New technologies have amplified the possibilities for processing and incorporating data and scientific methods in algorithms through the integration of the use of mobile technology and a wide range of wearables that allow acquisition metrics in real-time. These technologies arise as a possible alternative to supply market demand and to present practical solutions to problems that coaches and athletes face in their daily routines. Concerning biomechanical assessment in combat sports (i.e. reaction time, velocity, and force), the literature is scarce regarding studies that carried out surveys of new assessments and monitoring technologies, with solutions for coaches and athletes. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate, through a literature review, mobile technologies available on the market for biomechanical analyses in combat sports modalities. Significant growth has been observed in the number of studies involving mobile technologies with practical tools for biomechanical assessment in combat sports athletes. However, only seven technological proposals presented scientific reliability studies, and six assessed validity, showing the necessity of more original articles to investigate scientific validation. As a suggestion, a flowchart is presented with operational guidelines for the research and development of new technologies for biomechanical assessment and monitoring in combat sports in real-time.
FerreiraJJFernandesCRattenV, et al. Sports innovation: a bibliometric study. In: RattenV (ed.) Sport Entrepreneurship and Public Policy. Melbourne, Australia: Springer, 2020, pp.153–170.
3.
WorseyMEspinosaHShepherdJ, et al. Inertial sensors for performance analysis in combat sports: a systematic review. Sports2019; 7(1): 28.
4.
CoswigVSant’ AnaJCoelhoMN, et al. Development of a mobile phone app for measuring striking response time in combat sports: cross-sectional validation study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth2019; 7(11): e14641.
5.
OmcirkDVetrovskyTPadeckyJ, et al. Punch trackers: correct recognition depends on punch type and training experience. Sensors2021; 21(9): 2968.
6.
CulotGNassimbeniGOrzesG, et al. Behind the definition of industry 4.0: analysis and open questions. Int J Prod Econ2020; 226: 107617.
7.
Gallardo-FuentesFGallardo-FuentesJRamírez-CampilloR, et al. Intersession and intrasession reliability and validity of the My Jump app for measuring different jump actions in trained male and female athletes. J Strength Cond Res2016; 30(7): 2049–2056.
8.
SeoYDiLeoTPowellJB, et al. Comparison of estimated core body temperature measured with the BioHarness and rectal temperature under several heat stress conditions. J Occup Environ Hyg2016; 13(8): 612–620.
9.
FalcoCMolina-GarcíaJAlvarezO, et al. Effects of target distance on select biomechanical parameters in taekwondo roundhouse kick. Sports Biomech2013; 12(4): 381–388.
10.
HermannGScholzMVietenM, et al. Reaction and performance time of taekwondo top athletes demonstrating the Baldung Chagi. In: Proceedings of the 26th international conference on biomechanics in sports, Seoul, Korea, 2008, pp.416–419. https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/cpa/issue/view/ISBS2008
11.
SeshadriDRLiRTVoosJE, et al. Wearable sensors for monitoring the physiological and biochemical profile of the athlete. NPJ Digit Med2019; 2(72): 72.
12.
GentlesJAConiglioCLBesemerMM, et al. The demands of a women’s college soccer season. Sports2018; 6(1): 16.
13.
PoitrasIDupuisFBielmannM, et al. Validity and reliability of wearable sensors for joint angle estimation: a systematic review. Sensors2019; 19(7): 1555.
14.
Sant’ AnaJSDiefenthaelerFPupoJ, et al. Anaerobic evaluation of taekwondo athletes. Int SportMed J2014; 15: 492–499.
15.
Sant’AnaJFranchiniEda SilvaV, et al. Effect of fatigue on reaction time, response time, performance time, and kick impact in taekwondo roundhouse kick. Sports Biomech2017; 16(2): 201–209.
16.
GreenBNJohnsonCDAdamsA. Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. J Chiropr Med2006; 5(3): 101–117.
17.
SoaresPBCarneiroTCJCalmonJL, et al. Bibliometric analysis of the Brazilian scientific production on building and construction technologies in the web of science database. ambient Constr2016; 16(1): 175–185.
18.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg2010; 8(5): 336–341.
19.
Guerrero-BoteVPMoya-AnegónF. A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: the SJR2 indicator. J Inform2012; 6(4): 674–688.
20.
KitchenhamBChartersS. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report EBSE 2007-001, Keele University and Durham University Joint Report, 2007.
21.
Del VecchioFBFranchiniEDel VecchioAHM, et al. Energy absorbed by electronic body protectors from kicks in a taekwondo competition. Biol Sport2011; 28: 75–78.
22.
TasikaN. Reliability & linearity of an electronic body protector employed in taekwondo games: a preliminary study. J Hum Sport Exerc2013; 8(Proc3): S622–S632.
23.
WooJHKoJYChoiEY, et al. Development and evaluation of a novel taekwondo chest protector to improve mobility when performing axe kicks. Biol Sport2013; 30(1): 51–55.
24.
HachajTPiekarczykMOgielaMR. Human actions analysis: templates generation, matching and visualization applied to motion capture of highly-skilled karate athletes. Sensors2017; 17(11): 2590.
25.
SaponaraS. Wearable biometric performance measurement system for combat sports. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas2017; 66(10): 2545–2555.
26.
O’SullivanDMFifeGP. Biomechanical head impact characteristics during sparring practice sessions in high school taekwondo athletes. J Neurosurg Pediatr2017; 19(6): 662–667.
27.
ChadliSAbabouNAbabouA, et al. Quantification of boxing gloves damping: method and apparatus. Measurement2018; 129: 504–517.
28.
HachajTKoptyraKOgielaMR. Averaging of motion capture recordings for movements’ templates generation. Multimed Tools Appl2018; 77: 30353–30380.
29.
AlmeidaFBonitch-GóngoraJPadialP, et al. Effect of acute exposure to moderate altitude on kinematic variables of the ippon-seoi-nage and its relationship with the countermovement jump in elite judokas. PLoS One2018; 13(10): e0206297.
30.
MalawskiFKwolekB. Recognition of action dynamics in fencing using multimodal cues. Image Vis Comput2018; 75: 1–10.
31.
AmaroBAntunesJCunhaP, et al. Monitoring of bioelectrical and biomechanical signals in taekwondo training: first insights. Lect Notes Comput Vis Biomech2018; 27: 417–426.
32.
CorbiASantosOCBurgosD. Intelligent framework for learning physics with aikido (martial art) and registered. Sensors (Basel)2019; 19(17): 3681.
33.
NiewiadomskiRKolykhalovaKPianaS, et al. Analysis of movement quality in full-body physical activities. ACM Trans Interact Intell Syst2019; 9(1): 1–20.
34.
SantosOCCorbiA. Can aikido help with the comprehension of physics? A first step towards the design of intelligent psychomotor systems for STEAM kinesthetic learning scenarios. IEEE Access2019; 7: 176458–176469.
35.
FrassinelliSNiccolaiAZichRE, et al. Quantification of motor abilities during the execution of judo techniques. Acta Bioeng Biomech2019; 21(3): 3–12.
36.
AzevedoABCMenineaDSMagnoAP, et al. Application for mobile devices is a valid alternative for vertical jump height measurement in fighters. Rev Andaluza Med Deporte2019; 12(2): 83–87.
37.
WąsikJGóraTOrtenburgerD, et al. Kinematic quantification of straight-punch techniques using the preferred and non-preferred fist in taekwon-do. Biomed Hum Kinet2019; 11(1): 115–120.
38.
TiernanSMeagherAO’SullivanD, et al. Concussion and the severity of head impacts in mixed martial arts. Proc IMechE, Part H: J Engineering in Medicine2020; 234(12): 1472–1483.
39.
GattITAllenTWheatJ. Accuracy and repeatability of wrist joint angles in boxing using an electromagnetic tracking system. Sports Eng2020; 23(1): 1–10.
40.
LiHKhooSYapHJ. Differences in motion accuracy of baduanjin between novice and senior students on inertial sensor measurement systems. Sensors2020; 20(21): 6258.
41.
HaralabidisNSaxbyDJPizzolatoC, et al. Fusing accelerometry with videography to monitor the effect of fatigue on punching performance in elite boxers. Sensors2020; 20(20): 5749.
42.
MolinaroLTaborriJMontecchianiM, et al. Assessing the effects of kata and kumite techniques on physical performance in elite karatekas. Sensors2020; 20(11): 3186.
43.
TorigoeYNakamuraYFujimotoM, et al. Strike activity detection and recognition using inertial measurement unit towards kendo skill improvement support system. Sens Mater2020; 32(2): 651–673.
44.
JansenAEMcGrathMSamorezovS, et al. Characterizing head impact exposure in men and women during boxing and mixed martial arts. Orthop J Sports Med2021; 9(12): 1–9.
45.
AmerineniRGuptaLSteadmanN, et al. Fusion models for generalized classification of multi-axial human movement: validation in sport performance. Sensors2021; 21(24): 8409.
46.
MenzelTPotthastW. Validation of a novel boxing monitoring system to detect and analyse the centre of pressure movement on the boxer’s fist. Sensors2021; 21(24): 8394.
47.
MenzelTPotthastW. Application of a validated innovative smart wearable for performance analysis by experienced and non-experienced athletes in boxing. Sensors2021; 21(23): 7882.
48.
KhasanshinIOsipovA. Using an artificial neural network to develop an optimal model of straight punch in boxing and training in punch techniques based on this model and real-time feedback. PLoS One2021; 16(11): e0259457.
49.
MenzelTPotthastW. Validation of a unique boxing monitoring system. Sensors2021; 21(21): 6947.
50.
NadzalanAMJanepMJahiziAAA, et al. The influence of wearable resistance loading on taekwondo axe kick kinematics among elite taekwondo athletes. Int J Hum Mov Sports Sci2021; 9(5): 893–898.
51.
LiHYapHJKhooS. Motion classification and features recognition of a traditional chinese sport (baduanjin) using sampled-based methods. Appl Sci2021; 11(16): 7630.
52.
MarkovićSKosAVukovićV, et al. Use of IMU in differential analysis of the reverse punch temporal structure in relation to the achieved maximal hand velocity. Sensors2021; 21(12): 4148.
53.
VukovićVDopsajMKoropanovskiN, et al. Metrical characteristics and the reliability of kinematic sensor devices applied in different modalities of reverse punch in karate athletes. Measurement2021; 177: 109315.
54.
IshacKEagerD. Evaluating martial arts punching kinematics using a vision and inertial sensing system. Sensors2021; 21(6): 1948.
55.
MalawskiF. Depth versus inertial sensors in real-time sports analysis: a case study on fencing. IEEE Sens J2021; 21(4): 5133–5142.
56.
KhasanshinI. Application of an artificial neural network to automate the measurement of kinematic characteristics of punches in boxing. Appl Sci2021; 11(3): 1223.
57.
HarrisDMCaillaudKKhullarS, et al. The reliability of a linear position transducer and commercially available accelerometer to measure punching velocity in junior boxing athletes. Int J Sports Sci Coach2021; 16(1): 200–209.
58.
LabintsevAKhasanshinIBalashovD, et al. Recognition punches in karate using acceleration sensors and convolution neural networks. IEEE Access2021; 9: 138106–138119.
59.
SocciMVarde’iCHGiovannelliM, et al. Definition of physical-dynamic parameters in circular kick in Muay Thai through latest generation inertial sensors with a critical review of the literature. J Hum Sport Exerc2021; 16(2): 319–334.
60.
TiernanSMeagherAO’SullivanD, et al. Finite element simulation of head impacts in mixed martial arts. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng2021; 24(3): 278–288.
61.
KatoSYamagiwaS. Predicting successful throwing technique in judo from factors of kumite posture based on a machine-learning approach. Computation2022; 10(10): 175.
62.
VukovićVKoropanovskiNMarkovićS, et al. Specific test design for the in-depth technique analysis of elite karate competitors with the application of kinematic sensors. Appl Sci2022; 12(16): 8048.
63.
O’SullivanDMJeongHSWonHJ. Functional reaction times of a simulated blocking test among para taekwondo athletes. Healthcare2022; 10(7): 1231.
64.
PolechońskiJLangerA. Assessment of the relevance and reliability of reaction time tests performed in immersive virtual reality by mixed martial arts fighters. Sensors2022; 22(13): 4762.
65.
LiuYEvansJWąsikJ, et al. Performance alteration induced by weight cutting in mixed martial arts-a biomechanical pilot investigation. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19(4): 2015.
66.
NadzalanAMJanepMJahiziAAM, et al. The effects of wearable resistance loading on kinematic of front kick among elite taekwondo athletes. Hum Sport Med2022; 22(2): 92–99.
67.
RodriguesJCCPennaEMde AzevedoABC, et al. Effects of kiai on jumping performance and striking reaction time in karate athletes. Ido Mov Culture2022; 22(1): 27–35.
68.
HaynesTBishopCAntrobusM, et al. The validity and reliability of the My Jump 2 app for measuring the reactive strength index and drop jump performance. J Sports Med Phys Fitness2019; 59(2): 253–258.
69.
Puig-DivíAEscalona-MarfilCPadullés-RiuJM, et al. Validity and reliability of the kinovea program in obtaining angles and distances using coordinates in 4 perspectives. PLoS One2019; 14(6): e0216448.
70.
PueoBPenichet-TomasAJimenez-OlmedoJM. Validity, reliability and usefulness of smartphone and kinovea motion analysis software for direct measurement of vertical jump height. Physiol Behav2020; 227: 113144.
71.
OrtizARosario-CanalesMRodríguezA, et al. Reliability and concurrent validity between two-dimensional and three-dimensional evaluations of knee valgus during drop jumps. Open Access J Sports Med2016; 7: 65–73.
72.
MyersLRToonstraJLCrippsAE. The test–retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the FitLight Trainer™. Int J Athl Ther Training2023; 28(2): 84–88.
73.
MüllerAMMaherCAVandelanotteC, et al. Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and diet-related eHealth and mHealth research: bibliometric analysis. J Med Internet Res2018; 20(4): e122.
74.
WangYFangW. Innovation and development strategy of China’s sports industry under the new economic ecology. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on social science, public health and education, 2018, vol. 196.
75.
ThompsonWR. Worldwide survey of fitness trends for 2020. ACSMs Health Fit J2019; 23(6): 10–18.
de OliveiraLBSant’ AnaJFrecciaGW, et al. Validity of a mobile-based specific test to estimate metabolic thresholds in boxers. Proc IMechE, Part P: J Sports Engineering and Technology2024; 238(1): 15–22.
78.
GabbettTJNassisGPOetterE, et al. The athlete monitoring cycle: a practical guide to interpreting and applying training monitoring data. Br J Sports Med2017; 51(20): 1451–1452.
79.
CurrellKJeukendrupAE. Validity, reliability and sensitivity of measures of sporting performance. Sports Med2008; 38(4): 297–316.
