This study compared the responsiveness of the Hand 20 and the Japanese version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH-JSSH) questionnaires in carpal tunnel syndrome. The scores before and 3 months after surgery were used to calculate the standardized response mean and effect size. Of 57 patients enrolled in the study, 13 underwent open carpal tunnel release and 44 had endoscopic carpal tunnel release. The standardized response mean and the effect size of the Hand 20 scale were 0.60 and 0.54, respectively, and those of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand scale were 0.39 and 0.36, respectively. Compared with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire, the Hand 20 questionnaire appears to have better responsiveness for assessing the effect of treatment by carpal tunnel release.
AlotaibiNM. The cross-cultural adaptation of the disability of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH): a systematic review. Occup Ther Int. 2008, 15: 178–90.
2.
AtroshiIGummessonCAnderssonBDahlgrenEJohanssonA. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000, 71: 613–8.
3.
BeatonDEBombardierCGuilleminFFerrazMB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000, 25: 3186–91.
4.
CohenJ. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edn.Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1988: 147–51.
5.
ConstantCRMurleyAH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987, 214: 160–4.
6.
DawsonJCarrA. Outcomes evaluation in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001, 83: 313–5.
7.
De SmetL. Responsiveness of the DASH score in surgically treated basal joint arthritis of the thumb: preliminary results. Clin Rheumatol. 2004, 23: 223–4.
8.
De SmetLDe KeselRDegreefIDebeerP. Responsiveness of the Dutch version of the DASH as an outcome measure for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur. 2007, 32: 74–6.
9.
DubertTVochePDumontierCDinhA. [The DASH questionnaire. French translation of a trans-cultural adaptation] Chir Main. 2001, 20: 294–302.
10.
GayREAmadioPCJohnsonJC. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am. 2003, 28: 250–4.
11.
HudakPLAmadioPCBombardierC. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996, 29: 602–8.
12.
HunsakerFGCioffiDAAmadioPCWrightJGCaughlinB. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons outcomes instruments: normative values from the general population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002, 84-A: 208–15.
13.
ImaedaTHirataHTohS. Comparative responsiveness of Japanese versions of the DASH and SF-36 questionnaires and physical measurement to clinical changes after carpal tunnel release. Hand Surg. 2006, 11: 27–33.
14.
ImaedaTTohSNakaoY. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the hand version of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire. J Orthop Sci. 2005, 10: 353–9.
15.
ImaedaTUchiyamaSTohS. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the carpal tunnel syndrome instrument. J Orthop Sci. 2007, 12: 14–21.
16.
ItsuboTUchiyamaSMomoseTYasutomiTImaedaTKatoH. Electrophysiological responsiveness and quality of life (QuickDASH, CTSI) evaluation of surgically treated carpal tunnel syndrome. J Orthop Sci. 2009, 14: 17–23.
17.
JanssenSDe SmetL. Responsiveness of the DASH questionnaire for surgically treated tennis elbow. Acta Chir Belg. 2008, 108: 583–5.
18.
JesterAHarthAGermannG. Measuring levels of upper-extremity disability in employed adults using the DASH Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 2005, 30: 1074e1–e10.
19.
KingGJRichardsRRZuckermanJD. A standardized method for assessment of elbow function. Research Committee, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999, 8: 351–4.
20.
KirkleyAGriffinSMcLintockHNgL. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Am J Sports Med. 1998, 26: 764–72.
21.
KotsisSVChungKC. Responsiveness of the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2005, 30: 81–6.
22.
KurimotoSSuzukiMYamamotoMOkuiNImaedaTHirataH. Development and validation of a ten-item questionnaire with explanatory illustrations to assess upper extremity disorders: favorable effect of illustrations in the item reduction process. J Orthop Sci. 2011, 16: 737–44.
23.
KurimotoSYamamotoMShinoharaTTatebeMKatsuyukiIHirataH. Favorable effects of explanatory illustrations attached to a self-administered questionnaire for upper extremity disorders. Qual Life Res. Epub ahead of print 22July2012. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0233-4.
24.
LeeEWLauJSChungMMLiAPLoSK. Evaluation of the Chinese version of the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH-HKPWH): cross-cultural adaptation process, internal consistency and reliability study. J Hand Ther. 2004, 17: 417–23.
25.
LevineDWSimmonsBPKorisMJ. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993, 75: 1585–92.
OffenbaecherMEwertTSanghaOStuckiG. Validation of a German version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH-G). J Rheumatol. 2002, 29: 401–2.
28.
OrfaleAGAraujoPMFerrazMBNatourJ. Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the reliability of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2005, 38: 293–302.
29.
PaduaLLoMonacoMGregoriBValenteEMPaduaRTonaliP. Neurophysiological classification and sensitivity in 500 carpal tunnel syndrome hands. Acta Neurol Scand. 1997, 96: 211–7.
30.
PaduaRPaduaLCeccarelliE. Italian version of the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation. J Hand Surg Br. 2003, 28: 179–86.
31.
RosalesRSDelgadoEBDiez de la Lastra-BoschI. Evaluation of the Spanish version of the DASH and carpal tunnel syndrome health-related quality-of-life instruments: cross-cultural adaptation process and reliability. J Hand Surg Am. 2002, 27: 334–43.
32.
SuzukiMKurimotoSShinoharaTTatebeMImaedaTHirataH. Development and validation of an illustrated questionnaire to evaluate disabilities of the upper limb. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010, 92: 963–9.
33.
ThemistocleousGSGoudelisGKyrouI. Translation into Greek, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH). J Hand Ther. 2006, 19: 350–7.
34.
UchiyamaSImaedaTTohS. Comparison of responsiveness of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the carpal tunnel syndrome instrument to surgical treatment with DASH, SF-36, and physical findings. J Orthop Sci. 2007, 12: 249–53.
35.
VeehofMMSleegersEJvan VeldhovenNHSchuurmanAHvan MeeterenNL. Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV). J Hand Ther. 2002, 15: 347–54.
