Abstract
One reason why the debate about “emotion” runs into a dead end is that the second historical source which considered “emotion” as a cognitive function in the late 19th century was forgotten in Anglo-American psychology.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Dixon
T.
(2012 ). “Emotion”: The history of a keyword in crisis . Emotion Review , 4 , 338 –344 .
2.
James
W.
(1880 ). Le sentiment de l’effort . La Critique Philosophique, Politique, Scientifique, Littéraire , 9 , 123, 129, 145, 200, 220, 225, 289 .
3.
James
W.
(1884 ). What is an emotion?
Mind , 9 , 188 –205 .
4.
James
W.
(1890 ). The principles of psychology . London, UK : Macmillan .
5.
Mulligan
K.
Scherer
K.
(2012 ). Toward a working definition of emotion . Emotion Review , 4 , 345 –357 .
6.
Scarantino
A.
(2012 ). How to define emotions scientifically . Emotion Review , 4 , 358 –368 .
7.
Thorndike
E. L.
Herrick
C. J.
(1915 ). Watson’s “behavior.”
Journal of Animal Behavior , 5 , 462 –470 .
8.
Watson
J. B.
(1913 ). Psychology as the behaviorist views it . Psychological Review , 20 , 158 –177 .
9.
Wundt
W.
(1863 ). Vorlesungen über die Menschen- und Thierseele . Leipzig, Germany : L. Voss .
10.
Wundt
W.
(1880 ). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie (2nd rev. ed. ). Leipzig, Germany : W. Engelmann .