In joining Higgins’ music and emotion conversation I broaden the scope to consider the music–emotion nexus as a more dynamic, complex, contextual system of interactional experience. The music itself cannot be interpreted for what it does alone. We need to consider how musical experiences—understood holistically—may compel people to emotional experience, emotional work which is interwoven with context, aesthetic materials, and participating individuals.
Aristotle. (1905). Aristotle’s politics. (JowettB., Trans. & H. W. C. Davis [Introduction, Analysis & Index]). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
2.
ClarkeE. (2005). Ways of listening: An ecological approach to the perception of musical meaning. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3.
DeNoraT. (1986). How is extra-musical meaning possible? Music as a place and space for “work.”Sociological Theory, 4, 84–94.
4.
DeNoraT. (2006). Music and emotion in real time. In O’HaraK.BrownB. (Eds.), Consuming music together: Social and collaborative aspects of music consumption technologies (pp. 19–33). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
5.
DoreJ.McDermottR. P. (1982). Linguistic indeterminancy and social context in utterance interpretation. Language, 58, 373–398.
6.
HarrisC. T.SandreskyC. (1985). Love and death in classical music: Methodological problems in analyzing human meaning in music. Symbolic Interaction, 8, 291–310.
7.
HigginsK. M. (2012). Biology and culture in musical emotions. Emotion Review, 4, 273–282.
8.
JuslinP. N.VästfjällD. (2008). Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 559–621. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0800529310.1017/S0140525X08005293
9.
Plato. (1992). The republic. (LindsayH. D., Trans.). London, UK: David Campbell.
