammation inflammatory bowel disease lipids morbidity mortality traditional risk factors

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, despite significant advances in cardiovascular risk management over the past decennia.¹ CVD can be divided into venous and arterial disease, which both have a distinct pathogenic pathway, epidemiology, risk profile, diagnostics, and therapeutic strategy. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting the gastrointestinal tract and comprises ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). Similar to other chronic inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and psoriatic arthritis, IBD is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD;^2–5 Table 1). The overall underlying explanation for the association between IBD and CVD seems to be linked to the immunological processes in both chronic systemic inflammation and atherogenesis. The aim of this paper was to review current knowledge on epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of both VTE and ASCVD in IBD patients.

Table 1.

Relative risk of venous and arterial CVD in different chronic inflammatory diseases as compared with the general population following meta-analyses.

	VTE	HF	IHD	CeVD	PAD	Mortality
RA	1.94 (1.79–2.10)*	1.87 (1.47–2.39)*	1.26 (1.04–1.52)	1.90 (1.70–2.10)	NS	1.30 (1.20–1.40)
SLE	3.55 (2.69–4.69)*	1.27 (0.65–2.49)*	3.39 (2.15–5.35)	1.95 (1.52–2.53)	4.10 (1.5–11.6)**	2.72 (1.83–4.04)
PsA	1.20 (1.03–1.40)*	1.50 (1.10–2.00)	1.68 (1.31–2.15)	1.22 (1.05–1.41)	NA	1.62 (1.31–2.12)
IBD	2.20 (1.83–2.65)	2.03 (1.35–3.03)	1.17 (1.07–1.27)	1.25 (1.08–1.44)	NS	NS

Studies reporting hazard ratios instead of RR; **studies reporting odds ratio instead of RR. The parenthetical numerals are the 95%CI.

95%CI, 95% confidence interval; CD, Crohn’s disease; CeVD, cerebrovascular disease; HF, heart failure; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; IHD, ischemic heart disease; NA, not available; NS, non-significant; PAD, peripheral artery disease; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; RR, relative risk; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; UC, ulcerative colitis; VTE, venous thromboembolism.

Venous thromboembolism

Epidemiology

The risk of VTE is 2.5-fold higher in the IBD population as compared with controls, as has been shown in two meta-analyses of case-control studies, prospective cohort studies and population-based cohort studies.^6,7

Up to 90% of VTE cases concern deep venous thrombosis [DVT; relative risk (RR) 2.42; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 1.78–3.30] or pulmonary embolism (PE; RR 2.53; 95%CI 1.95–3.28). In the remaining 10% of VTE cases, other locations are affected, such as the mesenteric and cerebral veins.^6
–8 The risk of recurrent VTE within 5 years after discontinuation of coagulation therapy is higher among IBD patients as compared with controls (33.4% versus 21.7%, respectively; p = 0.010).⁹ Noteworthy, half of IBD patients had active disease at time of recurrent VTE. These data indicate that thromboprophylaxis may be considered during flares in IBD patients with a history of VTE.

Risk factors

Patient characteristics

The incidence rates of VTE increase with age and absolute risk is higher in patients aged ⩾60 years as compared with IBD patients aged <60 years (54.6/10.000 person-years versus 8.9/10.000 person-years, respectively). Nevertheless, relative risks in IBD patients as compared with controls are especially high in younger age groups, since IBD patients experience VTE at an earlier age as compared with controls.^10,11 Among IBD patients below the age of 40 years the incidence rate ratio (IRR) is 6.02 (95%CI 3.92–9.12) as compared with age- and sex-matched controls.¹⁰ Also, in pediatric and adolescent populations the relative risk of VTE is more than two to threefold higher [hazard ratio (HR) 6.6; 95%CI 3.3–13.2 in patients aged ⩽20 years versus HR ranging from 1.6 to 2.8 in older age groups].¹² No evident association between VTE risk and sex has been observed. In obese IBD patients, an increased prevalence of DVT and PE has been observed as compared with non-obese patients, according to preliminary data.¹³

Disease characteristics

The extent and location of IBD are associated with VTE risk. According to a retrospective study of 60 patients with confirmed IBD and DVT, 76% of VTE cases occurred in UC patients with pancolitis, and 24% of VTE cases occurred in patients with colitis limited to the left-sided colon or proctitis. In 40 CD patients, 79% of VTE cases occurred in patients with ileocolonic or colonic involvement, and 21% in patients with ileal disease.¹⁴

VTE risk is twice as high as compared with matched controls in quiescent IBD (HR 2.1; 95%CI 1.6–2.9; 1.4/1000 person-years), and increases to 8.5-fold in patients with active IBD (HR 8.4; 95%CI 5.5–12.8; 9.0/1000 person-years).¹⁵ The majority of VTEs during disease flares occur in outpatients in both absolute and relative numbers (non-hospitalized periods: HR 15.8; 95%CI 9.8–25.5; 6.4/1000 person-years versus during hospitalization: HR 3.2; 95%CI; 37.5/1000 person-years, respectively).¹⁵ VTE risk of hospitalized IBD patients is increased regardless of the indication for hospital admission, e.g. IBD flare, surgery or non-IBD-related reasons, probably related to in-hospital immobilization.¹⁶ Among hospitalized CD patients, intra-abdominal fistulizing disease was independently associated with VTE [odds ratio (OR) 1.39; 95%CI 1.13–1.70].¹⁷

Traditional VTE risk factors

Although VTE risk in IBD is increased independently of known clinical risk factors, i.e. long-distance journey, postoperative status, injury/immobility, pregnancy/delivery, oral contraceptives/hormone substitution, a cumulative effect of known clinical risk factors for VTE may be present.¹⁸

Data on VTE risk in IBD patients who use hormonal contraception specifically, are lacking. Based on an overall twofold increased VTE risk over baseline in women using estrogen-based methods, a cumulative effect of oral contraceptives and IBD may be relevant, especially in patients with active IBD. Therefore, individual counseling of patients on the optimal contraceptive method is recommended.¹⁹

Several studies indicate that intestinal resection increases the risk of both in-hospital and post-hospitalization VTE events when compared with non-IBD patients, resulting in rates of postoperative VTE between 0.6% and 8.9%. Surgery-related risk factors are emergency surgery, open procedure, longer operative time, ileostomy formation, anastomotic leak, and ileus.²⁰ The indication for surgery, e.g. related to IBD or colorectal cancer, is not associated with VTE risk. Patient-specific risk factors for postoperative VTE are diagnosis of UC (higher risk as compared with CD), age above 65 years, and obesity.^20
–22

According to a meta-analysis of five cohort studies, risk of VTE during pregnancy and postpartum is two to three times higher in the IBD population as compared with controls (RR 2.13; 95%CI 1.66–2.73 and RR 2.61; 95%CI 1.84–3.69, respectively). In both periods, UC patients are more at risk than CD patients. During pregnancy, the risk of DVT is increased, whereas for PE, no significant increased risk has been demonstrated (RR 2.74; 95%CI 1.73–4.36 versus RR 1.81; 95%CI 0.81–4.05, respectively).²³ Two studies addressed VTE in context of disease flares during pregnancy and showed that the pooled RR of pregnancy-associated VTE increased to 7.81 (95%CI 0.90–6.78).^24,25

Genetic factors

IBD is not associated with hereditary coagulation disorders predisposing to thrombosis.^26,27 The prevalence of mutations in genes encoding factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is comparable in VTE patients with IBD and controls.^26
–29 A recent genome-wide association study (GWAS) and whole-exome sequencing study investigated and defined high genetic risk for VTE as the presence of multiple VTE genetic variants or at least one pathogenic variant.³⁰ This high genetic risk was present in approximately one in seven IBD patients. VTE risk in IBD patients was significantly associated with both high polygenic risk scores and carriage of thrombophilia pathogenic variants (OR 3.13 and 2.11, respectively). An additional effect of genetic burden on VTE risk was suggested and associated with shorter time between IBD diagnosis, and VTE event and thrombosis at multiple sites. In general, analysis of genetic or acquired thrombophilia disorders may be disregarded after a diagnosis of VTE in patients with active IBD, unless a family history of VTE is present.³¹

Pathogenesis

Ample evidence from basic investigations supports the hypothesis of a hypercoagulable state in IBD, including the observations of increased levels of procoagulants, vascular endothelial dysfunction, decrease in anticoagulants and alterations in the fibrinolytic system leading to a prothrombotic tendency.^11,32 In addition, several studies have demonstrated an increased prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies among IBD patients as compared with controls.^33,34 Hypercoagulability has been observed both in quiescent and active IBD, and is substantiated by data on levels of the coagulation and fibrinolytic cascade.^35,36 For instance, thrombocytes showed a higher status of activation leading to an increased tendency to intravascular aggregation regardless of disease activity.³⁷ The hypercoagulable state is probably most pronounced during IBD disease flares, during which the procoagulation factors V, VII, VIII, X, XI, XII, von Willebrand factor, and fibrinogen are increased, and important drivers of anticoagulation, i.e. protein S and antithrombin, are decreased, and thrombocytosis and thrombocyte dysfunction have been observed.^38
–40

IBD drugs and VTE risk

Aminosalicylates

Clinical studies designed to evaluate the effect of aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) on VTE risk are not available. Platelets isolated from IBD patients receiving 5-ASA showed a reduction in both spontaneous and thrombin-induced platelet activation in vitro.⁴¹ No correlation was found between oral dosing and the level of platelet inhibition.

Corticosteroids

According to a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies, treatment with systemic corticosteroids during a flare is associated with a twofold increased risk of VTE as compared with patients not using corticosteroids (OR 2.20; 95%CI 1.70–2.86).⁴² Due to a substantial heterogeneity across selected studies, authors could not comment on confounding by hospitalization, immobilization or severity of the IBD flare. The association between corticosteroids and VTE risk may be dose dependent.⁴³ This hypothesis is illustrated by the findings of a prospective study, in which IBD patients receiving high-dose steroids in tapering regimen showed a decrease in fibrin degradation products and stability in fragments of prothrombin.⁴⁴ In vivo experimental studies in healthy individuals have shown that glucocorticoid treatment increases the levels of clotting factors and fibrinogen, but this finding has not been investigated in IBD patients.⁴⁵

Immunomodulators: methotrexate and thiopurines

Clinical data directly addressing the effect of immunomodulators on the incidence of VTE are not available. Methotrexate elevates homocysteine levels by antagonization of folic acid.⁴⁶ In IBD patients, the effect of methotrexate on homocysteine metabolism is counterweighted by use of folic acid.⁴⁷ Thiopurines are hypothesized to lower VTE risk by the reduction of platelet aggregation in vitro, and subsequently, inhibition of platelet-leukocyte aggregation.^48,49 Clinical data need to confirm this hypothesis.

Biologicals: TNFα antagonists, vedolizumab, ustekinumab

According to a meta-analysis of eight studies, anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) agents are associated with a significantly lower risk of developing VTE as compared with corticosteroids (OR 0.27; 95%CI 0.11–0.67).⁴² In a retrospective study, multivariate regression analysis of risk factors for VTE in IBD identified anti-TNFα therapy as a protective factor (OR 0.2; 95%CI 0.04–0.99).⁵⁰ These findings may not only be explained by effective treatment of chronic inflammation, but may also be attributed to the hypothesis that TNFα accelerates thrombus formation via its direct association with endothelial dysfunction.^51,52

Long-term post hoc analyses of the registration trials of vedolizumab as well as real-life cohort studies conclude an overall low VTE risk (UC < 1%, CD 1.5%).^53,54 Pooled data from the phase II/III clinical trials showed no significant difference in VTE risk in CD patients treated with ustekinumab as compared with placebo (0.75/100 person years versus 0.34/100 person years, respectively).⁵⁵ Only one real-life cohort study in 152 CD patients on ustekinumab reported one case of DVT after 1-year follow up.⁵⁶

Janus kinase inhibitors: tofacitinib

After the publication of a safety warning for tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily in rheumatoid arthritis, VTE risk during tofacitinib treatment is under a magnifying glass.⁵⁷ For UC, reported incidence rates of DVT and PE during tofacitinib treatment are not higher than expected: respectively, 0.04 patients/100 patient years and 0.16 patients/100 patient years.⁵⁸ In addition, VTE cases have only been observed in UC patients on predominant dose of 10 mg twice daily, and all cases had additional risk factors for VTE alongside UC. While large post-marketing cohort data on safety are awaited, increased awareness among clinicians seems prudent, and alternative treatment strategies in patients at increased risk of VTE warrant consideration.

Effect VTE drugs on inflammation in IBD

Anticoagulants

Since heparin possesses immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects via TNFα inhibition, a number of small studies have evaluated the efficacy of both unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparins in UC.^59,60 A meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials in 454 UC patients showed that subcutaneously administered heparin in UC is safe but has no additional benefit over conventional therapy with regard to efficacy (OR 0.78; 95%CI 0.50–1.21).⁶¹ In a double-blind, randomized trial, 141 UC patients taking extended colon-release heparin tablets achieved clinical and endoscopic improvement as compared with placebo.⁶² This finding remains unconfirmed. Therefore, there is no role for heparin as monotherapy or additional therapy in the management of UC.⁶³ The effect of vitamin K agonist and direct oral anticoagulants on IBD inflammation are not addressed in available literature.

Guidelines’ recommendations for VTE in IBD patients

The European Crohn and Colitis Organization (ECCO) guidelines describe recommendations on VTE management in IBD.⁶⁴ In 2014, the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) presented a consensus on the prevention and treatment of VTE in IBD.¹⁶ Other guidelines, including the American Society of Hematology (ASH) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) regard IBD as a chronic, moderate risk factor for VTE.^65,66

Guidelines recommend prompt diagnostic evaluation in the case of clinical suspicion of VTE. Thromboprophylaxis is indicated during hospitalization, and may be considered at discharge after hospitalization, after recent surgery and in outpatients with active IBD. The recommendation for thrombopropylaxis during hospitalization accounts for all IBD patients, regardless of the reason for admission. The duration of thromboprophylaxis is not specified for most clinical situations. In high-VTE-risk patients undergoing surgery without high risk of bleeding, CAG recommends extension of the pharmacologic prophylaxis during 4 weeks after discharge.

To date, no clinical trials address VTE treatment in IBD patients specifically. Both ECCO and CAG guidelines state that VTE treatment in IBD should follow the general antithrombotic therapy guidelines. Specific recommendations on the duration of anticoagulant therapy differ between guidelines. ASH recommends continuing antithrombotic therapy indefinitely after completion of primary treatment, unless comorbidities are present that predispose toward increased risk for bleeding complications (e.g. older age, history of bleeding, prior stroke, cancer, anemia, thrombocytopenia). In the CAG guideline, anticoagulant therapy is advised for a minimum of 3 months in the case of a first VTE. In case of a reversible provoking factor, recommendation is to only stop anticoagulant therapy 1 month after resolving the risk factor. Moderate to severe disease activity may be considered as a provoking factor for VTE. This implicates the indication of thrombopropylaxis in patients with a flare of IBD and a history of VTE, as mentioned previously.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Epidemiology

The risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD) and cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) is significantly, though modestly, increased in IBD patients. A recent meta-analysis of 11 studies reported a pooled RR of 1.17 (95%CI 1.07–1.27), 1.12 (95%CI 1.05–1.21), and 1.25 (95%CI 1.08–1.44) for coronary heart disease (CHD), myocardial infarction (MI) and CeVD, respectively.⁵ IBD patients have twice the risk of heart failure (HF) as compared with the general population (HR 2.03; 95%CI 1.35–3.03).⁶⁷ To date, an increased risk of peripheral artery disease has not been established.⁶⁸ Cardiovascular mortality in IBD patients is not increased as compared with the general population (pooled standardized mortality ratios for CD: 1.01; 95%CI 0.90–1.14, and for UC: 0.93; 95%CI 0.86–1.01).⁵ Mortality is regarded as a more robust endpoint as compared with CVD events, being less sensitive to detection bias. Vice versa, mortality might underestimate the prevalence of ASCVD, since an increasing proportion of patients survive ASCVD due to significant advances in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of ASCVD.

Risk factors

Patient characteristics

Regarding risk factors for ASCVD in IBD, the relative risks of IHD and CeVD is most pronounced in female patients, and the risk of CeVD in patients below the age of 40 years.^5,68 The observation of sex differences is probably related to differences in the prevalence and relative contribution of other risk factors. A potential explanation might be the greater contribution of chronic inflammation in the pathogenesis of ASCVD in women as compared with men. This is illustrated by the higher levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) in female patients with chronic inflammatory diseases.⁶⁹ In line with this, CRP levels were positively correlated with the relative risk of CHD, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors.⁷⁰ The contribution of sex hormones in development of ASCVD in IBD patients remains elusive. The increased relative risk of ASCVD in younger IBD patients might be the result from a younger age at IBD diagnosis accompanied by a more severe disease course, resulting in a prolonged exposure to chronic inflammation.⁷¹

Disease characteristics

Remarkably, the increased risk of IHD is already observed in the first year of IBD diagnosis (IRR 2.13; 95%CI 1.91–2.38), which may be explained by the commonly observed delay in IBD diagnosis.⁷² The degree of inflammation, both systemic (CRP levels) and clinical scores, was positively correlated to the development of IHD.⁷³ Disease flares were associated with an increased risk of MI (RR 1.49; 95%CI 1.16–1.93) and stroke (RR 1.53; 95%CI 1.22–1.92).⁷¹ Critical periods for the development of ASCVD events are the 3 months prior to and 3 months after an IBD-related hospital admission.⁷⁴ Furthermore, the extent and location of inflammation was associated with IHD risk, both in UC (pancolitis 6.32/1000 person years versus proctitis/left-sided 2.95/1000 person years) and CD (colonic disease 5.61/1000 person years versus ileum/ileocecal 4.35/1000 person years). As compared with controls, the subgroup of patients suffering from colonic involvement of IBD showed a threefold higher risk of developing MI.⁶⁷

With regard to HF, a large Danish population study has shown that IBD patients with disease flares and persistent disease activity are 2.5 times more like to be admitted to the hospital due to HF as compared with IBD patients in disease remission.⁷⁵ The risk of HF, caused by ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy (77%) or diastolic dysfunction (23%), emerges more clearly in patients diagnosed with UC as compared with CD (adjusted HR 2.06; 95%CI 1.18–3.65 versus HR 1.73; 95%CI 0.98–3.07, respectively).⁶⁷ Risk factors associated with HF were extent of inflammation (colonic disease in CD, pancolitis in UC), female sex, and age exceeding 40 years.⁶⁷

Traditional ASCVD risk factors

The increased ASCVD risk in IBD patients is not fully explained by an increased prevalence of traditional risk factors, according to available data. A large population study showed no increase in the traditional cardiovascular risk factors in IBD patients as compared with the general population. In this study, population blood pressure, total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) levels were slightly lower in IBD patients. Other traditional risk factors including plasma glucose, body composition [body mass index (BMI) and hip and waist circumference] and active smoking were comparable in the IBD and general population (Figure 1). These findings were unaffected after excluding individuals taking lipid-lowering drugs.⁷⁶ This observation has been confirmed by both cross-sectional and longitudinal cohort studies.^77,78

Figure 1.

Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors as compared with the general population.

The risk of diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 is increased in IBD patients as compared with the general population [standardized incidence ratio (SIR) 1.54; 95%CI 1.49–1.60], independent of IBD diagnosis or sex.⁷⁹ The prevalence of DM type 2 in IBD populations is increasing, illustrated by the finding that IBD patients diagnosed after 2014 have a higher risk of DM type 2 than patients receiving the diagnosis before the 21st century (SIR 1.79; 95%CI 1.67–1.91 versus 1.48; 95%CI 1.41–1.56, respectively, p < 0.001).⁷⁹ A recent meta-analysis confirmed an elevated risk of DM in IBD, both UC and CD (OR 1.26; 95%CI 1.03–1.53).⁸⁰ Insulin resistance and β-cell activity were shown to be significantly elevated in CD patients as compared with healthy controls.⁸¹

In general, IBD patients present with lower levels of TC and LDL-c, and no significant difference is seen with regard to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) and triglyceride (TG) concentrations as compared with the general population.^76,82 These lipid alterations were independent of disease activity. First, systemic inflammation, but also local inflammation of the intestine could play a role in the lower lipid levels during active disease. Second, chronic inflammation is associated with a more pro-atherogenic lipid profile characterized by small dense LDL-c particles and dysfunctional HDL-c losing its anti-inflammatory and cardioprotective properties.^82,83 Moreover, intestinal surgery has an influence on the lipid metabolism. Greater length of resected ileum segment was inversely correlated with plasma TC and LDL-c levels.⁸⁴ Evidence suggests that intestinal fat and cholesterol absorption is impaired in patients with an ileoanal anastomosis.⁸⁵

Framingham Risk Scores (FRS), a model to predict the 10-year risk of developing ASCVD in the general population, are in conflict with the observed higher incidence and prevalence of ASCVD in IBD. For instance, the FRS were significantly lower in IBD patients with CHD as compared with non-IBD controls with CHD (8.1 plus −3.47 versus 10 plus −3.75, respectively, p = 0.001).⁸⁶ This finding illustrates that traditional risk factors insufficiently account for the increased risk of ASCVD in IBD, and disease-specific modifiers may need to be added to present prediction models.

Markers of subclinical ASCVD

Several non-invasive modalities can be used to detect subclinical atherosclerosis, such as measurement of arterial stiffness by pulse-wave velocity between carotids and femorales (cfPWV; Δdistance/Δtime), the carotid intima media thickness (CIMT; mm) and flow-mediated dilation of arteries (FMD; % change in arterial dilation after acute bloodflow) by ultrasound, and coronary artery calcium (CAC) score by coronary computed tomography scans. The prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis is probably increased in IBD patients, according to available data. For instance, the mean CIMT and cfPWV are significantly increased in IBD patients as compared with healthy controls, suggesting increased arterial stiffness.⁸⁷ Likewise, the mean FMD was significantly lower in IBD patients as compared with the general population. Moreover, average coronary flow reserve (capacity of coronary circulation to respond to physiological increase in oxygen demand) is lower in IBD patients as compared with controls, and associated with inflammatory parameters and atherogenic lipid indices.⁸⁸ In contrast to previous surrogate markers of subclinical atherosclerosis, preliminary data showed that CD patients without ASCVD or traditional risk factors do not exhibit higher CAC scores as compared age- and sex-matched controls.⁸⁹ A relationship between arterial stiffness and inflammatory parameters has not been studied in IBD yet, but was confirmed in patients with other chronic inflammatory diseases, and healthy individuals.^90,91 The added value of measuring markers and diagnosing subclinical atherosclerosis in routine IBD care has not been established (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Immunologic profile and surrogate markers of subclinical atherosclerosis in IBD and the development of atherosclerosis.

Genetic factors

GWASs have linked nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 (NOD2) to the development of both CD and ASCVD. The NOD2 gene encodes for an intracellular receptor of peptidoglycan, a component of the bacterial cell wall, and three polymorphisms (R702W, G908R and 1007fs) have been shown to affect the intestinal mucosal barrier. NOD2 recognizes not only exogen ligands (microbial products) but also endogen ligands (oxidized LDL-c).^92,93 Interactions between NOD2 and bacterial components also take place in the cytoplasm of endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes, illustrated by its response to one of the most frequently detected bacteria in atherosclerotic plaques, Chlamydia pneumonia.⁹⁴ In mouse models, NOD2 loss of function has been shown to promote vascular inflammation underlying atherosclerosis.⁹⁵ In a White population, an association between NOD2 polymorphisms and the development of clinically and angiographically evident CHD has been demonstrated, independent of cardiovascular risk factors (e.g. Leu1007fsinsC was associated with an increased risk of CHD, whereas GLY908ARG polymorphism was protective).⁹⁶ In this analysis, NOD2 was more active in atherosclerotic plaques of the coronary arteries, although the three genetic variants associated with CD were not found to be associated with early-onset CHD.⁹⁷ Whether genetic variants, either in NOD2 or currently unidentified genes, contribute to the susceptibility to ASCVD in IBD patients, need to be investigated in future GWASs.

Pathogenesis

Inflammation and immune dysregulation

The pathogenesis underlying the association between IBD and ASCVD has not been fully elucidated. Recent advances in fundamental science show that low-grade chronic inflammation plays a role in all stages of atherosclerosis, from initiation to progression and subsequently thrombotic complications.⁹⁸ The majority of immune cell types interacting in IBD were identified in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic lesions, including macrophages, T and B cells, diverse pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. CRP was detected in atherosclerotic lesions after binding to modified forms of LDL-c.⁹⁹ Interleukin 6 (IL-6) activated immune cells involved in plaque formation and rupture. Both CRP and IL-6 were regarded as independent risk factors for CVD.¹⁰⁰ TNFα induced cytokine release via monocyte activation, smooth-muscle-cell proliferation, and promoted the interaction between the endothelium and circulating leukocytes by the upregulation of adhesion molecules such as VCAM-1 and ICAM-1.^101,102 Moreover, TNFα enhanced progression towards advanced atherosclerotic lesions in APOE*3 Leiden transgenic mice.¹⁰³ Overexpression of TNFα led to the reduction of endothelium-dependent relaxation in vitro and in vivo.⁵¹

Mediator of endothelial dysfunction

Chronic low-grade inflammation influences the physical and functional properties of arteries, in specific, the vascular endothelium. The result is endothelial dysfunction (ED), characterized by increased vascular smooth muscle tone, upregulation of cellular adhesion molecules, leukocyte diapedesis and procoagulant activity, and known as an independent predictor of new-onset ASCVD.¹⁰⁴ In IBD, ED is related to both the degree and duration of inflammation. Moreover, reduced production of the vasodilator nitric oxide (NO)^105
–108 and increase in the vasoconstrictor endothelin are reported in IBD.^109,110 Both human and animal models provide evidence for upregulation of circulating and local intestinal adhesion molecules in IBD, together with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), ICAM-1, MADCAM-1, and E-selectin.^111
–113 The expression of these molecules is correlated to disease activity, shown by a fall in the concentration of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 after treatment.¹¹⁴ The expression of VEGF correlated with advancement of atherosclerotic lesions.¹¹⁵ The concentration of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (CEP), essential for endothelial repair, were decreased in both CD and UC patients as compared with healthy controls.¹¹⁶ Increased concentration of lipopolysaccharides (LPS), a microbial product that induces increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines that contribute to endothelial damage and foam-cell formation, were measured in UC and CD patients and correlated with CRP levels^117,118 (Figure 2).

Effect of IBD drugs on ASCVD

Interventions reducing inflammatory burden might attenuate ASCVD risk, as shown by reduced risk of IHD in patients with previous intestinal surgery and on combination therapy (IRR 0.92; 95%CI 0.75–1.13 and IRR 0.58; 95%CI 0.22–1.56, respectively).⁷²

Aminosalicylates

Among 5-ASA users, a significant lower risk of IHD was reported as compared with non-users, also after adjustment for corticosteroid use.⁷² In vitro, 5-ASA shares anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties with aspirin.^119,120

Corticosteroids

Despite the frequent prescription of corticosteroids, remarkably few publications address the occurrence of hypertension, hyperglycemia, and insulin resistance specifically for IBD populations. A pilot study showed that orally taken but not bolus administration of methylprednisolone increased BMI, body fat percent and TC levels after 12-week treatment.¹²¹ In CD patients aged >50 years, treatment with corticosteroids significantly increased the risk of hypertension, but not of hyperglycemia or congestive heart failure.¹²² Studies addressing the risk of corticosteroid-induced diabetes in IBD are lacking. In a large population-based cohort study, the increased risk of DM type 2 was not assigned to corticosteroid exposure.⁷⁹ In contrast, the risk of HF was higher in patients using systemic corticosteroids as compared with non-users (adjusted HR 2.51, 95%CI 1.93–4.57).⁶⁷ A dose-dependent increase in the hazard of all-cause ASCVD was observed in immune-mediated diseases treated with corticosteroids, including IBD (1.08, 95%CI 1.07–1.10 per 5 mg/day).¹²³ Future research is needed to establish whether these effects differ between formulas, among which corticosteroids with a different mechanism of action (prednisone versus budesonide) or mode of administration (oral versus topical).

Immunomodulators: methotrexate and thiopurines

The effect of methotrexate on cardiovascular risk factors and ASCVD incidence in IBD are unknown. In other chronic inflammatory conditions, methotrexate was shown to have a beneficial effect on arterial stiffness and to reduce cardiovascular events.¹²⁴ Exposure to thiopurines was not associated with the risk of acute arterial events in IBD.¹²⁵

Biologicals: TNFα antagonists, vedolizumab, ustekinumab

In a nationwide cohort study, exposure to anti-TNFα agents was associated with a decrease of the risk of acute arterial events as compared with unexposed patients (HR 0.79; 95%CI 0.66–0.95).¹²⁵ Basic research reports that therapy targeting TNFα affects several risk factors associated with ASCVD.

First, the lipid profile is changed. The pro-atherogenic profile is improved during anti-TNFα therapy in both UC and CD. However, after initiation of TNFα antagonists, IBD patients displayed significantly higher small, dense LDL-c content within LDL-c fractions.¹²⁶ A discrepancy exists between studies assessing the effect on absolute lipid levels. After a 14-week TNFα antagonist regimen, CD patients presented with increased levels of TC, HDL-c, and apo-A1.¹²⁷ Long-term treatment of normolipidemic IBD patients showed persistent significant increase in TC and LDL-c after 3 years of follow up, resulting in an increased atherogenic index.¹²⁸ Other studies reached contradictory results, and showed no difference between pre- and post-treatment lipid profiles.^128
–130

Second, while an increase in weight has been reported for all biologicals, TNFα inhibition increases abdominal fat tissue measured by magnetic resonance imaging, independent of BMI evolution.^129,131 Third, a favorable effect on insulin sensitivity is described with declining glucose and glycated hemoglobin concentrations, probably as a consequence of the reversal of the TNFα-induced disturbance of insulin-mediated glucose uptake.^129,130 Finally, antagonization of TNFα improves endothelial function, arterial stiffness and fibrinolysis.⁵²

In the vedolizumab registration trials, cardiovascular death was reported in 1/895 (0.11%) UC and 1/1115 (0.09%) CD patients. In neither the post hoc analysis nor the long-term extension trials, additional cases were reported.^53,54 Similarly, no cardiovascular events were found in pivotal trials of ustekinumab. After 3-year follow up, 1/567 (0.18%) CD patients presented with a cardiovascular event.⁵³ Real-life data on cardiovascular risk in IBD patients treated with vedolizumab and ustekinumab are lacking, as well as fundamental research into the effect of these newer biologicals on processes associated with ASCVD pathogenesis.

Janus kinase inhibitors: tofacitinib

According to the registration trial data and available real-world cohort studies, major cardiovascular events during tofacitinib treatment occurred infrequently [incidence rate (IR) 0.24 per 100 person-years; 95%CI 0.07–0.62], and are not dose related.¹³² Four patients experienced major cardiovascular events (hemorrhagic stroke, acute coronary syndrome, MI and aortic dissection), of whom three out of four patients had several traditional cardiovascular risk factors. The incidence of major cardiovascular events was similar to that reported for other IBD drug therapies, and for tofacitinib in other chronic inflammatory conditions.^133,134 Recent new safety data from the post-marketing trials in rheumatoid arthritis patients with high CV risk showed higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events, for tofacitinib as compared with TNFα antagonists (IR 0.98, 95%CI 0.79–1.19 versus 0.73; 95%CI 0.52–1.01, respectively).¹³⁵ Extrapolation of these data to UC patients seems premature, and long-term safety data are required.

A significant increase in TC, HDL-c, and LDL-c levels were observed during tofacitinib induction therapy in the phase III registration trials, which stabilized during maintenance therapy.¹³² These findings were confirmed in both retrospective and prospective real-life cohort studies.^136,137 The lipid increases were modestly and reversibly correlated with CRP levels.¹³²

Effect of ASCVD drugs on IBD

Statins

Statins are among the most commonly prescribed agents worldwide. In addition to their lipid-lowering function, statins possess pleiotropic effects, including modulation of the immune system via inhibition of T cells, antigen presentation, and leukocyte infiltration in organs.¹³⁸ A beneficial effect of statins on the risk of IBD and IBD flares is controversial, since conflicting data have been published.^139
–143 To date, these study results have no clinical consequence and statins are not used as drug therapy in IBD.

Antihypertensive drugs

Observational studies have reported a reduced risk of prescription of corticosteroids, hospital admission and intestinal surgeries in IBD patients using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs).^144
–146 These findings need further confirmation. Inhibition of ACE and angiotensin receptors was shown to have anti-inflammatory effects. Possible mechanisms explaining the beneficial effect of ACE-Is and ARBs include the reduction of transforming-growth-factor-beta expression, micro- and macroscopic inflammation and intestinal fibrosis.^147,148 In a histopathological study, higher concentrations of angiotensin I and II were measured in colonic biopsies of CD patients as compared with biopsies of UC patients and healthy controls, which correlated with the degree of macroscopic inflammation in CD (r = 0.86 and r = 0.68, p < 0.001, respectively). The mucosal levels of angiotensin I also correlated with the clinical Crohn’s Disease Activity Index.¹⁴⁹ Several clinical studies report lower serum ACE levels in IBD patients as compared with healthy controls, irrespective of the presence of ACE polymorphisms, and mainly in patients suffering from ileitis.^150
–152 The ACE levels significantly raised in active CD patients achieving clinical remission.¹⁵⁰ In line with this observation, decreased levels of ACE are hypothesized to be a result of local damage due to inflammation. Altogether, these results complicate the formulation of a unifying hypothesis behind these observations, which is potentially binomial with separate local and systemic effects.

Guideline recommendations on ASCVD management

With regard to ASCVD, the ECCO guidelines state no specific recommendations except for management of known cardiovascular risk factors, including cigarette smoking cessation.⁶⁴

Both in the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and ESC guidelines, chronic inflammatory diseases are classified as risk factors for ASCVD.^65,153 In these leading guidelines, IBD is not mentioned as an independent risk factor. The standard risk calculators for CVD risk prediction, such as the FRS and the ACC/AHA ASCVD risk calculator, are not validated for patients with chronic inflammatory diseases, and therefore may underestimate the risk for ASCVD. In the latest ESC guidelines, the recommendation is to use a 1.5 factor multiplier in assessing the 10-year CVD risk in rheumatoid arthritis patients.¹⁵⁴ A gap in evidence is stated for other chronic inflammatory disease, including IBD. The ACC/AHA advice is to consider chronic inflammatory diseases as a risk-enhancing factor to guide decisions about preventive interventions (e.g. statin and antihypertensive therapy) in adult at borderline (5–7.5%) or intermediate (7.5–20%) 10-year ASCVD risk.

Future research perspectives

Cardiovascular management in IBD requires a transition from reactive to proactive (preventive) care in high-risk patients. The efforts, costs, and burden for patients need to be well balanced against the benefit of preventive CVD measures for individual patients. Therefore, important knowledge gaps need further elucidation.

First, the complex, molecular pathophysiology of CVD in IBD needs further exploration, including immunological mechanisms involved in both IBD pathogenesis and atherogenesis. For instance, growing evidence suggests a causal link between host–gut microbiome interactions in both IBD and CVD risk factors, such as type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome.¹⁵⁵

Second, clinical research needs to clarify the cardiovascular risk profile in IBD. Deep profiling of lipid changes and insulin resistance will add to better characterization of well-established CVD risk factors in IBD. Genetic studies should focus on variations associated with the development of CVD in IBD such as NOD2 gene polymorphisms. Patient registries and multidisciplinary collaborations enable the evaluation of epidemiology, clinical presentation and outcome of CVD in IBD, in comparison with the general population and other chronic inflammatory conditions. These insights are essential for the development of IBD-specific CVD prediction models.

Third, preventive strategies are likely to be dual: optimizing management of inflammation and cardiovascular risk management (CVRM). Adequate CVRM implies regular assessment, treatment and monitoring of CVD risk factors. The effect of CVD screening and subsequent intervention in IBD is yet unknown. Subsequently, it needs to be determined whether CVD screening in IBD proves cost effective.

Finally, when CVD risk warrants screening in clinical practice, CVRM in IBD needs to be well organized. The responsibilities of medical professionals working in primary and secondary care should be clarified in national guidelines.

Conclusion

IBD is associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk of VTE, 1.2-fold increased risk of ASCVD, and 2-fold increased risk of HF as compared with the general population. VTE events stem from a hypercoagulable state in IBD patients, and risk factors include older age, active disease, more extensive disease, pregnancy, hospitalization, IBD-related surgery and use of certain drugs. Inflammatory processes play a role in the stepwise development of atherosclerosis. The active and self-perpetuating immune response in IBD could therefore increase the CVD risk. The risk of ASCVD is incompletely explained by the prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, but potentially associated with disease activity, female sex and changes of the lipid profiles. Inflammatory processes play a role in both chronic inflammation in IBD and the stepwise development of atherosclerosis. An active and self-perpetuating immune response could therefore increase the CVD risk as observed in IBD. In patients with IBD, markers of subclinical atherosclerosis are more frequently present. The lipid metabolism in IBD patients is characterized by lower levels of TC and LDL-c during active disease as compared with disease remission. During active inflammation, both HDL-c and LDL-c show pro-atherogenic properties. Although the increased risk of CVD is recognized in IBD, preventive management may vary across clinical practices, especially for the situations for which specific recommendations are lacking in guidelines, such as ASCVD. To improve ASCVD prognosis in IBD, ongoing scientific research focuses on unraveling the pathogenesis and the cardiovascular risk profile, including both traditional and IBD-specific risk factors, underlying the increased risk of ASCVD in IBD.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors of this manuscript would like to acknowledge the work of medical and biological illustrator R. Slagter.

Contributors

JS searched and screened references. The submitted manuscript was cowritten by JR, CW, and AV.

Conflict of interest statement

JAM Sleutjes: nothing to declare.

JE Roeters van Lennep: nothing to declare.

CJ van der Woude: Celltrion, Abbvie, Takeda (advisory board).

AC de Vries: MLDS, Tramedico (research funding), Jansen, Takeda, Abbvie (advisory board).

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Jasmijn A. M. Sleutjes

References

World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases, https://www.who.int/health-topics/cardiovascular-diseases/ (2021, accessed January 2021).

Avina-Zubieta

Thomas

Sadatsafavi

, et al. Risk of incident cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Rheum Dis 2012; 71: 1524–1529.

Wang

Cheng

, et al. A meta-analysis of cardiovascular events in systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunol Invest 2019; 48: 505–520.

Polachek

Touma

Anderson

, et al. Risk of cardiovascular morbidity in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017; 69: 67–74.

Sun

Tian

Inflammatory bowel disease and cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality: a meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2018; 25: 1623–1631.

Fumery

Xiaocang

Dauchet

, et al. Thromboembolic events and cardiovascular mortality in inflammatory bowel diseases: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Crohns Colitis 2014; 8: 469–479.

Yuhara

Steinmaus

Corley

, et al. Meta-analysis: the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 37: 953–962.

Papay

Miehsler

Tilg

, et al. Clinical presentation of venous thromboembolism in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 2013; 7: 723–729.

Novacek

Weltermann

Sobala

, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease is a risk factor for recurrent venous thromboembolism. Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 779–787, 787.e1.

10.

Bernstein

Blanchard

Houston

, et al. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism among patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based cohort study. Thromb Haemost 2001; 85: 430–434.

11.

Cheng

Faye

AS.

Venous thromboembolism in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26: 1231–1241.

12.

Kappelman

Horvath-Puho

Sandler

, et al. Thromboembolic risk among Danish children and adults with inflammatory bowel diseases: a population-based nationwide study. Gut 2011; 60: 937–943.

13.

Xiao

Wakefield

, et al. Mo1790 - obesity is associated with increased risk for arterial and venous thromboembolism among inflammatory bowel disease patients. Gastroenterology 2017; 152: S781.

14.

Solem

Loftus

Tremaine

, et al. Venous thromboembolism in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 97–101.

15.

Grainge

West

Card

TR.

Venous thromboembolism during active disease and remission in inflammatory bowel disease: a cohort study. Lancet 2010; 375: 657–663.

16.

Nguyen

Bernstein

Bitton

, et al. Consensus statements on the risk, prevention, and treatment of venous thromboembolism in inflammatory bowel disease: Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. Gastroenterology 2014; 146: 835–848.e6.

17.

Nguyen

Sam

Rising prevalence of venous thromboembolism and its impact on mortality among hospitalized inflammatory bowel disease patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 2272–2280.

18.

Miehsler

Reinisch

Valic

, et al. Is inflammatory bowel disease an independent and disease specific risk factor for thromboembolism? Gut 2004; 53: 542–548.

19.

Limdi

Farraye

Cannon

, et al. Contraception, venous thromboembolism, and inflammatory bowel disease: what clinicians (and patients) should know. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019; 25: 1603–1612.

20.

Schlick

CJR

Yuce

Yang

, et al. A postdischarge venous thromboembolism risk calculator for inflammatory bowel disease surgery. Surgery 2021; 169: 240–247.

21.

McKechnie

Wang

Springer

, et al. Extended thromboprophylaxis following colorectal surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a comprehensive systematic clinical review. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22: 663–678.

22.

Clement

Dang

Laffin

, et al. Incidence of venous thromboembolism following proctectomy is greater in ulcerative colitis than in malignancy or Crohn’s Disease. J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 24: 2664–2666.

23.

Kim

Pfaller

Marson

, et al. The risk of venous thromboembolism in women with inflammatory bowel disease during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98: e17309.

24.

Hansen

Erichsen

Horvath-Puho

, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease and venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the postpartum period. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15: 702–708.

25.

Broms

Granath

Linder

, et al. Complications from inflammatory bowel disease during pregnancy and delivery. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 1246–1252.

26.

Bernstein

Sargent

Vos

, et al. Mutations in clotting factors and inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 338–343.

27.

Kader

Berman

Al-Seraihy

, et al. Prevalence of factor V G1691A (Leiden), prothrombin G20210A, and methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase C677T thrombophilic mutations in children with inflammatory bowel disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2002; 35: 629–635.

28.

Toruner

Erkan

Soykan

, et al. Factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A and MTHFR gene mutations in inflammatory bowel disease. Turk J Gastroenterol 2004; 15: 250–252.

29.

Vecchi

Sacchi

Saibeni

, et al. Inflammatory bowel diseases are not associated with major hereditary conditions predisposing to thrombosis. Dig Dis Sci 2000; 45: 1465–1469.

30.

Naito

Botwin

Haritunians

, et al. Prevalence and effect of genetic risk of thromboembolic disease in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 2021; 160: 771–780.e4.

31.

Magro

Soares

Fernandes

Venous thrombosis and prothrombotic factors in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 4857–4872.

32.

Giannotta

Tapete

Emmi

, et al. Thrombosis in inflammatory bowel diseases: what’s the link? Thromb J 2015; 13: 14.

33.

Sipeki

Davida

Palyu

, et al. Prevalence, significance and predictive value of antiphospholipid antibodies in Crohn’s disease. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 6952–6964.

34.

Aichbichler

Petritsch

Reicht

, et al. Anti-cardiolipin antibodies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci 1999; 44: 852–856.

35.

Van Bodegraven

Schoorl

Baak

, et al. Hemostatic imbalance in active and quiescent ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 487–493.

36.

Zezos

Papaioannou

Nikolaidis

, et al. Elevated markers of thrombin generation and fibrinolysis in patients with active and quiescent ulcerative colitis. Med Sci Monit 2009; 15: CR563–CR572.

37.

Collins

Cahill

Newland

, et al. Platelets circulate in an activated state in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 1994; 106: 840–845.

38.

Kume

Yamasaki

Tashiro

, et al. Activations of coagulation and fibrinolysis secondary to bowel inflammation in patients with ulcerative colitis. Intern Med 2007; 46: 1323–1329.

39.

Alkim

Ayaz

Alkim

, et al. Continuous active state of coagulation system in patients with nonthrombotic inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2011; 17: 600–604.

40.

Danese

Motte

Cde

Fiocchi

Platelets in inflammatory bowel disease: clinical, pathogenic, and therapeutic implications. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 938–945.

41.

Carty

MacEy

Rampton

DS.

Inhibition of platelet activation by 5-aminosalicylic acid in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000; 14: 1169–1179.

42.

Sarlos

Szemes

Hegyi

, et al. Steroid but not biological therapy elevates the risk of venous thromboembolic events in inflammatory bowel disease: a meta-analysis. J Crohns Colitis 2018; 12: 489–498.

43.

Higgins

Skup

Mulani

, et al. Increased risk of venous thromboembolic events with corticosteroid vs biologic therapy for inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 316–321.

44.

Kjeldsen

Lassen

Brandslund

, et al. Markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis as measures of disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 1998; 33: 637–643.

45.

Brotman

Girod

Posch

, et al. Effects of short-term glucocorticoids on hemostatic factors in healthy volunteers. Thromb Res 2006; 118: 247–252.

46.

Bălănescu

Bojincă

, et al. Cardiovascular effects of methotrexate in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Exp Ther Med 2019; 17: 1024–1029.

47.

Zezos

Papaioannou

Nikolaidis

, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia in ulcerative colitis is related to folate levels. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11: 6038–6042.

48.

Thomas

Skrinska

Lucas

FV.

The influence of glutathione and other thiols on human platelet aggregation. Thromb Res 1986; 44: 859–866.

49.

Irving

Macey

Shah

, et al. Formation of platelet-leukocyte aggregates in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2004; 10: 361–372.

50.

deFonseka

Tuskey

Conaway

, et al. Antitumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy is associated with reduced risk of thromboembolic events in hospitalized patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 50: 578–583.

51.

Wang

Chaudry

IH.

Administration of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in vivo depresses endothelium-dependent relaxation. Am J Physiol 1994; 266: H2535–H2541.

52.

Schinzari

Armuzzi

De Pascalis

, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonism improves endothelial dysfunction in patients with Crohn’s disease. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2008; 83: 70–76.

53.

Loftus

Jr. Feagan

Panaccione

, et al. Long-term safety of vedolizumab for inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 52: 1353–1365.

54.

Cross

Chiorean

Vekeman

, et al. Assessment of the real-world safety profile of vedolizumab using the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse event reporting system. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0225572.

55.

Sandborn

Feagan

Danese

, et al. Safety of ustekinumab in inflammatory bowel disease: pooled safety analysis of results from phase 2/3 studies. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2021; 27: 994–1007.

56.

Liefferinckx

Verstockt

Gils

, et al. Long-term clinical effectiveness of ustekinumab in patients with Crohn’s disease who failed biologic therapies: a national cohort study. J Crohns Colitis 2019; 13: 1401–1409.

57.

US Food and Drug Administration. Safety trial finds risk of blood clots in the lungs and death with higher dose of tofacitinib (Xeljanz, Xeljanz XR) in rheumatoid arthritis patients; FDA to investigate. US Food and Drug Administration, https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/safety-trial-finds-risk-blood-clots-lungs-and-death-higher-dose-tofacitinib-xeljanz-xeljanz-xr (2019, accessed January 2021).

58.

Sandborn

Panes

Sands

, et al. Venous thromboembolic events in the tofacitinib ulcerative colitis clinical development programme. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2019; 50: 1068–1076.

59.

White

Ang

Mahmud

, et al. Heparin and inflammatory bowel disease. Lancet 1999; 354: 1122–1123.

60.

Salas

Sans

Soriano

, et al. Heparin attenuates TNF-alpha induced inflammatory response through a CD11b dependent mechanism. Gut 2000; 47: 88–96.

61.

Shen

Ran

Tong

, et al. Meta-analysis: the utility and safety of heparin in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26: 653–663.

62.

Celasco

Papa

Jones

, et al. Clinical trial: oral colon-release parnaparin sodium tablets (CB-01-05 MMX) for active left-sided ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 31: 375–386.

63.

Chande

McDonald

Macdonald

, et al. Unfractionated or low-molecular weight heparin for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 10: CD006774.

64.

Harbord

Annese

Vavricka

, et al. The first European evidence-based consensus on extra-intestinal manifestations in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 2016; 10: 239–254.

65.

Piepoli

Hoes

Agewall

, et al. 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: the sixth joint task force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 2315–2381.

66.

Ortel

Neumann

Ageno

, et al. American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Blood Adv 2020; 4: 4693–4738.

67.

Aniwan

Pardi

Tremaine

, et al. Increased risk of acute myocardial infarction and heart failure in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16: 1607–1615.e1.

68.

Singh

Loftus

Jr , et al. Risk of cerebrovascular accidents and ischemic heart disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12: 382–393.e1: quiz e22.

69.

Bessant

Hingorani

Patel

, et al. Risk of coronary heart disease and stroke in a large British cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004; 43: 924–929.

70.

Cook

Buring

Ridker

PM.

The effect of including C-reactive protein in cardiovascular risk prediction models for women. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 21–29.

71.

Kristensen

Ahlehoff

Lindhardsen

, et al. Disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease is associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death–a Danish nationwide cohort study. PLoS One 2013; 8: e56944.

72.

Rungoe

Basit

Ranthe

, et al. Risk of ischaemic heart disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide Danish cohort study. Gut 2013; 62: 689–694.

73.

Le Gall

Kirchgesner

Bejaoui

, et al. Clinical activity is an independent risk factor of ischemic heart and cerebrovascular arterial disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0201991.

74.

Kirchgesner

Beaugerie

Carrat

, et al. Increased risk of acute arterial events in young patients and severely active IBD: a nationwide French cohort study. Gut 2018; 67: 1261–1268.

75.

Kristensen

Ahlehoff

Lindhardsen

, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Circ Heart Fail 2014; 7: 717–22.

76.

Aarestrup

Jess

Kobylecki

, et al. Cardiovascular risk profile among patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study of more than 100 000 individuals. J Crohns Colitis 2019; 13: 319–323.

77.

Yarur

Deshpande

Pechman

, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease is associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular events. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 741–747.

78.

Singh

Dulai

Zarrinpar

, et al. Obesity in IBD: epidemiology, pathogenesis, disease course and treatment outcomes. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 14: 110–121.

79.

Jess

Jensen

Andersson

, et al. Inflammatory bowel diseases increase risk of type 2 diabetes in a nationwide cohort study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 881–888.e1.

80.

Qiao

Yun

, et al. Increased risk of ischemic heart disease and diabetes in inflammatory bowel disease. Z Gastroenterol 2021; 59: 117–124.

81.

Bregenzer

Hartmann

Strauch

, et al. Increased insulin resistance and beta cell activity in patients with Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2006; 12: 53–56.

82.

Agouridis

Elisaf

Milionis

HJ.

An overview of lipid abnormalities in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Ann Gastroenterol 2011; 24: 181–187.

83.

Levy

Rizwan

Thibault

, et al. Altered lipid profile, lipoprotein composition, and oxidant and antioxidant status in pediatric Crohn disease. Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 71: 807–815.

84.

Akerlund

Reihner

Angelin

, et al. Hepatic metabolism of cholesterol in Crohn’s disease. Effect of partial resection of ileum. Gastroenterology 1991; 100: 1046–1053.

85.

Hakala

Vuoristo

Luukkonen

, et al. Impaired absorption of cholesterol and bile acids in patients with an ileoanal anastomosis. Gut 1997; 41: 771–777.

86.

Sappati Biyyani

Fahmy

Baum

, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease and coronary artery disease. Indian J Gastroenterol 2009; 28: 28–30.

87.

Leng

, et al. Subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Angiology 2017; 68: 447–461.

88.

Kul

Çalışkan

Güvenç

, et al. Plasma lipids in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Observations on the associations between lipid indices and coronary flow reserve. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2020; 132: 283–294.

89.

Rocha

Nomura

Rocha

, et al. P102 subclinical atherosclerosis assessed by coronary artery calcium score in patients with Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis 2019; 13(Suppl. 1): S138–S139.

90.

Maki-Petaja

Hall

Booth

, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with increased aortic pulse-wave velocity, which is reduced by anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy. Circulation 2006; 114: 1185–1192.

91.

Yasmin, McEniery

Wallace

, et al. C-reactive protein is associated with arterial stiffness in apparently healthy individuals. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004; 24: 969–974.

92.

Hampe

Cuthbert

Croucher

, et al. Association between insertion mutation in NOD2 gene and Crohn’s disease in German and British populations. Lancet 2001; 357: 1925–1928.

93.

Abraham

Cho

JH.

Inflammatory bowel disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 2066–2078.

94.

Opitz

Forster

Hocke

, et al. Nod1-mediated endothelial cell activation by Chlamydophila pneumoniae. Circ Res 2005; 96: 319–326.

95.

Yuan

Zelkha

Burkatovskaya

, et al. Pivotal role of NOD2 in inflammatory processes affecting atherosclerosis and periodontal bone loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110: E5059–E5068.

96.

Galluzzo

Patti

Dicuonzo

, et al. Association between NOD2/CARD15 polymorphisms and coronary artery disease: a case-control study. Hum Immunol 2011; 72: 636–640.

97.

El Mokhtari

Ott

Nebel

, et al. Role of NOD2/CARD15 in coronary heart disease. BMC Genet 2007; 8: 76.

98.

Ross

Atherosclerosis–an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 115–126.

99.

Singh

Suresh

Voleti

, et al. The connection between C-reactive protein and atherosclerosis. Ann Med 2008; 40: 110–120.

100.

Danesh

Kaptoge

Mann

, et al. Long-term interleukin-6 levels and subsequent risk of coronary heart disease: two new prospective studies and a systematic review. PLoS Med 2008; 5: e78.

101.

Mackesy

Goalstone

ML.

Extracellular signal-regulated kinase-5: novel mediator of insulin and tumor necrosis factor alpha-stimulated vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression in vascular cells. J Diabetes 2014; 6: 595–602.

102.

Thorne

Abbot

Stevens

, et al. Modified low density lipoprotein and cytokines mediate monocyte adhesion to smooth muscle cells. Atherosclerosis 1996; 127: 167–176.

103.

Boesten

Zadelaar

Van Nieuwkoop

, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha promotes atherosclerotic lesion progression in APOE*3-Leiden transgenic mice. Cardiovasc Res 2005; 66: 179–185.

104.

Cibor

Domagala-Rodacka

Rodacki

, et al. Endothelial dysfunction in inflammatory bowel diseases: pathogenesis, assessment and implications. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 1067–1077.

105.

Gravina

Dallio

Masarone

, et al. Vascular endothelial dysfunction in inflammatory bowel diseases: pharmacological and nonpharmacological targets. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2018; 2018: 2568569.

106.

Binion

Rafiee

Ramanujam

, et al. Deficient iNOS in inflammatory bowel disease intestinal microvascular endothelial cells results in increased leukocyte adhesion. Free Radic Biol Med 2000; 29: 881–888.

107.

Horowitz

Binion

Nelson

, et al. Increased arginase activity and endothelial dysfunction in human inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 292: G1323–G1336.

108.

Krieglstein

Cerwinka

Laroux

, et al. Regulation of murine intestinal inflammation by reactive metabolites of oxygen and nitrogen: divergent roles of superoxide and nitric oxide. J Exp Med 2001; 194: 1207–1218.

109.

Letizia

Boirivant

De Toma

, et al. Plasma levels of endothelin-1 in patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998; 30: 266–269.

110.

Murch

Braegger

Sessa

, et al. High endothelin-1 immunoreactivity in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Lancet 1992; 339: 381–385.

111.

Danese

Semeraro

Marini

, et al. Adhesion molecules in inflammatory bowel disease: therapeutic implications for gut inflammation. Dig Liver Dis 2005; 37: 811–818.

112.

Briskin

Winsor-Hines

Shyjan

, et al. Human mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 is preferentially expressed in intestinal tract and associated lymphoid tissue. Am J Pathol 1997; 151: 97–110.

113.

Aksoy

Cetinkaya

Savas

, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor, endostatin levels and clinical features among patients with ulcerative colitis and irritable bowel syndrome and among healthy controls: a cross-sectional analytical study. Sao Paulo Med J 2018; 136: 543–550.

114.

Jones

Banks

Haidar

, et al. Adhesion molecules in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 1995; 36: 724–730.

115.

Inoue

Itoh

Ueda

, et al. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) expression in human coronary atherosclerotic lesions: possible pathophysiological significance of VEGF in progression of atherosclerosis. Circulation 1998; 98: 2108–2116.

116.

Garolla

D’Inca

Checchin

, et al. Reduced endothelial progenitor cell number and function in inflammatory bowel disease: a possible link to the pathogenesis. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2500–2507.

117.

McDonnell

Liang

Noronha

, et al. Systemic toll-like receptor ligands modify B-cell responses in human inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011; 17: 298–307.

118.

Magro

Kotze

Martinez

CAR

, et al. Changes in serum levels of lipopolysaccharides and CD26 in patients with Crohn’s disease. Intest Res 2017; 15: 352–357.

119.

Desreumaux

Ghosh

Review article: mode of action and delivery of 5-aminosalicylic acid - new evidence. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24(Suppl. 1): 2–9.

120.

Sridhar

Parasa

Navaneethan

, et al. Comprehensive study of cardiovascular morbidity in hospitalized inflammatory bowel disease patients. J Crohns Colitis 2011; 5: 287–294.

121.

Farkas

Balint

Valkusz

, et al. Bolus administration of steroid therapy is more favorable than the conventional use in preventing decrease of bone density and the increase of body fat percentage in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 2014; 8: 992–997.

122.

Akerkar

Peppercorn

Hamel

, et al. Corticosteroid-associated complications in elderly Crohn’s disease patients. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92: 461–464.

123.

Pujades-Rodriguez

Morgan

Cubbon

, et al. Dose-dependent oral glucocorticoid cardiovascular risks in people with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a population-based cohort study. PLoS Med 2020; 17: e1003432.

124.

Woodman

Baghdadi

Shanahan

, et al. The temporal relationship between arterial stiffening and blood pressure is modified by methotrexate treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Front Physiol 2017; 8: 593.

125.

Kirchgesner

Nyboe Andersen

Carrat

, et al.; BERENICE Study Group. Risk of acute arterial events associated with treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases: nationwide French cohort study. Gut 2020; 69: 852–858.

126.

Schulte

Paulsen

Türk

, et al. Small dense LDL cholesterol in human subjects with different chronic inflammatory diseases. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2018; 28: 1100–1105.

127.

Koutroubakis

Oustamanolakis

Malliaraki

, et al. Effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibition with infliximab on lipid levels and insulin resistance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 21: 283–288.

128.

Miranda-Bautista

de Gracia-Fernandez

Lopez-Ibanez

, et al. Lipid profile in inflammatory bowel disease patients on anti-TNFα therapy. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60: 2130–2135.

129.

Parmentier-Decrucq

Duhamel

Ernst

, et al. Effects of infliximab therapy on abdominal fat and metabolic profile in patients with Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2009; 15: 1476–1484.

130.

Paschou

Kothonas

Lafkas

, et al. Favorable effect of anti-TNF therapy on insulin sensitivity in nonobese, nondiabetic patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Endocrinol 2018; 2018: 6712901.

131.

Borren

Tan

Jess

, et al. Assessment of body weight changes in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases initiating biologic therapy: a prospective cohort study. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65: 3672–3678.

132.

Sands

Taub

Armuzzi

, et al. Tofacitinib treatment is associated with modest and reversible increases in serum lipids in patients with ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 123–132.e3.

133.

PfizerInc. FDA Advisory Committee Meeting sNDA 203214 Briefing Document, https://www.fda.gov/media/111383/download (2018, accessed January 2021).

134.

Cohen

Tanaka

Mariette

, et al. Long-term safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis up to 8.5 years: integrated analysis of data from the global clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76: 1253–1262.

135.

PfizerInc. Pfizer shares co-primary endpoint results from post-marketing required safety study of XELJANZ^® (tofacitinib) in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-shares-co-primary-endpoint-results-post-marketing (2021, accessed January 2021).

136.

Biemans

VBC

Sleutjes

JAM

de Vries

, et al. Tofacitinib for ulcerative colitis: results of the prospective Dutch Initiative on Crohn and Colitis (ICC) registry. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 51: 880–888.

137.

Honap

Chee

Chapman

, et al. Real-world effectiveness of tofacitinib for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis: a multicentre UK experience. J Crohns Colitis 2020; 14: 1385–1393.

138.

Liao

Laufs

Pleiotropic effects of statins. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2005; 45: 89–118.

139.

Ungaro

Chang

Cote-Daigneault

, et al. Statins associated with decreased risk of new onset inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111: 1416–1423.

140.

Khalil

Boktor

Mortensen

, et al. Comparison of frequency of inflammatory bowel disease and noninfectious gastroenteritis among statin users versus nonusers. Am J Cardiol 2015; 115: 1396–1401.

141.

Crockett

Hansen

Sturmer

, et al. Statins are associated with reduced use of steroids in inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective cohort study. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2012; 18: 1048–1056.

142.

Dhamija

Hota

Kochhar

, et al. Randomized clinical trial: atorvastatin versus placebo in patients with acute exacerbation of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. Indian J Gastroenterol 2014; 33: 151–156.

143.

Higgins

Khan

Mapili

EMZ Abstracts of the AGA institute: atorvastatin decreases seo index in patients with short duration of disease in ulcerative colitis: a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: A-1–A-747.

144.

Garg

Royce

Tikellis

, et al. Imbalance of the renin-angiotensin system may contribute to inflammation and fibrosis in IBD: a novel therapeutic target? Gut 2020; 69: 841–851.

145.

Fairbrass

Hoshen

Gracie

, et al. Effect of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers on disease outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2021; 70: 218–219.

146.

Jacobs

Wagner

Gulotta

, et al. Impact of angiotensin II signaling blockade on clinical outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci 2019; 64: 1938–1944.

147.

Koga

Yang

Adler

, et al. Transanal delivery of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor prevents colonic fibrosis in a mouse colitis model: development of a unique mode of treatment. Surgery 2008; 144: 259–268.

148.

Wengrower

Zanninelli

Pappo

, et al. Prevention of fibrosis in experimental colitis by captopril: the role of tgf-beta1. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2004; 10: 536–545.

149.

Jaszewski

Tolia

Ehrinpreis

, et al. Increased colonic mucosal angiotensin I and II concentrations in Crohn’s colitis. Gastroenterology 1990; 98: 1543–1548.

150.

Matsuda

Suzuki

Furuya

, et al. Serum angiotensin I-converting enzyme is reduced in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis irrespective of genotype. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 2705–2710.

151.

Silverstein

Fierst

Simon

, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Am J Clin Pathol 1981; 75: 175–178.

152.

Sommer

Schweisfurth

Schulz

Serum angiotensin-I-converting enzyme and carboxypeptidase N in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Enzyme 1986; 35: 181–188.

153.

Arnett

Khera

Blumenthal

RS.

2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: part 1, lifestyle and behavioral factors. JAMA Cardiol 2019; 4: 1043–1044.

154.

Authors/Task Force Members, Piepoli

Hoes

155.

Talmor-Barkan

Kornowski

The gut microbiome and cardiovascular risk: current perspective and gaps of knowledge. Future Cardiol 2017; 13: 191–194.

Thromboembolic and atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in inflammatory bowel disease: epidemiology,pathogenesis and clinical management

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Venous thromboembolism

Epidemiology

Risk factors

Patient characteristics

Disease characteristics

Traditional VTE risk factors

Genetic factors

Pathogenesis

IBD drugs and VTE risk

Aminosalicylates

Corticosteroids

Immunomodulators: methotrexate and thiopurines

Biologicals: TNFα antagonists, vedolizumab, ustekinumab

Janus kinase inhibitors: tofacitinib

Effect VTE drugs on inflammation in IBD

Anticoagulants

Guidelines’ recommendations for VTE in IBD patients

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Epidemiology

Risk factors

Patient characteristics

Disease characteristics

Traditional ASCVD risk factors

Markers of subclinical ASCVD

Genetic factors

Pathogenesis

Inflammation and immune dysregulation

Mediator of endothelial dysfunction

Effect of IBD drugs on ASCVD

Aminosalicylates

Corticosteroids

Immunomodulators: methotrexate and thiopurines

Biologicals: TNFα antagonists, vedolizumab, ustekinumab

Janus kinase inhibitors: tofacitinib

Effect of ASCVD drugs on IBD

Statins

Antihypertensive drugs

Guideline recommendations on ASCVD management

Future research perspectives

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Contributors

Conflict of interest statement

Funding

ORCID iD

References