Tourniquet tolerance is affected by the method of exsanguination. Two commonly used methods, tight elastic bandaging and limb elevation, were tested to determine their effects on upper extremity tourniquet tolerance in 23 healthy adult volunteers. We found that tourniquet tolerance was significantly lower among the bandaging group compared with the limb elevation group (average 19.4 min and 24.1 min, respectively). Overall, the tourniquet tolerance was not affected by hand dominance or arm circumference.
BlondLMadsenJL. Exsanguination of the upper limb in healthy young volunteers. J Bone and Joint Surg Br. 2002, 84: 481–91.
2.
BlondLJensenNVNielsenNH. Clinical consequences of different exangination methods in hand surgery. A double-blind randomized study. J Hand Surg Eur. 2008, 33: 475–7.
3.
DistefanoVNixonJStoneR. Bioeletrical impedance plethysmography as an investigative tool in orthopaedics surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974, 99:203–6.
4.
FarboodAShahbaziS. Comparison of two different methods of limb exsanguination (Esmarch bandage and limb elevation) in intravenous regional anesthesia. Clin Anesth. 2008, 20: 196–9.
MarshallPDPatilMFaircloughJA. Should Esmarch bandages be used for exsanguination in knee arthroscopy and knee replacement surgery? A prospective trial of Esmarch exsanguination versus simple elevation. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1994, 39: 189–90.
PedowitzRAGershuniDHBotteMJKuiperSRydevikBL. The use of lower inflation pressure in extremity surgery facilitated by curved and wide tourniquets and an integrated cuff inflation system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993, 287: 237–44.
SapegaAAHeppenstallRBChanceBParkYSSokolowD. Optimizing tourniquet application and release times in extremity surgery. J Bone and Joint Surg Am. 1985, 67A: 303–14.
