How can pain complaints be elicited and analyzed so as to increase the empathic bond between patient and clinician? I will argue that though Wierzbicka’s approach to this question is useful—an exploration of certain abstract dimensions of pain’s meaning—it fails to examine key aspects that are the most useful and crucial for cultural analysis and for building empathic bonds between the clinician and patient. Not just a grammar of pain is needed; rather a biological philology of pain.
HintonD. E.GoodB. J. (2009a). A medical anthropology of panic sensations: Ten analytic perspectives. In HintonD. E.GoodB. (Eds.), Culture and panic disorder (pp. 57–85). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
2.
HintonD. E.GoodB. J. (Eds.). (2009b). Culture and panic disorder. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
3.
HintonD. E.HowesD.KirmayerL. J. (2008). Toward a medical anthropology of sensations: Definitions and research agenda. Transcultural Psychiatry, 45, 142–162.
4.
HintonD. E.NickersonA.BryantR. A. (2011). Worry and its relationship to PTSD among traumatized Cambodian refugees: A path analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 72, 1817–1825.
5.
HintonD. E.UmK.BaP. (2001). A unique panic-disorder presentation among Khmer refugees: The sore-neck syndrome. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 25, 297–316.
6.
WierzbickaA. (2012). Is pain a human universal? A cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspective on pain. Emotion Review, 4, 307–317.
