The aim of this study was to quantify the amount of tendon excursion and load experienced during simulated active and passive rehabilitation exercises. Six cadaver specimens were utilized to examine tendon excursion and load. Lateral fluoroscopic images were used to measure the excursions of metal markers placed in the flexor digitorum superficialis and profundus tendons of the index, middle, and ring fingers. Measurements were performed during ten different passive and active simulated motions. Mean tendon forces were higher in all active versus passive movements. Blocking movements placed the highest loads on the flexor tendons. Active motion resulted in higher tendon excursion than did passive motion. Simulated hook position resulted in the highest total tendon excursion and the highest inter-tendinous excursion. This knowledge may help optimize the management of the post-operative exercise therapy regimen.
BainbridgeLCRobertsonCGilliesDElliotD. A comparison of post-operative mobilization of flexor tendon repairs with “passive flexion-active extension” and “controlled active motion” techniques. J Hand Surg Br. 1994, 19: 517–21.
2.
BaskiesMATuckmanDVPaksimaN. Management of flexor tendo injuries following surgical repair. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008, 66: 35–40.
3.
BeckerHOrakFDuponselleE. Early active motion following a beveled technique of flexor tendon repair: report on fifty cases. J Hand Surg Am. 1979, 4: 454–60.
4.
ChesneyAChauhanAKattanAFarrokhyarFThomaA. Systematic review of flexor tendon rehabilitation protocols in zone II of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011, 127: 1583–92.
5.
DennerleinJTDiaoEMoteCDRempelDM. In vivo finger flexor tendon force while tapping on a keyswitch. J Orthop Res. 1999, 17: 178–84.
6.
EvansRBThompsonDE. The application of force to the healing tendon. J Hand Ther. 1993, 6: 266–84.
7.
FreehanLMBeaucheneJG. Early tensile properties of healing chicken flexor tendons: early controlled passive motion versus postoperative immobilization. J Hand Surg Am. 1990, 15: 63–8.
8.
HoribeSWooSLSpiegelmanJJMarcinJPGelbermanRH. Excursion of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon: a kinematic study of the human and canine digits. J Orthop Res. 1990, 8: 167–74.
9.
HoriiELinGTCooneyWPLinscheidRLAnKN. Comparative flexor tendon excursion after passive mobilization: an in vitro study. J Hand Surg Am. 1992, 17: 559–66.
10.
KesslerINissimF. Primary repair without immobilization of flexor tendon division within the digital sheath. An experimental and clinical study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1969, 40: 587–601.
11.
KitisPTBukerNKaraIG. Comparison of two methods of controlled mobilisation of repaired flexor tendons in zone 2. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009, 43: 160–5.
12.
KorstanjeJWSchreudersTRvan der SijdeJHoviusSEBoschJGSellesRW. Ultrasonographic assessment of long finger tendon excursion in zone v during passive and active tendon gliding exercises. J Hand Surg Am. 2010, 35: 559–65.
13.
KursaKLattanzaLDiaoERempelD. In vivo flexor tendon forces increase with finger and wrist flexion during active finger flexion and extension. J Orthop Res. 2006, 24: 763–9.
14.
LeeH. Double loop locking suture: a technique of tendon repair for early active mobilization. Part I: Evolution of technique and experimental study. J Hand Surg Am. 1990, 15: 945–52.
15.
MatthewsPRichardsH. Factors in the adherence of flexor tendon after repair: an experimental study in the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1976, 58: 230–6.
McLarneyEHoffmanHWolfeSW. Biomechanical analysis of the cruciate four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 1999, 24: 295–301.
18.
MoriyaTLarsonMCZhaoCAnKNAmadioPC. The effect of core suture flexor tendon repair techniques on gliding resistance during static cycle motion and load to failure: a human cadaver study. J Hand Surg Eur. 2011, 37: 316–22.
19.
PanchalJMehdiSO’DonoghueJMO’SullivanSTO’ShaughnessyMO’ConnorTP. The range of excursion of flexor tendons in Zone V: a comparison of active vs passive flexion mobilisation regimes. Br J Plast Surg. 1997, 50: 517–22.
20.
PowellESTrailIA. Forces transmitted along human flexor tendons during passive and active movements of the fingers. J Hand Surg Br. 2004, 29: 386–9.
21.
RobertsonGAal-QattanMM. A biomechanical analysis of a new interlock suture technique for flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br. 1992, 17: 92–3.
22.
SavageR. The influence of wrist position on the minimum force required for active movement of interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Br. 1988, 13: 262–8.
23.
SchuindFGarcia-EliasMCooneyWPAnKN. Flexor tendon forces: in vivo measurements. J Hand Surg Am. 1992, 17: 291–8.
24.
SilfverskioldKLMayEJTornvallAH. Flexor digitorum profundus tendon excursions during controlled motion after flexor tendon repair in zone II: a prospective clinical study. J Hand Surg Am. 1992, 17: 122–31.
25.
SilfverskioldKLMayEJ. Gap formation after flexor tendon repair in zone II. Results with a new controlled motion programme. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1993, 27: 263–8.
26.
SoetersJNRoebroeckMEHollandWPHoviusSEStamHJ. Reliability of tendon excursion measurements in patients using a color Doppler imaging system. J Hand Surg Am. 2004, 29: 581–6.
27.
StricklandJW. Development of flexor tendon surgery: twenty-five years of progress. J Hand Surg Am. 2000, 25: 214–35.
28.
StricklandJW. The scientific basis for advances in flexor tendon surgery. J Hand Ther. 2005, 18: 94–110.
29.
TanakaTAmadioPCZhaoCZobitzMEAnKN. Flexor digitorum profundus tendon tension during finger manipulation. J Hand Ther. 2005, 18: 330–8.
30.
TrumbleTEVedderNBSeilerJGHanelDPDiaoEPettroneS. Zone-II flexor tendon repair: a randomized prospective trial of active place-and-hold therapy compared with passive motion therapy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010, 92: 1381–9.
31.
WadaAKubotaHMiyanishiKHatanakaHMiuraHIwamotoY. Comparison of postoperative early active mobilization and immobilization in vivo utilising a four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br. 2001, 26: 301–6.
32.
WehbeMAHunterJM. Flexor tendon gliding in the hand. Part I. In vivo excursions. J Hand Surg Am. 1985, 10: 570–4.
33.
WooSLGelbermanRHCobbNGAmielDLothringerKAkesonWH. The importance of controlled passive mobilization on flexor tendon healing. A biomechanical study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981, 52: 615–22.
34.
WuYFZhouYLTangJB. Relative contribution of tissue oedema and the presence of and A2 pulley to resistance to flexor tendon movement: an in vitro and in vivo study. J Hand Surg Eur. 2011, 37: 310–5.
