Conflictual processes unfolding in legal and political social fields as well as commemorative events differentially shape social memories, including memories about genocides, in line with their rules of the game and institutional logics. News media subsequently process mnemonic struggles—carried out in law, politics, and commemorations—submitting them to the rules and norms of journalism before their messages reach the public. This article explores these processes for struggles pertaining to memories of the Armenian genocide. It is based on a quantitative and qualitative analysis of 259 English language newspaper articles published in the United States that report about a court case, a legislative process, and commemorative events. Our analysis identifies distinct patterns of representations. Differences are in line with the institutional logics of the legal and political fields and the epistemic potential of commemorative rituals, even as they interact with the logic of the journalistic field that mediates those accounts.
BaerA (2011) The voids of Sepharad: the memory of the holocaust in Spain. Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies12(1): 95–120.
8.
BensonR (1999) Field theory in comparative context: a new paradigm for media studies. Theory and Society28(3): 463–498.
9.
BensonR (2006) News media as a “journalistic field”: what Bourdieu adds to new institutionalism, and vice versa. Political Communication23: 187–202.
10.
BensonR (2019) How media ownership matters in the US: beyond the concentration debate. Sociétés Contemporaines113(1): 71–73.
11.
BondLRapsonJ (2014) The Transcultural Turn: Interrogating Memory between and beyond Borders. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
12.
BourdieuP (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJ (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood, pp. 241–258.
14.
BourdieuP (1998) On Television. New York: New Press.
15.
BourdieuPThompsonJBRaymondG (2009) Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16.
BuchholzL (2016) What is a global field? Theorizing fields beyond the nation-state. Sociological Review Monographs64(2): 31–60.
17.
CarlsonM (2009) Dueling, dancing, or dominating? Journalists and their sources. Sociology Compass3(4): 526–542.
18.
CollinsR (2005) Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
CottleS (2007) Ethnography and news production: new(s) developments in the field. Sociology Compass1(1): 1–16.
DayanDKatzEDayanD (1994) Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
DouglasL (2001) The Memory of Judgment: Making Law and History in the Trials of the Holocaust. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
DurkheimE (1995) Elementary Forms of the Religious Life: Newly Translated by Karen E. Fields. New York: Free Press.
25.
EdyJA (1999) Journalistic uses of collective memory. Journal of Communication49(2): 71–85.
26.
EyermanR (2019) Memory, Trauma, and Identity. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
FinkKSchudsonM (2014) The rise of contextual journalism, 1950s–2000s. Journalism15(1): 3–20.
28.
FligsteinNMcAdamD (2011) Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociological Theory29(1): 1–26.
29.
GansHJ (2005) Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. 2Nd Ed. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
30.
GarfinkelH (1956) Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies. The American Journal of Sociology61(5): 420–424.
31.
GensburgerS (2016) National Policy, Global Memory: The Commemoration of the “Righteous” from Jerusalem to Paris, 1942-2007. New York: Berghahn Books.
32.
HaganJ (2003) Justice in the Balkans: Prosecuting War Crimes in the Hague Tribunal. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
MarrusMR (2008) The Nuremberg Doctors’ trial and the limitations of context. In: HebererPMatthäusJ (eds) Atrocities on Trial. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 103–122.
41.
MeyersO (2021) The critical potential of commemorative journalism. Journalism22(7): 1682–1701.
42.
MoellerSD (1999) Compassion Fatigue: How the Media Sell Disease, Famine, War and Death. London: Routledge.
SapiroG (2018) Field Theory from a Transnational Perspective. In: SallazTMAJ (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 161–182.
52.
SavelsbergJJ (2015) Representing Mass Violence: Conflicting Responses to Human Rights Violations in Darfur. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
53.
SavelsbergJJ (2020) The representational power of international criminal courts. In: BergsmoMKlambergMLohneK, et al. (eds) Power in International Criminal Justice. Brussels: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, pp. 281–323.
54.
SavelsbergJJ (2021) Knowing about Genocide: Armenian Suffering and Epistemic Struggles. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
55.
SavelsbergJJKingRD (2007) Law and collective memory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science3(1): 189–211.
56.
SavelsbergJJKingRD (2011) American Memories: Atrocities and the Law. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
57.
SavelsbergJJNyseth BrehmH (2015) Global justice, national distinctions: criminalizing human rights violations in Darfur. American Journal of Sociology121(2): 564–603.
58.
SavelsbergJJPhilipsM (2022) Epistemic power of universal jurisdiction: spreading knowledge about mass atrocity crimes. Minneapolis Journal of International Law31(2): 57–95.
59.
SchudsonM (2001) The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism (London, England)2(2): 149–170.
60.
SchudsonM (2014) Journalism as a vehicle of non-commemorative cultural memory. In: ZelizerBTenenboim-WeinblattK (eds) Journalism and Memory. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 85–96.
61.
ScovilleCFligsteinN (2020) The promise of field theory for the study of political institutions. In: JanoskiTde LeonCMisraJ, et al. (eds) The New Handbook of Political Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 79–101.
62.
ShilsEYoungM (1953) The meaning of the coronation. The Sociological Review1(2): 63–81.
63.
SigalLV (1973) Reporters and Officials: The Organization and Politics of Newsmaking. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
64.
SmithP (2008) Punishment and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
65.
ThompsonA (ed.) (2019) Media and Mass Atrocity: The Rwanda Genocide and beyond. Waterloo, ON, Canada: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
UsherN (2017) Venture-backed news startups and the field of journalism. Digital Journalism5(9): 1116–1133.
68.
Wahl-JorgensenK (2013) Subjectivity and story-telling in journalism. Journalism Studies14(3): 305–320.
69.
Wahl-JorgensenKBerryMGarcia-BlancoI, et al. (2017) Rethinking balance and impartiality in journalism? How the BBC attempted and failed to change the paradigm. Journalism18(7): 781–800.
70.
WahutuJS (2017) ‘In the case of Africa in general, there is a tendency to exaggerate’: representing mass atrocity in Africa. Media Culture & Society39(6): 919–929.
71.
WahutuJS (2018) Representations of Africa in African media: the case of the Darfur violence. African Affairs117(466): 44–61.
72.
WhiteKC (2018) The Branding of Right-wing Activism: The News Media and the Tea Party. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73.
XuNGutscheREJr (2021) “Going offline”: social media, source verification, and Chinese investigative journalism during “information overload.”Journalism Practice15(8): 1146–1162.
74.
ZelizerB (1992) Covering the Body: The Kennedy Assassination, the Media, and the Shaping of Collective Memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
75.
ZelizerBTenenboim-WeinblattK (eds) (2014) Journalism and Memory. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
76.
ZelizerBParkDGudelunasD (2002) How bias shapes the news: challenging The New York Times’ status as a newspaper of record on the Middle East. Journalism3(3): 283–307.
