Identifying predictors of players’ perception regarding sliding friendliness and the overall field performance of artificial turf systems for soccer

Abstract

Due to different design parameters, there is a large variety of artificial turf configurations on the market for soccer. The ultimate aim for any player surface is to maximize the performance and to minimize injuries. The aim of this study is to develop and validate the Football Turf Performance Questionnaire which measures the performance of an artificial turf soccer pitch and to identify predictors for both the overall performance and sliding friendliness based on the players’ perceptions. Three types of artificial turf configurations were evaluated by an elite soccer team in five different trials. Statistical analyses were performed to check the reliability, the classification into factors and identification of predictors, respectively. The best predictors of the total judgement are the descriptors ‘hardness of the field during falling and during sprinting’ and ‘traction during stopping’ and the indicators ‘traction’ and ‘shock absorption’. For sliding friendliness solely, the best predictors are the descriptor ‘burning feeling of the skin after a sliding movement’ and the indicators ‘skin irritation’ and ‘traction’.

Keywords

Soccer artificial turf players’ perception sliding discomfort

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

FIFA quality concept for football turf, http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/afdeveloping/pitchequip/fqc_football_turf_folder_342.pdf (accessed 12 June 2013)

Fleming

Forrester

Artificial turf research at Loughborough University. Procedia Eng 2014; 72: 925–930.

Guisasola

James

Stiles

. Dynamic behaviour of soils used for natural turf sports surfaces. Sports Eng 2010; 12(3): 111–122.

Guisasola

James

Llewellyn

. Quasi-static mechanical behaviour of soils used for natural turf sports surfaces and stud force prediction. Sports Eng 2010; 12(2): 99–109.

Nigg

Frederick

Hawes

. Factors influencing short-term pain and injuries in tennis. Int J Sport Biomech 1986; 2: 156–165.

Fuller

Dick

Corlette

. Comparison of the incidence, nature and cause of injuries sustained on grass and new generation artificial turf by male and female football players. Part 2: training injuries. Br J Sports Med 2007; 41(Suppl. 1): i27–i32.

Ekstrand

Timpka

Hagglund

Risk of injury in elite football played on artificial turf versus natural grass: a prospective two-cohort study. Br J Sports Med 2006; 40(12): 975–980.

Ekstrand

Hagglund

Fuller

CW.

Comparison of injuries sustained on artificial turf and grass by male and female elite football players. Scand J Med Sci Spor 2011; 21(6): 824–832.

Zanetti

Bignardi

Franceschini

. Amateur football pitches: mechanical properties of the natural ground and of different artificial turf infills and their biomechanical implications. J Sports Sci 2013; 31(7): 767–778.

10.

FIFA quality concept for football turf – handbook of requirements , January 2012 ed., http://quality.fifa.com/contentassets/78d39a99968f4315ac58a46ff15409eb/fqc-handbook-of-requirements_january-2012.pdf

11.

Potthast

Verhelst

Hughes

. Football-specific evaluation of player–surface interaction on different football turf systems. Sports Techn 2010; 3(1): 5–12.

12.

Charalambous

Von Lieres und Wilkau

Potthast

. The effects of artificial surface temperature on mechanical properties and player kinematics during landing and acceleration. J Sport Health Sci 2016; 5(3): 355–360

13.

McGhie

Ettema

Biomechanical analysis of surface-athlete impacts on third-generation artificial turf. Am J Sport Med 2013; 41(1): 177–185.

14.

Galbusera

Tornese

Anasetti

. Does soccer cleat design influence the rotational interaction with the playing surface? Sport Biomech 2013; 12(3): 293–301.

15.

Smeets

Jacobs

Hertogs

. Torsional injuries of the lower limb: an analysis of the frictional torque between different types of football turf and the shoe outsole. Br J Sports Med 2012; 46(15): 1078–1083.

16.

Fuller

Smith

Junge

. The influence of tackle parameters on the propensity for injury in international football. Am J Sport Med 2004; 32(1 Suppl.): 43S–53S.

17.

Van den Eijnde

WAJ

Peppelman

Lamers

EAD

. Understanding the acute skin injury mechanism caused by player-surface contact during soccer: a survey and systematic review. Orthop J Sports Med 2014; 2(5)

18.

Immers

Kunstgras. wat vindt u ervan. BSc Thesis, Haagse Academie Lichamelijke Opvoeding, NL, 2012 (in Dutch).

19.

Zanetti

EM.

Amateur football game on artificial turf: players’ perceptions. Appl Ergon 2009; 40(3): 485–490.

20.

Roberts

Osei-Owusu

Harland

. Elite football players’ perceptions of football turf and natural grass surface properties. Procedia Eng 2014; 72: 907–912.

21.

Sánchez-Sánchez

García-Unanue

Jiménez-Reyes

. Influence of the mechanical properties of third-generation artificial turf systems on soccer players’ physiological and physical performance and their perceptions. PLoS ONE 2014; 9(10): e111368.

22.

De Looze

Kuijt-Evers

van Dieen

Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures. Ergonomics 2003; 46(10): 985–997.

23.

Kuijt-Evers

Twisk

Groenesteijn

. Identifying predictors of comfort and discomfort in using hand tools. Ergonomics 2005; 48(6): 692–702.

24.

Mundermann

Nigg

Stefanyshyn

. Development of a reliable method to assess footwear comfort during running. Gait Posture 2002; 16(1): 38–45.

25.

Fleming

Young

Roberts

. Human perceptions of artificial surfaces for field hockey. Sports Eng 2005; 8(3): 121–136.

26.

Hoekma

van den Heuvel

Zo groen als kunstgras: Een onderzoek naar de ervaringen van spelers, gemeenten en verenigingen meet kunstgras in de periode 2001–2007. Netherlands, Hertogenbosch: W.J.H. Mulier Instituut, 2007 (in Dutch).

27.

Andersson

Ekblom

Krustrup

Elite football on artificial turf versus natural grass: movement patterns, technical standards, and player impressions. J Sports Sci 2008; 26(2): 113–122.

28.

Peppelman

van den Eijnde

WAJ

Langewouters

. The potential of the skin as a readout system to test artificial turf systems: clinical and immunohistological effects of a sliding on natural grass and artificial turf. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34(9): 783–788.

29.

Jolliffe

IT.

Principal component analysis. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer, 2002.

30.

Tavakol

Dennick

Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ 2011; 2: 53–55.

31.

Kati

Effect of mechanical behaviour of artificial turf on players surface interaction in soccer. PhD Thesis, Loughborough University, Loughborough, 2012.

32.

McGhie

Ettema

Biomechanical analysis of traction at the shoe-surface interface on third-generation artificial turf. Sports Eng 2013; 16(2): 71–80.

33.

Van den Eijnde

Peppelman

Weghuis

. Psychosensorial assessment of skin damage caused by a sliding on artificial turf: the development and validation of a skin damage area and severity index. J Sci Med Sport 2014; 17(1): 18–22.

34.

Ronkainen

Osei-Owusu

Webster

. Elite player assessment of playing surfaces for football. Procedia Eng 2012; 34: 837–842.

35.

McLaren

Fleming

Forrester

Artificial grass: a conceptual model for degradation in performance. Procedia Eng 2012; 34: 831–836.

36.

Sánchez-Sánchez

Felipe

Burillo

. Effect of the structural components of support on the loss of mechanical properties of football fields of artificial turf. Proc IMechE, Part P: J Sports Engineering and Technology 2014; 26: 155–164.

37.

Fleming

Forrester

McLaren

NJ.

Understanding the effects of decompaction maintenance on the infill state and play performance of third-generation artificial grass pitches. Proc IMechE, Part P: J Sports Engineering and Technology 2015; 229(3): 169–182.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB