This article focuses on how political actors appropriate the past by utilizing collective traumas for their populist cause. We demonstrate how the Ulucanlar Prison Museum in Turkey and the oppression of military interventions, for which it served as a backyard, became a tool for the AKP’s (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi-Justice and Development Party) populist agenda. Through a particular narration of history embedded in the museum, the AKP aimed to forge an internal frontier within the society between an envisioned homogenous body of people on the one hand and the elite on the other. Situating itself as the people’s authentic voice against this elite, the AKP tried to further its popular appeal and legitimize its extension of power. What appeared as coming to terms with the past was instead the instrumentalization of the past for a singular political agenda, eager to remove the complexities and pluralism of the past for the sake of telling a politically useful story.
AratoA (2013) Political theology and populism. Social Research80(1): 143–172.
2.
ArendtH (1951) The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace and Co.
3.
ArtD (2006) The Politics of the Nazi Past in Germany and Austria. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AslanidisP (2016) Is populism an ideology: A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies64(1): 88–104.
5.
AssmannJ (1995) Collective memory and cultural identity. New German Critique65: 125–133.
6.
AysuT (2015) Turning Ulucanlar prison into Ulucanlar prison museum: The politics of creating a memory place. Master Thesis, İstanbul Bilgi University, Turkey.
7.
AytaçSEElçiE (2019) Populism in Turkey. In: StockemerD (ed.) Populism around the World: A Comparative Perspective. Cham: Springer, pp.89–108.
8.
BakinerO (2018) A key to Turkish politics? The center-periphery framework revisited. Turkish Studies19(4): 503–522.
9.
BarrRR (2009) Populists, outsiders and anti-establishment politics. Party Politics15(1): 29–48.
10.
BarthesR (1981) The discourse of history. Comparative Criticism3: 7–20.
BozoğluG (2020a) Museums, Emotion and Memory Culture: The Politics of the Past in Turkey. London: Routledge.
18.
BozoğluG (2020b) ‘A great bliss to keep the sensation of the conquest’: The emotional politics of the Panaroma 1453 Museum in İstanbul. In: De CesariCKayaA (eds.) European Memory in Populism: Representation of Self and Other. London: Routledge, pp. 91–111.
19.
BullAC (2016) Modern Italy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
CengizkanACengizkanNM (2019) Bir Şehir Kurmak: Ankara 1923–1933. Ankara: VEKAM.
21.
CohenJL (2019) Populism and the politics of resentment. Jus Cogens1: 5–39.
22.
ConnertonP (2008) Seven types of forgetting. Memory Studies1(1): 59–71.
23.
De CesariCKayaA (eds.) (2019) European Memory in Populism: Representations of Self and Other. London: Routledge.
24.
De la TorreC (2019) Is left populism the radical democratic answer?Irish Journal of Sociology27(1): 64–71.
25.
DorollC M (2015) The Spatial Politics of Turkey’s Justice and Development Party (AK Party): On Erdoğanian New Ottomanism, unpublished PhD. Thesis (University of Arizona).
26.
EyermanR (2004) The past in the present: Culture and the transmission of memory. Acta Sociologica47(2): 159–169.
27.
FilcD (2010) The Political Right in Israel: Different Faces of Jewish Populism. London: Routledge.
FungAWrightEO (2003) Thinking about empowered participatory governance. In: FungAWrightEO (eds) Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso Press, pp.3–45.
30.
GidronNBonibowskiB (2013) Varieties of populism: Literature review and research agenda. Working Paper Series, Weatherhead Center for International Affairs13(4): 1–39.
HirstP (2000) Democracy and governance. In: PierreJ (ed.) Debating Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.13–36.
33.
Hooper-GreenhillE (1994) The Educational Role of the Museum. London: Routledge.
34.
KansteinerW (2002) Finding meaning in memory: A methodological critique of collective memory studies. History and Theory41(2): 179–197.
35.
KayaA (2020) Populism and Heritage in Europe Lost in Diversity and Unity. London: Routledge.
36.
KayaATecmenA (2019) The use of the past in populist political discourse: Justice and development party rule in Turkey. In: de CesariCKayaA (eds) European Memory in Populism: Representations of Self and Other. London: Routledge.
37.
KayaARobertMVTecmenA (2020) Populism in Turkey and France: nativism, multiculturalism and Euroskepticism. Turkish Studies21(3): 361–391.
LaclauE (2005) On Populist Reason. London; New York: Verso.
40.
LandsbergA (2004) Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture. New York City: Columbia University Press.
41.
MacCannellD (1973) Staged authenticity: Arrangement of social space in tourist settings. American Journal of Sociology79(3): 589–603.
42.
MacCannellD (2008) Staged authenticity today, In: SorkinM (ed.) Indefensible Space: The Architecture of the National Insecurity State. London: Routledge, pp. 259–76.
43.
MacCannellD (2013) The Tourist: A New Theory of Leisure Class. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
44.
MardinŞ (1973) Center and periphery relations: A key to Turkish politics?Daedalus102: 169–190.
45.
MasonRSaynerJ (2019) Bringing museum silence into focus: Eight ways of thinking about silence in museums. International Journal of Heritage Studies25(1): 5–20.
MouffeC (2018) For a Left Populism. London: Verso.
48.
MuddeC (2004) The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition39(4): 541–563.
49.
MuddeCKaltwasserCR (2018) Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies51(13): 1667–1693.
50.
MüllerJW (2016) What is Populism?London: Penguin Books.
51.
NoraP (1989) Between memory and history: Les Lieu de Mémorie. Representations26: 7–24.
52.
OlickJK (1999) Collective memory: The two cultures. Sociological Theory17(3): 333–348.
53.
ÖnişZ (2015) Monopolising the Centre: The AKP and the uncertain path of Turkish democracy. The International Spectator50(2): 22–41.
54.
ÖzbudunE (2013) Party Politics and Social Cleavages in Turkey. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
55.
PrenticeR (2001) Experiential cultural tourism: Museums & the marketing of the new romanticism of evoked authenticity. Museum Management and Curatorship19(1): 5–26.
56.
SarginGA (2004) Displaced memories, or the architecture of forgetting and remembrance. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22(5): 659–680.
57.
SavageR (2012) From McCarthyism to the Tea Party: Interpreting Anti-Leftist Forms of US Populism in Comparative Perspective.New Political Science34(4): 564–584.
58.
ThurstonH (2016) Prisons and Punishment in Texas: Culture, History and Museological Representation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
59.
TMMOB Mimarlar Odası Ankara Şubesi (2010) Kent Düşleri 1- Projefikir Ulucanlar Merkez Kapalı Cezaevi Değerlendirme Projesi. Ankara: TMMOB Ankara Şubesi.
60.
TraversoE (2019) Geçmişi Kullanma Kılavuzu-Tarih, Bellek, Politika. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
61.
UrbinatiN (2013) The populist phenomenon. Raisons Politiques3: 137–154.
62.
VioliP (2012) Trauma site museums and politics of memory: Tuol Sleng, Villa Grimaldi and the Bologna Ustica museum. Theory, Culture and Society29(1): 5–75.
63.
WalbyKPicheJ (2015) Staged authenticity in penal history sites across Canada. Tourist Studies15(3): 231–247.
64.
WertschJV (2000) Narratives as cultural tools in sociocultural analysis: Official history in soviet and post-soviet Russia. Ethos28(4): 511–533.
WeylandK (1996) Neopopulism and neoliberalism in Latin America: Unexpected affinities. Studies in Comparative International Development31: 3–31.
67.
WhiteHV (1973) Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
68.
WhiteHV (1978) Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
69.
WhiteHV (1990) The Content of the Form. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
70.
YalımI (2002) Ulus Devletin Kamusal Alanda Meşruiyet Aracı: Toplumsal Belleğin Ulus Meydanı Üzerinden Kurgulanma Çabası. In: SargınGA (ed.) Başkent Üzerine Mekan-Politik Tezler: Ankara’nın Kamusal Yüzleri. Istanbul: Iletişim Yayınları, pp.9–40.
71.
ZerubavelY (1995) Recovered Roots: Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.
