Arterial lactate as a risk factor for death in respiratory failure related to coronavirus disease 2019: an observational study

Abstract

Background:

Arterial lactate is a recognized biomarker associated with death in critically ill patients. The prognostic role of arterial lactate in acute respiratory failure due to the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unclear.

Objectives:

We aimed to investigate the prognostic role of arterial lactate levels at admission in patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure.

Design and Methods:

Cohorts of consecutive patients admitted to nonintensive care units (ICU) at study centers for COVID-19-related respiratory failure were merged into a collaborative database. The prognostic role of lactate levels at admission was assessed for continuous values and values ⩾2.0 mmol/l, and lactate clearance at 24 h through delta-lactate (ΔLac). The study outcome was 30-day in-hospital death. Cox proportional regression model was used to assess independent predictors of the study outcome.

Results:

At admission, 14.6% of patients had lactate levels ⩾2 mmol/l. In-hospital death at 30 days occurred in 57 out of 206 patients; 22.3% and 56.7% with normal or ⩾ 2 mmol/l lactate at admission, respectively. The median lactate level was 1.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 0.8–1.3] mmol/l and 1.3 (IQR 1.0–2.1) mmol/l in survivors and nonsurvivors, respectively (p-value < 0.001). After adjusting for age, relevant comorbidities, acidemia, and the severity of respiratory failure, lactate ⩾2.0 mmol/l was associated with in-hospital death (HR 2.53, 95% CI 1.29–4.95, p-value 0.0066), while Δ Lac ⩾0 was not (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.42–4.49). These results were confirmed in patients with a pO₂/FiO₂-ratio (P/F ratio) ⩽300 mmHg.

Conclusions:

In our study, increased arterial lactate at admission was independently associated with in-hospital death at 30 days in non-ICU patients with acute respiratory failure related to COVID-19.

Keywords

adult respiratory distress syndrome COVID-19 lactate respiratory insufficiency

Introduction

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had dramatic consequences on global health worldwide.¹ Clinical presentation ranges from asymptomatic (about 33%) to severe (14%) or critical disease (5%) in infected patients.^2,3 Progression from mild to severe disease is mainly due to rapidly developing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In patients with critical disease, the observed case fatality rate is as high as about 49%.²

Several demographic features, laboratory abnormalities, and procedures have been associated with disease severity and clinical outcome.^4–9 Mortality in ARDS has been mainly related to the severity of hypoxia.^10,11 In this setting, the role of lactate levels as a severity marker is unclear. However, lactate is rapidly available at blood gas analysis and is a marker of severity in several clinical conditions in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU), like major trauma or different type of shock.^12–22 Historically, lactate was considered a dead-end waste product of anaerobic metabolism triggered by inadequate oxygen delivery and tissue hypoxia²³; more recently, impaired oxygen extraction, peripheral shunting, stress, and increased adrenergic stimulation have been recognized as triggers for anaerobic metabolism and increased lactate levels.^18,22,24

For community-acquired pneumonia, lactate is already known as a parameter associated with the severe course of the disease and mortality.^25–27 However, COVID-19 pneumonia has different pathophysiology, probably due to the viral etiology, and the prognostic role of lactate in this setting remains uncertain.

An association between increased lactate levels and adverse outcomes has been suggested in studies of COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU.^28–30 Nevertheless, the association between lactate levels and mortality in COVID-19 patients in the non-ICU setting has been explored in a few studies.^31,32 Prompt identification of COVID-19 patients likely to deteriorate by a simple test such as lactate assessment would be crucial for tailoring patient management.

Our study aims at investigating the association between arterial lactate levels and death in patients with respiratory failure related to COVID-19 pneumonia admitted outside the ICU setting.

Methods

Study design, setting, and selection of participants

We considered for inclusion in the study consecutive adult patients admitted due to COVID-19 pneumonia at the Department of Internal and Cardiovascular Medicine – COVID-19 of the University of Perugia from February to May 2021 and at the Department of Medicine at the University of Pisa from March to April 2020. Patients were included in the study if the following criteria were fulfilled: (1) diagnosis of COVID-19 confirmed by real time-polymerase chain reaction testing and (2) pneumonia detected by imaging techniques (chest X-ray, computed tomography, or lung ultrasonography). Exclusion criteria were lack of serum lactate measurement at admission and pregnancy.

Outcomes

The study outcome was in-hospital death at 30 days.

Measurements

The following data were collected for each patient: age, sex, comorbidities (congestive heart failure, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, systemic arterial hypertension, obesity, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, and diabetes mellitus), use of supplemental oxygen therapy, and noninvasive respiratory strategies (noninvasive mechanical ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure).

Data from arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis, including pH, lactate, pO₂, pCO₂, and FiO₂, were recorded. To account for the severity of respiratory failure at admission, the pO₂/FiO₂-ratio (P/F) was calculated.

According to previous literature, lactate was considered increased if ⩾2.0 mmol/l.³³

Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic characteristics, ABG parameters, and respiratory indexes at admission. Categorical variables were reported as frequencies, while numerical variables were given as mean ± standard deviation if normally distributed or median and interquartile range (IQR) if non-normally distributed. Differences in continuous variables were tested by independent t-test or the Kruskal–Wallis test as appropriate, and differences in categorical characteristics by the χ² test or Fisher exact test.

The association between lactate at admission as continuous values or as normal/increased according to a cutoff ⩾2.0 mmol/l and death were assessed¹⁰; an analysis was also performed for lactate with a cutoff level ⩾4.0 mmol/l.^16,33 To analyze the association between lactate clearance and death, delta-lactate (Δ Lac) at 24 h was calculated. Δ Lac was defined as the ratio of the difference between serum lactate at admission and on the following day, divided by the first lactate, all by 100.¹² According to this formula, positive values indicate a decrease in serum lactate, while negative values indicate an increase in serum lactate. The P/F was used to express the severity of respiratory failure, categorized into four stages: >300, 300–200, 200–100, and <100 mmHg.³⁴

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with increased lactate at admission. Cox proportional regression model was used to evaluate factors independently associated with in-hospital death at 30 days. Multivariable analyses were constructed from univariable variables having p <0.10 at entry. Lactate levels were added to multivariable models as variables of clinical interest. pH was added to multivariable models to assess the independency of the prognostic role of lactate from acidemia. Survival analysis for in-hospital death at 30 days was presented by Kaplan–Meier curves with the log-rank test and by Cox proportional hazard model. Subgroup analyses for patients with P/F ⩽300 mmHg, or with PaCO₂ ⩽ 45 mmHg, or with pH ⩽ 7.45 at admission were performed.

We assessed the discriminatory ability for lactate levels at admission by calculating the area under the curve (AUC), with AUC = 0.50 for prediction no better than chance and AUC = 1.00 for perfect discriminatory ability. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were also calculated.

With an expected incidence of in-hospital death of 20% (consistent with contemporary literature) and 40% in the elevated lactate group, a two-sided test at a significance level of 0.05 and a power of 90%, we estimated that about 200 patients with COVID-19-related respiratory failure were required to assess the prognostic role of lactate levels after adjusting for age and the severity of respiratory failure.³⁵

All tests were two-sided, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

All analyses were performed in R version 3.6.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

The study was conducted according to the amended Declaration of Helsinki. It was approved by the local ethics committee (Comitato Etico Regionale dell’Umbria, approval number CRU Unipg 20-05 SARS-CoV-2). Standard written informed consent at hospital admission has been obtained from all subjects.

Results

Characteristics of study subjects

During the study period, 383 patients with SARS-CoV-2-related respiratory failure were admitted to the study centers. After excluding 177 patients due to the lack of arterial lactate measurement at admission, 206 patients were included in the study (Figure 1). Table 1 shows the main patients’ features and ABG measures at admission according to vital status at 30 days. The median age was 71 (IQR 57–81) years. The most prevalent comorbidity was systemic arterial hypertension (54.4%).

Figure 1.

Flowchart of patient selection.

Table 1.

Main characteristics or measures of study patients at admission according to in-hospital death at 30 days.

	Characteristic/measure	Total(N = 206)	Alive(N = 149)	Dead(N = 57)	p-value
Demographics	Age, years (IQR)	71 (57–81)	66 (53–76)	81 (74–86)	<0.001
	Female, n (%)	69 (33.5%)	51 (34.2%)	18 (31.6%)	0.719
Arterial blood gas analysis	Lac, median (IQR) mmol/l	1.1 (0.9–1.5)	1.0 (0.8–1.3)	1.3 (1.0–2.1)	<0.001
	Range min–max	0.0–13.2	0.0–2.7	0.8–13.2
	Lac ⩾ 2, n (%)	30 (14.6%)	13 (8.7%)	17 (29.8%)	< 0.001
	Lac ⩾ 4, n (%)	6 (2.9%)	0 (0.0%)	6 (10.5%)	< 0.001
	pH, median (IQR)	7.46 (7.43–7.49)	7.46 (7.43–7.49)	7.46 (7.41–7.49)	0.254
	Range min–max	7.22–7.68	7.31–7.68	7.22–7.60
	PaO₂, median (IQR) mmHg	66.0 (54.0–80.0)	69.0 (55.7–81.5)	59.0 (47.0–72.0)	0.002
	Range min–max	24.0–225.0	31.0–225.0	24.0–190.0
Comorbidities	Cancer, n (%)^a	27 (13.1%)	17 (11.4%)	10 (17.5%)	0.243
	Systemic arterial hypertension, n (%)^a	112 (54.4%)	73 (49.0%)	39 (68.4%)	0.012
	Congestive heart failure, n (%)^a	18 (8.7%)	10 (6.7%)	8 (14.0%)	0.096
	Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, n (%)^a	18 (8.7%)	8 (5.4%)	10 (17.5%)	0.006
	Chronic kidney disease, n (%)^a	19 (9.2%)	8 (5.4%)	11 (19.3%)	0.002
	Chronic liver disease, n (%)^a	9 (4.4%)	3 (2.0%)	6 (10.5%)	0.007
	Diabetes mellitus, n (%)^a	43 (20.9%)	29 (19.5%)	14 (24.6%)	0.421
	Obesity, n (%)^a	32 (20.5%)	29 (25.2%)	3 (7.3%)	0.015
Respiratory support	Noninvasive ventilation, n (%)	97 (47.1%)	67 (45.0%)	30 (52.6%)	0.324
Respiratory indexes	P/F, mmHg (IQR)	261.0 (190.4–319.0)	266.8 (214.0–333.0)	201.8 (134.7–267.3)	<0.001
	P/F, n (%)				<0.001
	<100	16 (7.8%)	5 (3.4%)	11 (19.6%)
	100–200	43 (21.1%)	26 (17.6%)	17 (30.4%)
	200–300	83 (40.7%)	62 (41.9%)	21 (37.5%)
	>300	62 (30.4%)	55 (37.2%)	7 (12.5%)
	_STPF, mmHg (IQR)	208.1 (135.0–274.0)	223.7 (154.5–289.0)	157.5 (88.3–216.9)	<0.001
	RI (IQR)	4.4 (3.4–5.6)	4.9 (3.8–6.0)	3.4 (2.5–3.9)	<0.001
	ROX (IQR)	15.6 (6.5–25.1)	20.9 (9.1–27.9)	6.3 (4.1–13.0)	<0.001

IQR, interquartile range; P/F, P/F ratio; RI, respiratory index; ROX, respiratory rate-oxygenation index; _STPF, standardize P/F ratio.

History of . . . .

During hospitalization, 47.1% of patients required noninvasive mechanical respiratory strategies. Severe ARDS (P/F < 100 mmHg) at admission was present in 7.8% of patients and was more common in patients who died during hospital stay (19.6%).

Main results

At admission, 14.6% of patients had increased lactate levels ⩾2.0 mmol/l. Patients’ characteristics and ABG parameters associated with increased lactate levels at admission are reported in e-Tables 1 and 2. Age and P/F were independently associated with elevated lactate levels. In addition to P/F, standardized P/F, respiratory index, and respiratory rate-oxygenation index were inversely correlated with elevated lactate levels at univariate analysis. Lactate assessment on the second day from admission was available for 89 patients, in which Δ Lac was calculated. In 52 patients, lactate levels decreased, while in 37 patients, lactate levels increased.

In-hospital death at 30 days occurred in 57 patients (27.7%) (Table 1). Death occurred in 22.3% and 56.7% of patients with normal and increased lactate at admission, respectively, and these data accounted for a 56.7% positive predictive value and a 77.3% negative predictive value. The median lactate level was 1.0 (IQR 0.8–1.3) mmol/l in survivors at 30 days and 1.3 (IQR 1.0–2.1) mmol/l in patients who died during hospital stay (p-value < 0.001). In particular, 17 out of 57 (29.8%) and 13 out of 149 (8.7%) patients who died and who survived respectively had increased lactate levels at admission (sensitivity 29.8%, specificity 91.3%). Of note, all patients with lactate ⩾4 mmol/l at admission died during the hospital stay. e-Table 3 shows factors associated with death at 30 days at univariate analysis. The risk for death associated with lactate and pH values at admission is shown in Figure 2 and e-Figure 1. At multivariate analysis, lactate levels ⩾2 or ⩾4 mmol/l at admission were independently associated with in-hospital death at 30 days (HR 2.53, 95% CI 1.29–4.95, p-value 0.0066; HR 8.10, 95% CI 1.88–34.87, p-value 0.0050, respectively), as it was the case for P/F <100, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and age (Table 2; Figure 3; and e-Figure 2). Adjusted survival curves based on Cox proportional hazard model are shown in e-Figure 3. Lactate increase at 24 h was not associated with death (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.42–4.49, p-value 0.6045).

Figure 2.

Risk of death at 30 days associated with arterial lactate level at admission.

Table 2.

Risk factor for in-hospital death at 30 days (Cox proportional hazard model–multivariate).

Variable	HR	95% CI	p-value
Lactate ⩾ 2 mmol/l	2.53	1.29–4.95	0.0066
pH < 7.35	0.53	0.16–1.77	0.3053
P/F < 100	5.28	1.81–15.42	0.0024
P/F 100–200	2.08	0.78–5.23	0.1404
P/F 200–300	1.83	0.73–4.60	0.1992
Age	1.06	1.03–1.08	<0.001
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease	3.45	1.64–7.25	0.0011
Chronic kidney disease	2.60	1.28–5.30	0.0083
Variable	HR	95% CI	p-value
Lactate ⩾ 4 mmol/l	8.10	1.88–34.87	0.0050
pH < 7.35	0.25	0.05–1.21	0.0848
P/F < 100	4.62	1.47–14.56	0.0089
P/F 100–200	2.47	0.94–6.49	0.0672
P/F 200–300	1.94	0.78–4.87	0.1559
Age	1.05	1.03–1.08	0.0001
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease	2.89	1.36–6.14	0.0058
Chronic kidney disease	2.33	1.15–4.70	0.0186
Variable	HR	95% CI	p-value
Δ Lac ⩾ 0	1.37	0.42–4.49	0.6045
pH < 7.35	0.28	0.05–1.66	0.1620
P/F < 100	12.72	2.16–74.98	0.0050
P/F 100–200	0.89	0.11–7.35	0.9116
P/F 200–300	3.28	0.56–19.35	0.1897
Age	1.07	1.02–1.13	0.0073
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease	4.84	1.13–20.78	0.0340
Chronic kidney disease	2.35	0.42–13.17	0.3301

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; P/F, P/F ratio.

Figure 3.

Kaplan–Meier survival curves based on cutoff lactate level of 2 mmol/l for 30-days in-hospital death.

Of note, the AUC for lactate levels at admission to predict 30-day in-hospital death was 0.69 (95% CI 0.61–0.77) (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Discriminatory ability of lactate levels at admission for in-hospital death at 30 days.

The association between lactate ⩾2 or ⩾4 mmol/l at admission and in-hospital death at 30 days was confirmed even in patients having a P/F ratio ⩽300 mmHg and in patients with pCO₂ ⩽45 mmHg at admission (e-Tables 4 and 5). A positive nonsignificant association was found in the subgroup of patients with pH ⩽7.45, but the sample size was small (85 patients) (e-Table 6).

Discussion

Our study shows that in non-ICU patients admitted for COVID-19-related respiratory failure, elevated lactate levels at admission are independently associated with in-hospital death at 30 days. The association is confirmed in patients with P/F ⩽300 mmHg at admission. Lactate clearance, considered as a variation of lactate levels at 24 h, was not significantly associated with in-hospital death.

Lactate is a reversible product of glucose metabolism generated in anaerobic metabolism, and it is associated with the metabolic response to stress. Hyperlactatemia may originate from several causes: tissue hypoxia or deficit in oxygen delivery, impaired oxygen extraction, peripheral shunting, stress, and increased adrenergic stimulation.¹⁸ Overall, hyperlactatemia should be regarded as an adaptive response to an injury rather than a simple marker of tissue hypoxia.²² In fact, lactate may play a role as an alternative energy supply in shock patients.^22,24,36,37 Overall, high lactate levels may be seen as a stress response with activation of the sympathetic nervous system, increased glycolysis, and a modified bioenergetic supply.^18,22,38 The role of lactate as a predictor of death in critically ill patients is established, mainly in sepsis.^21,39,40 Updated guidelines from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommend assessing lactate and lactate kinetics to manage critically ill COVID-19 patients, with a low level of evidence.⁴¹ Studies in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU suggested a positive association between hyperlactatemia or lactate clearance and mortality.^28–30 Limited data exist on the potential association of arterial or venous lactate levels with mortality in non-ICU COVID-19 patients.^31,32 In our study of non-ICU patients, hyperlactatemia at admission was independently associated with in-hospital death at 30 days. Moreover, increased lactate levels were associated with the severity of respiratory failure as defined according to different respiratory indexes. However, in our study lactate clearance at 24 h was not significantly associated with in-hospital death. Whether the lack of association could have been influenced by the timing of assessment (24 h) or whether this analysis would have required a larger sample size is debatable. Indeed, the mean time to death in our study was 10 ± 7 days. With this time lag, the role of lactate clearance at 24 h could be of limited clinical value.

The discriminatory power for lactate levels at admission to predict in-hospital death was modest. However, hyperlactatemia (⩾2 mmol/l) showed a high specificity to predict death. In particular, all patients with lactate ⩾4 mmol/l died at 30 days. Future studies are required to confirm these thresholds and results.

In a retrospective cohort study of critically ill COVID-19 patients treated in the ICU, lower blood pH was a strong prognostic factor for fatal outcomes.⁴² In our study, elevated lactate levels were associated with in-hospital death regardless of acidemia or impaired kidney function, a condition linked to acidemia in hyperlactatemia.¹⁸ The increase in lactate levels is a marker of prolonged and severe hypoxia at the tissue level that recognizes a wide range of causes. An increase in lactates may allow emergency physicians to rapidly identify critically ill patients before the compensation mechanisms are exhausted. At various stages of the pandemic, hospital overcrowding resulted in guidelines that suggested postponing access to the ED in favor of home management. These strategies have often proved unsuccessful, while better results in terms of survival may be obtained with early (and possibly noninvasive) treatments. Our data, showing higher mortality in patients with elevated lactate at ED access, confirm this interpretation.

Like other studies, we considered in-hospital death as the study outcome.¹¹ Death is a hard clinical event, independent of physician judgment. Differently, the decision to admit a patient to the ICU is physician-dependent, and death in the ICU is subjective to other non-COVID-related complications, such as bacterial superinfections.⁴³

Our study has some limits. First, one of the study cohorts was retrospective. Second, the low proportion of patients with a second assessment at 24 h could have limited the analysis to demonstrate a significant association between Δ Lac and adverse outcome, so further studies with a larger sample size would be required. Moreover, cutoff values for lactate levels of 2 and 4 mmol/l were considered according to previous studies and guidelines in septic patients, while more accurate values could be validated in further studies of COVID-19 patients.

Our study also presents some strengths. In particular, it is among the first to have demonstrated an association between elevated lactate levels and adverse outcomes in non-ICU COVID-19 patients, providing an adequate sample size for the credibility of the results.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study shows that elevated arterial lactate is independently associated with in-hospital death at 30 days in non-ICU patients admitted for COVID-19-related respiratory failure. Prospective studies are required to confirm the prognostic role of arterial lactate in this particular setting.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-tar-10.1177_17534666231186730 – Supplemental material for Arterial lactate as a risk factor for death in respiratory failure related to coronavirus disease 2019: an observational study

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-tar-10.1177_17534666231186730 for Arterial lactate as a risk factor for death in respiratory failure related to coronavirus disease 2019: an observational study by Giorgio Maraziti, Laura Marchini, Greta Barbieri, Marco Falcone, Francesco Corradi, Mara Graziani, Lorenzo Ghiadoni and Cecilia Becattini in Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the critical revision of the manuscript by Prof. Stefano Nava, Università Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna, IRCCS Ospedale di Sant’Orsola, Bologna.

Declarations

ORCID iD

Giorgio Maraziti

Supplemental material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Wiersinga

Rhodes

Cheng

, et al. Pathophysiology, transmission, diagnosis, and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a review. JAMA 2020; 324: 782–793.

McGoogan

JM.

Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020; 323: 1239–1242.

Oran

Topol

EJ.

The proportion of SARS-CoV-2 infections that are asymptomatic: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2021; 174: 655–662

Gupta

Hayek

Wang

, et al. Factors associated with death in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in the US. JAMA Intern Med 2020; 180: 1436–1447.

Corradini

Ventura

Ageno

, et al. Clinical factors associated with death in 3044 COVID-19 patients managed in internal medicine wards in Italy: results from the SIMI-COVID-19 study of the Italian Society of Internal Medicine (SIMI). Intern Emerg Med 2021; 16: 1005–1015.

Sjoding

Admon

Saha

, et al. Comparing clinical features and outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2021; 18: 1876–1885.

Cueto-Manzano

Espinel-Bermudez

Hernandez-Gonzalez

, et al. Risk factors for mortality of adult patients with COVID-19 hospitalised in an emerging country: a cohort study. BMJ Open 2021; 11: e050321.

Roig-Marín

Roig-Rico

Ground-glass opacity on emergency department chest X-ray: a risk factor for in-hospital mortality and organ failure in elderly admitted for COVID-19. Postgrad Med 2023; 135: 265–272.

Graziani

Barbieri

Maraziti

, et al. The role of prone positioning in patients with SARS-CoV-2-related respiratory failure in non-intensive care unit. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2023; 17: 17534666231164536.

10.

Tobin

Jubran

Laghi

PaO2 /FIO2 ratio: the mismeasure of oxygenation in COVID-19. Eur Respir J 2021; 57: 2100274.

11.

Maraziti

Becattini

Early variation of respiratory indexes to predict death or ICU admission in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2-related respiratory failure. Respiration 2022; 101: 632–637.

12.

Masyuk

Wernly

Lichtenauer

, et al. Prognostic relevance of serum lactate kinetics in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45: 55–61.

13.

Bruno

Wernly

Binneboessel

, et al. Failure of lactate clearance predicts the outcome of critically ill septic patients. Diagnostics 2020; 10: 1105.

14.

Hernandez

Bellomo

Bakker

The ten pitfalls of lactate clearance in sepsis. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45: 82–85.

15.

Borthwick

Brunt

Mitchem

, et al. Does lactate measurement performed on admission predict clinical outcome on the intensive care unit? A concise systematic review. Ann Clin Biochem 2012; 49: 391–394.

16.

Dellinger

Levy

Rhodes

, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39: 165–228.

17.

Evans

Rhodes

Alhazzani

, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med 2021; 47: 1181–1247.

18.

Gattinoni

Vasques

Camporota

, et al. Understanding lactatemia in human sepsis. Potential impact for early management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 200: 582–589.

19.

Bakker

Gris

Coffernils

, et al. Serial blood lactate levels can predict the development of multiple organ failure following septic shock. Am J Surg 1996; 171: 221–226.

20.

Manikis

Jankowski

Zhang

, et al. Correlation of serial blood lactate levels to organ failure and mortality after trauma. Am J Emerg Med 1995; 13: 619–622.

21.

Rivers

Nguyen

Havstad

, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1368–1377.

22.

Levy

Lactate and shock state: the metabolic view. Curr Opin Crit Care 2006; 12: 315–321.

23.

Mizock

Falk

JL.

Lactic acidosis in critical illness. Crit Care Med 1992; 20: 80–93.

24.

Gladden

LB.

Lactate metabolism: a new paradigm for the third millennium. J Physiol 2004; 558: 5–30.

25.

Chen

CS.

Lactate on emergency department arrival as a predictor of mortality and site-of-care in pneumonia patients: a cohort study. Thorax 2015; 70: 404–410.

26.

Frenzen

Kutschan

Meiswinkel

, et al. Admission lactate predicts poor prognosis independently of the CRB/CURB-65 scores in community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Microbiol Infect 2018; 24: 306.e1–306.e6.

27.

Gwak

Jeong

, et al. Initial serum lactate level is associated with inpatient mortality in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Emerg Med 2015; 33: 685–690.

28.

Bruno

Wernly

Flaatten

, et al. Lactate is associated with mortality in very old intensive care patients suffering from COVID-19: results from an international observational study of 2860 patients. Ann Intensive Care 2021; 11: 128.

29.

Vassiliou

Jahaj

Ilias

, et al. Lactate kinetics reflect organ dysfunction and are associated with adverse outcomes in intensive care unit patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: preliminary results from a Greek single-centre study. Metabolites 2020; 10: 386.

30.

Nardi

Sanson

Tassinari

, et al. Lactate arterial-central venous gradient among COVID-19 patients in ICU: a potential tool in the clinical practice. Crit Care Res Pract 2020; 2020: 4743904

31.

Velavan

Kieu

Linh LT

Kreidenweiss

, et al. Longitudinal monitoring of lactate in hospitalized and ambulatory COVID-19 patients. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2021; 104: 1041–1044.

32.

Hökenek

NMA

Rohat . Prognostic value of blood gas lactate levels among COVID-19 patients. J Clin Med Kaz 2021; 18: 87–90.

33.

Singer

Deutschman

Seymour

, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315: 801–810.

34.

The ARDS Definition Task Force. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition. JAMA 2012; 307: 2526–2533.

35.

Rosner

Fundamentals of biostatistics. 8th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning, 2016.

36.

Garcia-Alvarez

Marik

Bellomo

Stress hyperlactataemia: present understanding and controversy. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014; 2: 339–347.

37.

Revelly

Tappy

Martinez

, et al. Lactate and glucose metabolism in severe sepsis and cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Med 2005; 33: 2235–2240.

38.

Lazzeri

Valente

Chiostri

, et al. Clinical significance of lactate in acute cardiac patients. World J Cardiol 2015; 7: 483–489.

39.

Bakker

Nijsten

Jansen

TC.

Clinical use of lactate monitoring in critically ill patients. Ann Intensive Care 2013; 3: 12.

40.

Vincent

Quintairos

ESA

Couto

, et al. The value of blood lactate kinetics in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care 2016; 20: 257.

41.

Alhazzani

Evans

Alshamsi

, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines on the management of adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the ICU: first update. Crit Care Med 2021; 49: e219–e34.

42.

Kieninger

Sinning

Vadász

, et al. Lower blood pH as a strong prognostic factor for fatal outcomes in critically ill COVID-19 patients at an intensive care unit: a multivariable analysis. PLoS ONE 2021; 16: e0258018.

43.

Falcone

Tiseo

Giordano

, et al. Predictors of hospital-acquired bacterial and fungal superinfections in COVID-19: a prospective observational study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021; 76: 1078–1084.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.18 MB