Male sexual function and pelvic floor surgery of their female partner: A one-year follow-up study

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to examine if sexual function of male partners changed after surgery for pelvic floor disorders and to explore associated factors.

Study design

This was an observational follow-up study at the Gynecological Department at the St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim. The sample consisted of 35 male partners of women scheduled for pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence surgery. Self-administered questionnaires, containing validated instruments as well as exploratory questions, were sent to women and their partners before and one year after pelvic floor surgery. Vaginal dimensions were measured in all women according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System, both before and after the surgery.

Main outcome measures

The Brief Sexual Function Instrument and the presence of erectile dysfunction.

Results

One year after pelvic floor surgery, scores for sexual drive, erection and overall satisfaction from the Brief Sexual Function Instrument were unchanged; the ejaculation score (range 0–4) had mildly improved from a range of 4 (median 4) to a range of 3.5 (median 4), (p = 0.014). The proportion of men with erectile dysfunction was unchanged, while the proportion of men reporting vaginal wind had significantly decreased (p = 0.016). None of the baseline factors, subjective experiences or vaginal dimensions at baseline or follow-up were associated with the improved ejaculation score; only a reduction in the proportion of men reporting their partners with dyspareunia (ns) was significantly correlated (Spearman’s rho 0.42, p = 0.019).

Conclusion

Sexual function of male partners was unchanged or mildly improved after pelvic floor surgery.

Keywords

Coital incontinence male sexuality pelvic floor dysfunction pelvic organ prolapse surgery stress urinary incontinence surgery

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdel-Fattah

Familusi

Fielding

. Primary and repeat surgical treatment for female pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in parous women in the UK: a register linkage study. BMJ Open 2011; 1: e000206–e000206.

Lindau

Gavrilova

. Sex, health, and years of sexually active life gained due to good health: evidence from two US population based cross sectional surveys of ageing. BMJ 2010; 340: c810–c810.

Pauls

Silva

Rooney

. Sexual function after vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 622 e1–622 e7.

Srikrishna

Robinson

Cardozo

. Can sex survive pelvic floor surgery? Int Urogynecol J 2010; 21: 1313–1319.

Pauls

. Impact of gynecological surgery on female sexual function. Int J Impot Res 2010; 22: 105–114.

Serati

Salvatore

Uccella

. Female urinary incontinence during intercourse: a review on an understudied problem for women's sexuality. J Sex Med 2009; 6: 40–48.

Schimpf

Harvie

Omotosho

. Does vaginal size impact sexual activity and function? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2010; 21: 447–452.

Ellerkmann

Cundiff

Melick

. Correlation of symptoms with location and severity of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 1332–1337. discussion 7–8.

Kuhn

Brunnmayr

Stadlmayr

. Male and female sexual function after surgical repair of female organ prolapse. J Sex Med 2009; 6: 1324–1334.

10.

Vollebregt

Fischer

Gietelink

. Effects of vaginal prolapse surgery on sexuality in women and men; results from a RCT on repair with and without mesh. J Sex Med 2012; 9: 1200–1211.

11.

Bekker

Beck

Putter

. Sexual experiences of men with incontinent partners. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 1877–1882.

12.

Nilsson

Lalos

Lindkvist

. Impact of female urinary incontinence and urgency on women's and their partners' sexual life. Neurourol Urodyn 2011; 30: 1276–1280.

13.

Haylen

de Ridder

Freeman

. An international urogynecological association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 2010; 29: 4–20.

14.

Bump

Mattiasson

. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 175: 10–17.

15.

Mykletun

Dahl

O'Leary

. Assessment of male sexual function by the Brief Sexual Function Inventory. BJU Int 2005; 97: 316–323.

16.

NIH Consensus Conference. Impotence. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence. JAMA 1993; 270: 83–90.

17.

American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed., text rev. Washington DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2000.

18.

Abrams

Cardozo

Fall

. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 116–126.

19.

Bowling

. Just one question: if one question works, why ask several? J Epidemiol Community Health 2005; 59: 342–345.

20.

Strand

Dalgard

Tambs

. Measuring the mental health status of the Norwegian population: a comparison of the instruments SCL-25, SCL-10, SCL-5 and MHI-5 (SF-36). Nord J Psychiatr 2003; 57: 113–118.

21.

O'Leary

Rhodes

Girman

. Distribution of the Brief Male Sexual Inventory in community men. Int J Impot Res 2003; 15: 185–191.

22.

Nicolosi

Moreira

Jr Shirai

. Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction in four countries: cross-national study of the prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction. Urology 2003; 61: 201–206.

23.

Zucchi

Lazzeri

Porena

. Uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Nat Rev Urol 2010; 7: 626–633.