We compared the short-term recovery of patients treated with trapeziometacarpal joint (TMJ) implant arthroplasty versus resection-suspension-interposition (RSI) arthroplasty. Implant patients (n = 147) had a better 3-month postoperative brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) score (mean 82) compared to RSI patients (n = 127), who had a mean score of 69. Key pinch strength at 3 months was also higher in the implant group compared to the RSI group (6.8 kg vs. 3.1 kg). At 1 year, both groups had similar brief MHQ scores, but key pinch remained higher in the implant group (7.0 kg vs. 3.9 kg [RSI]). After implant arthroplasty, employed patients returned to work after a mean of 44 days, which was significantly faster than the 84 days for RSI patients. Patients after TMJ implant arthroplasty recover significantly faster in the first 3 postoperative months compared to RSI patients. However, 1-year postoperative outcomes are similar for both cohorts, with key pinch strength remaining higher for patients with TMJ implant arthroplasty.
AthlaniLMotteDMartelMMoissenetFMottetJBeaulieuJY.Comparison of simulated key pinch after three surgical procedures for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a cadaver study. J Hand Surg Eur. 2021,
46: 1088–95.
2.
BenchimolEISmeethLGuttmannA, et al.
The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med. 2015,
12: e1001885.
3.
Cebrian-GomezRLizaur-UtrillaASebastia-ForcadaELopez-PratsFA.Outcomes of cementless joint prosthesis versus tendon interposition for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a prospective study. J Hand Surg Eur. 2019,
44: 151–8.
4.
CooneyWP3rdLeddyTPLarsonDR.Revision of thumb trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am. 2006,
31: 219–27.
5.
EatonRGGlickelSZ.Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Staging as a rationale for treatment. Hand Clin. 1987,
3: 455–71.
6.
EppingWNoackG.[Surgical treatment of the saddle joint arthrosis]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1983,
15: 168–76.
7.
FalknerFTumkayaAMThomasBPanzramBBickertBHarhausL.Dual mobility prosthesis for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: results from a prospective study of 55 prostheses. J Hand Surg Eur. 2023,
48: 566–74.
8.
FroschauerSMHolzbauerMMihalicJAKwasnyO.TOUCH® prosthesis for thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: a prospective case series. J Clin Med. 2021,
10: 4090.
9.
Gonzalez-EspinoPPottierMDetrembleurCGoffinD.Touch(R) double mobility arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: outcomes for 92 prostheses. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2021,
40: 760–4.
10.
GrobetCAudigéLEichlerKMeierFMarksMHerrenDB.Cost-Utility analysis of thumb carpometacarpal resection arthroplasty: a health economic study using real-world data. J Hand Surg Am. 2022,
47: 445–53.
11.
KapandjiA.[Clinical test of apposition and counter-apposition of the thumb]. Ann Chir Main. 1986,
5: 67–73.
12.
KenwardMGRogerJH.Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics. 1997,
53: 983–97.
13.
KnoblochKKraemerRPapstSSorgHVogtPM.German version of the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire: implications for early quality of life following collagenase injection in dupuytren contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012,
129: 886e–7e.
14.
LeeJKYoonBHLeeHIKimCChoiSHanSH.Prosthetic replacement has a clinical outcome superior to that of trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition: a meta-analysis. Orthopedics. 2021,
44: e151–e7.
15.
LussiezBFalaiseCLedouxP.Dual mobility trapeziometacarpal prosthesis: a prospective study of 107 cases with a follow-up of more than 3 years. J Hand Surg Eur. 2021,
46: 961–7.
16.
MaiaMVde MoraesVYDos SantosJBFaloppaFBellotiJC.Minimal important difference after hand surgery: a prospective assessment for DASH, MHQ, and SF-12. SICOT J. 2016,
2: 32.
17.
MarksMAudigéLHerrenDBSchindeleSNelissenRGVliet VlielandTP.Measurement properties of the German Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in patients with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014,
66: 245–52.
18.
MarksMGrobetCAudigéLHerrenDB.Clinical thresholds of symptoms for deciding on surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Eur. 2019,
44: 937–45.
19.
MarksMVliet VlielandTPAudigéLHerrenDBNelissenRGvan den HoutWB.Healthcare costs and loss of productivity in patients with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Eur. 2015,
40: 927–34.
20.
MattilaSWarisE.Revision of trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: risk factors, procedures and outcomes. Acta Orthop. 2019,
90: 389–93.
21.
MegerleKGroulsSGermannGKloetersOHellmichS.Revision surgery after trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011,
131: 205–10.
22.
RajSClayRRamjiS, et al.
Trapeziectomy versus joint replacement for first carpometacarpal (CMC 1) joint osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022,
32: 1001–21.
23.
SigfussonRLundborgG.Abductor pollicis longus tendon arthroplasty for treatment of arthrosis in the first carpometacarpal joint. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1991,
25: 73–7.
24.
TangJBGiddinsG.Why and how to report surgeons’ levels of expertise. J Hand Surg Eur. 2016,
41: 365–6.
25.
ThorkildsenRDRokkumM.Trapeziectomy with LRTI or joint replacement for CMC1 arthritis, a randomised controlled trial. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2019,
53: 361–9.
26.
van der OestMJWTeunissenJSPoelstraR, et al.
Factors affecting return to work after surgical treatment of trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Eur. 2021,
46: 979–84.
27.
WaljeeJFKimHMBurnsPBChungKC.Development of a brief, 12-item version of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011,
128: 208–20.
28.
WehrliMHenslerSSchindeleSHerrenDBMarksM.Measurement properties of the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire in patients with Dupuytren contracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2016,
41: 896–902.
29.
WeilbyA.Tendon interposition arthroplasty of the first carpo-metacarpal joint. J Hand Surg Br. 1988,
13: 421–5.
30.
WolfJMAtroshiIZhouCKarlssonJEnglundM.Sick leave after surgery for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: a population-based study. J Hand Surg Am. 2018,
43: 439–47.
31.
WoutersRMJobi-OdeneyeAOde la TorreA, et al.
A standard set for outcome measurement in patients with hand and wrist conditions: consensus by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Hand and Wrist Working Group. J Hand Surg Am. 2021,
46: 841–55.
