The proliferation of dimensions of appraisal is both welcome and worrying. The preoccupation with sorting out causes may be somewhat otiose. And the ubiquity of emotions in levels of processing raises intriguing problems about the role of language in identifying and triggering emotions and appraisals.
ArnoldM. B. (1960). Emotion and personality. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
2.
BerlinI. (1958). Two concepts of liberty. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
3.
DescartesR. (1984). The philosophical writings of Descartes, Vol. 1: The passions of the soul (CottinghamJ.StoothoffR.MurdochD. Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1649)
4.
de SousaR. (1987). The rationality of emotion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
de SousaR. (2007). Why think? Evolution and the rational mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
DunbarR. I. M. (1993). Co-evolution of neocortex size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Science, 16, 681–735.
7.
EllsworthP. C. (2013). Appraisal theory: Old and new questions. Emotion Review, 5, 125–131.
8.
ElmerN. (1994). Gossip, reputation, and social adaptation. In GoodmanR.Ben-Ze’evA. (Eds.), Good gossip (pp. 117–138). Kansas City: University Press of Kansas.
9.
EvansJ. S.FrankishK. (Eds.). (2009). In two minds: Dual processes and beyond. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
FontaineJ. R. J.SchererK. R.SorianoC. (in press). Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
FrankfurtH. G. (1988). The importance of what we care about: Philosophical essays. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
FrijdaN. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
13.
FrijdaN. (2007). The laws of emotion. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
14.
GrahecN. (2007). Feeling pain and being in pain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
HackingI. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
KristjanssonK. (2003). On the very idea of “negative emotions.”Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33, 351–364.
17.
LambieJ. A.MarcelA. A. (2002). Consciousness and the varieties of emotion experience: A theoretical framework. Psychological Review, 109, 219–259.
18.
LewisM. D. (2005). Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 169–194.
19.
MagaiC.Haviland-JonesJ. (2002). The hidden genius of emotions: Lifespan transformations of personality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
MarrD. (1982). Vision. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
21.
MoorsA. (2013). On the causal role of appraisal in emotion. Emotion Review, 5, 132–140.
22.
MoorsA.De HouwerJ. (2006). Problems with dividing the realm of processes. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 199–204.
23.
MoorsA.EllsworthP. C.SchererK. R.FrijdaN. H. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5, 119–124.
24.
OatleyK. (2012). The passionate muse: Exploring emotions in stories. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
RoschE.LloydB. (Eds.). (1979). Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
RosemanI. J. (2013). Appraisal in the emotion system: Coherence in strategies for coping. Emotion Review, 5, 141–149.
27.
RussellB. (1918). Mysticism and logic. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
28.
SchererK. R. (2013). The nature and dynamics of relevance and valence appraisals: Theoretical advances and recent evidence. Emotion Review, 5, 150–162.
29.
StanovichK. (2004). The robot’s rebellion: Finding meaning in the age of Darwin. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
30.
WilliamsB. (1986). Ethics and the limits of philosophy (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
