French cognitive policy analysis, with its frame of reference theory, assumes that meaning structures public action. The purpose of this article is to show, based on the work of Daniel C. Dennett, that the philosophy of mind may renew the analysis of the theoretical limitations encountered by the frame of reference theory. The soft realism concerning the existence of mental states which Dennett defends provides an opening for a dialogue between cognitive science and public policy analysis.
CampbellL.J. (2002) ‘Ideas, Politics and Public Policy’, Annual Review of Sociology28, pp. 21–38.
2.
ChurchlandP. (1981) ‘Is Determinism Self-Refuting?’, Mind90, pp. 99–101.
3.
CohenM.MarchJ.OlsenJ. (1972) ‘Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice’, Administrative Science Quarterly17(1), pp. 1–25.
4.
DennettD.C. (1987) The Intentional Stance, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
DennettD.C. (1991) ‘Real Patterns’, Journal of Philosophy88(1), pp. 27–51.
6.
DennettD.C. (2005) Sweet Dreams: A Philosophy of Mindfulness and Somaesthetics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
DretskeF. (2000) Perception, Knowledge and Belief: Selected Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
FodorJ.A. (1981) Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
GrouinR.HarguindéguyJ.B. (2007) ‘De l'usage des sciences cognitives dans l'analyse des politiques publiques’, Swiss Political Science Review13(3), pp. 369–393.
10.
JobertB.MullerP. (1987) L'Etat en action: politiques publiques et corporatismes, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
MehtaJ. (2011) ‘The Varied Roles of Ideas in Politics’ in BélandD.CoxR.H. (eds.), Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, New York: University Press.
13.
MullerP. (1980) ‘La genèse et l'élaboration d'une nouvelle politique agricole en France (1945–1965)’, unpublished manuscript.
14.
MullerP. (1984) Le technocrate et le paysan, Paris: Economie et humanisme, les Editions Ouvrières.
15.
MullerP. (1990) Les politiques publiques, Paris: PUF.
16.
MullerP. (1995) ‘Les politiques publiques comme construction d'un rapport au monde’ in FaureA.PolletA.WarinG. (eds.), La construction du sens dans les politiques publiques: débats autour de la notion de référentiel, Paris: L'Harmattan.
17.
MullerP. (2000) ‘L'analyse cognitive des politiques publiques: Vers une sociologie politique de l'action publique’, Revue française de sciences politiques50(2), pp. 189–208.
18.
MullerP. (2005) ‘Esquisse d'une théorie du changement dans l'action publique: Structures, acteurs et cadres cognitif’, Revue française de science politique55(1), pp. 155–187.
19.
ParsonsC. (2002) ‘Showing Ideas as Causes: The Origins of the European Union’, International Organization56(1), pp. 47–84.
20.
SabatierP. (1998) ‘The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance for Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy5(1), pp. 98–130.
21.
SchmidtV. (2005) Public Discourse and Welfare State Reform: The Social Democratic Experience, Amsterdam: Mets & Schilt.
22.
SearleJ. (1997) The Construction of Social Reality, New York: Free Press.
23.
SimonH.A. (1947) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization, New York: Macmillan.
24.
SperberD. (1997) ‘Individualisme méthodologique et cognitivisme’ in BoudonR.ChazelF.BouvierA. (eds.), Cognition et sciences sociales, Paris: Presse Universitaires de France, pp. 123–136.
25.
StoneA. (1992) ‘Le “néo-institutionnalisme”: Défis conceptuels et méthodologiques’, Politix20, pp. 156–168.
26.
SurelY. (2000) ‘The Role of Cognitive and Normative Frames in Policy-Making’, Journal of European Public Policy7(4), pp. 495–512.
