Abstract
The renin–angiotensin system (RAS) is a key component of cardiovascular physiology and homeostasis due to its influence on the regulation of electrolyte balance, blood pressure, vascular tone and cardiovascular remodeling. Deregulation of this system contributes significantly to the pathophysiology of cardiovascular and renal diseases. Numerous studies have generated new perspectives about a noncanonical and protective RAS pathway that counteracts the proliferative and hypertensive effects of the classical angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)/angiotensin (Ang) II/angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R) axis. The key components of this pathway are ACE2 and its products, Ang-(1-7) and Ang-(1-9). These two vasoactive peptides act through the Mas receptor (MasR) and AT2R, respectively. The ACE2/Ang-(1-7)/MasR and ACE2/Ang-(1-9)/AT2R axes have opposite effects to those of the ACE/Ang II/AT1R axis, such as decreased proliferation and cardiovascular remodeling, increased production of nitric oxide and vasodilation. A novel peptide from the noncanonical pathway, alamandine, was recently identified in rats, mice and humans. This heptapeptide is generated by catalytic action of ACE2 on Ang A or through a decarboxylation reaction on Ang-(1-7). Alamandine produces the same effects as Ang-(1-7), such as vasodilation and prevention of fibrosis, by interacting with Mas-related GPCR, member D (MrgD). In this article, we review the key roles of ACE2 and the vasoactive peptides Ang-(1-7), Ang-(1-9) and alamandine as counter-regulators of the ACE–Ang II axis as well as the biological properties that allow them to regulate blood pressure and cardiovascular and renal remodeling.
Keywords
Introduction
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, representing 30% of all deaths [WHO, 2011]. Atherosclerosis and hypertension (HT) are the most common causes of CVD [Poulter, 2003; Coffman, 2011]. These pathologies predominantly affect the heart and blood vessels, through cardiovascular remodeling [Kearney et al. 2005], a process characterized by structural and functional changes in the arteries and heart [Creemers and Pinto, 2011; Fan et al. 2012; Heusch et al. 2014]. Cardiac remodeling involves the development of cardiac hypertrophy, which is initially is a compensatory process to reduce ventricular wall stress, improve cardiac output and maintain energy requirements [Berenji et al. 2005]. Vascular remodeling affects artery function and involves changes in vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) migration, proliferation, cell death and extracellular matrix protein secretion [Gibbons and Dzau, 1994]. Vascular remodeling can trigger kidney remodeling, characterized by parenchymal destruction and fibrosis. This complex interaction has been described as cardiorenal syndrome [Ronco et al. 2008; Campbell et al. 2009].
In this article, we review the key role of the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and the vasoactive peptides angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)], angiotensin-(1-9) [Ang-(1-9)] and alamandine as counter-regulators of the ACE–angiotensin II (Ang II) axis as well as the biological properties that allow them to regulate blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular and renal remodeling.
Canonical renin–angiotensin system (RAS)
HT is one of the most common factors that triggers cardiovascular remodeling. This disease is characterized by chronically elevated BP and mainly affects the cardiovascular system. HT occurs due to increased mechanical and hemodynamic stress, pressure overload and activation of vasoactive substances. Ang II, a component of the RAS, is one of most important vasoactive substances and influences the development of HT and cardiovascular remodeling [Touyz, 2003; Montezano et al. 2014].
The RAS is a fundamental component of cardiovascular physiology and homeostasis due to its influence on the regulation of electrolyte balance, BP, vascular tone and cardiovascular remodeling. Deregulation of this system contributes significantly to the pathophysiology of CVD [McKinney et al. 2014]. The canonical RAS pathway begins with the formation of the decapeptide angiotensin I (Ang I) in the circulation from angiotensinogen of hepatic origin, via the action of renin. ACE then catalyzes the cleavage of two amino acids from the C-terminal of Ang I to form Ang II, which is involved in sodium homeostasis, aldosterone secretion and regulation of BP by action in VSMC [Varagic et al. 2014].
Ang II binds with high affinity to its two different cell–surface receptors, subtypes AT1R and AT2R, which are members of the seven transmembrane domain G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) superfamily, through Gq and Gi, respectively [Kaschina and Unger, 2003]. These receptors differ with respect to molecular weight, signaling mechanisms and tissue-specific expression [Li et al. 2012]. AT1R mediates most of the physiological and pathological effects of Ang II and is widely expressed in the cardiovascular cells [Mehta and Griendling, 2007]. The binding of Ang II to the AT1R results in coupling of G proteins (Gq/G11and/or Gi/Go) to the C-terminal of the receptor, inducing many intracellular effects through phospholipase C (PLC)/inositol trisphosphate (IP3)/diacylglycerol (DAG)/Ca2+ pathway, adenylyl cyclase, MAP kinases, tyrosine kinases, tyrosine phosphatases, PLC/phospholipase A2 (PLA2), Janus kinase (JAK) signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway, NADPH oxidase, RhoA/Rho kinase among others [Higuchi et al. 2007], causing cardiovascular remodeling [Suzuki et al. 2005]. Some tyrosine kinase receptors in VSMCs, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) are transactivated by AT1R to induce growth and migration [Higuchi et al. 2007].
AT2R shares only 34% sequence identity with AT1R and forms heterodimers with AT1R [Funke-Kaiser et al. 2010]. The human AGTR2 gene that encodes for AT2R is located on the X chromosome and consists of three exons with an uninterrupted coding region that encodes a 363 amino acid receptor [Funke-Kaiser et al. 2010]. Whereas AT1R mediates most of the recognized detrimental effects of Ang II, it seems that the AT2R opposes, in part, the AT1R mediated effects [Li et al. 2012]. AT2R is expressed in adult tissues in smaller amounts than AT1R [Horiuchi et al. 1999]. The expression of AT2R undergoes a complex tissue specific regulation that appears to influence vascular development and repair. AT2R is expressed by cardiomyocyte, cardiac fibroblast, aorta, coronary and resistant arteries. AT2R is regulated during HT, inflammation, myocardial infarction and vascular injury [Faria-Costa et al. 2014]. AT2R effects and cell signaling have been less well characterized than those of AT1R [Savoia et al. 2005; Hu et al. 2008]. Current knowledge suggests that AT2R stimulation mediates vasodilation, antigrowth, proapoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects [Touyz and Schiffrin, 2000; Henrion et al. 2001]. Hence, AT2R can modulate cardiovascular remodeling as well as progression of atherosclerosis [Faria-Costa et al. 2014]. Recent studies suggest that AT2R regulates BP, cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis, and cell death after myocardial infarction [Li et al. 2012; Tavares et al. 2013].
AT2R stimulation activates the nitric oxide (NO)/cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) pathway [Abadir et al. 2003]. This occurs either directly or indirectly through bradykinin (BK) or by increased endothelial nitric oxide synthetase (NOS) activity or expression. AT2R activation is associated with phosphorylation of protein phosphatases, IκBα (inhibitor of NF-κB), the transcription factor ATF2, and dephosphorylation of JNK, p38MAPK, ERK1/2 and STAT3, which are linked to antiproliferative and anti-inflammatory effects and apoptosis [Brassard et al. 2005; Savoia et al. 2006; Dandapat et al. 2008; Hu et al. 2008]. AT2R stimulation induces relaxation by large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels (BKCa) opening [Dimitropoulou et al. 2001] and by negative regulation of the vascular RhoA/Rho kinase pathway [Savoia et al. 2006]. AT2R also enhances tyrosine phosphatases and vanadate-sensitive phosphatases MKP1 (DUSP1), SHP1 (PTPN6) and PP2A activities and inhibits cell growth [Bedecs et al. 1997; Horiuchi et al. 1997].
Noncanonical RAS
The key components of this pathway are ACE2, Ang-(1-7) and Ang-(1-9). Ang-(1-7) can be produced from Ang I by different endopeptidases and from Ang II by ACE2 (Figure 1) [Santos et al. 1988; Ferrario et al. 1991]. This heptapeptide has positive cardiovascular and renal effects such as vasodilation and antifibrosis [Santos et al. 1992; Ferreira et al. 2010]. Ang-(1-9) is generated from Ang I by ACE2, regulates cardiac hypertrophy and has antihypertensive effects [Varagic et al. 2014]. Ang-(1-7) and Ang-(1-9) produce biological effects through the Mas receptor (MasR) and AT2R, respectively [Santos et al. 2003; Flores-Muñoz et al. 2011].

Protective RAS pathway: ACE2 and vasoactive peptides.
The GPCR MasR is encoded by the Mas proto-oncogene [Young et al. 1986]. Among its physiological ligands are Ang-(1-7) and the neuropeptide FF (NPFF) [Santos et al. 2003]. Most effects of MasR are mediated by Ang-(1-7) [Santos et al. 2006]. However, Ang III and Ang IV activate MasR generating similar effects to those found for Ang-(1-7) [Gembardt et al. 2008]. The nonpeptide compound AVE 0991, an agonist of MasR, mimics Ang-(1-7) effects in blood vessels [Lemos et al. 2005], heart [Benter et al. 2006] and kidney [Pinheiro et al. 2004]. Kostenis and colleagues showed that MasR hetero-oligomerizes with AT1R and inhibits the actions of Ang II [Kostenis et al. 2005].
A novel peptide from the noncanonical pathway, alamandine was recently identified in rats, mice and humans [Lautner et al. 2013]. This heptapeptide is generated by the catalytic action of ACE2 on Ang A or through a decarboxylation reaction on Ang-(1-7) in the N-terminal aspartate amino acid residue. Alamandine produces the same effects as Ang-(1-7), such as vasodilation and antifibrosis [Villela et al. 2014], through interaction with the Mas-related GPCR member D (MrgD), also known as hGPCR45 [Takeda et al. 2002] and TGR7 [Shinohara et al. 2004]. This receptor was recently identified as a novel GPCR in murine and human genomes [Dong et al. 2001].
Noncanonical RAS as counter-regulator of the canonical RAS
Recent studies have generated new perspectives about a noncanonical and protective RAS pathway (Figure 1) that counteracts the proliferative and hypertensive effects of the classical ACE/Ang II/AT1R axis [Donoghue et al. 2000; McKinney et al. 2014]. The ACE2/Ang-(1-7)/MasR and ACE2/Ang-(1-9)/AT2R axes have effects opposite to those of the ACE/Ang II/AT1R axis, such as decreased proliferation and cardiovascular remodeling, increased production of NO and vasodilation [Ocaranza et al. 2014b, 2014c; Varagic et al. 2014].
There are various conjectures about the selective activity of Ang-(1-9) on AT2R, as compared with Ang II, which shows a higher affinity for AT2R and produces different effects. AT1R and AT2R share structural hallmarks of GPCRs; AT2R contains equivalent residues in the critical positions Asn111, Lys 199 and Asp281, but it lacks an equivalent residue for His256, conferring it with binding properties similar to those of a constitutively-activated AT1R. This phenotype, described as relaxed conformation, might be susceptible to stabilization by the extra histidine residue present in Ang-(1-9), leading to the activation of pathways that counter-regulate the effects of Ang II and the AT1R [Miura and Karnik, 1999]. Furthermore, there could be a ligand-specific conformation triggered by Ang-(1-9) that results in differential signaling pathway activation [Clarke and Bond, 1998]. Another possibility is that Ang-(1-9) exerts its effects by being metabolized to Ang-(1-7) or another unknown peptide with great affinity for the AT2R, or an alternative receptor that is also affected by the AT2R inhibitor PD123319. This alternative receptor could be the MrgD [Lautner et al. 2013].
ACE2
Like ACE, ACE2 belongs to the family of zinc metalloproteases. ACE2 is a membrane-bound ecto-enzyme that can be found in soluble form in the plasma and tissues such as heart, liver, kidney, brain and blood vessels [Ocaranza et al. 2014a]. ACE2 gene expression is high in the kidney and low in the heart, aorta, lung and retina. ACE2 is not expressed in the brain, adrenals, skeletal muscle or fatty tissue [Yagil et al. 2003]. ACE and ACE2 have 40% amino acid sequence homology but have different substrate specificities [Chamsi-Pasha et al. 2014]. ACE2 is a monocarboxypeptidase with a single active site and greater (~400-fold) affinity for Ang II than Ang I [Tipnis et al. 2000; Rice et al. 2004] and is insensitive to ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) [Donoghue et al. 2000].
ACE2 regulation
The metalloproteinase ADAM17 cleaves the membrane-bound ectodomain of ACE2, which releases soluble ACE2 into the plasma [Iwata et al. 2009]. Levels of this form of the enzyme are elevated after myocardial infarction (MI) and Ang II promotes ACE2 shedding by increasing ADAM17 activity [Patel et al. 2014]. This could be one of the mechanisms by which Ang II induces heart injury.
ACEIs and AT1R antagonists (ARAs) increase ACE2 activity in the heart and kidneys in normotensive and hypertensive rats and in rats with MI [Ishiyama et al. 2004; Ferrario et al. 2005a, 2005b; Ocaranza et al. 2006]. ACEIs and ARAs can also modulate both the ACE2/Ang-(1-7)/MasR and ACE2/Ang-(1-9)/AT2R axes. ACEIs increase levels of Ang I, which can then be converted to Ang-(1-9) by ACE2 or to Ang-(1-7) by other endopeptidases [Moon, 2013]. The effect of the ACEI captopril may be accompanied by increased excretion of Ang-(1-7) [Castro-Moreno et al. 2012]. ARAs increase the availability of Ang II so that it can be metabolized to Ang-(1-7). Ang-(1-7) can also be an Ang II antagonist, because it binds with low affinity to the AT1R [Moon, 2013].
Several ACE2 activators have been tested, such as XNT and NCP-2454. XNT decreases BP and improves cardiac function in hypertensive rats [Hernandez Prada et al. 2008]. NCP-2454 prevents pulmonary HT by inhibiting inflammatory cascades and restoring caveolin 1 expression [Haga et al. 2014]. However, recombinant ACE2 attenuates diabetic nephropathy by decreasing Ang II and increasing Ang-(1-7) levels [Oudit et al. 2010].
ACE2 in HT
The potential role of ACE2 in essential HT is based on the findings that this enzyme is present in the heart and kidney [Donoghue et al. 2000; Tipnis et al. 2000] and that the ACE2 gene is associated with the BP locus on the X chromosome [Crackower et al. 2002]. Both spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and spontaneously hypertensive stroke-prone rats (SHRSP) show reduced renal ACE2 protein levels compared with normotensive Sabra and Wistar Kyoto (WKY) strains [Crackower et al. 2002; Zhong et al. 2004; Tikellis et al. 2006]. Renal expression of ACE2 is higher in newborn and prehypertensive SHR rats and diminishes as the rat reaches adulthood and becomes hypertensive [Tikellis et al. 2006]. However, some investigators have been unable to detect any difference in renal ACE2 mRNA, protein or activity between adult hypertensive rats and their normotensive controls [Hamming et al. 2005]. Transgenic SHRSP-ACE2 rats on a SHRSP genetic background expressing the human ACE2 in VSMCs have significantly elevated circulating Ang-(1-7) levels. Mean arterial BP and vasoconstrictive response to Ang II are reduced, while endothelial function is improved in SHRSP-ACE2 compared with SHRSP rats [Rentzsch et al. 2008]. Gain-of-function experiments in SHRs indicated that ACE2 expression in the central nervous system is associated with substantially decreased BP [Yamazato et al. 2007] and improves of endothelial function in hypertensive rats [Gallagher et al. 2008]. These effects were accompanied with increased levels of Ang-(1-7) in both plasma and kidney [Moon, 2013]. Indeed, ACE2-deficient C57BL/6 mice have raised basal BP with notable amplifications of angiotensin-II-induced HT and have increased accumulation of Ang II in plasma and the kidney after Ang II infusion [Gurley et al. 2006].
Based on these observations, low ACE2 expression and activity have been associated with HT, suggesting that ACE2 could prevent the development of HT. Therefore, ACE2 has been proposed as a novel therapeutic target for HT treatment [Diez-Freire et al. 2006]. In fact, ACE2 overexpression in SHR and WKY rats, produced using a lentiviral vector, results in significantly decreased systolic BP. However, genetic studies in humans have not shown an association between ACE2 and HT. Indeed, four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the ACE2 gene were evaluated and none showed any association with HT [Benjafield et al. 2004]. The disparity between animal and human results regarding ACE2’s relationship with HT could be due to the complex compensatory mechanisms present in humans. In genetic hypertensive animal models, these compensatory mechanisms are less prevalent, as animals display spontaneous HT, while human essential HT is multifactorial and is the result of both environmental and genetic factors [Jacob, 1999; Stoll et al. 2000, 2001]. Decreased ACE2 expression could be a predisposing rather than a causal factor in essential HT.
The manipulating of ACE2 gene expression in adult animal is a useful alternative approach in studying this enzyme’s role in controling BP and cardiovascular functions. In ACE2 knockout mice, BP was significantly increased following Ang II infusions [Gurley et al. 2006]. In contrast, a spontaneous hypotension was observed in ACE knockout mice [Krege et al. 1995]. These data suggest that, in addition to the Ang II system, ACE2 might regulate BP.
Recently, Sriramula and colleagues showed that ACE2 overexpression in the brain attenuated the development of deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA) salt HT, a neurogenic HT model with enhanced brain RAS and sympathetic activity [Sriramula et al. 2014]. DOCA salt induces a reduction of neuronal NOS expression and phosphorylated endothelial NOS/total endothelial NOS, and enhanced phosphorylation of Akt and ERK 1/2 in the paraventricular nucleus; these effects are reversed by ACE2 overexpression. ACE2 overexpression blunts the HT-mediated increase in the cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) gene and protein expression in the paraventricular nucleus. Furthermore, gene silencing of either COX-1 or COX-2 in the brain reduces microglial activation and accompanied neuroinflammation, ultimately attenuating DOCA salt HT. These data provide evidence that brain ACE2 overexpression reduces oxidative stress and COX-mediated neuroinflammation, improves antioxidant and NO signaling, and thereby attenuates the development of neurogenic HT.
ACE2 in cardiac remodeling
Because cardiomyocytes express a complete RAS, the heart was the first organ in which ACE2 physiology was studied [Averill et al. 2003]. In the heart, ACE2 participates in the structural and functional regulation. ACE2 knockout mice present a deficiency in cardiac contractility accompanied by high levels of Ang II in the plasma and heart [Crackower et al. 2002]. ACE2 gene expression is abundant in the heart [Ferrario, 2006]. The severity of cardiac dysfunction depends on the age and sex of the animals, with abnormalities most pronounced in adult male mice. However, the hearts of these animals do not show dilatation, hypertrophy, fibrosis or excessive collagen deposits, although Ang II levels are elevated in the heart and plasma [Crackower et al. 2002]. The cardiac phenotype found in ACE2-/- mice is similar to that observed in cardioplegia, representing human adaptive responses to coronary disease and bypass surgery [Hsueh et al. 1998; Kloner et al. 1998]. These mice also show a greater expression of genes induced by hypoxia, a condition that causes endothelial dysfunction, vasoconstriction and cardiac hypoperfusion [Crackower et al. 2002].
The ventricular dysfunction observed in ACE2-/- mice can be completely reversed by a second mutation that causes ACE gene deficiency [Crackower et al. 2002]. These results imply an important regulatory mechanism involving an interaction between ACE and ACE2 in normal control of cardiac function [Crackower et al. 2002]. Similarly in MI, loss of ACE2 accelerates maladaptive left ventricular remodeling [Kassiri et al. 2009]. ACE2’s role in cardiac physiopathology has also been supported by observations of increased cardiac ACE2 activity in patients with terminal idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy [Zisman et al. 2003] and with ischemic heart disease [Goulter et al. 2004]. These observations suggest that a greater expression of ACE2 in damaged tissue can result from the participation of ACE2 as compensatory mechanism.
Although most studies suggest that ACE2 may have cardioprotective effects after myocardial injury, studies in transgenic mice with increased cardiac ACE2 expression have shown an increased incidence of sudden death that correlates with ACE2 expression levels [Donoghue et al. 2003]. Electrophysiological studies have revealed alterations in heart rhythm, including ventricular tachycardia that can progress to fibrillation and death. Interestingly, Ang-(1-7) has been shown to reverse cardiac arrhythmia [Santos et al. 2004]. Additionally, the administration of Ang-(1-7) preserves cardiac contractility after experimental MI in rats [Loot et al. 2002].
To understand the importance of ACE2 in cardiac remodeling, the effect of cardiac ACE2 overexpression using a lentivirus [Huentelman et al. 2005], as well as evaluating the effect of ACE inhibitors [Ocaranza et al. 2006]. ACE2 overexpression significantly reduces the development of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and myocardial fibrosis triggered by Ang II [Huentelman et al. 2005]. Further, in MI rats randomized to receive either vehicle or ACEI for 8 weeks, enalapril, prevented LVH and increased ACE2 expression several fold [Ocaranza et al. 2006]. These results suggest a cardioprotective role of ACE2 in those models. There is evidence that ACE2 is upregulated post-MI in both a rat model and in human patients and in the failing heart [Karram et al. 2005; Ocaranza et al. 2006; Epelman et al. 2009; Kim et al. 2010; Burchill et al. 2012; Ortiz-Perez et al. 2013]. During the early post-MI period (1 week) in rats, ventricular dysfunction is associated with significantly increased plasma and LV ACE and ACE2 activity, as well as elevated Ang II/Ang I and Ang-(1-9)/Ang I ratios, but reduced Ang-(1-7)/Ang I ratios [Ocaranza et al. 2006]. However, during the long-term post-MI stage (8 weeks), the development of LVH is associated with marked myocardial dysfunction [Ocaranza et al. 2006]. Plasma and LV ACE and Ang II levels remain high during this stage, but plasma and LV ACE2 activity and plasma Ang-(1-9) levels are lower than those of controls, with no change in plasma Ang-(1-7) levels observed at any time [Ocaranza et al. 2006]. Similar results have also been found in a HF model induced by volume overload [Karram et al. 2005]. The increase in cardiac and plasma ACE2 activity noted after experimental MI is consistent with studies in patients [Ortiz-Perez et al. 2013]. In this study, the novel findings were that ACE2 is upregulated in the acute phase of ST segment elevation MI (STEMI) in humans. Serum ACE2 activity was found to correlate with the infarct size and ACE2 activity measured acutely is associated with late LV systolic function and occurrence of adverse LV remodeling. However, varied cardiac effects of ACE2 on post-MI remodeling have been shown. The inhibition of ACE2 by the compound C16 increased the infarct size and reduced the LV contractile function, while resulted in less myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis suggesting that ACE2 activity has diverse effects on post-MI remodeling [Kim et al. 2010]. Also Burchill and colleagues found that the beneficial effects of ACEI and ARA or in combination on cardiac remodeling were similar and occurred with no further increase in cardiac ACE2 expression [Burchill et al. 2012] .
ACE2 genetic deletion or pharmacological inhibition has been associated with LVH, dysfunction in response to MI and diabetic cardiomyopathy [Kim et al. 2010; Patel et al. 2012; Moritani et al. 2013]. ACE2 overexpression prevented collagen accumulation, cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis. Moreover, it also improved left ventricular remodeling and function in a rat model with diabetic cardiomyopathy [Dong et al. 2012]. Furthermore, SNPs in the ACE2 gene are also associated with LVH, impaired cardiac function and HT [Patel et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2013; Yang et al. 2014]. Because of these and other findings, ACE2 gene is considered a functional candidate for CVD [Burrell et al. 2013].
ACE2 in vascular remodeling
ACE2 is present in human coronary arteries and arterioles, the vasa vasorum of most organs and large conduit arteries of SHRs [Donoghue et al. 2000; Hamming et al. 2004; Igase et al. 2005]. ACE2 localizes preferentially to endothelial cells and arterial VSMCs [Donoghue et al. 2000; Hamming et al. 2004]. Vascular endothelial damage induces vascular ACE [Shi et al. 1994]. Reducing BP with drugs that block the RAS such as ACEI [Thybo et al. 1995; Rizzoni et al. 1998a, 1998b] or ARAII [Rizzoni et al. 1998a, 1998b; Schiffrin et al. 2000] and calcium channel antagonists [Porteri et al. 1998] reverses the eutrophic inward vascular remodeling [Hamming et al. 2004].
As a specific Ang II-degrading enzyme, ACE2 suppresses VSMC proliferation and vascular hypertrophy. Loss of ACE2 led to vascular proliferation and elevated migration of VSMC, while ACE2 overexpression inhibited vascular proliferation and hypertrophy by preventing aortic wall thickening [Jin et al. 2012; Patel et al. 2012]. In hypertensive animal models, ACE2 mRNA and protein have been associated with immunoreactive Ang-(1-7) in the large conduit arteries of SHRs. Treatment with an AT1R blocker induces a five-fold increase in ACE2 mRNA and is associated with a significant increase in aortic Ang-(1-7) protein expression. This effect is associated with decreased aortic medial thickness, suggesting that this may be a protective mechanism to prevent cardiovascular events during HT [Igase et al. 2005]. ACE2 protein is expressed not only in the media of the carotid artery, but also in the neointima of the balloon-injured carotid artery in SHR [Igase et al. 2008]. ARA-induced increase in neointimal ACE2 was associated with a reduction in neointima thickness [Igase et al. 2008]. This association between an increase in ACE2 protein in the injured carotid artery of SHR and vascular remodeling during blockade of Ang II receptors could indicate the possibility that ACE2 plays a role in mediating the local effects of reversal of vascular hypertrophy in the carotid artery.
Aortic wall from hypertensive rats shows increased ACE levels, decreased ACE2 mRNA and protein levels, with no differences in the other angiotensins. These findings are associated with increased mRNA and protein levels of transforming growth factor (TGF) β1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) [Ocaranza et al. 2011]. These results strongly suggest that vascular remodeling could be dependent on the tissular ACE2 axis rather than the plasmatic RAS [Ocaranza et al. 2011].
Ang-(1-7)
Ang-(1-7) is produced from Ang I by different endopeptidases which cleave the Pro7-Phe8 bond to remove the last three amino acids. The role of the prolyl endopeptidase (PEP) [Welches et al. 1991], thimet oligopeptidase (TOP) and neutral endopeptidase (NEP) [Chappell et al. 1998] in the conversion of Ang I into Ang-(1-7) depends on tissue enzyme distribution and substrate availability. Neprilysin is highly active in the vascular endothelium whereas the hydrolytic activity of TOP is important in the formation of Ang-(1-7) in VSMC [Welches et al. 1993; Chappell et al. 1994]. Ang-(1-7) is also produced from Ang II by ACE2 [Tipnis et al. 2000]. The level of Ang-(1-7) is regulated by the action of ACE which hydrolyzes Ang-(1-7) to Ang-(1-5) [Chappell et al. 1998].
The functional role of Ang-(1-7) in the antagonism of the actions of Ang II was known before the discovery of ACE2 and MasR [Sampaio et al. 2003]. Ang-(1-7) induces regional and systemic vasodilation, diuresis and natriuresis, and also has antiproliferative and antimigratory effects on smooth muscle cells, cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts and glomerular cells. The cardioprotective effects of Ang-(1-7) are mediated by MasR to different signaling pathways involving MAPK, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt and NADPH oxidase [Nemoto et al. 2014; Zheng et al. 2014]. The interaction Ang-(1-7)/MasR leads to activation of different effectors such as forkhead box protein O1 (FOXO1), COX-2 and vasodilator mediators such as prostanoids and NO. Furthermore, this heptapeptide has positive effects on metabolism, increasing the glucose uptake and lipolysis [Passos-Silva et al. 2013].
Ang-(1-7) in HT
Ang-(1-7) may act as an antihypertensive hormone [Moriguchi et al. 1995], based on its potent natriuretic and diuretic actions [Dellipizzi et al. 1994; Hilchey and Bell-Quilley, 1995; Handa et al. 1996] and vasodepressor effects in the coronary and mesenteric vascular beds [Osei et al. 1993; Porsti et al. 1994; Brosnihan et al. 1996]. Moreover, low concentrations of Ang-(1-7) enhance the vasodepressor actions of BK, potentiating BK vasodilatory effects [Paula et al. 1995; Abbas et al. 1997; Li et al. 1997]. This interaction is exaggerated after ACE inhibition. Although the precise mechanisms of this potentiation remain controversial [Greco et al. 2006; Carvalho et al. 2007], data suggest that the release of prostaglandins, NO and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor [Oliveira et al. 1999], as well as the ability of Ang-(1-7) to inhibit ACE activity [Tom et al. 2001], may be involved in these effects.
Rakusan and colleagues evaluated the effects of target disruption of the MasR for Ang-(1-7) in knockout mice on the course of two-kidney, one-clip Goldblatt HT model. Their results showed that MasR knockout mice responded to clipping by accelerated increases in BP and the final BP was significantly higher than that in wild-type mice [Rakusan et al. 2010].
Although most evidence indicates that the effects of Ang-(1-7) are due to its interaction with the MasR, there is evidence to suggest that Ang-(1-7) also signals through the AT2R pathway in spite of having a relatively low affinity for this receptor [Bosnyak et al. 2011]. Ang-(1-7) reduces BP in HT rats during blockage of the AT1R in a similar fashion to that seen with AT2R agonist CGP42114. Furthermore, the vasodepressor effect of Ang-(1-7) is blocked by AT2R antagonist PD123319, but not by the MasR antagonist A779 [Li and Widdop, 2004; Walters et al. 2005]. These effects appear to be preserved in aged rats both by the MasR and AT2R [Bosnyak et al. 2012]. However, the importance of the AT2R to the signaling of and the effects triggered by Ang-(1-7) remains controversial, because studies have shown that the effects of Ang-(1-7) on BP are independent of the AT2R [Gembardt et al. 2012]. The fact that Ang-(1-7) generates effects via the MasR and AT2R could be explained by the similarity in the signaling pathways of these two receptors, with the result that antagonists for one receptor inhibit the action of agonists for the other receptor. According to Villela and colleagues, there may be a functional interaction between the two receptors, but this hypothesis should be tested in future studies [Villela et al. 2015].
Ang-(1-7) in cardiac remodeling
Chronic infusion of Ang-(1-7) prevents the development of heart failure (HF) after MI [Averill et al. 2003]. In ACE2-/- mice, AT1R blockade and Ang-(1-7) administration in a pressure overload-induced HF model suppresses NADPH oxidase, reduces cardiac hypertrophy and recovers systolic dysfunction [Patel et al. 2012]. Treating MI rats with Ang-(1-7) in hydroxypropyl β-cyclodextrin (HPβCD) improves cardiac function [Marques et al. 2012]. Ang-(1-7) reduces pathological cardiac remodeling by attenuating interstitial and perivascular fibrosis. In cardiac fibroblasts, Ang-(1-7) reduces DNA, protein and collagen synthesis upon stimulation with serum and endothelin-1 (ET-1) [McCollum et al. 2012]. In type 2 diabetes patients, plasma Ang-(1-7) level is negatively and significantly associated with ratio of early diastolic mitral inflow to annular velocity (E/Ea) and Log N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), but positively associated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LHEF) and ratio of early to late left ventricular filling velocity (E/A). These data suggest a protective action of Ang-(1-7) in cardiac remodeling and function in diabetic patients [Hao et al. 2013].
Ang-(1-7) agonists have been tested, including peptides CGEN-856 and CGEN-857 [Shemesh et al. 2008] and nonpeptide molecule AV0991. Oral treatment with AV0991 reduces cardiac remodeling in hypertensive rats [Cunha et al. 2013]. Moreover, Ang-(1-7) prevents organ damage in hypertensive rats by activating nitric oxide synthase. These effects are inhibited in MasR knockout mice [Lemos et al. 2005; Carvalho et al. 2007].
Most of the data related to MasR and its ligand Ang-(1-7) in the heart have shown cardioprotective effects of Ang-(1-7). Accordingly, cardiomyocytes from MasR-KO mice presented a smaller peak Ca2+ transient and slower Ca2+ uptakes due to a decreased expression of SERCA2 [Gomes et al. 2012]. These changes were turned into a decreased heart function in MasR-KO mice [Santos et al. 2006; Botelho-Santos et al. 2012; Gava et al. 2012]. The changes in the Ca2+ handling proteins were paralleled by changes in NO production [Dias-Peixoto et al. 2008]. Cardiomyocytes from MasR-KO mice presented normal endothelial NOS (eNOS) protein levels. However, MasR deficiency resulted in a 70% increase in caveolin 3 expression and a decrease in heat shock protein 90 [Dias-Peixoto et al. 2008]. These two alterations may lead to a decrease in eNOS activity, because caveolin 3 prevents calmodulin interaction with NOS and heat shock protein 90 act as a scaffold protein for the recruitment of Akt to the eNOS complex [Wu, 2002; Takahashi and Mendelsohn, 2003]. Likewise, the antihypertrophic effect of Ang-(1-7) on cardiomyocytes was blunted by downregulation of Mas by antisense RNA [Tallant et al. 2005].
Ang-(1-7) in vascular remodeling
Ang-(1-7) is produced and metabolized in vascular endothelial cells [Santos et al. 1992]. This heptapeptide produces relaxation in canine and porcine coronary arteries, rat aortic rings and mesenteric microvessels of normotensive and hypertensive rats [Brosnihan et al. 1996; Gorelik et al. 1998; Fernandes et al. 2001; Haulica et al. 2003]. Ang-(1-7) mediates the chronic hypotensive effects of losartan in normal rats [Collister and Hendel, 2003] and vasodilation in forearm circulation of normotensive subjects and patients with essential HT through a pathway that does not involve NO synthesis [Sasaki et al. 2001].
Ang-(1-7) potentiates the vasodilator and hypotensive effects of BK in normotensive and hypertensive rats [Paula et al. 1995], in porcine [Tom et al. 2001] and rat coronary vessels [Almeida et al. 2000]. Ueda and colleagues demonstrated that Ang-(1-7) potentiates the vasodilating effect of BK in human forearm resistance vessels through a mechanism that appears to involve NO release [Ueda et al. 2001]. BK-potentiating activity of Ang-(1-7) also involves inhibition of ACE [Tom et al. 2001] and a crosstalk between MasR and kinin B2 receptor [Brosnihan et al. 1996; Soares De Moura et al. 2004]. Recent observations indicate that Ang-(1-7)/MasR pathway is mainly involved in the effects of ACEI because of Ang-(1-7) antagonist (A779) reverses the potentiation of BK in mesenteric microvessels by enalapril or enalaprilat [Fernandes et al. 2001] or attenuates the potentiated hypotensive response to BK in captopril-treated rats [Maia et al. 2004]. But Ang-(1-7) infusion after balloon catheter injury of rat carotid artery reduces neointima formation [Strawn et al. 1999]. This effect is likely mediated by inhibition of VSMC proliferation [Freeman et al. 1996].
The protective role of Ang-(1-7) on vascular beds by controling vascular tone and its relationship with the genesis of vascular dysfunction were first shown in MasR KO mice by Xu and colleagues and by Rabelo and colleages [Xu et al. 2008; Rabelo et al. 2008]. The results showed that MasR KO mice impair the in vivo endothelium-dependent vasolkrelaxant response to acetylcholine, reduce the urinary excretion rates of nitrate and nitrite and the plasma levels of nitrite [Rabelo et al. 2008; Xu et al. 2008], increase the aortic thiobarbituric reactive substances levels [Xu et al. 2008], upregulate the protein and gene expression of the NADPH oxidase catalytic subunit gp91phox (Nox2) [Rabelo et al. 2008; Xu et al. 2008] and reduce the aortic SOD activity [Xu et al. 2008]. Taken together, these findings point to the protective role played by MasR on endothelial function by inhibiting the vascular oxidative stress mediated by NADPH oxidase-derived O2-.
Ang-(1-9)
At early 1970s, Oparil and colleagues reported the rapid appearance of Leu after injection of radiolabeled Ang I in dog renal and pulmonary arteries [Oparil et al. 1970, 1971]. They suggested a carbopeptidase was breaking down Ang I forming des-Leu10 Ang I, now known as Ang-(1-9). Shortly afterwards Ang-(1-9) was detected in human and rat plasma [Johnson et al. 1989]. Initially Ang-(1-9) was thought to be biologically inactive, operating indirectly by competing with Ang I for the ACE active site and therefore reducing Ang II levels while increasing those of Ang-(1-7) [Drummer et al. 1990; Donoghue et al. 2000; Rice et al. 2004]. However, increasing evidence has shown that Ang-(1-9) has cardiovascular effects in vivo and in vitro, acting through AT2R [Ocaranza et al. 2010; Flores-Muñoz et al. 2012b; Cha et al. 2013].
Ang-(1-9) in HT
Studies in MI rats have shown that ACE2 activity positively correlates with Ang-(1-9) levels [Ocaranza et al. 2006]. Circulating Ang-(1-9) levels and both plasma and aortic wall ACE2 activities are significantly decreased in DOCA salt hypertensive rats. However, no change in Ang-(1-7) plasma level has been observed in this experimental model. Administration of fasudil, a Rho kinase inhibitor, reduces BP by 13% and ACE activity by 15% but increases ACE2 activity in the plasma and aortic wall [Ocaranza et al. 2011]. Chronic administration of Ang-(1-9) significantly reduces HT in experimental models of HT induced by Ang II infusion and the Goldblatt model (2K-1C) [Ocaranza et al. 2014c]. This antihypertensive effect of Ang-(1-9) involves the AT2R and is independent of Ang-(1-9) conversion to Ang-(1-7) [Ocaranza et al. 2014c]. These findings suggest an excellent opportunity to simultaneously measure ACE2 and Ang-(1-9) in hypertensive patients [Ocaranza et al. 2014b]. Therefore, this second axis involving ACE2 and Ang-(1-9) could be also an important target for HT therapy.
Ang-(1-9) in cardiac remodeling
The first observations on the role of the Ang-(1-9) in counter-regulating of the ACE–Ang II axis were made by Ocaranza and colleagues [Ocaranza et al. 2006] . In MI rats, circulating and LV ACE2 activities are downregulated in the long-term phase of LV dysfunction. These effects are prevented by the conventional ACEI, enalapril [Ocaranza et al. 2006]. Plasma Ang-(1-9) levels increase significantly when MI or sham-operated rats are treated with enalapril, but circulating Ang-(1-7) levels remain constant. Based on these findings, Ocaranza and colleagues proposed that Ang-(1-9) rather than Ang-(1-7) counter-regulates Ang II in this experimental model of HF [Ocaranza et al. 2006]. Ocaranza and colleagues also showed that Ang-(1-9) regulates cardiac hypertrophy in vivo and in vitro [Ocaranza et al. 2010]. In rats with MI randomized to receive vehicle, enalapril or the ARA candesartan, both drugs prevented LVH and increased plasma Ang-(1-9) levels several-fold [Ocaranza et al. 2010]. Ang-(1-9) levels correlate inversely with different LVH markers, even after adjusting for BP reduction. This effect of Ang-(1-9) is specific, as there was no correlation with LVH for Ang-(1-7), Ang II or BKs. In other experiments, chronic administration of Ang-(1-9) to MI rats has been shown to decrease plasma Ang II levels, inhibit plasma and LV ACE activity, and prevent cardiomyocyte hypertrophy [Ocaranza et al. 2010]. Interestingly, in two experimental HT models (Ang II infusion and Goldblatt model 2K-1C), chronic administration of Ang-(1-9) significantly reduced hypertensive cardiac damage [Ocaranza et al. 2014c]. These effects of Ang-(1-9) are mediated by AT2R, but not by Ang-(1-7) [Flores-Muñoz et al. 2011, 2012a, 2012b].
Ang-(1-9) in vascular remodeling
It has recently been shown that inhibition of the RhoA/Rho-associated, coiled-coil containing protein kinase (ROCK) signaling pathway increases ACE2 activity and Ang-(1-9) plasma levels, reducing BP and vascular remodeling in DOCA hypertensive rats [Ocaranza et al. 2011]. Furthermore, overexpression of vascular remodeling promoting genes was normalized and mRNA eNOS levels increased, revealing a novel role of Ang-(1-9) in vascular protection further than regulating HT. In the same vein, Ang-(1-9) infusion improved vasorelaxation and NO levels on SHRSP [Flores-Muñoz et al. 2012b]. Ang-(1-9) may increase NO bioavailability by stimulating BK release [Erdös et al. 2002; Jackman et al. 2002]. Also, Flores-Muñoz and colleagues reported an Ang-(1-9)-induced increase in NADPH oxidase 4 expresion [Flores-Muñoz et al. 2012b], which has been previously associated with endothelium promoted vasodilation by the release of NO [Ray et al. 2011]. However, the molecular mechanisms by which Ang-(1-9) causes those effects remain to be elucidated.
ACE2 and vasoactive peptides in renal remodeling
In male ACE2-/- mice, structural changes in the glomerulus included increased collagen type I and III and fibronectin content. These animals show signs renal dysfunction, such as increased albumin excretion in the urine compared with control groups. Treatment with the AT1R antagonist irbesartan prevents these structural and functional changes [Oudit et al. 2006]. The role of renal ACE2 in humans is unclear. The only available study used immunostaining of ACE2 in renal biopsies of 58 patients with primary renal disease or renal disease secondary to glomerulopathy and diabetic kidney disease [Lely et al. 2004]. ACE2 was found in tubular cells, glomerular epithelial cells, VSMCs and the endothelial cells of interlobular arteries. Immunohistochemical studies in the kidney show that ACE and ACE2 are located predominantly in the epithelial cells of the proximal tubule [Donoghue et al. 2000; Tikellis et al. 2003]. Both primary and secondary renal disease is associated with the expression of the de novo ACE2 in glomerular endothelial cells and peritubular capillaries.
The kidney is an important organ in HT. It is also a well-known target for end organ damage in HT, but several studies suggest that the kidney also plays an active role in the pathogenesis of HT. For example, in salt-sensitive HT, a high-salt diet results in decreased renal blood flow [Campese, 1994] and altered-pressure natriuresis curves are observed in essential HT [Guyton, 1992]. Ali and colleagues recently demonstrated that Ang-(1-7) concentration and ACE2 activity in the renal cortex were reduced in high-sodium diet (HSD) induced HT and that this was reversed by C21 (AT2R selective agonist) treatment [Ali et al. 2015]. Reduced nephron numbers are also associated with essential HT and this finding may be partly attributable to enhanced Ang II generation [Brenner and Chertow, 1994; Keller et al. 2003].
Emerging evidence shows that ACE2 plays an important role in negatively regulating HT. In rat HT models, renal ACE2 mRNA and protein levels are decreased, although this finding could not be confirmed in human hypertensive nephropathy [Lely et al. 2004]. Furthermore, in rats treated with ACEI and ARA, local renal ACE2 activity is elevated [Ferrario et al. 2005a, 2005b]. ACE is upregulated in human diabetic nephropathy accompanied by HT, a condition associated with high Ang II levels [Huang et al. 2003]. Taken together, these findings suggest that HT is associated with an alteration in renal ACE/ACE2 balance towards increased Ang II generation (i.e. ACE upregulation) and decreased Ang II degradation (i.e. ACE2 downregulation).
In order to understand factors that may downregulate renal ACE2 during HT, Koka and colleagues explored in vivo and in vitro regulation of ACE2 under hypertensive conditions [Koka et al. 2008]. In patients with hypertensive cardiomyopathy and nephropathy and in vitro in a human tubular cell line (HK-2), Ang II upregulates ACE and downregulates ACE2 expression levels under hypertensive conditions [Koka et al. 2008]. The AT1R-mediated ERK/p38MAPK kinase signaling pathway is a key mechanism by which Ang II downregulates ACE2 expression, implicating low ACE2 in hypertensive CV and renal disease [Huang et al. 2003]. The RAS is also involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy [Brenner et al. 2001] and ACE inhibition has a significant effect on kidney protection. In rodent experimental models of diabetes mellitus type 1, ACE and ACE2 mRNA and protein levels are decreased. This effect is prevented by ACEI, suggesting that ACE2 could have a renoprotective effect in diabetes [Ferrario, 2003]. Opposite results have been presented by Ye and colleagues, who showed that ACE expression is increased in the renal tubules of diabetic mice (db/db) at 8 weeks of age compared with the control group (db/m), likely as an early renoprotective effect [Ye et al. 2004].
Alamandine and cardiovascular remodeling
A new member of the RAS has been discovered recently, the heptapeptide Ala-Arg-Val-Tyr-Ile-His-Pro, known as alamandine. Lautner and colleagues characterized alamandine as an endogenous peptide in rat and mouse cardiac tissue and human plasma [Lautner et al. 2013]. Using mass spectrometry, they identified alamandine as a product of catalytic hydrolysis of the octapeptide angiotensin A by ACE2. Its sequence is very similar to Ang-(1-7), differing only by the presence of an alanine residue in place of an aspartate residue in the amino terminus. Alamandine may be synthesized by decarboxylation of the Ang-(1-7) N-terminal aspartate amino acid residue. The enzyme responsible for the latter reaction remains unknown [Lautner et al. 2013]. Alamandine degradation has not yet been elucidated. However, aminopeptidases may play an important role, since the removal of Ala1 could lead to the formation of Ang-(2-7), which considered an inactive peptide, although it shows ACE inhibitory activity [Paula et al. 1999]. Other Ang-(1-7) degrading enzymes, such as NEP or neprilysin, may also participate, given alamandine’s similarity to Ang-(1-7) [Etelvino et al. 2014].
Alamandine produces vasorelaxation in phenylephrine-contracted aortic rings and when microinjected into central areas critically involved in BP control, such as caudal ventrolateral and rostral ventrolateral medulla. Alamandine produces a decrease versus increase in BP in the former versus the latter, respectively, revealing that it acts locally and centrally in a manner similar to Ang-(1-7). Additionally, oral alamandine administration produces a long-term antihypertensive effect in SHR rats [Lautner et al. 2013], suggesting a therapeutic potential for the conditions underlying cardiovascular remodeling. Furthermore, alamandine has a direct effect on remodeling by diminishing collagen I, III and fibronectin accumulation in rats with isoproterenol-induced heart fibrosis [Lautner et al. 2013]. Since alamandine is a very new member of the RAS, there is scarce information about its involvement in disease, although it has been reported that its plasma concentration is elevated in nephropathy patients, suggesting that alamandine may participate in pathological conditions [Lautner et al. 2013].
In 2001, researchers identified a large family of genes that code for GPCRs and have a strong sequence homology with the MasR, called Mas-related genes (Mrg) [Dong et al. 2001]. Among the Mrg-receptor family, the Mrg type D (MrgD) was identified as the binding site for alamandine [Lautner et al. 2013]. Interestingly, although alamandine residue’s sequence differs only slightly from Ang-(1-7), its effects are mediated through the MrgD and its binding to the Mas is weak or nonexistent [Villela et al. 2015]. In aortic ring vasorelaxation assays, the Mas antagonist A-779 does not block alamandine-induced vasorelaxation. Furthermore, alamandine-induced vasorelaxation is preserved in aortic rings of Mas-deficient mice, showing that alamandine does not produce these effects through the Mas receptor. However,
Future directions for ACE2 and its vasoactive peptides in cardiovascular and renal remodeling
RAS activation has an important role in the development of HT and secondary target organ damage (TOD), characterized by cardiovascular and renal remodeling [Touyz, 2003; Montezano et al. 2014]. Currently, pharmacologic blockade of the RAS is one of the most useful tools for treating HT and TOD. However, current HT treatment has significant limitations that jeopardize clinical success and compliance. Antihypertensive drugs are not always effective in normalizing BP, and two or three drugs are often required [Mancia, 2009]. Moreover, these drugs are not particularly effective in reducing TOD and adverse effects are common [Jamerson et al. 2008]. Thus, there is a need to develop more effective antihypertensive drugs to normalize BP, reduce cardiovascular and renal remodeling, and increase compliance.
In light of the limited efficacy of currently available treatment options for cardiovascular and renal damage, it is fundamental to identify new molecules to prevent and reduce HT and the resulting pathologic cardiovascular and renal remodeling. Therefore, the discovery of ACE2, Ang-(1-7), Ang-(1-9) and alamandine is significant. Moreover, in patients with HT, HF or kidney damage currently on RAS blocker therapy, ACE2 overexpression and treatment with Ang-(1-7), Ang-(1-9) and alamandine might have additive effects to ACEI and AT1R blockers. We can speculate that the antiremodeling mechanisms triggered Ang-(1-7), Ang-(1-9) and alamandine act by AT1R antagonism lowering Ang II levels and ACE inhibition. The effects of even higher Ang-(1-7), Ang-(1-9) and alamandine levels on these clinical situations and the appropriate strategies to increase these levels should be further investigated.
Footnotes
Funding
This research was supported by Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (CONICYT), Chile: grants FONDEF D11I1122 to M.P.O., M.C. and S.L., and FONDAP 15130011 to M.P.O., M.C., P.F.C. and S.L.E.M.-T. and D.M.-R. hold PhD fellowships from CONICYT.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest in preparing this article.
