Despite significant advancements in flexor tendon repair techniques and rehabilitation strategies, achieving complete restoration of digital motion remains a formidable challenge. The most prevalent complications associated with tendon repair are the development of tendon adhesions and joint contractures. Left unaddressed, these complications can further lead to secondary pathomechanical changes, resulting in fixed deformities significantly affecting hand function. This review of zone-specific considerations in flexor tendon rehabilitation provides an in-depth analysis of the dynamics of tendon motion after repair and strategies to minimize common secondary complications.
Al-QattanMM.Flexor tendon repair in zone III. J Hand Surg Eur. 2011,
36: 48–52.
2.
AthwalGSWolfeSW.Treatment of acute flexor tendon injury: zones III-V. Hand Clin. 2005,
21: 181–6.
3.
BalSOzBGurganA, et al.
Anatomic and functional improvements achieved by rehabilitation in zone II and zone V flexor tendon injuries. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011,
90: 17–24.
4.
BigorreNDelaquaizeFDegezFCelerierS.Primary flexor tendons repair in zone 2: current trends with GEMMSOR survey results. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2018,
37: 281–8.
5.
BraakmanM.Normal radiographic angulation in the 4th and 5th metacarpal: a reference guide. Eur J Radiol. 1996,
22: 38–41.
6.
CaoYTangJB.Investigation of resistance of digital subcutaneous edema to gliding of the flexor tendon: an in vitro study. J Hand Surg Am. 2005,
30: 1248–54.
7.
ChinchalkarSJLantingBARossD.Swan neck deformity after distal interphalangeal joint flexion contractures: a biomechanical analysis. J Hand Ther. 2010,
23: 420–5.
8.
ChinchalkarSLarocerie-SalgadoJSuhN.Pathomechanics and management of secondary complications associated with tendon adhesions following flexor tendon repair in zone II. J Hand Microsurg. 2016,
8: 70–9.
9.
ChinchalkarSJPipicelliJGAgurAAthwalGS.Zone III flexor tendon injuries – a proposed modification to rehabilitation. J Hand Ther. 2015,
28: 319–23.
10.
ChungBChiuDTWThanikV.Relative motion flexion splinting for flexor tendon lacerations: proof of concept. Hand (N Y). 2019,
14: 193–6.
11.
CivanOGürsoyMKCavitAÖzcanlıHKaralezliMN.Tenolysis rate after zone 2 flexor tendon repairs. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2020,
31: 281–5.
12.
CooneyWPLinGTAnKN.Improved tendon excursion following flexor tendon repair. J Hand Ther. 1989,
2: 102–6.
13.
DuboussetOF.The digital joints. In: TubianaR (Ed.) The hand.
Philadelphia,
WB Saunders, 1981,
Vol. I: 191–201.
14.
DuranREHouserRG. Controlled passive motion following flexor tendon repair in zones two and three. In: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: symposium on tendon surgery in the hand. St. Louis, MO, Mosby; 1975: 105–14.
15.
DyCJHernandez-SoriaAMaYRobertsTRDaluiskiA.Complications after flexor tendon repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Am. 2012,
37: 543–51.
16.
GelbermanRHMenonJGonsalvesMAkesonWH.The effects of mobilization on the vascularization of healing flexor tendons in dogs. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980,
153: 283–9.
17.
GibsonPDSobolGLAhmedIH.Zone II flexor tendon repairs in the United States: trends in current management. J Hand Surg Am. 2017,
42: e99–e108.
18.
GrothGN.Pyramid of progressive force exercises to the injured flexor tendon. J Hand Ther. 2004,
17: 31–42.
19.
HenrySLHowellJW.Use of a relative motion flexion orthosis for postoperative management of zone I/II flexor digitorum profundus repair: a retrospective consecutive case series. J Hand Ther. 2020,
33: 296–304.
20.
HigginsALalondeDH.Flexor tendon repair postoperative rehabilitation: the Saint John protocol. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016,
23: e1134.
21.
HitchcockTFLightTRBunchWH, et al.
The effect of immediate constrained digital motion on the strength of flexor tendon repairs in chickens. J Hand Surg Am. 1987,
12: 590–5.
22.
JoSDyCJ.Flexor tendon repair: avoidance and management of complications. Hand Clin. 2023,
39: 427–34.
23.
KabakSHaliciMBaktirATürkCYAvşarogullariL.Results of treatment of the extensive volar wrist lacerations: ‘the spaghetti wrist’. Eur J Emerg Med. 2002,
9: 71–6.
24.
KleinertHEKutzJECohenMJ. Primary repair of zone 2 flexor tendon lacerations. In: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Symposium on tendon surgery in the hand. St. Louis, MO, Mosby; 1975: 91–104.
25.
LillySIMesserTM.Complications after treatment of flexor tendon injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006,
14: 387–96.
26.
MasonMLAllenHS.The rate of healing of tendons: an experimental study of tensile strength. Ann Surg. 1941,
113: 424–59.
27.
MealsCLalondeDCandelierG.Repaired flexor tendon excursion with half a fist of true active movement versus full fist place and hold in the awake patient. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019,
7: e2074.
28.
MerrittWH.Relative motion splint: active motion after extensor tendon injury and repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2014,
39: 1187–94.
29.
MerrittWHHowellJW.Relative motion orthoses: the concepts and application to hand therapy management of finger extensor tendon zone III and VII repairs, acute and chronic Boutonniere deformity, and sagittal band injury. In: SkirvenTOstermanAFedorczykJShinE (Eds.) Rehabilitation of the hand and upper extremity, 7th Edn.
Philadelphia,
Elsevier2021: 1496–510.
30.
MomeniAGrauelEChangJ.Complications after flexor tendon injuries. Hand Clin. 2010,
26: 179–89.
31.
NewingtonLRossRHowellJW.Relative motion flexion splinting for the rehabilitation of flexor tendon repairs: a systematic review. Hand Ther. 2021,
26: 102–12.
32.
NovakCBvon der HeydeRL.Rehabilitation of the upper extremity following nerve and tendon reconstruction: when and how. Semin Plast Surg. 2015,
29: 73–80.
33.
ÖksüzÇArslanÖBBaşCEAyhanE.Early active movement with relative motion flexion splint for the management of zone 1–2 flexor tendon repairs: case series. Physiother Theory Pract. 2023,
39: 2420–6.
34.
OsanamiYAokiMShiratoR, et al.
Tensile load on the flexor digitorum profundus tendon during palmar and lateral blocking exercises: influence on blocking force and distal interphalangeal joint flexion angle. J Hand Ther. 2021,
34: 555–60.
PeckFRoeANgC, et al.
The Manchester short splint: a change to splinting practice in the rehabilitation of zone II flexor tendon repairs. Hand Therapy. 2014,
19: 47–53.
37.
PetersSEJhaBRossM.Rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the hand. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021,
1: CD012479.
38.
PettengillKVan StrienG.State of the art flexor tendon rehabilitation. In: TangJBAmadioPGuimberteauJ-CChangJ (Eds.) Tendon surgery of the hand.
Philadelphia,
Saunders, 2012: 405–14.
39.
ReitoAManninenMKarjalainenT.The effect of delay to surgery on major complications after primary flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Asian Pac. 2019,
24: 161–8.
40.
RudgeWBJJamesM.Flexor tendon injuries in the hand: a UK survey of repair techniques and suture materials: are we following the evidence?ISRN Plastic Surg. 2014,
2014: 687128.
41.
SavageR.In vitro studies of a new method of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br. 1985,
10: 135–41.
42.
SavageR.The influence of wrist position on the minimum force required for active movement of the interphalangeal joints. J Hand Surg Br. 1988,
13: 262–8.
43.
SchreudersTA.The quadriga phenomenon: a review and clinical relevance. J Hand Surg Eur. 2012,
37: 513–22.
44.
SkirvenTMDeTullioLM.Therapy after flexor tendon repair. Hand Clin. 2023,
39: 181–92.
45.
StefanichRJPutnamMDPeimerCASherwinFS.Flexor tendon lacerations in zone V. J Hand Surg Am. 1992,
17: 284–91.
46.
StricklandJW.Development of flexor tendon surgery: twenty-five years of progress. J Hand Surg Am. 2000,
25: 214–35.
47.
SvingenJWiigMTuressonCFarneboSArnerM.Risk factors for reoperation after flexor tendon repair: a registry study. J Hand Surg Eur. 2022,
47: 1071–6.
48.
TanakaTAmadioPCZhaoC, et al.
Gliding characteristics and gap formation for locking and grasping tendon repairs: a biomechanical study in a human cadaver model. J Hand Surg Am. 2004,
29: 6–14.
49.
TanakaTAmadioPCZhaoCZobitzMEAnKN.Flexor digitorum profundus tendon tension during finger manipulation. J Hand Ther. 2005,
18: 330–8.
50.
TangJB.Indications, methods, postoperative motion and outcome evaluation of primary flexor tendon repairs in Zone 2. J Hand Surg Eur. 2007,
32: 118–29.
TangJB.Rehabilitation after flexor tendon repair and others: a safe and efficient protocol. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2021,
46: 813–7.
53.
TangJBShiD.Subdivision of flexor tendon “no man’s land” and different treatment methods in each sub-zone. A preliminary report. Chin Med J (Engl). 1992,
105: 60–8.
54.
TarasJSGrayRMCulpRW.Complications of flexor tendon injuries. Hand Clin. 1994.
10: 93–109.
55.
TopaITamasCPerteaM, et al.
Flexor tendon repair in “no man’s land”: postoperative management. Clin Anat. 2011,
10: 396–400.
56.
TrumbleTEVedderNBSeilerJG3rd, et al.
Zone-II flexor tendon repair: a randomized prospective trial of active place-and-hold therapy compared with passive motion therapy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010,
92: 1381–9.
57.
WilhelmiBJKangRHWagesDJLeeWPMayJWJr.Optimizing independent finger flexion with zone V flexor repairs using the Massachusetts General Hospital flexor tenorrhaphy and early protected active motion. J Hand Surg Am. 2005,
30: 230–6.
58.
WuYFTangJB.Recent developments in flexor tendon repair techniques and factors influencing strength of the tendon repair. J Hand Surg Eur. 2014,
39: 6–19.
59.
YiiNWUrbanMElliotD.A prospective study of flexor tendon repair in zone 5. J Hand Surg Br. 1998,
23: 642–8.
60.
YükselFPekerFAçikelCCelIközB.Secondhand management of “spaghetti wrist”: do not hesitate to explore. Ann Plast Surg. 2002,
49: 500–4.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
