What, if anything, grounds the right of national defense? This essay explicates and defends a consequentialist answer to that question. After explaining the relevance and importance of this project, I clarify the meaning of consequentialism and explain how consequentialists understand and justify rights, including the right of national defense. International law enshrines that right. After explaining why it is correct to do so and why that right should be upheld, I examine some issues that this right leaves unsettled and probe its moral limits. I then reply to several objections to a consequentialist approach to national defense, pursuing in particular the criticism that consequentialists cannot justify the Allies’ having taken up defensive arms against the Axis powers in World War II.
AlexanderL (2008) Demystifying Legal Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BrandtRB (1992) Morality, Utilitarianism, and Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
DowerN (2009) The Ethics of War and Peace. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4.
EckertAE (2009) National defense and state personality. Journal of International Political Theory5(2): 161–176.
5.
ElshtainJB (2003) Just War Against Terror: The Burden of American Power in a Violent World. New York: Basic Books.
6.
FranceschetA (2010) Kant, international law, and the problem of humanitarian intervention. Journal of International Political Theory6(1): 1–22.
7.
HardinR (1988) Morality within the Limits of Reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
HareRM (1979) What is wrong with slavery. Philosophy & Public Affairs8(2): 103–121.
9.
HareRM (1981) Moral Theory: Its Levels, Methods, and Point. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
HeinzeEA (2009) Waging Humanitarian War: The Ethics, Law, and Politics of Humanitarian Intervention. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
11.
JohnsonJT (2011) Ethics and the Use of Force: Just War in Historical Perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.
12.
KaganS (2000) Evaluative focal points. In: HookerBMasonEMillerDE (eds) Morality, Rules and Consequences: A Critical Reader. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 134–155.
13.
LackeyD (1989) The Ethics of War and Peace. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
LubanD (1980) Just war and human rights. Philosophy & Public Affairs9(2): 160–181.
15.
McMahanJ (2009) Killing in War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
McMahanJ (2010) Laws of war. In: BessonSTasioulasJ (eds) The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 493–509.
17.
McMahanJMapelDTesónF (2004) Symposium: War and self-defense. Ethics and International Affairs18(1): 75–92.
18.
MapelD (2007) The right of national defense. International Studies Perspectives8(1): 1–15.
19.
MeyerMJ (1989) Dignity, rights, and self-control. Ethics108(2): 520–534.
20.
MillerRB (2010) Terror, Religion, and Liberal Thought. New York: Columbia University Press.
21.
MillJS (1969) Utilitarianism. In: RobsonJM (ed.) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Volume X: Essays on Ethics, Religion, and Society. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press, pp. 203–260.
22.
MillJS (1977) On liberty. In: RobsonJM (ed.) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Volume XVIII: Essays on Politics and Society, Part 1. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press, pp. 213–310.
23.
MillJS (1984a) The contest in America. In: RobsonJM (ed.) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Volume XXI: Essays on Equality, Law, and Education. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press, pp. 127–142.
24.
MillJS (1984b) A few words on non-intervention. In: RobsonJM (ed.) The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Volume XXI: Essays on Equality, Law, and Education. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press, pp. 111–124.
25.
MooreGE (1903) Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
NagelT (1972) War and massacre. Philosophy &Public Affairs1(2): 123–144.
27.
NozickR (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
28.
OrendB (2006) The Morality of War. Peterborough, ON, Canada: Broadview.
29.
ParfitD (2011) On What Matters, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
PattisonJ (2010) Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: Who Should Intervene?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
PettitPSmithM (2000) Global consequentialism. In: HookerBMasonEMillerDE (eds) Morality, Rules and Consequences: A Critical Reader. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 121–133.
32.
PojmanLP (2000) Life and Death: Grappling with the Moral Dilemmas of Our Times. 2nd ed.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
33.
RodinD (2002) War and Self-Defense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
RodinD (2007) The problem with prevention. In: ShueHRodinD (eds) Preemption: Military Action and Moral Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 143–170.
35.
RussellB (1915) The ethics of war. International Journal of Ethics25(2): 127–142.
36.
RuysT (2010) “Armed Attack” and Article 51 of the UN Charter: Evolutions in Customary Law and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
SchauerF (1993) Playing by the Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
ShawWH (1999) Contemporary Ethics: Taking Account of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Blackwell.
39.
ShawWH (2006a) The consequentialist perspective. In: DreierJ (ed.) Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 5–20.
40.
ShawWH (2006b) Contemporary criticisms of utilitarianism: A response. In: WestH (ed.) The Blackwell Guide to Mill’s Utilitarianism. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 201–216.
41.
ShawWH (2012) Justice, rights, and rules in Mill’s utilitarianism. In: KahnL (ed.) Mill on Justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 47–69.
42.
ShueH (2010) Laws of war. In: BessonSTasioulasJ (eds) The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 511–527.
43.
SidgwickH (1908) The Elements of Politics. 3rd ed.London: Macmillan.
44.
Sinnott-ArmstrongW (2007) Preventive war—What is it good for? In: ShueHRodinD (eds) Preemption: Military Action and Moral Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 202–221.
45.
TesónFR (2006) Eight principles for humanitarian intervention. Journal of Military Ethics5(2): 93–113.
46.
VaughnL (2010) Contemporary Moral Arguments. New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
WalzerM (2000) Just and Unjust Wars. 3rd ed.New York: Basic Books.
48.
WalzerM (2006) Arguing about War. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
