Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2012-6
Isolated,extra-articular neck and shaft fractures of the 4th and 5th metacarpals: a comparison of transverse and bouquet (intra-medullary) pinning in 67 patients
Although extra-articular metacarpal fractures are common, there is no consensus on the mode of treatment. We evaluated the outcome in 67 patients operated for isolated, extra-articular fractures in the neck or shaft of the ulnar two metacarpals 28 months post-operatively. There were 22 bouquet (intra-medullary) pinnings and 45 transverse pinnings; 11 were lost to follow-up. Overall, hand function was good, and no difference was detected between the two methods (QuickDASH, grip strength, range of motion, VAS pain and VAS satisfaction). Many patients suffered complications: 12% had a superficial infection (all treated with transverse pinning with wires left exposed); 39% had some impairment in skin sensation; 29% reported cold intolerance; and 10% had other complications. Due to the potential risk of a secondary fracture of the neighbouring metacarpal after transverse pinning, we recommend bouquet (intra-medullary) pinning. We also recommend burying wires beneath the skin surface to avoid infection.
AbdonPMuhlowAStigssonL. Subcapital fractures of the fifth metacarpal bone. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1984, 103: 231–4.
2.
AliAHammanJMassDP. The biomechanical effects of angulated boxer’s fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 1999, 24: 835–44.
3.
BansalRCraigenMA. Fifth metacarpal neck fractures: is follow-up required?J Hand Surg Eur. 2007, 32: 69–73.
4.
BeatonDEWrightJGKatzJN. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005, 87: 1038–46.
5.
BirndorfMSDaleyRGreenwaldDP. Metacarpal fracture angulation decreases flexor mechanical efficiency in human hands. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997, 99: 1079–83; discussion 84–5.
6.
BosworthDM. Internal splinting of fractures of the fifth metacarpal. J Bone Joint Surg. 1937;19:826-7. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006, 445: 3.
7.
BraakmanMOderwaldEEHaentjensMH. Functional taping of fractures of the 5th metacarpal results in a quicker recovery. Injury. 1998, 29: 5–9.
8.
ButtWD. Fractures of the hand. II. Statistical review. Can Med Assoc J. 1962, 86: 775–9.
9.
DebnathUKNassabRSOniJADavisTR. A prospective study of the treatment of fractures of the little finger metacarpal shaft with a short hand cast. J Hand Surg Br. 2004, 29: 214–17.
10.
EmmettJEBreckLW. A review and analysis of 11,000 fractures seen in a private practice of orthopaedic surgery, 1937–1956. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958, 40: 1169–75.
11.
FinsenV. [Norwegian version of the DASH questionnaire for examination of the arm shoulders and hand]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008, 128: 1070.
12.
FordDJAliMSSteelWM. Fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck: is reduction or immobilisation necessary?J Hand Surg Br. 1989, 14: 165–7.
13.
FoucherG. “Bouquet” osteosynthesis in metacarpal neck fractures: a series of 66 patients. J Hand Surg Am. 1995, 20: S86–90.
14.
FrazierWHMillerMFoxRSBrandDFinsethF. Hand injuries: incidence and epidemiology in an emergency service. JACEP. 1978, 7: 265–8.
15.
GonzalezMHIgramCMHallRFJr.Flexible intramedullary nailing for metacarpal fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 1995, 20: 382–7.
16.
GreerSEWilliamsJM. Boxer’s fracture: an indicator of intentional and recurrent injury. Am J Emerg Med. 1999, 17: 357–60.
17.
GudmundsenTEBorgenL. Fractures of the fifth metacarpal. Acta Radiol. 2009, 50: 296–300.
18.
HansenPBHansenTB. The treatment of fractures of the ring and little metacarpal necks. A prospective randomized study of three different types of treatment. J Hand Surg Br. 1998, 23: 245–7.
19.
HardingIJParryDBarringtonRL. The use of a moulded metacarpal brace versus neighbour strapping for fractures of the little finger metacarpal neck. J Hand Surg Br. 2001, 26: 261–3.
20.
HofmeisterEPKimJShinAY. Comparison of 2 methods of immobilization of fifth metacarpal neck fractures: a prospective randomized study. J Hand Surg Am. 2008, 33: 1362–8.
21.
HoveLM. Fractures of the hand. Distribution and relative incidence. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1993, 27: 317–19.
22.
HunterJMCowenNJ. Fifth metacarpal fractures in a compensation clinic population. A report on one hundred and thirty-three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970, 52: 1159–65.
23.
KuokkanenHOMulari-KeranenSKNiskanenROHaapalaJKKorkalaOL. Treatment of subcapital fractures of the fifth metacarpal bone: a prospective randomised comparison between functional treatment and reposition and splinting. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1999, 33: 315–17.
24.
LambDWAbernethyPARainePA. Unstable fractures of the metacarpals. A method of treatment by transverse wire fixation to intact metacarpals. Hand. 1973, 5: 43–8.
25.
ManuedduCADella SantaD. Fasciculated intramedullary pinning of metacarpal fractures. J Hand Surg Br. 1996, 21: 230–6.
McMahonPJWoodsDABurgePD. Initial treatment of closed metacarpal fractures. A controlled comparison of compression glove and splintage. J Hand Surg Br. 1994, 19: 597–600.
28.
OrbayJLTouhamiA. The treatment of unstable metacarpal and phalangeal shaft fractures with flexible nonlocking and locking intramedullary nails. Hand Clin. 2006, 22: 279–86.
PorterMLHodgkinsonJPHirstPWhartonMRCunliffeM. The boxers’ fracture: a prospective study of functional recovery. Arch Emerg Med. 1988, 5: 212–15.
31.
RobertsN. Fractures of the phalanges of the hand and metacarpals: (Section of Orthopaedics). Proc R Soc Med. 1938, 31: 793–8.
32.
Schadel-HopfnerMWildMWindolfJLinhartW. Antegrade intramedullary splinting or percutaneous retrograde crossed pinning for displaced neck fractures of the fifth metacarpal?Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007, 127: 435–40.
33.
SorensenJSFreundKGKejlaG. Functional fracture bracing in metacarpal fractures: the Galveston metacarpal brace versus a plaster-of-Paris bandage in a prospective study. J Hand Ther. 1993, 6: 263–5.
34.
Statius MullerMGPoolmanRWvan HoogstratenMJStellerEP. Immediate mobilization gives good results in boxer’s fractures with volar angulation up to 70 degrees: a prospective randomized trial comparing immediate mobilization with cast immobilization. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003, 123: 534–7.
35.
StrubBSchindeleSSondereggerJ. Intramedullary splinting or conservative treatment for displaced fractures of the little finger metacarpal neck? A prospective study. J Hand Surg Eur. 2010, 35: 725–9.
36.
TheeuwenGALemmensJAvan NiekerkJL. Conservative treatment of boxer’s fracture: a retrospective analysis. Injury. 1991, 22: 394–6.
37.
TrevisanCMorgantiACasiraghiAMarinoniEC. Low-severity metacarpal and phalangeal fractures treated with miniature plates and screws. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004, 124: 675–80.
38.
van AakenJKampfenSBerliM. Outcome of boxer’s fractures treated by a soft wrap and buddy taping: a prospective study. Hand (N Y). 2007, 2: 212–17.
39.
WestbrookAPDavisTRArmstrongDBurkeFD. The clinical significance of malunion of fractures of the neck and shaft of the little finger metacarpal. J Hand Surg Eur. 2008, 33: 732–9.
40.
WinterMBalaguerTBessiereCCarlesMLebretonE. Surgical treatment of the boxer’s fracture: transverse pinning versus intramedullary pinning. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007, 32: 709–13.
41.
WongTCIpFKYeungSH. Comparison between percutaneous transverse fixation and intramedullary K-wires in treating closed fractures of the metacarpal neck of the little finger. J Hand Surg Br. 2006, 31: 61–5.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
