Recent advances in cervical spinal cord stimulation (SCS) have demonstrated improved efficacy as a therapeutic intervention for restoring hand functions in individuals with spinal cord injuries or stroke. Accumulating evidence consistently shows that cervical SCS yields significant improvements in grip force, proximal arm strength and muscle activation, with both immediate and sustained effects. This review synthesizes the evidence that electrical stimulations modulate the spinal and supraspinal organization of uninjured descending motor tracts, primarily the residual corticospinal tract, reticulospinal tract and propriospinal network of neurons, as well as increasing the sensitivity of spinal interneurons at the stimulated segments to these inputs. Additionally, we examine contemporary strategies aimed at achieving more precise patterned stimulations, including intraspinal microstimulation, ventral cord stimulation and closed-loop neuromodulation, and discuss the potential benefits of incorporating cervical SCS into a multimodal treatment paradigm.
AlstermarkBPetterssonLGNishimuraY, et al.
Motor command for precision grip in the macaque monkey can be mediated by spinal interneurons. J Neurophysiol. 2011,
106: 122–6.
2.
AndersonDJKipkeDRNagelSJ, et al.
Intradural spinal cord stimulation: performance modeling of a new modality. Front Neurosci. 2019,
13: 253.
3.
AndersonKD.Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004,
21: 1371–83.
4.
AngeliCAEdgertonVRGerasimenkoYPHarkemaSJ.Altering spinal cord excitability enables voluntary movements after chronic complete paralysis in humans. Brain. 2014,
137: 1394–409.
5.
AngerhöferCColucciAVermehrenMHömbergVSoekadarSR.Post-stroke rehabilitation of severe upper limb paresis in Germany – toward long-term treatment with brain–computer interfaces. Front Neurol. 2021,
12: 772199.
6.
BakerSN.The primate reticulospinal tract, hand function and functional recovery. J Physiol. 2011,
589: 5603–12.
7.
BakerSNPerezMA.Reticulospinal Contributions to Gross Hand Function after Human Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurosci. 2017,
37: 9778–84.
8.
BaldwinKMHaddadFPandorfCERoyRREdgertonVR.Alterations in muscle mass and contractile phenotype in response to unloading models: role of transcriptional/pretranslational mechanisms. Front Physiol. 2013,
4: 284.
9.
BamfordJPutmanCMushahwarV.Intraspinal microstimulation preferentially recruits fatigue-resistant muscle fibres and generates gradual force in rat. J Physiol. 2005,
569: 873–84.
10.
BareyreFMKerschensteinerMRaineteauOMettenleiterTCWeinmannOSchwabME.The injured spinal cord spontaneously forms a new intraspinal circuit in adult rats. Nat Neurosci. 2004,
7: 269–77.
11.
BasileGAQuartuMBertinoS, et al.
Red nucleus structure and function: from anatomy to clinical neurosciences. Brain Struct Funct. 2021,
226: 69–91.
12.
BenavidesFDJoHJLundellHEdgertonVRGerasimenkoYPerezMA.Cortical and subcortical effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in humans with tetraplegia. J Neurosci. 2020,
40: 2633–43.
13.
van den BrandRHeutschiJBarraudQ, et al.
Restoring voluntary control of locomotion after paralyzing spinal cord injury. Science. 2012,
336: 1182–5.
14.
BrösamleCSchwabME.Cells of origin, course, and termination patterns of the ventral, uncrossed component of the mature rat corticospinal tract. J Comp Neurol. 1997,
386: 293–303.
15.
BrownstoneRMChopekJW.Reticulospinal systems for tuning motor commands. Frontiers in Neural Circuits. 2018,
12.
16.
Brus-RamerMCarmelJBMartinJH.Motor cortex bilateral motor representation depends on subcortical and interhemispheric interactions. J Neurosci. 2009,
29: 6196–206.
17.
BurnhamRMartinTSteinRBellGMacLeanISteadwardR.Skeletal muscle fibre type transformation following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1997,
35: 86–91.
18.
CamposRJDimitrijevicMMFaganelJSharkeyPC.Clinical evaluation of the effect of spinal cord stimulation on motor performance in patients with upper motor neuron lesions. Appl Neurophysiol. 1981,
44: 141–51.
19.
CapogrossoMWengerNRaspopovicS, et al.
A computational model for epidural electrical stimulation of spinal sensorimotor circuits. J Neurosci. 2013,
33: 19326–40.
20.
CarmelJBMartinJH.Motor cortex electrical stimulation augments sprouting of the corticospinal tract and promotes recovery of motor function. Front Integr Neurosci. 2014,
8: 51.
21.
CarrollSCooperCBrownDSormannGFloodSDenisonM.Australian experience with the Freehand System for restoring grasp in quadriplegia. Aust N Z J Surg. 2000,
70: 563–8.
22.
CastroMJAppleDFStaronRSCamposGEDudleyGA.Influence of complete spinal cord injury on skeletal muscle within 6 mo of injury. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999,
86: 350–8.
23.
ChandrasekaranSBhagatNARamdeoR, et al.
Targeted transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation promotes persistent recovery of upper limb strength and tactile sensation in spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Front Neurosci. 2023,
17: 1210328.
24.
CookAWWeinsteinSP.Chronic dorsal column stimulation in multiple sclerosis. Preliminary report. N Y State J Med. 1973,
73: 2868–72.
25.
CourtineGSongBRoyRR, et al.
Recovery of supraspinal control of stepping via indirect propriospinal relay connections after spinal cord injury. Nat Med. 2008,
14: 69–74.
26.
DavidsonAGBufordJA.Motor outputs from the primate reticular formation to shoulder muscles as revealed by stimulus-triggered averaging. J Neurophysiol. 2004,
92: 83–95.
27.
DavisRGrayEKudzmaJ.Beneficial augmentation following dorsal column stimulation in some neurological diseases. Appl Neurophysiol. 1981,
44: 37–49.
28.
DawsonJLiuCYFranciscoGE, et al.
Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb motor function after ischaemic stroke (VNS-REHAB): a randomised, blinded, pivotal, device trial. Lancet. 2021,
397: 1545–53.
29.
DengLRavenscraftBXuX-M.Exploring propriospinal neuron-mediated neural circuit plasticity using recombinant viruses after spinal cord injury. Experimental Neurology. 2022,
349: 113962.
30.
DimitrijevicMMDimitrijevicMRIllisLSNakajimaKSharkeyPCSherwoodAM. Spinal cord stimulation for the control of spasticity in patients with chronic spinal cord injury: I. Clinical observations. Central Nervous System Trauma. 1986,
3: 129–43.
31.
DonkorES.Stroke in the 21st century: a snapshot of the burden, epidemiology, and quality of life. Stroke Res Treat. 2018,
2018: 3238165.
32.
DooleyDMSharkeyJ.Electrical stimulation of the spinal cord in patients with demyelinating and degenerative diseases of the central nervous system. Appl Neurophysiol. 1981,
44: 218–24.
33.
DuanRQuMYuanY, et al.
Clinical benefit of rehabilitation training in spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021,
46: E398–410.
34.
EdgertonVRHarkemaS.Epidural stimulation of the spinal cord in spinal cord injury: current status and future challenges. Expert Rev Neurother. 2011,
11: 1351–3.
35.
EisdorferJTSmitRDKeefeKMLemayMASmithGMSpenceAJ.Epidural Electrical Stimulation: A Review of Plasticity Mechanisms That Are Hypothesized to Underlie Enhanced Recovery From Spinal Cord Injury With Stimulation. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience. 2020,
13.
36.
FehlingsMGWongTHTatorCHTymianskiM.Effect of a direct current field on axons after experimental spinal cord injury. Can J Surg. 1989,
32: 188–91.
37.
FengJLiTLvM, et al.
Reconstruction of paralyzed arm function in patients with hemiplegia through contralateral seventh cervical nerve cross transfer: a multicenter study and real-world practice guidance. eClinicalMedicine. 2022,
43.
38.
FilliLSchwabME.Structural and functional reorganization of propriospinal connections promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Neural Regen Res. 2015,
10: 509–13.
39.
FilliLEngmannAKZörnerB, et al.
Bridging the gap: a reticulo-propriospinal detour bypassing an incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neurosci. 2014,
34: 13399–410.
40.
FlynnJRGrahamBAGaleaMPCallisterRJ.The role of propriospinal interneurons in recovery from spinal cord injury. Neuropharmacology. 2011,
60: 809–22.
41.
FouadKPedersenVSchwabMEBrösamleC.Cervical sprouting of corticospinal fibers after thoracic spinal cord injury accompanies shifts in evoked motor responses. Curr Biol. 2001,
11: 1766–70.
42.
FoxKStrykerM.Integrating Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity: introduction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017,
372: 20160413.
43.
FreyvertYYongNAMorikawaE, et al.
Engaging cervical spinal circuitry with non-invasive spinal stimulation and buspirone to restore hand function in chronic motor complete patients. Sci Rep. 2018,
8: 15546.
44.
GadPLeeSTerrafrancaN, et al.
Non-invasive activation of cervical spinal networks after severe paralysis. J Neurotrauma. 2018,
35: 2145–58.
45.
GrahnPJLavrovIASayenkoDG, et al.
Enabling task-specific volitional motor functions via spinal cord neuromodulation in a human with paraplegia. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2017,
92: 544–54.
46.
GreinerNBarraBSchiavoneG, et al.
Recruitment of upper-limb motoneurons with epidural electrical stimulation of the cervical spinal cord. Nat Commun. 2021,
12: 435.
47.
GrillnerS.The Brain in Motion: From Microcircuits to Global Brain Function.
The MIT Press,
MA, 2023.
48.
GuihoTBakerSNJacksonA.Epidural and transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation facilitates descending inputs to upper-limb motoneurons in monkeys. J Neural Eng. 2021,
18: 046011.
49.
HarkemaSGerasimenkoYHodesJ, et al.
Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study. Lancet. 2011,
377: 1938–47.
50.
HatemSMSaussezGdella FailleM, et al.
Rehabilitation of motor function after stroke: a multiple systematic review focused on techniques to stimulate upper extremity recovery. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016,
10: 442.
51.
HoganMKBarberSMRaoZ, et al.
A wireless spinal stimulation system for ventral activation of the rat cervical spinal cord. Sci Rep. 2021,
11: 14900.
52.
HuangRNikooyanAAMooreLD, et al.
Minimal handgrip force is needed for transcutaneous electrical stimulation to improve hand functions of patients with severe spinal cord injury. Sci Rep. 2022,
12: 7733.
53.
InaniciFSamejimaSGadPEdgertonVRHofstetterCPMoritzCT.Transcutaneous electrical spinal stimulation promotes long-term recovery of upper extremity function in chronic tetraplegia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2018,
26: 1272–8.
54.
InaniciFBrightonLNSamejimaSHofstetterCPMoritzCT.Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation restores hand and arm function after spinal cord injury. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2021,
29: 310–9.
55.
IsaTNishimuraY.Plasticity for recovery after partial spinal cord injury – hierarchical organization. Neurosci Res. 2014,
78: 3–8.
56.
JaveedSDibbleCFGreenbergJK, et al.
Upper limb nerve transfer surgery in patients with tetraplegia. JAMA Network Open. 2022,
5: e2243890.
57.
JinBAlamMTiernoA, et al.
Serotonergic facilitation of forelimb functional recovery in rats with cervical spinal cord injury. Neurotherapeutics. 2021,
18: 1226–43.
58.
KastenMRSunshineMDSecristESHornerPJMoritzCT.Therapeutic intraspinal microstimulation improves forelimb function after cervical contusion injury. J Neural Eng. 2013,
10: 044001.
59.
KikkertSPfyfferDVerlingMFreundPWenderothN.Finger somatotopy is preserved after tetraplegia but deteriorates over time. eLife. 2021,
10: e67713.
60.
KinoshitaMMatsuiRKatoS, et al.
Genetic dissection of the circuit for hand dexterity in primates. Nature. 2012,
487: 235–8.
61.
KiwerskiJ.Stimulation of the spinal cord in the treatment of traumatic injuries of cervical spine. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1986,
49: 166–71.
62.
KnotkovaHHamaniCSivanesanE, et al.
Neuromodulation for chronic pain. Lancet. 2021,
397: 2111–24.
63.
LawrenceDGKuypersHG.The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey. I. The effects of bilateral pyramidal lesions. Brain. 1968a,
91: 1–14.
64.
LawrenceDGKuypersHG.The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey. II. The effects of lesions of the descendingbrain-stem pathways. Brain. 1968b,
91: 15–36.
65.
LemonRN.Descending pathways in motor control. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008,
31: 195–218.
66.
LiuYYangXHeZ, et al.
Spinal cord injury: global burden from 1990 to 2019 and projections up to 2030 using Bayesian age-period-cohort analysis. Front Neurol. 2023,
14.
67.
LorachHGalvezASpagnoloV, et al.
Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain-spine interface. Nature. 2023,
618: 126–33.
68.
LuDCEdgertonVRModaberM, et al.
Engaging cervical spinal cord networks to reenable volitional control of hand function in tetraplegic patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016,
30: 951–62.
69.
MatsuyamaKTakakusakiKNakajimaKMoriS.Multi-segmental innervation of single pontine reticulospinal axons in the cervico-thoracic region of the cat: anterograde PHA-L tracing study. J Comp Neurol. 1997,
377: 234–50.
70.
MayZFenrichKKDahlbyJBattyNJTorres-EspínAFouadK.Following spinal cord injury transected reticulospinal tract axons develop new collateral inputs to spinal interneurons in parallel with locomotor recovery. Neural Plasticity. 2017,
2017: e1932875.
71.
McKinleyWSantosKMeadeMBrookeK.Incidence and outcomes of spinal cord injury clinical syndromes. J Spinal Cord Med. 2007,
30: 215–24.
72.
McPhersonJGMillerRRPerlmutterSI.Targeted, activity-dependent spinal stimulation produces long-lasting motor recovery in chronic cervical spinal cord injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015,
112: 12193–8.
73.
MendellLM.Constructing and deconstructing the gate theory of pain. Pain. 2014,
155: 210–6.
74.
MeyerCHofstoetterUSHubliM, et al.
Immediate effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on motor function in chronic, sensorimotor incomplete spinal cord injury. J Clin Med. 2020,
9: 3541.
75.
MishraAMPalAGuptaDCarmelJB.Paired motor cortex and cervical epidural electrical stimulation timed to converge in the spinal cord promotes lasting increases in motor responses. J Physiol. 2017,
595: 6953–68.
76.
MondelloSEKastenMRHornerPJMoritzCT.Therapeutic intraspinal stimulation to generate activity and promote long-term recovery. Front Neurosci. 2014,
8: 21.
77.
MoritzCTLucasTHPerlmutterSIFetzEE.Forelimb movements and muscle responses evoked by microstimulation of cervical spinal cord in sedated monkeys. J Neurophysiol. 2007,
97: 110–20.
78.
MoritzCField-FoteECTefertillerC, et al.
Non-invasive spinal cord electrical stimulation for arm and hand function in chronic tetraplegia: a safety and efficacy trial. Nat Med. 2024,
30: 1276–83.
MushahwarVKGillardDMGauthierMJAProchazkaA.Intraspinal micro stimulation generates locomotor-like and feedback-controlled movements. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2002,
10: 68–81.
81.
NathanPWSmithMC.The rubrospinal and central tegmental tracts in man. Brain. 1982,
105: 223–69.
82.
NishimuraYMorichikaYIsaT.A subcortical oscillatory network contributes to recovery of hand dexterity after spinal cord injury. Brain. 2009,
132: 709–21.
83.
Olivares-MorenoRRodriguez-MorenoPLopez-VirgenVMacíasMAltamira-CamachoMRojas-PiloniG.Corticospinal vs rubrospinal revisited: an evolutionary perspective for sensorimotor integration. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2021,
15.
84.
PalAParkHRamamurthyA, et al.
Spinal cord associative plasticity improves forelimb sensorimotor function after cervical injury. Brain. 2022,
145: 4531–44.
85.
PatelNPooMM.Orientation of neurite growth by extracellular electric fields. J Neurosci. 1982,
2: 483–96.
86.
PetersonBWMaunzRAPittsNGMackelRG.Patterns of projection and braching of reticulospinal neurons. Exp Brain Res. 1975,
23: 333–51.
87.
Pierrot-DeseillignyE.Propriospinal transmission of part of the corticospinal excitation in humans. Muscle Nerve. 2002,
26: 155–72.
88.
PirondiniECarranzaEBalaguerJ-M, et al.
Poststroke arm and hand paresis: should we target the cervical spinal cord?Trends in Neurosciences. 2022,
45: 568–78.
89.
PowellMPVermaNSorensenE, et al.
Epidural stimulation of the cervical spinal cord for post-stroke upper-limb paresis. Nat Med. 2023,
29: 689–99.
90.
ProchazkaAGauthierMWielerMKenwellZ.The bionic glove: an electrical stimulator garment that provides controlled grasp and hand opening in quadriplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997,
78: 608–14.
91.
RaineteauOSchwabME.Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001,
2: 263–73.
92.
RattayFMinassianKDimitrijevicMR.Epidural electrical stimulation of posterior structures of the human lumbosacral cord: 2. quantitative analysis by computer modeling. Spinal Cord. 2000,
38: 473–89.
93.
RiddleCNEdgleySABakerSN.Direct and indirect connections with upper limb motoneurons from the primate reticulospinal tract. J Neurosci. 2009,
29: 4993–9.
94.
RosenJABarsoumAH.Failure of chronic dorsal column stimulation in multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology. 1979,
6: 66–7.
95.
RosenzweigESCourtineGJindrichDL, et al.
Extensive spontaneous plasticity of corticospinal projections after primate spinal cord injury. Nat Neurosci. 2010,
13: 1505–10.
96.
RowaldAKomiSDemesmaekerR, et al.
Activity-dependent spinal cord neuromodulation rapidly restores trunk and leg motor functions after complete paralysis. Nat Med. 2022,
28: 260–71.
97.
SaigalRRenziCMushahwarVK.Intraspinal microstimulation generates functional movements after spinal-cord injury. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2004,
12: 430–40.
98.
SainiVGuadaLYavagalDR.Global epidemiology of stroke and access to acute ischemic stroke interventions. Neurology. 2021,
97: S6–16.
99.
SchepensBDrewT.Independent and convergent signals from the pontomedullary reticular formation contribute to the control of posture and movement during reaching in the cat. J Neurophysiol. 2004,
92: 2217–38.
100.
SeáñezICapogrossoM.Motor improvements enabled by spinal cord stimulation combined with physical training after spinal cord injury: review of experimental evidence in animals and humans. Bioelectronic Medicine. 2021,
7: 16.
101.
SeitzRJAzariNPKnorrUBinkofskiFHerzogHFreundH-J.The role of diaschisis in stroke recovery. Stroke. 1999,
30: 1844–50.
102.
ShapovalovAI.Extrapyramidal monosynaptic and disynaptic control of mammalian alpha-motoneurons. Brain Research. 1972,
40: 105–15.
103.
SharpeANJacksonA.Upper-limb muscle responses to epidural, subdural and intraspinal stimulation of the cervical spinal cord. J Neural Eng. 2014,
11: 016005.
104.
SinghGKellerALucasK, et al.
Safety and feasibility of cervical and thoracic transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation to improve hand motor function in children with chronic spinal cord injury. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface. 2023.
105.
SunshineMDChoFSLockwoodDRFechkoASKastenMRMoritzCT.Cervical intraspinal microstimulation evokes robust forelimb movements before and after injury. J Neural Eng. 2013,
10: 036001.
106.
TakeokaAVollenweiderICourtineGArberS.Muscle spindle feedback directs locomotor recovery and circuit reorganization after spinal cord injury. Cell. 2014,
159: 1626–39.
107.
UrbanLSThorntonMAIngraham DixieKL, et al.
Formation of a novel supraspinal-spinal connectome that relearns the same motor task after complete paralysis. J Neurophysiol. 2021,
126: 957–66.
108.
WaltzJMAndreesenWHHuntDP.Spinal cord stimulation and motor disorders. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 1987,
10: 180–204.
109.
WelniarzQDusartIRozeE.The corticospinal tract: evolution, development, and human disorders. Developmental Neurobiology. 2017,
77: 810–29.
110.
WoodingtonBJLeiJCarnicer-LombarteA, et al.
Flexible circumferential bioelectronics to enable 360-degree recording and stimulation of the spinal cord. Sci Adv. 2024,
10: eadl1230.
111.
WuY-KLevineJMWechtJR, et al.
Posteroanterior cervical transcutaneous spinal stimulation targets ventral and dorsal nerve roots. Clin Neurophysiol. 2020,
131: 451–60.
112.
XieXCuiH yanXuSHuY.Field distribution of epidural electrical stimulation. Comput Biol Med. 2013,
43: 1673–9.
113.
YangQRamamurthyALallS, et al.
Independent replication of motor cortex and cervical spinal cord electrical stimulation to promote forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rats. Exp Neurol. 2019,
320: 112962.
114.
ZaaimiBEdgleySASoteropoulosDSBakerSN.Changes in descending motor pathway connectivity after corticospinal tract lesion in macaque monkey. Brain. 2012,
135: 2277–89.
115.
ZhangFMomeniKRamanujamA, et al.
Cervical spinal cord transcutaneous stimulation improves upper extremity and hand function in people with complete tetraplegia: a case study. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2020,
28: 3167–74.
116.
ZhengM-XHuaX-YFengJ-T, et al.
Trial of contralateral seventh cervical nerve transfer for spastic arm paralysis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2018,
378: 22–34.
117.
ZimmermannJBJacksonA.Closed-loop control of spinal cord stimulation to restore hand function after paralysis. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2014,
8.
118.
ZimmermannJBSekiKJacksonA.Reanimating the arm and hand with intraspinal microstimulation. J Neural Eng. 2011,
8: 054001.
119.
van ZylNHillBCooperCHahnJGaleaMP.Expanding traditional tendon-based techniques with nerve transfers for the restoration of upper limb function in tetraplegia: a prospective case series. The Lancet. 2019,
394: 565–75.
