The aim of this article is to develop Kenneth N. Waltz’s conceptualization of system structures based on the distribution of capabilities to those described by two traits at system-level: the distribution of capabilities across states and states’ geographic positions with respect to each other, that is, the contiguity configuration. The development generates taxonomies of structures evaluated as mental pictures that guide, organize, and channel thoughts by identifying the ways system structures constrain international interactions. Mental pictures are argued to derive from a multiplicity of interrelated neurophysiological processes of the brain according to functionalism which is a monist doctrine of the philosophy of mind. Mental pictures establish structural constraints as products of an algorithm based on realism and system theory depicting a neo-Kantian view of how our minds impose order on sensory data.
AngyalA (1969) A logic of systems. In: EmeryFE (ed.) Systems Thinking. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp.17–29.
2.
AshbyW (1952) Design for a Brain. London: Chapman and Hall.
3.
AshleyRK (1984) The poverty of Neorealism. International Organization38(2): 225–286.
4.
AudiR (2015) The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, 3rd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
AusterCJ (1980) Balance theory and other extra-balance properties: An application to fairy tales. Psychological Reports47: 183–188.
6.
AveyPCDeschMC (2014) What do policymakers want from us? Results of a survey of Current and former senior national security decision makers. International Studies Quarterly58(2): 227–246.
7.
BächtoldM (2010) Saving Mach’s view on atoms. Journal for General Philosophy of Science41(1): 1–19.
8.
BendorJHammondTH (1992) Rethinking Allison’s models. The American Political Science Review86(2): 301–322.
9.
BertalanfyLV (1950) An outline of general system theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science1(2): 134–165.
10.
BertalanfyLV (1968) General System Theory: Foundations, Development. New York, NY: Braziller.
11.
BlackburnS (2016) Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
BlockN (1983) Mental pictures and cognitive science. The Philosophical Review92(4): 499–541.
13.
BoltzmannL (1974) On the significance of theories. In: McGuinnessB (ed.) Theoretical physics and philosophical problems: Selected writings. Dordrecht and Boston, MA: Reidel, pp.33–36.
14.
BouldingKE (1962) Conflict and Defense: A General Theory. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
15.
BreitW (1984) Galbraith and Friedman: Two versions of economic reality. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics7(1): 18–29.
16.
CaplowT (1959) Further development of a theory of coalitions in the Triad. The American Journal of Sociology64: 488–493.
17.
CartwrightDHararyF (1956) Structural balance: A generalization of Heider’s theory. Psychological Review63: 277–293.
18.
CercignaniC (1998) The Man Who Trusted Atoms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
ChakravarttyA (2007) A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
ChalmersD (1996) The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
ChurchlandPM (1979) Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
ChurchlandPM (1984) Matter and Consciousness: A Contemporary Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
ChurchlandPM (1996) The Engine of Reason, the Seat of the Soul. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
ChurchlandPMHookerCA (1985) Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism (With a Reply From Bas C. van Fraassen). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
CoxR (1986) Social forces, states, and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. In: KeohaneRO (ed.) Neorealism and Its Critics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, pp.204–254.
26.
DennettD (1991) Consciousness Explained. New York, NY: Little, Brown.
27.
De RegtH (1999) Ludwig Boltzmann’s Bildtheorie and scientific understanding. Synthese119: 113–134.
28.
DerryGN (1999) What Science Is and How It Works. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
29.
DescartesR (1989) Discourse on Method and the Meditations (Trans. VeitchJ). New York, NY: Prometheus Books.
30.
D’AgostinoS (1990) Boltzmann and Hertz on the Bild-conception of physical theory. History of Science28: 380–398.
31.
FetzerJHAlmederRF (1993) Glossary of Epistemology/Philosophy of Science. New York, NY: Paragon House.
32.
FodorJA (1981) The mind-body problem. Scientific American244: 114–122.
33.
GarnettJ (1984) Common Sense and Theory of International Politics. London: Macmillan.
34.
GeorgeA (1993) Bridging the Gap: Theory and Practice in Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace.
35.
HallidayFRosenbergJ (1998) Interview with Ken Waltz. Review of International Studies24: 371–386.
36.
HararyF (1953) On the notion of balance of a signed graph. The Michigan Mathematical Journal2(2): 143–146.
37.
HararyF (1985) The love-hate structure of dangerous corner. Semiotica54(3-4): 387–393.
38.
HarkavyRE (1977) Preemption and two-front conventional warfare: A comparison of 1967 Israeli strategy with the pre-World War One German Schlieffen plan. Jerusalem Papers on Peace Problems, no.23. Jerusalem: Leonard David Institute for International Relations.
39.
HeiderF (1946) Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of Psychology21(1): 107–112.
40.
HeiderF (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. London and Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
HeilJ (1998) Philosophy of Mind: A Contemporary Introduction. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
42.
HeisJ (2018) Neo-Kantianism. In: ZaltaE (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), pp.1–71.
43.
HertzH (1956) The Principles of Mechanics Presented in a New Form. New York, NY: Dover.
44.
JacksonPT (2010) The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. London: Routledge.
45.
KeohaneRO (1986) Theory of world politics: Structural realism and beyond. In: KeohaneRO (ed.) Neorealism and Its Critics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, pp.158–203.
46.
KimJ (1996) Philosophy of Mind. Boulder, CO: Westview.
47.
LakeDA (2011) Why “Isms” are evil: Theory, epistemology, and academic sects as impediments to understanding and progress. International Studies Quarterly55: 465–480.
48.
LewisD (1969) Convention. Cambridge: Harvard University of Press.
49.
MearsheimerJ (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York, NY: Norton.
50.
MillerAI (1984) Imagery in Scientific Thought: Creating 20-h Century Physics. New York, NY: Springer Science.
51.
MonteiroNPRubyKG (2009) IR and the false promise of philosophical foundations. International Theory1(1): 15–48.
52.
MorgenthauHJ (1960) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York, NY: Knopf.
53.
NamierLB (1942) Conflicts: Studies in Contemporary History. London: Macmillan.
54.
NeumannIB (2002) Returning practice to the linguistic turn: The case of diplomacy. Millennium - Journal of International Studies31: 627–651.
55.
NielsenKRasmussenOWæverO (2007) 10 x 10. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
56.
OkashaS (2002) Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
PolgerT (2004) Natural Minds. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
58.
PondEWaltzKN (1994) International politics, viewed from the ground. International Security19(1): 195–199.
59.
PutnamH (1975) Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
RyleG (1949) The Concept of Mind. New York, NY: Barnes and Noble.
61.
SeaburyP (1965) The Balance of Power in World History. San Francisco, NC: Chandler.
62.
SellarsW (1956) Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In: FeiglHScrivenM (eds) Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 2. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp.253–329.
63.
SmartJJC (1959) Sensations and brain processes. The Philosophical Review68: 141–156.
64.
SmithJM (1982) Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
SpykmanN (1942) America’s Strategy in World Politics. New York, NY: Harcourt and Brace.
66.
StentG (1973) Shakespeare and DNA. New York Times, 28January. Sec. E.
67.
TaliaferroJW (2001) Security seeking under anarchy: Defensive realism revisited. International Security25(3): 128–161.
68.
Van FraassenBC (1980) Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
69.
VisserH (1999) Boltzmann and Wittgenstein or how pictures became linguistic. Synthese119: 135–156.
70.
WæverO (2009) Waltz’s theory of theory. International Relations23(2): 201–222.
71.
WallaceW (1996) Truth and power, monks and technocrats: Theory and practice in international relations. Review of International Studies22: 301–321.
72.
WaltS (1987) The Origins of Alliances. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
73.
WaltzKN (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
74.
WaltzKN (1997) Evaluating theories. The American Political Science Review91(4): 913–917.
75.
WendtAE (1987) The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization41(3): 335–370.
76.
WillisRH (1962) Coalitions in the tetrad. Sociometry25(4): 358–376.
77.
YanowD (2006) Thinking interpretively: Philosophical presuppositions and the human sciences. In: YanowDSchwartz-SheaP (eds) Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. New York, NY and London: M. E. Sharpe, pp.5–26.
78.
YoungP (1993) The evolution of conventions. Econometrica61(1): 57–84.
